Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 231-302-2 | CAS number: 7488-55-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Carcinogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- carcinogenicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- other information
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- GLP study from US authorities
Data source
Referenceopen allclose all
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 982
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Health effects assessment for tin and tin compounds
- Author:
- U.S. EPA
- Year:
- 1 987
- Bibliographic source:
- EPA/600/8-88/055
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Begruendungen zu Zinn(II)-Verbindnungen, anorganische in TRGS 900
- Author:
- Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin
- Year:
- 2 008
- Bibliographic source:
- Begruendungen zu Zinn(II)-Verbindnungen, anorganische in TRGS 900, Ausgabe März 2008
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 451 (Carcinogenicity Studies)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- additional analysis, see principles
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Additional chemical absorption of tin in bone, kidney and liver in the groups treated with 1 and 2 ppm stannous chloride was determined
- GLP compliance:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Tin sulphate
- EC Number:
- 231-302-2
- EC Name:
- Tin sulphate
- Cas Number:
- 7488-55-3
- Molecular formula:
- O4S.Sn
- IUPAC Name:
- λ²-tin(2+) sulfate
- Test material form:
- solid: crystalline
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- other: rat, mice
- Strain:
- other: rat: F344/N, mice: B6C3F_1
- Sex:
- male/female
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 105 weeks
- Frequency of treatment:
- in normal diet
- Post exposure period:
- 0
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 ppm
- Remarks:
- nominal in diet
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 ppm
- Remarks:
- nominal in diet
approx. 37 mg/kg/d in male rats, approx. 95 mg/kg/d in female mice
- Dose / conc.:
- 2 ppm
- Remarks:
- nominal in diet
approx. 74 mg/kg/d in male rats, approx. 190 mg/kg/d in female mice
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- rats: 10 per sex and dose
mice: 10 per sex and dose - Control animals:
- yes
Results and discussion
Results of examinations
- Relevance of carcinogenic effects / potential:
- A carcinogenesis bioassay of stannous chloride was conducted in F344/N rats and B6C3Fl/N mice. The doses selected for the 2- year chronic study were 1,000 and 2,000 ppm stannous chloride because higher doses (3,800 ppm or more) in the 13-week study caused distention of the cecum in rats and mice and reddened gastric mucosa in rats. Mean body weight gain and feed consumption of dosed and control rats and mice were comparable in the chronic study. Survival of high-dose male rats was somewhat lower than that of the control and low-dose groups (37150, control; 39/50, low-dose; 30150, high-dose). Survival of control male mice was less (P < 0.05) than that of either dosed group (32/50, 42/50, 45/50); survival of the female mice appeared to be dose related (38/50,33/50, 28/50).
C-cell adenomas were significantly (P < 0.05) increased in low-dose male rats. C-cell carcinomas of the thyroid in male rats did not occur at a significant incidence; however, C-cell adenomas or carcinomas (combined) occurred in male rats with a significant positive trend (P = 0.027 for the life table test), and the incidence in either dosed group was significantly (P < 0.01, lowdose; P 50.05, high-dose) higher than that seen in the controls (control, 2/50, 4%; low-dose, 13/49, 27%; high-dose, 8/50, 16%). The incidence of C-cell carcinomas or the combined incidence of C-cell adenomas and carcinomas in previous control groups of male F344/N rats from this laboratory has been as high as 7% and 20%, respectively (historical incidence at this laboratory: C-cell adenomas, 24/288, 8.3%; C-cell carcinomas, 8/ 288, 2.8%; C-cell adenomas or carcinomas, 32/288, 11.1%). If the historical control rate is used as a basis of comparison, the low-dose effect remains significant (P < 0.01), but the high-dose does not. Since the incidences of these tumors in high-dose male rats were not significantly different from the historical control rate at this laboratory and since the incidence of C-cell hyperplasia in male rats (control, 1 / 50, 2%; low-dose, 1/49, 2%; high-dose, 2/50, 4%) was similar in dosed groups and controls,, the increased incidence of thyroid tumors in dosed male rats is not considered to be clearly related to administration of stannous chloride.
Adenomas of the lung in male rats occurred with a significant (P < 0.05) positive trend, but the increased incidence in the high-dose group was not significant in a direct comparison with the control group (controls, 0/50,0%; low-dose, 0150, 0%; high-dose, 3/50, 6%). The historical incidence of control F344/N male rats with adenomas of the lung at this laboratory is 2.1% (6/289) with a range of 0%-6%. The incidence of male rats with either adenomas or carcinomas (combined) in the lung was not statistically significant.
Retinal degeneration, found in increased incidence in high-dose male rats and in low-dose female rats, has previously been found at this laboratory to be related to proximity to the fluorescent light.
The incidence of female mice with either hepatocellular adenomas or carcinomas exhibited a significant (P < 0.05) dose-related trend (controls, 3/49, 6%; low-dose, 4/49, 8%; high-dose, 8/49, 16%). However, the incidence observed in the high-dose group falls within the historical range for female control B6C3F1 /N mice at the laboratory (4%-18%; mean, 24/297,8%), and is not statistically significant relative to the historical control rate; thus the increase is not considered to be related to administration of stannous chloride.
Histiocytic lymphomas in female mice occurred with a significant positive trend (P < 0.05). However, the incidence of histiocytic lymphomas in the female controls (O/50, 0%) is lower than the historical incidence for mice of the same sex and strain at this laboratory (9/298, 3.0%; range, 0%-6%). Furthermore, the incidence of all lymphomas or leukemias was not significantly elevated in groups of dosed female mice (control, 6/50, 12%; low-dose, 10/49,20%; high-dose, 11 /49, 22%). The incidence of lymphomas or leukemias in the dosed groups was similar to the historical incidence for control female B6C3Fl/N mice at this laboratory (67/298, 22%).
In summary, although certain tumors observed in the present study occurred at increased incidences in the dosed groups, the historical data from the laboratory suggests these differences could be attributed to normal variations in tumor incidence and could not be unequivocally attributed to administration of stannous chloride. Nonetheless, the increases seen for C-cell tumors in male rats may have been associated with the dietary administration of stannous chloride. In other 2-year studies using Long-Evans rats and Charles River Swiss mice (see Table l), investigators concluded that stannous chloride was not a carcinogen (Kanisawa and Schroeder, 1967; Schroeder et al., 1968). These two studies were considered inadequate to evaluate the carcinogenicity of stannous chloride because the doses used were low (0.28 ppm in the diet or 5 ppm in the water) and because histopathological examination was done on a select limited number of tissues. The absorption of stannous chloride by rats and mice has been demonstrated in the current study (Table 2) and by several previous investigators (Flinn and Inouye, 1928; Kehoe et al., 1940; Schroeder and Balassa, 1967; Schroeder et al., 1968; Yamaguchi et al., 1977; Yamaguchi et al., 1980). The amount retained in various tissues is dependent on the species and dose used (Table 2). For example, F344/N rats in the present study had concentrations of tin in the kidneys that were 28 to 68 times greater than those found in the kidneys of B6C3FI/N mice administered the same doses (Table 2), but both species accumulated equivalent concentrations of tin in the bone and liver. It is known that ingestion of stannous chloride in humans and rats results in approximately 99% excretion in the feces (Flinn and Inouye, 1928; Fritsch et al., 1977); the extremely low accumulation of tin in the bone, kidney, and liver of animals in the present study is in agreement. Utilization of stannous chloride as a food preservative or exposure to tin leached from canned foods would presumably result in equally low absorption by humans. For example, bone, kidney, and liver from adult males contained only tenths of a pg tin/g tissue Kehoe et al., 1940).
Effect levels
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 2 ppm
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: carcinogenicity (rat and mouse)
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of this bioassay, stannous chloride was judged not to be carcinogenic for male or female F344/ N rats or MC3FlIN mice, although C-cell tumors of the thyroid gland in male rats may have been associated with the administration of the test chemical.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.