Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 204-262-9 | CAS number: 118-58-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- 1989-06-07 to 1989-06-27
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- GLP study according to principles similar to those of OECD TG 474, but only 1000 instead of 2000 erythrocytes evaluated. To address toxicological endpoints as part of the REACH registration of Benzyl Salicylate (Target Substance) it is proposed to read-across to Ethylhexyl Salicylate (Source Substance). The use of read-across works within the spirit of REACH and the stated aim of the legislation to reduce animal testing where possible. The Target Substance and Source Substance have been characterised using the categories and databases present in the OECD [Q]SAR Toolbox. From the profiling, it can be seen that the two substances share structural similarities and also ‘mechanistic action’ similarities which are both general and endpoint specific. Therefore, read across is justified.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 989
- Report date:
- 1989
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- 1000 instead of 2000 erythrocytes were evaluated
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-ethylhexyl salicylate
- EC Number:
- 204-263-4
- EC Name:
- 2-ethylhexyl salicylate
- Cas Number:
- 118-60-5
- Molecular formula:
- C15H22O3
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-ethylhexyl salicylate
- Test material form:
- other: liquid
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): HR 89/131494
- Molecular formula (if other than submission substance): C15H22O3
- Molecular weight (if other than submission substance): 255.33 g/mol
- Physical state: colourless, oily liquid
- Analytical purity: 99.9%
- Impurities (identity and concentrations): not reported
- Composition of test material, percentage of components: not reported
- Purity test date: not reported
- Lot/batch No.: 37798
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: not reported
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- NMRI
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: SAVO GmbH, Kisslegg, Germany
- Age at study initiation: 6 to 10 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: 25 to 30 g
- Assigned to test groups randomly: yes
- Fasting period before study: not reported
- Housing: in groups of up to five animals in Makrolon cages of size II with Altromin woodshaving
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Altromin 1324 standard diet ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least five days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 2
- Humidity (%): 55
- Air changes (per hr): not reported
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours dark/12 hours light
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: arachis oil
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: no justification provided
- Concentration of test material in vehicle: 200 mg/mL
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage or dermal): 10 mL/kg bw - Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: the solutions were prepared freshly directly before application
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Groups were treated with the substance and sampling was performed after 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Frequency of treatment:
- One treatment at the beginning of the test.
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
2000 mg/kg bw
Basis:
actual ingested
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Five males and five females
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- Five males and five females treated with 50 mg/kg 9,10-dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene (DMBA) by oral gavage with sampling time after 48 hours
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Bone marrow smears and polychromatic erythrocytes
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION: a limit test was performed showing that a dose of 2000 mg/kg bw was the maximum tolerated dose not leading to cytotoxicity.
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION: animals were killed by cervical dislocation and bone marrow was removed from both femora by rinsing with foetal calf serum. Bone marrow cells were centrifuged at 150 g for 10 minutes and the supernatant was discarded. From the pellet, smears were made on slides and air dried. Two slides were made per animal. The slides were stained by the May-Gruenwald-Giemsa method according to Schmid (1973) by staining for 3 minutes in undiluted May-Gruenwald solution, then staining for 2 minutes in May-Gruenwald diluted with distilled water to a ratio 1:1, rinsing briefly in distilled water, staining for 10 minutes in Giemsa diluted with distilled water to a ratio 1:6, rinsing thoroughly in distilled water, drying in air, cleaning the back side of the slides with methanol, cleaning in xylene for 5 minutes and mounting in Eukitt.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS: slides were coded and observed blindly under a microscope with 100x oil immersion objective lens at 1250 fold magnification. At least 1000 polychromatic erythrocytes per animal were scored for the incidence of micronuclei. The number of micronucleated normochromatic erythrocytes was also recorded. The ratio of polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocytes was determined for each animal by counting a total of 1000 erythrocytes. - Evaluation criteria:
- An increased frequency of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes among treated animals compared to control animal values is taken as an indication of treatment-induced genetic damage.
- Statistics:
- Statistical significance was determined according to the methods of Kastenbaum and Bowman (1970).
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Remarks:
- According to an initial toxicity test the maximum tolerated dose was 2000 mg/kg bw
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- Both negative and positive control frequencies of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes agreed with the values previously established in the testing laboratory.
Any other information on results incl. tables
To address toxicological endpoints as part of the REACH registration of Benzyl Salicylate (Target Substance) it is proposed to read-across to Ethylhexyl Salicylate (Source Substance).
The use of read-across works within the spirit of REACH and the stated aim of the legislation to reduce animal testing where possible.
The Target Substance and Source Substance have been characterised using the categories and databases present in the OECD [Q]SAR Toolbox. From the profiling, it can be seen that the two substances share structural similarities and also ‘mechanistic action’ similarities which are both general and endpoint specific.
Therefore, read across is justified.
Table: Detailed results of analysis for single animals used in the micronucleus test
Dose and sampling time |
Sex |
Animal identification |
PE examined |
PE with MN |
NE with MN (‰) |
Ratio PE/NE |
|
Total |
‰ |
||||||
Vehicle control, 24 hours after oral application by gavage |
female |
A1 |
1086 |
2 |
1.84 |
0.00 |
1.76 |
A2 |
1071 |
2 |
1.87 |
1.00 |
2.05 |
||
A3 |
1010 |
0 |
0.00 |
0.98 |
1.88 |
||
A4 |
1016 |
2 |
1.97 |
3.00 |
2.34 |
||
A5 |
1004 |
3 |
2.99 |
2.98 |
2.24 |
||
male |
B1 |
1010 |
1 |
0.99 |
1.94 |
1.52 |
|
B2 |
1019 |
1 |
0.98 |
0.00 |
2.08 |
||
B3 |
1087 |
1 |
0.92 |
1.98 |
1.85 |
||
B4 |
1002 |
2 |
2.00 |
1.97 |
1.56 |
||
B5 |
1020 |
2 |
1.96 |
0.00 |
2.07 |
||
Test substance at 2000 mg/kg bw, 24 hours after oral application by gavage |
female |
C1 |
1032 |
1 |
0.97 |
0.99 |
2.24 |
C2 |
1018 |
2 |
1.96 |
0.00 |
2.15 |
||
C3 |
1002 |
2 |
2.00 |
0.00 |
1.83 |
||
C4 |
1014 |
1 |
0.99 |
1.99 |
1.32 |
||
C5 |
1006 |
2 |
1.99 |
0.00 |
1.89 |
||
male |
D1 |
1005 |
2 |
1.99 |
0.98 |
1.16 |
|
D2 |
1003 |
2 |
1.99 |
1.98 |
1.10 |
||
D3 |
1004 |
1 |
1.00 |
1.99 |
1.96 |
||
D4 |
1003 |
0 |
0.00 |
1.90 |
1.29 |
||
D5 |
1003 |
1 |
1.00 |
2.00 |
1.50 |
||
Test substance at 2000 mg/kg bw, 48 hours after oral application by gavage |
female |
E1 |
1006 |
1 |
0.99 |
1.96 |
1.15 |
E2 |
1001 |
1 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
1.45 |
||
E3 |
1032 |
2 |
1.94 |
0.98 |
1.62 |
||
E4 |
1010 |
3 |
2.97 |
0.00 |
1.20 |
||
E5 |
1002 |
0 |
0.00 |
0.99 |
1.69 |
||
male |
G1 |
1012 |
3 |
2.96 |
2.96 |
1.27 |
|
G2 |
1003 |
1 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.56 |
||
G3 |
1030 |
2 |
1.94 |
2.94 |
1.17 |
||
G4 |
1013 |
1 |
0.99 |
2.00 |
2.02 |
||
G5 |
1006 |
1 |
0.99 |
0.99 |
1.96 |
||
Test substance at 2000 mg/kg bw, 72 hours after oral application by gavage |
female |
H1 |
1006 |
1 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
1.22 |
H2 |
1005 |
2 |
1.99 |
2.96 |
1.16 |
||
H3 |
1046 |
2 |
1.91 |
1.00 |
1.48 |
||
H4 |
1033 |
3 |
2.90 |
1.99 |
1.74 |
||
H5 |
1009 |
1 |
0.99 |
0.99 |
1.76 |
||
male |
I1 |
1008 |
2 |
1.98 |
1.92 |
1.85 |
|
I2 |
1075 |
1 |
0.93 |
0.99 |
1.67 |
||
I3 |
1043 |
1 |
0.96 |
2.97 |
1.20 |
||
I4 |
1029 |
2 |
1.94 |
1.99 |
1.80 |
||
I5 |
1009 |
1 |
0.99 |
0.00 |
1.77 |
||
DMBA at 50 mg/kg bw, 24 hours after oral application by gavage |
female |
L1 |
1013 |
10 |
9.87 |
5.81 |
1.27 |
L2 |
1011 |
12 |
11.87 |
4.80 |
1.28 |
||
L3 |
1000 |
8 |
8.00 |
6.56 |
1.19 |
||
L4 |
1005 |
10 |
9.95 |
4.96 |
1.33 |
||
L5 |
1009 |
13 |
12.88 |
4.69 |
1.30 |
||
male |
M1 |
1019 |
12 |
11.78 |
9.79 |
1.00 |
|
M2 |
1001 |
9 |
8.99 |
11.93 |
1.32 |
||
M3 |
1003 |
11 |
10.97 |
4.73 |
0.95 |
||
M4 |
1017 |
13 |
12.78 |
5.66 |
1.06 |
||
M5 |
1009 |
10 |
9.91 |
5.00 |
1.37 |
||
PE = polychromatic erythrocytes; NE = normochromatic erythrocytes; PE with MN = micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes; NE with MN = micronucleated normochromatic erythrocytes; DMBA = 9,10-dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
The substance did not induce chromosomal damage or damage to the mitotic apparatus in bone marrow cells of mice after a single oral application at a dose of 2000 mg/kg bw. - Executive summary:
As discussed as part of the category of salicylate substances (RAAF Document).
Only 2 members of this category have in vivo mutagenicity micronucleus data. However, all 11 of these substances have in vivo mutagenicity micronucleus alerts for H-acceptor-path3-H-acceptor interaction which indicates a possiblechemical interaction with DNA and/or proteinsvianon-covalent binding, such as DNA intercalation or groove-binding.
However, the results of the 2 main source substances both have negative experimental data for this endpoint and therefore it can be assumed that when taken into account with the in vitro data and the experimental data consistencies (negative data) within the category and the total lack of any DNA interactions (in vitro and in vivo), that the target substance benzyl salicylate would also be negative in such a genetox in vivo micronucleus assay.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.