Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 233-135-0 | CAS number: 10043-01-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Epidemiological data
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- epidemiological data
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- disregarded due to major methodological deficiencies
- Study period:
- 1999
- Reliability:
- 4 (not assignable)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Publication; It has been suggested that there are some 400 other individuals who have not been studied but are known to have similar symptoms, and little is known about the prognosis for affected individuals (no follow up studies have been arranged), although anecdotally many originally affected still have symptoms 11 years later.
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Disturbance of cerebral function in people exposed to drinking water contaminated with aluminium sulphate: retrospective study of the Camelford water incident.
- Author:
- Altmann P, Cunningham J, Dhanesha U, Ballard M, Thompson J and Marsh F.
- Year:
- 1 999
- Bibliographic source:
- BMJ. 319: 807-11.
Materials and methods
- Study type:
- cohort study (retrospective)
- Endpoint addressed:
- neurotoxicity
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- To establish whether people exposed to drinking water contaminated with 20 tonnes of aluminium sulphate in the Camelford area of Cornwall in the south west of England in July 1988 had suffered organic brain damage as opposed to psychological trauma only.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Automatically generated during migration to IUCLID 6, no data available
- IUPAC Name:
- Automatically generated during migration to IUCLID 6, no data available
- Test material form:
- not specified
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Aluminium sulphate
Constituent 1
Method
- Type of population:
- general
- Ethical approval:
- not specified
- Details on study design:
- HYPOTHESIS TESTED (cohort study): To establish whether people exposed to drinking water contaminated with aluminium sulphate had suffered organic brain damage as opposed to psychological trauma only.
METHOD OF DATA COLLECTION
- Type: Retrospective study of affected people
SETTING: On 6 July 1988, 20 tonnes of aluminium sulphate were accidentally emptied into the treated water reservoir that served 20000 people in the Camelford area of Cornwall in the south west of England.
STUDY POPULATION
- Total number of subjects participating in study: 55 affected people
- Sex/age: 30 women and 25 men, aged 15-¬70 years, mean 41.8 (2.1) years
COMPARISON POPULATION
- Type: Other comparison group: 15 sibling pairs; 15 siblings nearest in age to one of the group but who had not been exposed to the contaminated water were studied.
HEALTH EFFECTS STUDIED
- Disease(s):
- Diagnostic procedure: Standard laboratory techniques were used for routine blood haematology and biochemistry analysis. Aluminium was measured with well-established methods (Altmann et al., 1987; Altmann, 1991), the normal serum concentration being less than 10 µg/L.
- Visual analogue scales were used to score each patient's general appearance and affect and subjects' own views of their symptoms. Two identical visual analogue questionnaires were administered to examine changes in symptoms over time—one concerning symptoms 1 month after the incident (as perceived in retrospect) and one similarly relating to symptoms at the time of investigation.
OTHER DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION ABOUT STUDY:
Various clinical and psychological tests to determine medical condition and anxiety levels in affected people. Assessment of premorbid IQ (pFSIQ) with the national adult reading test, a computerised battery of psychomotor testing, and measurement of the difference in latencies between the flash and pattern visual evoked potentials in all participants. - Exposure assessment:
- estimated
- Details on exposure:
- TYPE OF EXPOSURE: Accidental exposure
TYPE OF EXPOSURE MEASUREMENT: Biomonitoring (urine) / Biomonitoring blood / other: Clinical assessment, Psychomotor testing, Visual evoked potentials, Effects of anxiety
EXPOSURE LEVELS: 20 tonnes of aluminium sulphate were accidentally emptied into the treated water reservoir that served 20000 people.
POSTEXPOSURE PERIOD: Three years after the incident the study was performed to investigate 55 adults who were considering litigation on account of its alleged effects. - Statistical methods:
- Differences between normally distributed group data were analysed by the unpaired or paired Student's t test as well as one factor analysis of variance and nonparametric tests when appropriate. Correlations between different variables were performed by least squares linear regression analysis. In addition, analysis of covariance was used when age was a covariate. Two tail probability (P) values of < 0.05 were regarded as significant. Analyses were performed with StatView for Macintosh (Haycock et al., 1992).
Results and discussion
- Results:
- - Clinical assessment: All 55 participants complained of short term memory loss and impaired concentration. None had any relevant personal or family history or were taking any form of psychotropic drug or consuming excessive alcohol. The participants' visual analogue scores indicated deteriorating memory and concentration. Physical examination, in particular of the neurological system and visual acuity, yielded normal results in all the participants.
- Psychomotor testing: The mean (SE) pFSIQ was above average at 114.4 (1.1). The most sensitive of the psychomotor tests for organic brain disease was the symbol digit coding (SDC) test (normal score 100, abnormal < 85). Participants performed less well on this test (54.5 (6.0)) than expected from their pFSIQ (P < 0.0001) and a little less poorly on the averaged less discriminating tests within the battery (86.1 (2.5), P < 0.0001). In a comparison with the 15 sibling pairs (affected people's age 41.0 (3.3) years v sibling age of 42.7 (3.1) years (P = 0.36) the exposed people had similar pFSIQ (114.7 (2.1)) to their siblings (116.3 (2.1), (P = 0.59) but performed badly on the symbol digit coding test (51.8 (16.6)) v (87.5 (4.9) for siblings, P = 0.03).
- Visual evoked potentials: The flashpattern differences in exposed people were greater than in 42 unrelated control subjects of similar age (27.33 (1.64) ms v 18.57 (1.47) ms, P = 0.0002). The 15 unexposed siblings had significantly better flashpattern differences than their affected siblings (13.4 (2.4) ms v 29.6 (2.9) ms, P = 0.0002).
- Effects of anxiety: Thirty six of the 55 participants studied were available for anxiety testing, which was carried out at a different location and time. The mean SCL90 score was 1.0 (0.1), indicating relatively low levels of anxiety. Those below the median anxiety score (0.8) did not differ from those above it with regard to their symbol digit coding scores or flashpattern differences. No effect of anxiety could be shown on these measurements from the analysis of the anxiety scores of exposed people.
- Haematology and biochemistry: There were no significant findings. Serum aluminium concentrations were normal, urinary aluminium concentration was increased in one participant, and several current tap water aluminium concentrations were high. - Confounding factors:
- Results shown that several abnormalities in people exposed to aluminium and other contaminants in the Camelford incident. Their assessment of symptoms correlated with independent assessments of their general appearance and mental affect, adding weight to the validity of their complaints but throwing no light on the causation.
- Strengths and weaknesses:
- results show that although the sibling pairs were indistinguishable (paired Student's t test) in terms of age and pFSIQ, the results of both the symbol digit coding tests and the flashpattern differences were significantly worse (by paired Student t test) in the Camelford participants than in their unexposed siblings.
Any other information on results incl. tables
None
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- People who were exposed to the drinking water contaminated with aluminium sulphate suffered considerable damage to cerebral function, which was not related to anxiety. Follow up studies would be required to determine the longer term prognosis for affected individuals.
- Executive summary:
A retrospective study was conducted to establish whether people exposed to drinking water contaminated with 20 tonnes of aluminium sulphate in the Camelford area of Cornwall in the south west of England in July 1988 had suffered organic brain damage as opposed to psychological trauma only. In this study, 55 affected people and 15 siblings nearest in age to one of the group but who had not been exposed to the contaminated water were studied. Various clinical and psychological tests to determine medical condition and anxiety levels in affected people. Assessment of premorbid IQ (pFSIQ) with the national adult reading test, a computerised battery of psychomotor testing, and measurement of the difference in latencies between the flash and pattern visual evoked potentials in all participants.
The mean (SE) pFSIQ was above average at 114.4 (1.1). The most sensitive of the psychomotor tests for organic brain disease was the symbol digit coding (SDC) test (normal score 100, abnormal < 85). Participants performed less well on this test (54.5 (6.0)) than expected from their pFSIQ (P < 0.0001) and a little less poorly on the averaged less discriminating tests within the battery (86.1 (2.5), P < 0.0001). In a comparison with the 15 sibling pairs (affected people's age 41.0 (3.3) years v sibling age of 42.7 (3.1) years (P = 0.36) the exposed people had similar pFSIQ (114.7 (2.1)) to their siblings (116.3 (2.1), (P = 0.59) but performed badly on the symbol digit coding test (51.8 (16.6)) v (87.5 (4.9) for siblings, P = 0.03). The flash-pattern differences in exposed people were greater than in 42 unrelated control subjects of similar age (27.33 (1.64) ms v 18.57 (1.47) ms, P = 0.0002). The 15 unexposed siblings had significantly better flash-pattern differences than their affected siblings (13.4 (2.4) ms v 29.6 (2.9) ms, P = 0.0002). No effect of anxiety could be shown on these measurements from the analysis of the anxiety scores of exposed people.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
