Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information

No data were available for genotoxic activity of MHHPA, a read across using data from the structural analogue 4-MHHPA, that showed no genetic toxicity for MHHPA.

 

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Justification for type of information:
REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
Please refer to IUCLID Section 13.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Justification for type of information:
REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
Please refer to IUCLID Section 13.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Key result
Species / strain:
lymphocytes: human
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Justification for type of information:
REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
Please refer to IUCLID Section 13.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Key result
Species / strain:
mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Genetic toxicity in vivo

Description of key information

REACH Regulation 1907/2006, Annex VIII, Column 2, section 8.4 states that appropriate in vivo mutagenicity studies should be considered in those cases of a positive result in any of the in vitro genotoxicity studies. In vitro investigations were negative and in vivo studies are therefore regarded as inappropriate and not in line with current concerns regarding animal welfare and the use of animals in scientific experiments.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

No data were available for genotoxic activity of MHHPA, instead, read across approach was applied using data from the structural analogue 4-MHHPA, as similar chemical and toxicological properties are assumed.

 

Ames-test:

A bacterial reverse mutation assay (Ames test) was performed according to OECD/EU test methods. Experiments were performed both in the absence and presence of metabolic activation at concentrations up to 5000 µg/plate. The substance did not induce reverse mutation in Salmonella typhimurium or Escherichia coli.

 

Chromosome aberration:

The ability to cause chromosomal damage was investigated in cultured human lymphocytes in vitroin the absence and presence of S9 metabolic activation according to OECD/EU test methods. Two independent experiments were performed. In the first experiment the cells were treated for 3 hours in presence and absence of S9 metabolism and harvested after 24 hours. This was corresponding to approximately 1.5 cell cycles. The second experiment was performed over the same time period with continuous exposure until harvest. 4-MHHPA did not induce chromosomal aberrations.

 

Cell gene mutation:

Gene mutation was investigated by assaying for 5-trifluorothymidine resistant mutants in mouse lymphoma L5178Y treated with 4-MHHPA, in absence and presence of S9 metabolic activation, using a fluctuation method. Methods used were in accordance with OECD/EU test guidelines. Two independent assays were performed. 4-MHHPA did not induce mutations at the TK locus of L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells.

 

In vivo-testing:

REACH Regulation 1907/2006, Annex VIII, Column 2, section 8.4 states that appropriatein vivomutagenicity studies should be considered in those cases of a positive result in any of the in vitro genotoxicity studies. In vitro investigations were negative and in vivo studies are therefore regarded as inappropriate and not in line with current concerns regarding animal welfare and the use of animals in scientific experiments.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the results obtained from genetic toxicity testing, MHHPA was not classified and labelled according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP).