Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 809-930-9 | CAS number: 1330-78-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Acute Toxicity: dermal
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- January 4 1979 to February 22 1979
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Non-GLP study, no specific methodology followed although fully documented report available.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 979
- Report date:
- 1979
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Acute dermal toxicity in rabbits was determined according to the procedures suggested by Hagan. New Zealand white rabbits were assigned to groups and maintained under standard laboratory conditions prior to administration of the test material.
Prior to determination of LD50 , single animals were dosed at various levels to determine a range within which the LD50 could be determined. The animals were prepared by clipping the skin of the mid-dorsal area of the trunk free of hair. Animals were further prepared by introducing longitudinal epidermal incisions over the clipped skin surface, thus enhancing the penetrability of the stratum corneum. Applications were made under gauze patches. The dosed area was then covered with an impermeable p lastic wrapping for 24 hours, after which it was removed and the skin gently cleansed.
Animals were returned to quarters where food and water were available ad libitum following the dose application, and were observed fourteen full days following application to determine mortality during this period.
Following the range finding, rabbits were divided into groups of six , sexes equally distributed, one-half of the animals abraded. Groups were dosed, as described above, at graded dose levels according to the results of the range finding previously performed.
Animals were observed for signs of pharmacologic activity and drug toxicity at 1, 3, 6, and 24 hours post-dosage. Observations were made daily thereafter for a total of fourteen days. Non-surviviors and animals sacrificed a t the end of the 14 day observation period were subjected to complete gross necropsy. LD50 together with 95% confidence limits was determined, where possible, by the method of Litchfield and Wilcoxin. - GLP compliance:
- no
- Test type:
- standard acute method
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Kronitexs TCP, C-8824-29
- IUPAC Name:
- Kronitexs TCP, C-8824-29
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Kronitex TCP, C-8824-29
- Molecular formula (if other than submission substance): Not applicable
- Molecular weight (if other than submission substance): Not applicable
- Smiles notation (if other than submission substance): Not specified
- InChl (if other than submission substance): Not specified
- Structural formula attached as image file (if other than submission substance): see Fig. No
- Substance type: Not specified
- Physical state: Not specified
- Analytical purity: Not specified
- Impurities (identity and concentrations): Not specified
- Composition of test material, percentage of components: Not specified
- Isomers composition: Not specified
- Purity test date: Not specified
- Lot/batch No.: Not specified
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: not specified
- Radiochemical purity (if radiolabelling): not applicable
- Specific activity (if radiolabelling): not applicable
- Locations of the label (if radiolabelling): not applicable
- Expiration date of radiochemical substance (if radiolabelling): not applicable
- Stability under test conditions: not specified
- Storage condition of test material: not specified
- Other:
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- All animals are fed and watered ad libitum; with Wayne animal feeds used exclusively. Animals are received from Summit View Farm, Belvidere, New
Jersey and are conditioned prior to use.
Rabbits were divided into groups of six , sexes equally distributed, one-half of the animals abraded.
Administration / exposure
- Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Remarks:
- Presumably neat.
- Details on dermal exposure:
- The animals were prepared by clipping the skin of the mid-dorsal area of the trunk free of hair. Animals were further prepared by introducing longitudinal epidermal incisions over the clipped skin surface, thus enhancing the penetrability of the stratum corneum. Applications were made under
gauze patches. The dosed area was then covered with an impermeable plastic wrapping for 24 hours, after which it was removed and the skin gently cleansed. - Duration of exposure:
- 24 h
- Doses:
- Single doses, at 3.14, 5, 6.3, 10, 12.6 g/kg
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 3
- Control animals:
- no
- Details on study design:
- Acute dermal toxicity in rabbits was determined according to the procedures suggested by Hagan (1959). New Zealand white rabbits were assigned to groups and maintained under standard laboratory conditions prior to administration of the test material.
Prior to determination of LD50 single animals ere dosed at various levels to determine a range within which the LD could be determined.
The animals were prepared by clipping the skin of the mid-dorsal area of the trunk free of hair. Animals were further prepared by introducing longitudinal epidermal incisions over the clipped skin surface, thus enhancing the penetrability of the stratum corneum. Applications were made under
gauze patches. The dosed area was then covered with an impermeable plastic wrapping for 24 hours, after which it was removed and the skin gently cleansed. Animals were returned to quarters where food and water were available ad libitum following the dose application, and were observed fourteen full days following application to determine mortality during this period.
Following the range finding, rabbits were divided into groups of six , sexes equally distributed, one-half of the animals abraded. Groups were dosed, as described above, at graded dose levels according to the results of the range finding previously performed. Animals were observed for signs of pharmacologic activity and drug toxicity at 1, 3, 6, and 24 hours post-dosage. Observations were made daily thereafter for a total of fourteen days. Non-survivors and animals sacrificed at the end of the 14 day observation period were subjected to complete gross necropsy. LD50 together with 95% confidence limits was determined where possible, by the method of Litchfield and Wilcoxin (1949). - Statistics:
- None specified.
Results and discussion
- Preliminary study:
- Not applicable.
Effect levels
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- 3.7 other: g/kg
- Based on:
- test mat.
- 95% CL:
- 2.31 - 5.92
- Mortality:
- Range finding study: 2 animals at 10.0 and 15.0 g/kg dose levels were found dead on Day 2.
Full study:
Dose level: 3.14 g/kg: No deaths
Dose level: 5.00 g/kg: 2 deaths were noted on Day 3. 1 death occured on Day 5.
Dose level: 6.30 g/kg: 2 deaths were noted on Day 4. 1 death occured on Day 5. Animal 6 died on Day 10 and was replaced.
Dose level: 10.00 g/kg: Deaths were noted on Days 2,3,4,5 and Day 9 (unspecified)
Dose level: 12.60 g/kg: 1 death was noted on Day 2; 2 deaths were noted on Day 3. 2 deaths were noted on Day 4. - Clinical signs:
- other: Dose level: 3.14 g/kg: Skin pliable and non - irritated. No gross changes observed. Animal 3, on days 4 - 6: Possible respiratory infection - slight difficulty breathing. Dose level: 5.00 g/kg: Skin pliable and non - irritated ; faeces loose. No gross
- Gross pathology:
- No pathological findings were recorded.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1
|
Dose level g/kg |
Sex |
Dead/dosed |
% Mortality |
Range finding |
1.00 |
1M |
0/1 |
0 |
5.00 |
1M |
0/1 |
0 |
|
10.00 |
1F |
1/1 |
100 |
|
15.00 |
1F |
1/1 |
100 |
|
Test dosage |
3.14 |
3M:3F |
0/3:0/3 |
0 |
5.00 |
3M:3F |
2/3:2/3 |
67 |
|
6.30 |
3M:3F |
2/3:2/3 |
67 |
|
10.00 |
3M:3F |
3/3:2/3 |
83 |
LD50 = 3.7 (2.31 - 5.92) g/kg
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- not classified
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- The acute dermal toxicity of Tricresyl Phosphate (LD50) is 3.7 (2.31 - 5.92) g/kg
- Executive summary:
The study has shown the acute dermal toxicity of Tricresyl Phosphate (LD50) to be 3.7 (2.31 - 5.92) g/kg. No classification is applicable.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.