Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Acute Toxicity: oral

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
10 Sep 1991 - 24 Sep 1991
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: see 'Remark'
Remarks:
GLP - Guideline study, tested with the source substance Cetyl-2-Ethylhexanoate. According to the ECHA guidance document "Practical guide 6: How to report read-across and categories (March 2010)", the reliability was changed from RL1 to RL2 to reflect the fact that this study was conducted on a read-across substance.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1991
Report date:
1991

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 401 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Hexadecyl 2-ethylhexanoate
EC Number:
261-619-1
EC Name:
Hexadecyl 2-ethylhexanoate
Cas Number:
59130-69-7
Molecular formula:
C24H48O2
IUPAC Name:
hexadecyl 2-ethylhexanoate
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Only trade name given
- Chemical denomination: Cetyl-2-Ethylhexanoate
- Batch No.: Lot 120300
- Delivery: August 20, 1991
- Physical state: colourless liquid
- Analytical purity: 100 %
- Stability Pure: stable for at least two years
- Stability in Solvent: stable in Arachis oil
- Expiration date: December 31, 1993

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
other: rat, Bor: WISW (SPF) Cpb
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Winkelmann GmbH, Borchen, Germany
- Age at study initiation: approx. 10 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: mean 174 g (males), 165 g (females)
- Fasting period before study: 16 hours
- Housing: groups of 5 animals in Makrolon Type-3 cages with standard softwood bedding
- Diet: pelleted Altromin Maintenance Diet 1324, Altromin GmbH, Lage, Germany , ad libitum
- Water: tap water , ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 7 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 - 25
- Humidity (%): 45 - 60
- Air changes (per hr): 10 - 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
arachis oil
Details on oral exposure:
VEHICLE
- Purity: DAB 9

MAXIMUM DOSE VOLUME APPLIED: 10 mL/kg bw
Doses:
2000 mg/kg bw
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations: several times on the application day and twice daily thereafter.
- Frequency of weighing: one day before application, on the day of application, on days 2, 7 and 14.
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes, external examination and thoracal and abdominal cavities.
- Other examinations performed: clinical signs, body weight

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Remarks on result:
other: rats
Mortality:
No deaths occurred.
Clinical signs:
other: No signs of systemic toxicity were observed.
Gross pathology:
No treatment- related findings.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Mean body weights (g):

Day

Male

Female

-1

182

173

day of application

174

165

2 d

192

178

7 d

224

179

14 d

260

190

Body weight gain

78

17

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not classified
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
CLP: not classified
DSD: not classified