Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 274-778-7 | CAS number: 70693-62-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effects on fertility
Description of key information
A performance of a 2-generation study is waived as no effects on reproduction are expected, on the basis of existing toxicological information . Thus, no descriptors for fertility effects are available.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- extended one-generation reproductive toxicity - basic test design (Cohorts 1A, and 1B without extension)
- Data waiving:
- study scientifically not necessary / other information available
- Justification for data waiving:
- other:
- Reproductive effects observed:
- not specified
Reference
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
The performance of a 2-generation study is waived on the basis of existing toxicological information.
KMPS is not systemically available. The effects in repeated dose toxicity studies demonstrated to be restricted to the site of first contact and limited to local irritation/corrosion. As no systemic toxicity was evident in these studies, the results of a multigeneration study are largely predictable on the basis of the existing studies. Any findings are anticipated to be related to the primary oxidising effects at the site of first contact. Furthermore, mammalian systems are equipped with effective biological detoxification mechanisms against reactive oxygen species which maintain hydrogen peroxide at physiological levels. For these reason, the conduct of a reproductive toxicity study with KMPS (triple salt) is not considered to be required for animal welfare reasons and based on the information available: KMPS is not considered to represent a specific hazard with regard to reproductive toxicity.
Effects on developmental toxicity
Description of key information
Developmental toxicity/teratogenicity
KMPS triple salt was tested for developmental toxicity/teratogenicity by oral exposure in the rat. The observed LOAEL for maternal toxicity/embryotoxic/teratogenic effects was >= 750 mg/kg bw/d. The maternal and foetal NOAEL for oral exposure was determined to 250 mg/kg bw/d.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2004-02-03 - 2004-09-15
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study conducted in full compliance with OECD 414. This study was selected as the key study because the information provided for the hazard endpoint is sufficient for the purpose of classification and labelling and/or risk assessment.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Version / remarks:
- January 2001
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.3700 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: Crl:CD(SD)IGS BR
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Laboratories, Inc., Raleigh, North Carolina, U.S.A
- Age at study initiation: 66-67 days
- Weight at study initiation: 201-225 g - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- other: Deionized water
- Details on exposure:
- - Concentration in vehicle: 0; 7.5; 25; 75 mg/mL
- volume applied: 10mL/kg bw - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Data from the analysis of the samples collected near the beginning, middle, and end of the study indicate that the test substance was mixed uniformly in the vehicle and was at the targeted concentrations.
- Details on mating procedure:
- - Impregnation procedure: purchased timed pregnant; animals were 1, 2, or 3 days of gestation at arrival
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Days 6-20 of gestation.
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily for a duration of about 14 days
- Duration of test:
- About 14 days (days 6 through 20 of pregnancy)
- Dose / conc.:
- 750 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 75 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 22 animals (females) per group
- Control animals:
- yes
- Details on study design:
- not indicated
- Maternal examinations:
- DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily for mortality and clinical signs
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: daily
FOOD CONSUMPTION: Yes
- Days 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20 and 21 of gestation - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
The intact and the empty uterus of each dam having at least one viable foetus was weighed to permit calculation of maternal body weight adjusted to exclude the products of conception. The corpora lutea count for each ovary of females with viable foetuses was recorded.
For each female with visible implantation sites, the types of implants (live and dead foetuses, and resorptions) and their relative positions were recorded. - Fetal examinations:
- - General examinations: Resorptions, interuterine location, sex and body weight of each foetus was recorded
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes: For each litter, the first live foetus and every other liver foetus thereafter (approximately 50 % of the foetuses) were examined for visceral alterations. In addition, all live foetuses with malformations visible at external examination were examined for soft tissue alterations.
- Skeletal examinations: Yes: After fixation in Bouin’s fixative, the heads of decapitated foetuses were examined and alterations were recorded. After alcohol fixation, the alizarin-stained skeletons were examined and skeletal alterations were recorded for all live foetuses, excluding the foetal heads fixed in Bouin’s fixative. - Statistics:
- For litter parameters, the proportion of affected foetuses per litter or the litter mean was used as experimental unit for statistical evaluation.
For each parameter analysed with a trend test, the test was applied to the data sequentially. If a significant dose-response was detected, data from the top dose group was excluded and the test repeated until no further trend was detected. The level of significance selected was p ≤ 0.05.
Analysis of dosing solutions:
Three sets of samples were collected near the beginning, middle, and end of he study. Analyses addressed concentration verification and uniformity of mixing. Two independent samples from each test formulation were collected. One sample of the vehicle and two samples from each test formulation were analysed immediately after submission - Indices:
- Please refer to Table 1-4
- Historical control data:
- not data provided with the study report
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Maternal toxic effects:yes
Details on maternal toxic effects:
(Note: Tables mentioned below are presented under “Remarks on results including tables and figures”)
One animal in the 750 mg/kg bw/day group was found dead on day 13 of gestation. No abnormal clinical signs of toxicity were noted prior to death. However, on days 8-10 of gestation, the rat lost 10 g of weight, and food consumption during this period was substantially below the control mean and the 750 mg/kg bw/day group mean. Over days 10-12 of gestation, the animal appeared to temporarily recover, gained 16.1 g of weight, and food consumption was similar to both the control and 750 mg/kg group mean values. No postmortem gross abnormalities were detected.
On day 21 of gestation, gross postmortem abnormalities in the stomach were observed in 4 dams administered 750 mg/kg bw/day.
Two animals in the 750 mg/kg bw/day dose group exhibited salvation and stained fur, and one animal was gasping. The incidences of these observations were not significantly increased.
Test substance-related, statistically significant decrease in body weight gain occurred in dams administered 750 mg/kg bw/day (please refer to table 2). Mean body weight gain values in 750 mg/kg bw/day females were slightly lower than the control values during days 14-18 of gestation, and were significantly reduced on days 18-21 of gestation. Mean maternal weight gain for the 750 mg/kg bw/day group, both absolute and net (corrected to exclude the product of conception) were significantly reduced (13 % and 29% lower than the respective control values) on days 6-21 of gestation. In addition, absolute and net final body weights on day 21 of gestation were 5 % lower than the control values.
There were no test substance related effects on the body weight gain in rats administered 250 mg/kg bw/day.
Test substance related decreases in food consumption occurred in dams administered 750 mg/kg bw/day of the test substance. Over the entire dosing period (days 6-21 of gestation) food consumption for 750 mg/kg bw/day dams was 7.5 % lower than the control value. The reduction in food consumption in 750 mg/kg bw/day dams was consistent with the decreased body weight and weight gain. There were no test substance related effects on food consumption in the 250 mg/kg bw/day group.
All substance related gross postmortem changes were only observed in the 750 mg/kg bw/day group. Increased thickness of the nonglandular stomach was observed in 4 of 22 dams, and red discoloration of the glandular stomach was observed in one dam. In addition, the small and large intestines of one rat were distended with fluid. - Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Effect level:
- 750 mg/kg bw/day
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Key result
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:no effects
Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
(Note: Tables mentioned below are presented under “Remarks on results including tables and figures”)
The mean number of corpora lutea, implantation sites, resorptions, live foetuses, and sex ratio were comparable across all groups (please refer to tables 1-3 and 4). One dam in the 750 mg/kg bw/day group had one early resorption and 10 late resorptions (no live foetuses were born). The resorptions were considered secondary to poor maternal health (weight loss, reduced food consumption, intestines distended with fluid) since the incidence of both early and late foetal resorptions for the remaining dams in the 750 mg/kg bw/day group were similar to control.
Mean foetal weight in the 750 mg/kg bw/day group was 4 %lower than the control value. Although not statistically significant, this change was considered to be substance related and adverse by the study author since it occurred at a dosage where maternal toxicity was observed. The notifier however, does not consider the effect to be adverse due to the low magnitude of body weight reductions in foetuses of the high dose group and since the slightly lower weight correlates with the lower body weight of the dams. In addition lower fetal body weights were observed in a small number of foetuses in 9/20 litters of the high dose group only which lead to the overall and not significant reduction of fetal body weight. Mean foetal weights for the 75 and 250 mg/kg bw/day groups were similar to the control value.
There were no test substance related foetal malformations (please refer to table 5) or variations (see table 6) at any dosage. One foetus in the control group had branched and fused ribs, one foetus in the 75 mg/kg bw/day group had cleft palate and anophthalmia, and one had a filamentous tail. No foetal malformations were detected in the 750 mg/kg bw/day group.
The number and type of variations was similar for all groups, and was common to this strain and developmental age. The incidence of size 3 renal papilla was slightly higher in the treated groups compared to the control group. This was due to an unusually low incidence in the control group whereas the incidence in the treated groups was either below or within the historical control range. - Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- fetal/pup body weight changes
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: absence of effects
- Key result
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
- Key result
- Developmental effects observed:
- no
- Conclusions:
- The study and the conclusions which are drawn from it fulfill the quality criteria (validity, reliability, repeatability). Under the conditions of the study, the maternal and foetal NO(A)EL was 250 mg/kg bw/day, based on decreased maternal body weight gain, food consumption, and mortality at 750 mg/kg bw/day, and based on the slightly lower foetal weight at 750 mg/kg bw/day. Therefore, the test substance is not uniquely toxic to the conceptus.
No teratogenic effects were observed at any dose level. - Executive summary:
Materials and methods
KMPS triple salt was applied by gavage from day 6 to 20 of gestation to Crl:CD(SD)IGS BR rats at dose levels of 0, 75, 250, and 750 mg/kg bw/day (selection of dose levels was due to the results of a pilot developmental study (please refer to Overall remarks).
During the in-life portion of the study, maternal clinical signs, body weights, and food consumption data were collected. On day 21 of gestation, dams were euthanised and subjected to a gross external and internal examination. Uterine contents were described; all foetuses were removed and individually weighed, sexed, and examined for external alterations. Approximately one-half of the foetuses were subjected to visceral and head evaluations; all foetuses were examined for skeletal alterations.
Results and discussion
Adverse test substance related maternal toxicity occurred at 750 mg/kg bw/day. One dam in the 750 mg/kg bw/day group was found dead on day 13 of gestation, however, no clinical signs of toxicity or gross abnormalities were detected in this animal. Dams sacrificed on day 21 of gestation had increased thickness of the non-glandular stomach, red discoloration of the glandular stomach, which is considered to be the consequence of a direct irritating effect of the test material, and distention of the intestines with fluid. Body weight gain and food consumption were also decreased in 750 mg/kg bw/day dams (please refer to table 2). No test substance related clinical signs of toxicity were observed at any dosage.
The mean number of corpora lutea, implantation sites, resorptions, live foetuses, and sex ration were comparable across all groups (please refer to table 4).
Mean foetal weight in the 750 mg/kg bw/day group was slightly lower (4 %, not statistically significant) compared to the control value. Although not statistically significant, this change was considered to be substance related and adverse by the study authors. The notifier however, does not consider the effect to be adverse due to the low magnitude of body weight reductions in foetuses of the high dose group and since the slightly lower weight correlates with the lower body weight of the dams. In addition lower fetal body weights were observed in a small number of foetuses in 9/20 litters of the high dose group only which lead to the overall and not significant reduction of fetal body weight. Mean foetal body weights for the 75 and 250 mg/kg bw/day groups were similar to the control value.
There were no test substance and/or dose related foetal malformations or variations observed at any dosage level (please refer to tables 5 and 6).
Reference
Table 2: Mean maternal body weight changes (g)
Group: Dose (mg/kg bw/day) | I | II | III | IV |
Gestation Days | - | |||
0-4 | 12.5 | 14.6 | 13.7 | 13.2 |
16-18 | 25.0 | 25.8 | 24.0 | 23.8 |
18-21 | 51.5 | 52.9 | 52.4 | 41.5* |
6-21 | 135.0 | 147.3 | 133.3 | 117.1* |
· * Parametric comparison to control (Dunnett/Tamhane-Dunnett) significant
Table 3: Reproductive outcome
Dose Group (mg/kg bw/day) | I | II | III | IV |
No. Pregnant | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 |
No. Aborted | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
No. Early Deliveries | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
No. Deaths | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
No. Females with total Resorptions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1a |
No. Litters | 22 | 22 | 22 | 20 |
No. Live Foetuses | 270 | 272 | 265 | 250 |
No. Dead Foetuses | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
No. Foetal Resorptions | 6 | 5 | 13 | 3 |
a Data from the female with total resorptions were excluded from statistical analyses.
Table 4: Reproductive outcome (means per litter)
Dose Group (mg/kg bw/day) | I | II | III | IV |
Live Foetusesa: | - | - | - | - |
Total | 12.3 (2.1)b | 12.4 (1.8) | 12.0 (2.3) | 12.5 (1.9) |
Males | 6.0 | 5.4 | 5.4 | 7.0 |
Females | 6.2 | 7.0 | 6.7 | 5.5 |
Dead Foetuses | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Resorptions: | - | - | - | - |
Total | 0.3 (0.6) | 0.2 (0.4) | 0.6 (0.7) | 0.2 (0.4) |
Early | 0.3 (0.6) | 0.2 (0.4) | 0.6 (0.7) | 0.2 (0.4) |
Late | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Implantations/ | 12.5 (1.8) | 12.6 (1.8) | 12.6 (2.0) | 12.7 (1.8) |
Mean | 13.8 (2.2) | 14.0 (1.8) | 14.3 (2.0) | 14.2 (2.0) |
Mean Foetal Weighta | - | - | - | - |
Total | 5.25 (0.06) | 5.44 (0.07) | 5.28 (0.08) | 5.04 (0.04) |
Males | 5.38 | 5.57 | 5.43 | 5.14 |
Females | 5.12 | 5.32 | 5.16 | 4.93 |
Sex Ratiod | 0.49 (0.12) | 0.43 (0.18) | 0.45 (0.17) | 0.57 (0.15) |
a Statistical analyses were only conducted on the mean total number of live foetuses per litter and total mean foetal weight.
b Standard deviation is reported in parentheses.
c Statistical analyses are not conducted on mean corpora lutea data; these data are presented for information only.
d Number male foetuses/total number foetuses per litter
Table 5: Incidence of foetal malformations
Dose Group | I | II | III | IV |
External: |
|
|
|
|
Visceral: |
|
|
|
|
Head: |
|
|
|
|
Skeletal: |
|
|
|
|
Total No. affected | 1 [1] | 1 [1] | 1 [1] | 0 [0] |
Number examined and affected, including the number affected with the listed malformations are expressed as foetuses [litters].
Table 6: Incidence of foetal variations
Dose Group | I | II | III | IV |
Developmental Variations | - | - | - | - |
External | - | - | - | - |
No. examined | 270 [22] | 272 [22] | 265 [22] | 250 [20] |
No. affected | 0 [0] | 0 [0] | 0 [0] | 0 [0] |
Visceral | - | - | - | - |
No. examined | 139 [22] | 142 [22] | 140 [22] | 129 [20] |
No. affected | 0 [0] | 0 [0] | 0 [0] | 0 [0] |
Head | - | - | - | - |
No. examined | 139 [22] | 142 [22] | 140 [22] | 129 [20] |
No. affected | 0 [0] | 0 [0] | 0 [0] | 0 [0] |
Skeletal | - | - | - | - |
No. examined | 270 [22] | 272 [22] | 265 [22] | 250 [20] |
No. affected | 19 [8] | 25 [11] | 14 [9] | 22[7] |
Total with developmental Variations | 19 [8] | 25 [11] | 14 [9] | 22 [7] |
Variations due to retarded development | - | - | - | - |
External | - | - | - | - |
No. examined | 270 [22] | 272 [22] | 265 [22] | 250 [20] |
No. affected | 0 [0] | 0 [0] | 0 [0] | 0 [0] |
Visceral | - | - | - | - |
No. examined | 139 [22] | 142 [22] | 140 [22] | 129 [20] |
No. affected | 1 [1] | 4 [3] | 2 [2] | 5 [4] |
Head | - | - | - | - |
No. examined | 139 [22] | 142 [22] | 140 [22] | 129 [20] |
No. affected | 0 [0] | 0 [0] | 0 [0] | 0 [0] |
Skeletal | - | - | - | - |
No. examined | 270 [22] | 272 [22] | 265 [22] | 250 [20] |
No. affected | 0 [0] | 0 [0] | 0 [0] | 1 [1] |
Total variations due to retarded development | 1 [1] | 4 [3] | 2 [2] | 6 [5] |
Total number foetuses with variations | 20 [8] | 29 [13] | 15 [9] | 28 [10] |
Numbers examined and affected, including the number affected with the listed malformations are expressed as foetuses [litters].
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 250 mg/kg bw/day
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- Guideline conform study
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Developmental toxicity/teratogenicity
KMPS triple salt was tested for developmental toxicity/teratogenicity in a study according to OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study) in rats. KMPS triple salt was applied by gavage from day 6 to 20 of gestation to Crl:CD(SD)IGS BR rats at dose levels of 0, 75, 250, and 750 mg/kg bw/day.
Adverse test substance related maternal toxicity occurred at 750 mg/kg bw/day. There were no test substance and/or dose related foetal malformations or variations observed at any dosage level.
Under the conditions of the study, the maternal and foetal NO(A)EL was 250 mg/kg bw/day, based on decreased maternal body weight gain, food consumption, and mortality at 750 mg/kg bw/day, and based on the slightly lower foetal weight at 750 mg/kg bw/day. Therefore, the test substance is not uniquely toxic to the conceptus.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Classification, Labelling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
Based on available data the substance is considered to be not classified according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP), as amended for the seventeenth time in Regulation (EU) 2021/849.
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
