Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 204-262-9 | CAS number: 118-58-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2019-2020
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- according to OECD 421 (GLP)
- Justification for type of information:
- Following ECHA communication (CCH-C-2114552456-45-01/F) we are updating our dossier by including the final study reports (of OECD 408, 421 and 414), providing tabs results within the study reports .
Following ECHA decision (CCH-D-2114379324-45-01/F) on Benzyl Salicylate it was requested to conduct additional toxicological studies.
The Screening study for reproductive/developmental toxicity (Annex VIII, Sections 8.6.1 and 8.7.1.; test method: OECD TG 421) in rats, oral route, and Pre-natal de-velopmental toxicity study (Annex IX, Section 8.7.2.; test method: EU B.31./OECD 414) in a first species (rat or rabbit), oral route.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 020
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD 421 (Reproduction/Developmental screening test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Benzyl salicylate
- EC Number:
- 204-262-9
- EC Name:
- Benzyl salicylate
- Cas Number:
- 118-58-1
- Molecular formula:
- C14H12O3
- IUPAC Name:
- benzyl salicylate
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Benzyl Salicylate
- Substance type: no data
- Physical state:no data
- Analytical purity: no data
- Impurities (identity and concentrations): no data
- Composition of test material, percentage of components: no data
- Isomers composition: no data
- Purity test date: no data
- Lot/batch No.: 299171
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: no data
- Stability under test conditions: no data
- Storage condition of test material: no data
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Benzyl Salicylate (CAS No. 118-58-1)
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Vehicle:
- other: PMI Nutrition International LLC Certified Rodent LabDiet®
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Test substance diet formulations have been previously shown to be stable and homogeneous over the range of concentrations used on this study for at least 11 days at room temperature (18°C to 24°C).Therefore, stability of test substance in the test diet will not be assessed on this study. However, homogeneity of the test substance in the dietary preparations will be assessed in this study (prior to the start of dosing, if possible). Representative batches of test diet at each of the selected dosage levels will be mixed in a Hobart blender. Duplicate samples will be taken from the top, middle and bottom strata of each test diet. These samples at each of the selected dosage levels will be analyzed for homogeneity.
The acceptable results for homogeneity assessment include an RSD for the mean concentration within 10% or less at a concentration that is within the acceptable limits (85-115% of the target concentrations). - Details on mating procedure:
- After a minimum of 14 days of dosing, the animals were paired on a 1:1 basis within each group. Positive evidence of mating was confirmed by the presence of a vaginal copulatory plug or the presence of sperm in a vaginal lavage. Vaginal lavages were performed daily during the mating period until evidence of mating was observed. If evidence of mating was not apparent after 14 days, the animals were separated, with no further opportunity for mating. Animals cohabited over a 12-hour dark cycle were considered to have been paired for 1 day.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- The control and test diets were offered continuously throughout the study. The test substance was administered as a constant concentration (ppm) in the diet. Males were exposed for 14 days prior to mating, throughout mating and continuing until the day prior to euthanasia. Females were exposed for 14 days prior to mating and continuing through Lactation Day 13. Females with no evidence of mating were exposed through the day prior to euthanasia. The F1 animals were not directly exposed to the test substance at any time during the study; the offspring of the F0 parental generation were potentially exposed to the test substance in utero and while nursing.
- Frequency of treatment:
- Reported previously.
- Duration of test:
- Reported previously.
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 500 ppm
- Remarks:
- Equivalent to 32 and 34 mg/kg bw/d (males and females respectively)
- Dose / conc.:
- 750 ppm
- Remarks:
- Equivalent to 48 and 49 mg/kg bw/d (males and females respectively)
- Dose / conc.:
- 2 500 ppm
- Remarks:
- Equivalent to 158 and 166 mg/kg bw/d (males and females respectively)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10
- Control animals:
- yes
- yes, plain diet
- Details on study design:
- he route of administration was oral (dietary), because oral ingestion is a potential route of exposure in humans. Historically, this route has been used extensively for studies of this nature.
Dose selection for this study was based on a previous rat embryo/fetal developmental toxicity study in which benzyl salicylate was administered at doses of 0, 1000, 3000, and 4000 ppm in the diet. Mean absolute body weights in the 4000 ppm group were up to 6.4% lower than the control group during Gestation Days 7–21. Mean body weights in the 3000 ppm group were sporadically lower than the control group; however, the values were ≤ 4.3% lower than the control group. Mean fetal body weights (male, female, and combines sexes) were 6.8% to 7.1% and 10.2% to 10.7% lower in the 3000 and 4000 ppm groups, respectively, compared to the concurrent control group.
Based on these results above and based on the longer exposure that animals were submitted to on this study (at least 28 days for males and approximately 60 days for females), 0, 500, 750, and 2500 ppm dose levels were selected. The high-dose level was expected to produce some toxicity, but not excessive lethality that would prevent meaningful evaluation. The mid-dose level was expected to produce minimal toxic effects. The low-dose level was expected to produce no observable indications of toxicity.
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- Clinical signs, body weights, body weight gains, food consumption, estrous cycles, reproductive performance, parturition, litter viability and survival, anogenital distance, areolae/nipple anlagen, thyroid hormones, gross necropsy findings, organ weights, and histopathologic examinations.
- Ovaries and uterine content:
- For all females, vaginal lavages were performed daily for 14 days prior to randomization and continuing until evidence of mating was observed. The slides were microscopically examined to determine the stage of the estrous cycle. The average cycle length was calculated for complete estrous cycles (i.e., the total number of returns to metestrus [M] or diestrus [D] from estrus [E] or proestrus [P] for 14 consecutive days before cohabitation and until the detection of evidence of mating). Estrous cycle length was determined by counting the number of days from the first M or D in a cycle to the first M or D in a subsequent cycle. The cycle during which evidence of mating was observed for a given animal was not included in the individual mean estrous cycle length calculation. Vaginal lavages were also performed on the day of necropsy to determine the stage of the estrous cycle.
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Information included in the section 7.8.1 (Toxicity to Reproduction).
Effect levels (maternal animals)
open allclose all
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- Maternal
- Effect level:
- 158 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No test substance-related effects were noted in general toxicity and repro-developmental toxicity at higher dose tested in 421 study (158 mg/kg bw/d)
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- Reproductive
- Effect level:
- 158 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No test sunstace-related effects were noted on general toxicity and reproductive
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 158 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No test substance related effects were noted
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
Maternal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
- Localisation:
- other: No effects observed
Results (fetuses)
Effect levels (fetuses)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 158 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No adverse effects observed.
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
Overall developmental toxicity
- Developmental effects observed:
- no
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 158 mg/kg bw/day
- Treatment related:
- no
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of this screening study, no test substance-related effects were noted on reproductive performance in F0 males and females at any exposure concentration. Based on the lack of F0 parental toxicity at any exposure concentration, an exposure concentration of 2500 ppm (the highest dose level tested) was considered to be the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) for F0 systemic and reproductive toxicity of benzyl salicylate when administered in the diet to Crl:CD(SD) male and female rats. Based on the lack of test substance-related effects at any dose level, an exposure concentration of 2500 ppm (the highest dose level tested) was considered to be the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) for F1 neonatal toxicity.
The 2500 ppm dose level corresponded to actual consumption of 166 mg/kg/day for males during the pre-mating period and 158, 170, and 324 mg/kg/day for females during pre-mating, gestation, and lactation, respectively. - Executive summary:
Information included in the section 7.8.1 (Toxicity to Reproduction).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.