Registration Dossier
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-860-4 | CAS number: 100-52-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
With the completion of contemporary OECD TG 487 and TG 490 studies, the overall Weight of Evidence supports the classification of benzaldehyde as "not genotoxic". The whole of the literature points to benzaldehyde as not genotoxic, with only a small number of studies concluding "positive" results. In particular,
Citation | Test System | Conclusion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Several in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity tests with the test substance are available. The key studies come from the NTP report on the test substance (NTP, 1990). The test substance is negative in an in vitro mutagenecity study with Salmonella typhimurium with and without metabolic activation. In a chromosome aberration study the testsubstance did not induce effects both with and without metabolic activation. In a mouse lymphoma study a slightly positive result was reported both with and without S-9 mix.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Additional information from genetic toxicity in vitro:
The test substance was not mutagenic in Salmonella gene mutation assays (Florin et al., 1980; Kasamaki et al., 1982; Haworth et al., 1983).
It exhibited genotoxic activity in the mouse lymphoma assay (McGregor et al., 1989) and in assays for sister chromatid exchanges in both Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells (Galloway etal., 1986). Induction of chromosomal aberrations by the test substance was also reported in Chinese hamster lung cells at a dose stated to be 50 nM (5.3 ng/ml) (Kasamaki et al., 1982); however, the National Toxicology Program (NTP), using concentrations of the test substance which were approximately 10,000 times higher, found no increase in aberrations in CHO cells (Galloway et al., 1986). This basic pattern of no mutagenic activity in bacterial systems but possible weak clastogenic effects in some mammalian cell assays is also reflected in test results from metabolites of the test substance, i.e., benzoic acid.
In in-vivo sex-linked recessive lethal mutation assays with Drosophila melanogaster the test substance was tested negative after oral and ip administration.
No adequate in vivo data are available that confirm the weakly positive results reported in in vitro tests.
Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
The study in mammalian cells was chosen over that in bacterial cells, as the higher level study.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The available data do not lead to classification for genotoxicity according to DSD and CLP.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

Route: .live2