Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 233-826-7 | CAS number: 10377-60-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Long-term toxicity to fish
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- fish short-term toxicity test on embryo and sac-fry stages
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- 2008
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Remarks:
- The study was not carried out according to GLP and the concentrations were measured as nitrate-nitrogen with a HACH-Lange reagens kit, which is a method that is not very specific. Furthermore the specific nominal and measured test concentrations were not reported. However, it is well described in a peer-reviewed journal. Therefore it is considered reliable with restrictions.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: American Society for Testing Materials. 1997. Standard guide for conducting early life-stage toxicity tests with fishes. E 1241-92. In Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 11.05. West Conshohocken, PA, pp 550-577.
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- Concentrations were determined 4 to 6 times weekly
- Vehicle:
- no
- Test organisms (species):
- Pimephales promelas
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Fathead minnow
- Source: Fertilized fathead minnow eggs were collected in-house from fathead minnow breeding pairs. - Test type:
- flow-through
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 32 d
- Hardness:
- 210 - 230 mg/L (CaCO3)
- Test temperature:
- 23.0 ± 0.10 °C
- pH:
- 7.75 ± 0.055
- Dissolved oxygen:
- >6.0 mg/L
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Five concentrations and a control were tested in duplo. However, it is not reported what concentrations were tested.
- Details on test conditions:
- These toxicity tests estimated the test chemical concentration that reduced hatch rate, fry survival, and fish weight over 32 d. Fertilized fathead minnow eggs were collected in-house from fathead minnow breeding pairs. When enough eggs were spawned on the same day, the eggs were consolidated into a beaker of control water by gently rolling them off the spawning substrate. Eggs were distributed in groups of five using a stratified-random procedure into egg cups suspended in the test aquaria (30x15x19cm, fill volume 6.75L, flow-through, renewal of test solution 24-25 times per day, peristatltic diluter, replacement of aquaria after 15d) with toxicant concentrations at the desired levels. Egg cups were constructed of glass jars that were 5 cm in depth and 5 cm in diameter. A stainless steel screen formed the bottom. Cups contained between 25 and 30 eggs each with two cups per aquarium giving four per treatment. The number of eggs was the same among treatments but varied among tests as spawning success of breeding pairs varied. As water levels in the aquarium rose and fell with each dosing apparatus cycle, water moved past the eggs, ensuring well oxygenated water and fresh toxicant. A 15:9 h light: dark photoperiod was provided. At 24-h intervals during the first 6 d, each egg cup was removed and placed in a Petri dish containing the test water, and the eggs were inspected under a magnifying glass. Dead eggs and those with fungus were recorded and removed. Hatched fry were removed from egg cups and placed in their appropriate test aquaria. All fry hatched within 6 d. Hatch success wasrecorded over the first 6 d as the percentage of successful hatch [hatch success = (total number of hatched fry/initial number of eggs) X 100]. Once hatched, fry were fed to satiation with freshly hatched brine shrimp ( <48 h old) augmented with finely ground flake food two to three times daily. Fry were counted on days 11, 18, 21, and 32, while transferring them with a large syringe from test aquaria into a temporary holding aquarium containing test water. Dead and missing fry, assumed to be dead, were recorded. Food was withheld 24 h prior to test conclusion. At the conclusion of the test, fish were given a lethal exposure to MS-222 and preserved in a 70% alcohol solution for approximately 2 weeks before weighing. Preserved individual fry weights were recorded to the nearest 0.001 g. Overall treatment effects on embryo and fry percentage survival (with arcsine transformation) and mean fry weight were determined using one-way ANOVA. Each treatment was compared to the control using Dunnett's test. The NOEC and LOEC were reported as in the growth tests.
- Reference substance (positive control):
- not specified
- Key result
- Duration:
- 32 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 157 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (not specified)
- Conc. based on:
- other: NO3-N
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 32 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 294 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (not specified)
- Conc. based on:
- other: mg NO3-N
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Details on results:
- The NOEC and LOEC were based on a significant reduction (p = 0.027) in weight of fish at the end of the test ( 11 mg in the middle treatment vs 16 mg for the controls). Although fry survival was significantly reduced (p = 0.007) from the control (23% survived vs 78% for the control), that reduction occurred at a higher nitrate concentration than for final weight. Nitrate concentrations had no effect on embryo survival.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- NOEC 157 mg/L (growth rate)
LOEC 294 mg/L (growth rate) - Endpoint:
- fish, juvenile growth test
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- 2008
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Remarks:
- The study was not carried out according to GLP and the concentrations were measured as nitrate-nitrogen with a HACH-Lange reagens kit, which is a method that is not very specific. Furthermore the specific nominal and measured test concentrations were not reported. To reduce reproductive behaviour, the photoperiod of the growth test was 9:15 (light:dark), which deviates from the usual 16:8 cycle. However, it is well described in a peer-reviewed journal. Therefore it is considered reliable with restrictions.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Growth tests estimated the test chemical concentration that affected fish growth over 30 d. Specific growth rate (SGR) was measured as percentage growth per day (SGR = [log e (final measure - initial measure)]/[number of days elapsed between measurements]). Twelve fish, acclimated to test temperatures, were distributed to each test aquarium in a stratified-random manner. Fish were then weighed to the nearest 0.01 g, and total length was measured to the nearest 0.5 mm. During this process, fish received one of 12 unique fin clips to allow identification of individual fish. Fin clips used were dorsal, anal, left or right pectoral, left or right pelvic, upper or lower caudal, or combinations of caudal with pectoral or caudal with pelvic. Preliminary experiments showed that fin clips did not significantly reduce the growth rate of test fish over a 30-d period. Before fish were weighed, food was withheld for 24 h. During the measuring and fin clipping process, fish were anesthetized with 100 mg/L tricaine methanesulfonate (MS-222). Once measured, weighed, and clipped, fish were allowed 24 h to acclimate to test aquaria prior to chemical exposure. Test fish received a refresh of the fin clip and were reweighed at 15 d after withholding food for 24 h. The toxicity test concluded with a final weight and length measurement at 30 d after withholding food for 24 h. During the testing period, fish were fed to satiation two or three times
per day using a combination of frozen adult brine shrimp and flake food. Uneaten food was siphoned from test aquaria at least once daily. An overall effect of the treatment on percentage survival (with arcsine transformation) and SGR was determined using one-way ANOVA. Each treatment was compared to the control using Dunnett's test. Three endpoints were described: the no-observed-effect concentration (NOEC), which was the highest concentration not significantly different from the control (p < 0.05); the lowest-observed-effect concentration (LOEC), which was the lowest concentration that was significantly different from the control (p < 0.05). - GLP compliance:
- no
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- Concentrations were determined 4 to 6 times weekly
- Vehicle:
- no
- Test organisms (species):
- other: juvenile Topeka shiner and with juvenile Fathead minnow
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
The test was carried out with juvenile Topeka shiner and with juvenile Fathead minnow
- Common name: Topeka shiner
- Source: Juvenile (~7 months) Topeka shiners were obtrained annually over a 3-year period from Lost Valley Fish Hatchery in Missouri, USA. They were held at appr. 12 °C in 1,500 L flow-through aerated holding tanks until the acclimation period. During the holding period, fish were fed frozen brown shrimp (Artemia salina) augmented with flake food once or twice daily.
- Age at study initiation: 10 months (juveniles)
- Length at study initiation: Not reported
- Weight at study initiation: 0.79 ± 0.02 g
- Common name: Fathead minnow
- Source: Fathead minnows were bred in-house and originated from a mixed stock from Kurtz Fish Hatchery, Elverson, Pennsylvania, USA, and the U.S. EPA, Duluth, Minnesota, USA. Fathead minnows were fed the same diet as the Topeka shiners and were held at approximately 25°C.
- Age at study initiation: 7 months (juveniles)
- Length at study initiation: Not reported
- Weight at study initiation: 0.73 ± 0.012 g
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: Once measured, weighed, and clipped, fish were allowed 24 h to acclimate to test aquaria prior to chemical exposure.
- Acclimation conditions: same as test - Test type:
- flow-through
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 30 d
- Hardness:
- 210 - 230 mg/L (CaCO3)
- Test temperature:
- Topeka shiner: 23.4 ± 0.04 °C
Fathead minnow: 23.1 ± 0.07 °C
- pH:
- 8.25 ± 0.012
- Dissolved oxygen:
- Topeka shiner: >6.0 mg/L
Fathead minnow: 5.5 mg/L - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Five concentrations and a control were tested in duplo. However, it is not reported what concentrations were tested.
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: Aquaria with a stainless steel screen at one end maintaining water depth at 22 cm
- Material: Not reported
- Dimensions: 50 x 25 x 30cm
- Fill volume: 27.5 L
- Type of flow-through (e.g. peristaltic or proportional diluter): Peristaltic diluter
- Renewal rate of test solution (frequency/flow rate): 6 - 7 times per day
- Replacement of aquaria: After 15 days, test aquaria were replaced with clean aquaria
- No. of organisms per vessel: 12
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates):2
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 2
- Biomass loading rate: Topeka shiner: 0.34 g/L, Fathead minnow: 0.32 g/L (Calculated by reviewer based on average initial weight and fill volume)
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source: A deep well (not further specified), total alkalinity, chloride concentration and pH were recorded
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: No
- Photoperiod: 9:15 (light dark) to reduce reproductive behaviour
- Light intensity: Not reported
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED: Survival and specific growth rate (intervals not specified)
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
No information provided on test concentrations - Reference substance (positive control):
- not specified
- Key result
- Duration:
- 30 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 268 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (not specified)
- Conc. based on:
- other: NO3-N
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: Juvenile Topeka shiner
- Duration:
- 30 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 486 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (not specified)
- Conc. based on:
- other: NO3-N
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: Juvenile Topeka shiner
- Key result
- Duration:
- 30 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 58 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (not specified)
- Conc. based on:
- other: NO3-N
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other: Juvenile Fathead minnow
- Duration:
- 30 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 121 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (not specified)
- Conc. based on:
- other: NO3-N
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other: Juvenile Fathead minnow
- Details on results:
- Juvenile Topeka shiner: The NOEC and LOEC were based on a significant reduction (p = 0.007) in specific growth rate at 30 d . None of the treatments had a significant effect on survival.
Juvenile Fathead minnows: The NOEC and LOEC were based on a significant reduction (p ≤ 0.001) in survival (38% survived in the third highest treatment vs 100% in controls) at 30 d The specific growth rate of fathead minnows at 121 mg/L N was significantly higher than that of fish in the controls (p = 0.028). A reduced density of fish in the aquarium may have caused the higher specific growth rate in that treatment. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- Juvenile Topeka shiner: NOEC 268 mg/L, LOEC 486 mg/L
Juvenile Fathead minnow: NOEC 58 mg/L, LOEC 121 mg/L
Referenceopen allclose all
Description of key information
In accordance with column 2 of REACH Annex IX, no long term toxicity testing is proposed (required in section 9.1.6) as the chemical safety assessment does not indicate a need to further investigate the effects on fish. All data available on magnesium nitrate itself and on the other nitrates show a very low toxicity. In addition, the substance does have a very high water solubility and its chemical properties do not indicate bioaccumulation. Therefore, the study is not considered necessary.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Although the endpoint is waived, there are reliable 30d growth rate and 32d embryo-larval tests available for the structural related substance sodium nitrate from Adelman (2009).
In the 30d growth rate test the NOEC for juvenile Topeka shiner was 268 mg/L (growth rate) and the NOEC for Fathead minnow was 58 mg/L (mortality).
In the 32d embryo-larval test, the NOEC to Fathead minnow was 157 mg/L based on growth rate (no effect on embryo survival).
These tests confirm the low toxicity of sodium nitrate.
The read-across rationale can be found in the document attached in the target record.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.