Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 231-959-5 | CAS number: 7782-50-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- sub-chronic toxicity: inhalation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1987
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Publicly available literature, non GLP
Cross-reference
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 987
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 413 (Subchronic Inhalation Toxicity: 90-Day Study)
- Deviations:
- not applicable
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- No guideline indicated as study is a subchronic inhalation study. The conduct was similar to OECD guideline 413 “Subchronic Inhalation Toxicity: 90-day Study
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Chlorine
- EC Number:
- 231-959-5
- EC Name:
- Chlorine
- Cas Number:
- 7782-50-5
- Molecular formula:
- Cl2
- IUPAC Name:
- dichlorine
- Details on test material:
- chlorine gasSupplied by Matheson (Morrow, GA) as a 3 % Cl2 in nitrogen mixture
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- monkey
- Strain:
- other: Rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta)
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- 4 monkeys per sex and groupAge: not statedbody weightmales: 2.5 kgfemales: 2.4 kg
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- inhalation
- Type of inhalation exposure:
- whole body
- Vehicle:
- other: none, dilution with air
- Remarks on MMAD:
- MMAD / GSD: Not applicable, chlorine is a gas
- Details on inhalation exposure:
- No vehicle (dilution with clean air only)
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Mean measured chlorine concentration0.1±0.03 ppm0.5±0.1 ppm2.3±0.4 ppm
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- one year
- Frequency of treatment:
- 5days per week, 6h per day
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:0, 0.1, 0.5 and 2.5 ppmBasis:nominal conc.
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:0.1±0.03 ppm, 0.5±0.1 ppm and 2.3±0.4 ppm Basis:analytical conc.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 4 monkeys per sex and group
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Details on study design:
- Three groups of four male and four female Rhesus monkeys each were exposed to chlorine for a period of 6 hours per day for 52 weeks (exposure on week days only). Monkeys were exposed to nominal concentrations of 0, 0.1, 0.5 and 2.5 ppm Cl2corresponding to analytical concentrations of 0.1±0.03, 0.5±0.1 and 2.3±0.4 ppm Cl2.Clinical signs and mortality were recorded twice daily and the animals underwent a detailed physical examination monthly during the treatment period of the study. Body weights and electrocardiograms were obtained monthly. Ophthalmological examinations were performed prior to initiation of exposures and at the termination of the study.Pulmonary function evaluations, which included pulmonary diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide and distribution of ventilation, were conducted three times prior to the start and monthly thereafter. Haematology, serum chemistry, and urinalysis tests were conducted on all monkeys prior to exposure initiation and at monthly intervals thereafter. At the end of the treatment period, all animals were fasted overnight, anaesthetised and sacrificed by exsanguination. Macroscopic and microscopic examinations were conducted.Nominal and analytical concentrations were regularly determined during the study. No MMAD and GSD were determined in this study and particle size measurements were not possible to perform fore chlorine is a gas.
- Positive control:
- no positive control
Examinations
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- The monkeys were observed twice daily for clinical signs of toxicity and underwent a detailed physical examination once each month following sedation with ketamine. Electrocardiograms were obtained four times prior to the start of the study and monthly while the studyMortality: Twice daily during the treatment period of the study.Body weight : The monkeys were weighed monthly.Ophthalmoscopic examination: Prior to initiation of exposures and at the termination of the study the monkeys received an ophthalmoscopic examination.Haematology: Haematologic tests were conducted on all monkeys prior to exposure initiation and at monthly intervals thereafter. The determination included haematocrit, haemoglobin concentration, erythrocyte count, leukocyte count (total and differential), reticulocyte count, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular haemoglobin, and mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration.Clinical Chemisty: Clinical measurements were conducted on all monkeys prior to study start and monthly thereafter. They included alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, γ-glutamyltransferase, blood urea nitrogen, calcium, phosphorus, total bilibrubin, and total protein. Additional measurements included alkaline phosphatase and glucose. The serum electrolytes, sodium, potassium and chloride, were analysed.Urinalysis: Urinalysis was conducted prior to the study start and monthly thereafter. The determination included colour, microscopic examination of sediment, specific gravity, volume, and pH, protein, glucose, occult blood, nitrites, bilibrubin, ketones and urobilinogen.
- Sacrifice and pathology:
- Organ Weights The weights of heart, lung plus trachea, liver, gonads, kidneys, spleen, and brain were recorded for all monkeys.Gross and histopathology The following tissues were examined from monkeys in all study groups: adrenal (2), aorta (abdominal), bone marrow (sternum, smear and section), brain (cerebellum, cerebrum (2 levels),medulla), cervix, epididymis, oesophagus, eye/optic nerve (2), gallbladder, heart, kidney (2), lachrymal gland, large intestine (cecum, colon, rectum), larynx, liver, lung (all five lobes), lymph nodes (cervical, bronchial, mesenteric), mammary gland (male and female), nasal tissues (4 sections: at the first palantine ridge and just posterior to the third, fifth, and seventh palatine ridges), neuroganglia (lumbar and sacral, dorsal), ovary (2), oviduct (2), pancreas, parathyroid (2), peripheral nerve (sciatic, anterior tibial), pituitary, prostate, salvary gland (submaxillary), skeletal muscle (gastrocnemius), skin, small intestine (duodenum, jejunum, ileum), spinal cord (4 levels), spleen, stomach, (cardia, fundus, pylorus), testis (2), thymus, thyroid (2), tongue, trachea (2 levels), urinary bladder, and uterus. A grading system of trace, mild, moderate, and severe was used to define the lesions.
- Other examinations:
- Clinical observational neurologic examination were conducted prior to and at the termination of the study.Pulmonary function evaluations, which included pulmonary diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO) distribution of ventilation (N2 washout), where conducted three times prior to the start of the study and monthly thereafter.Blood gas and pH evaluations were conducted during the pre-exposure period and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of the study.
- Statistics:
- Body weights, haematologic, serum chemistry, blood gas data, and absolute and relative (to body weight) organ weights were analysed by nonparametric analysis, using the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance, followed where appropriate, with the Mann-Whitney U test. All statistical analyses compared the treatment groups with the control group by sex. Pulmonary physiology data were analysed using a reported-measures design analysis of variance (Winner, 1971) with treatment and time as factors, each animal being observed during each time period (three pre-initiation intervals and monthly for the duration of the study). All statistical tests were conducted using p<0.05 as the level of significance.
Results and discussion
Results of examinations
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, treatment-related
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not examined
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- no effects observed
- Haematological findings:
- no effects observed
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- no effects observed
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Details on results:
- Clinical signsAfter approx. 6 weeks of exposure, the 2.3 ppm group exhibited overt signs of ocular irritation (tearing, reddened eyes, rubbing at eyes) during daily exposures. Signs of ocular irritation were not observed at the lower exposure concentrations.MortalityNot reported.Body weight and body weight gainThere were no significant differences in body weights between the control group and any of the exposure groups at any interval during the study.Food consumption and compound intakeNot investigated.Water consumptionNot determinedOphthalmoscopic examinationThe monkeys exposed to 2.3 ppm Cl2 exhibited conjunctival irritation with some exudation during the ocular examination at the end of the study. The conjunctival irritation may have been further exacerbated by self-inflicted rubbing-trauma.There was no gross evidence of chronic changes in the conjunctiva nor were corneas affected. Blood analysisHaematologyThere were no exposure-related differences in haematology parameters evaluated.Clinical chemistryThere were no exposure-related differences in the clinical chemistry parameters evaluated.UrinalysisThere were no exposure-related differences in the urinalysis parameters evaluated.Sacrifice and pathologyAbsolute and relative organ weightsThe two statistically significant differences observed for organ weights (increased liver/body weight and absolute heart weight for the 0.5 ppm group females) were not concentration-related and therefore considered to be due to normal biological variability and the small sample population.Gross pathology and histopathologyMacroscopy:There were no exposure-related macroscopic changes in tissues of either sex in any exposure group.Microscopy:The only treatment-related histopathological change observed was focal epithelial hyperplasia which was characterised by increased cell numbers and loss of cilia and goblet cells in affected areas of the respiratory epithelium of the nose and trachea.• Nasal passages (please refer to table below): In affected areas small zones of respiratory epithelium exhibited hypercellularitiy with loss of goblet cells and cilia, with no apparent increase in epithelial thickness. In some areas the nuclei of epithelial cells in regions of hypercellularity showed altered polarity, suggesting that the lesion was an early stage of squamous metaplasia. However, frank squame cell formation was minimal, and this lesion will be referred to subsequently as epithelial hyperplasia. This lesion was most commonly present on the angular margins of the turbinates and was less frequently observed on the lateral wall or septum adjacent to these margins. Respiratory epithelial hyperplasia was in some cases associated with a mild suppurative inflammatory response. Respiratory epithelial hyperplasia was observed in the nasal passages of both sexes in the 2.3 ppm exposure group. It was also observed, but only in its very mildest form, in the 0.5 ppm group, females of the 0.1 ppm group, and in one male control monkey. It was evident in treated animals that these lesions increased in incidence and severity with increasing exposure concentration.• Trachea: the epithelial lesions resembled those seen in the nasal passages but were less severe and involved in only a small circumferential section of the ventral and ventolateral trachea. Again, the lesion was comprised of epithelial hyperplasia with minimal evidence of early non-keratinising squamous metaplasia.• Parasites (nematode: Anatrichosoma; mite: probably Pneumonyssus sp) and/or ova were observed in 11 of 32 animals and histological changes compatible with the presence of the parasites were observed in an additional 16 monkeys. The lesions caused by parasites were focal, and there was no evidence to suggest that they interfered with the recognition of possible exposure-related effects in the lung.• Granulomatous rhinitis was generally confined to the nasal mucosa anterior to the turbinates. However, in on of the monkeys exposed to chlorine (a 0.1 ppm group male) the granulomatous rhinitis and associated squamous metaplasia extended to the level of the turbinates and thus overlapped the area in which exposure-related lesions were present.OtherNo exposure-related differences were observed in the evaluated neurologic or electrocardiographic parameters. There was a statistically significant trend for increasing pulmonary diffusing capacity and distribution of ventilation values for both sexes over the course of 15 month (including three pre-initiation evaluations) during which pulmonary function evaluations were conducted. There were, however, no significant differences between control and exposed groups with regard to either pulmonary diffusing capacity or distribution of ventilation at any interval during the study (please refer to table below).
Effect levels
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Effect level:
- 2.3 ppm
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: corresponding to 6.9 mg/m3 (20.9 mg/kg bw/d assuming a body weight of 2.5 kg and a respiratory volume of 0.021 m3/min. similar to humans)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 0.5 ppm
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: corresponding to 1.5 mg/m3 (4.5 mg/kg bw/d assuming a body weight of 2.5 kg and a respiratory volume of 0.021 m3/min. similar to humans)
Target system / organ toxicity
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
Any other information on results incl. tables
Incidence of histopathological lesions observed in monkeys exposed to chlorine for 1 yeara
| Nasal mucosal lesions |
| |
Exposure concentration | Trace | Mild | Tracheal mucosal lesionsb |
| Males |
| |
0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0.5 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
2.3 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Females |
| |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0.1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
0.5 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
2.3 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
|
|
|
|
a four monkeys/sex/group were examined.
b Epithelial hyperplasia with loss of cilia and goblet cells
Pulmonary function values at selected intervals for monkeys exposed to chlorine for 1 yeara
| Pulmonary diffusing capacity [mL CO/min/mm Hg] | Distribution of ventilation [No. breaths to 1 % N2] | ||||||
Study interval | 0 ppm | 0.1 ppm | 0.5 ppm | 2.3 ppm | 0 ppm | 0.1 ppm | 0.5 ppm | 2.3 ppm |
| Males | Males | ||||||
Pre-initiation | 2.0±0.3 | 2.4±0.2 | 2.0±0.7 | 2.0±0.4 | 34±4 | 24±6 | 36±6 | 36±8 |
4 months | 2.0±0.4 | 2.1±0.2 | 1.7±0.4 | 1.8±0.3 | 48±19 | 44±6 | 42±4 | 48±16 |
8 months | 2.1±0.9 | 2.2±0.5 | 2.2±0.9 | 2.7±0.5 | 33±5 | 32±9 | 46±13 | 35±9 |
12 months | 2.8±0.6 | 2.9±0.6 | 3.6±0.8 | 2.8±0.7 | 42±6 | 45±18 | 43±8 | 52±26 |
| Females | Females | ||||||
Pre-initiation | 1.8±0.5 | 2.0±0.6 | 1.8±0.1 | 1.8±0.4 | 39±14 | 32±3 | 33±8 | 28±7 |
4 months | 1.6±0.4 | 2.0±0.5 | 1.7±0.5 | 1.9±0.5 | 55±8 | 50±12 | 42±9 | 45±21 |
8 months | 1.8±0.7 | 2.6±1.1 | 2.1±0.5 | 1.6±0.8 | 42±14 | 30±3 | 37±11 | 30±4 |
12 months | 2.1±0.7 | 2.8±0.5 | 2.6±0.4 | 2.9±1.1 | 56±25 | 40±18 | 46±14 | 51±15 |
aValues are the means ±SD from four monkeys/sex/group. There were no statistically significant differences observed between the control and the exposure groups at any of the 12 monthly intervals for either pulmonary function parameter.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Treatment-induced histopathological changes were found in the respiratory epithelium of the nasal passages and trachea and were limited to focal, concentration-related epithelial hyperplasia with loss of cilia and decreased numbers of goblet cells in affected areas. These changes in nose and trachea were focal and mild in monkeys exposed to 2.3 ppm Cl2 and were not found in all animals in these exposure groups. Tracheal lesions were confined to the 2.3 ppm group. The lesions observed at 2.3 ppm were not present in all animals. At the lower Cl2 concentrations, similar though less prominent respiratory epithelial lesions were observed. The latter changes were very minimal and were confined to the nasal passages of some treated monkeys and one control animal.The results of this study indicate that 2.3 ppm chlorine acts as an upper respiratory irritant in monkeys, while 0.5 and 0.1 ppm induce changes of questionable clinical significance.
- Executive summary:
The parasite Anatrichosoma spp. was present in many of the animals and induced moderate to severe, granulomatous rhinitis. However, the lesions associated with this nematode were generally confined to the nasal vestibule in the region lined by squamous epithelium. Furthermore, inflammatory responses to the nematode appeared to have no major effect on the shape and diameter of the vestibular lumen, and thus probably had little effect on nasal airflow patterns or consequently on regional deposition of Cl2 in the nose.
In this study, treatment-related responses were confined to ocular and respiratory tract irritation. Histopathological examinations revealed that treatment-induced lesions were limited to the respiratory epithelium of the nose and trachea. These lesions were characterised by mild, focal, epithelial hyperplasia in the absence of epithelial thickening with an associated loss of cilia and goblet cells in the affected areas.
Nasal and tracheal lesions were induced by exposure to 2.3 ppm chlorine, while less distinct but similar changes were also present in the nasal passages of some animals in the 0.5 and 0.1 ppm groups in the absence of tracheal lesions. These findings indicate a concentration-related response relationship for Cl2-induced airway toxicity.No histological lesions were observed in this study at sites other than the nasal cavity and trachea. There was also no indication that exposure to chlorine concentrations up to 2.3 ppm for 1 year produced neither electrocardiogram abnormalities nor haematological changes.
Blood gases, distribution of ventilation, diffusing capacity, and histological evaluations were conducted and there were no exposure-related effects found in blood gas or pulmonary function parameters. These findings were further verified by the lack of histological lesions. LO(A)EL: 2.3 ppm corresponding to 6.9 mg/m3 (20.9 mg/kg bw/d assuming a body weight of 2.5 kg and a respiratory volume of 0.021 m3/min. similar to humans) NO(A)EL: 0.5 ppm corresponding to 1.5 mg/m3 (4.5 mg/kg bw/d assuming a body weight of 2.5 kg and a respiratory volume of 0.021 m3/min. similar to humans)
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
