Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

HMBDA is of low acute toxicity in mammals by both the oral and dermal routes.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Acute toxicity: via oral route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 401 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
GLP compliance:
yes
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
yes
Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Zeneca
- Age at study initiation: young adults
- Weight at study initiation: male=303-329g female=208-236g
- Fasting period before study: No
- Housing: Suspended cages (32.5cm x 37.5cm x 23cm) stainless steel
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 6 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19-23 °C
- Humidity (%): 40-70%
- Air changes (per hr): 25-30
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
other: hydroxypropylmethylcellulose
Details on oral exposure:
VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle: 200mg/ml
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 10ml/kg
Doses:
2000mg/kg
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5 male and 5 female
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 15 days post dose
- Frequency of observations and weighing: daily observations, weighing days -1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 15
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
- Other examinations performed: clinical signs, body weight, post mortem examination
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
act. ingr.
Mortality:
None of the animals died
Clinical signs:
other: There were no signs of toxicity in any animal at any time during the study
Gross pathology:
No treatment related macroscopic findings
Interpretation of results:
practically nontoxic
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
The oral LD50 was >2000 mg/kg to rats.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Value:
2 000 mg/kg bw
Quality of whole database:
Sufficient to meet data requirements. The study is Klimisch 1.

Acute toxicity: via inhalation route

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Quality of whole database:
An acute inhalation toxicity study is scientifically unjustified and is not in the interests of animal welfare. Acute studies are available by the oral and dermal routes.

Acute toxicity: via dermal route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: dermal
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
GLP compliance:
yes
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
yes
Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Zeneca
- Age at study initiation: Young adults
- Weight at study initiation: male=234-254g female=188-200g
- Housing: suspended cages (32.5cm x 37.5cm x 23cm) stainless steel
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 6 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19-23°C
- Humidity (%): 40-70%
- Air changes (per hr): 25-30
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Type of coverage:
occlusive
Vehicle:
water
Details on dermal exposure:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: Approximately 4cm x 6cm
- Type of wrap if used: gauze patch covered by plastic film and held in position using adhesive bandage and PVC tape

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): cotton wool soaked in clean warm water
- Time after start of exposure: 24h

TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): amount calculated according to weight and adjusted for water content to give dose of 2000mg/kg
- For solids, paste formed: yes, by addition of 0.3-0.4ml water
Duration of exposure:
24h
Doses:
2000mg/kg
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5 male and 5 female
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 15 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: daily observations, weighing days 1, 3, 5, 8, 15
- Other examinations performed: clinical signs, body weight,post mortem examination
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
act. ingr.
Mortality:
None of the animals died
Clinical signs:
other: There were no signs of toxicity in any animal at any time during the study. Signs of slight skin irritation (e.g. erythema, odema, scabbing) were seen in four males and two females, but had completely regressed by day 8.
Gross pathology:
No treatment related macroscopic findings
Interpretation of results:
practically nontoxic
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
The dermal LD50 was >2000 mg/kg to rats
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Value:
2 000 mg/kg bw
Quality of whole database:
Sufficient to meet data requirements. The study is Klimisch 1.

Additional information

HMBDA is of low acute toxicity in mammals by both the oral and dermal routes.The acute oral LD50 is > 2000 mg/kg while the acute dermal LD50 is > 2000 mg/kg. A low acute oral toxicity result (LD50 > 5000 mg/kg) was also reported in an additional, unreliable acute oral study. Testing by the inhalation route is not scientifically justified.


Justification for selection of acute toxicity – oral endpoint
Two acute oral studies are available. The selected study has the higher Klimisch score.

Justification for selection of acute toxicity – dermal endpoint
Only one study available.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Given the available LD50 values, HMBDA does not meet the criteria for classification for acute toxicity by either the oral or dermal routes.