Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 931-330-1 | CAS number: 69227-24-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- February 17, 2014 to March 7, 2014
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Rat liver microsomal enzymes (S9 homogenate)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Range finding test in strain TA100 and E.Coli WP2 uvrA with and without metabolic activation: Positive control; Solvent control; 3; 10; 33; 100; 333; 1000; 3330; 5000 ug/L
Experiment 1: Tester trains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 with and without metabolic activation: Positive control; Solvent control; 3; 10; 33; 100; 333; 1000 ug/L.
Experiment 2: Tester trains TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100: Positive control; Solvent control; 3; 10; 33; 100; 333; 1000 ug/L. Tester strain E.Coli WP2 uvrA: Positive control; Solvent control; 3; 10; 33; 100; 333; 1000; 3330 and 5000 ug/L - Vehicle / solvent:
- Ethanol
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Ethanol
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Saline
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- Remarks:
- TA1535; concentration/plate 5 µg
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
- Positive control substance:
- other: ICR-191
- Remarks:
- TA1537; concentration/plate 2.5 µg
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
- Positive control substance:
- 2-nitrofluorene
- Remarks:
- TA98; concentration/plate 10 µg
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- TA100; concentration/plate 650 µg
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- Remarks:
- WP2 uvrA; concentration/plate 15 µg
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation and solvent DMSO
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- TA1535 2.5 µg S9-mix 5 and 10%; TA1537 2.5 µg S9-mix 5%; TA1537 5 µg S9-mix 10%; TA98 1 µg S9-mix 5 and10%; TA100 1 µg S9-mix 5% ; TA100 2 µg S9-mix 10% ; W2P uvrA 15 µg S9-mix 5 and 10%
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium; in agar (plate incorporation)
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Triplicates
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY: Reduction of the bacterial background lawn, the increase in the size of the microcolonies and the reduction of the revertant colonies were examined. - Evaluation criteria:
- A Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay and/or Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay is considered acceptable if it meets the following criteria:
a)The negative control data (number of spontaneous revertants per plate) should be within the laboratory historical range for each tester strain
b)The positive control chemicals should produce responses in all tester strains, which are within the laboratory historical range documented for each positive control substance. Furthermore, the mean plate count should be at least three times the concurrent vehicle control group mean
c)The selected dose range should include a clearly toxic concentration or should exhibit limited solubility as demonstrated by the preliminary toxicity range-finding test or should extendto 5 mg/plate.
No formal hypothesis testing was done.
A test substance is considered negative (not mutagenic) in the test if:
a)The total number of revertants in tester strain TA100 is not greater than two (2) times the concurrent control, and the total number of revertants in tester strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 or WP2 uvrA is not greater than three (3) times the concurrent vehicle control.
b)The negative response should be reproducible in at least one independently repeated experiment.
A test substance is considered positive (mutagenic) in the test if:
a)The total number of revertants in tester strain TA100 is greater than two (2) times the concurrent control, or the total number of revertants in tester strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 or WP2 uvrA is greater than three (3) times the concurrent vehicle control.
b)In case a repeat experiment is performed when a positive response is observed in one of the tester strains, the positive response should be reproducible in at least one independently repeated experiment.
The preceding criteria were not absolute and other modifying factors might enter into the final evaluation decision. - Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- other: Cytotoxicity, as evidenced by a decrease in the number of revertants, was observed in tester strain TA98 in the presence of 5 and 10 %(v/v) S9-mix.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Under the study conditions, the test substance was not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay.
- Executive summary:
A study was conducted to evaluate the in vitro genetic toxicity of the test substance, C8-18 and C18-unsatd. MEA, according to OECD Guideline 471, in compliance with GLP. The substance was tested in the Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay with four histidine-requiring strains of Salmonella typhimurium (TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100) and in the Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay with a tryptophan-requiring strain of Escherichia coli (WP2 uvrA). The test was performed in two independent experiments in the presence and absence of S9-mix (rat liver S9-mix induced by Aroclor). An additional experiment was performed with the strains TA1537, TA98 and WP2 uvrA in the presence of S9-mix. In the dose range finding test, the substance was tested up to concentrations of 5000 μg/plate in the absence and presence of S9-mix in the strains TA100 and WP2 uvrA. The substance precipitated on the plates at dose levels of 3330 and 5000 μg/plate. In tester strain TA100, toxicity was observed at dose levels of 333 μg/plate and upwards in the absence of S9-mix and at dose levels of 1000 μg/plate and upwards in the presence of S9-mix. In tester strain WP2 uvrA, the bacterial background lawn was not reduced at any of the concentrations tested. No biologically relevant decrease in the number of revertants was observed up to the dose level of 3330 μg/plate. Since the test substance precipitated heavily on the plates at the test substance concentration of 5000 μg/plate, the number of revertant colonies of this dose level could not be determined. Based on the results of the dose range finding test, the substance was tested in the first mutation assay at a concentration range of 3 to 666 μg/plate in the absence of S9-mix and at a concentration range of 10 to 1000 μg/plate in the presence of 5% (v/v) S9-mix in tester strains TA1535, TA1537 and TA98. The test substance did not precipitate on the plates at this dose level. Toxicity was observed in all tester strains, except in TA98 in the presence of S9-mix. In an independent repeat of the assay with additional parameters, the substance was tested at a concentration range of 3 to 666 μg/plate in the absence of S9-mix and at a concentration range of 10 to 1000 μg/plate in the presence of 10% (v/v) S9-mix in tester strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100 and at 10 to 3330 μg/plate in tester strain WP2 uvrA in the absence and presence of 10% (v/v) S9-mix. Precipitate on the plates was only observed at the dose level of 3330 μg/plate in the absence of S9-mix. Toxicity was observed in all tester strains, except in TA1537 and TA98 in the presence of S9-mix and in WP2 uvrA in the absence and presence of S9-mix. Since in the first experiment in tester strain TA98 and in the second experiment in the tester strains TA1537, TA98 and WP2 uvrA no toxicity or precipitate on the plates was observed, a third mutation experiment was performed with these strains in the presence of S9-mix (5% %(v/v) S9-mix and 10 %(v/v) S9-mix, for experiment 1 and 2, respectively). The substance was tested up to 5000 μg/plate. The test substance precipitated on the plates at dose levels of 3330 and 5000 μg/plate. Due to the precipitate of the test substance on the plates the bacterial background could not be determined at the dose levels of 3330 and 5000 μg/plate, except at tester strain WP2 uvrA. Cytotoxicity, as evidenced by a decrease in the number of revertants, was observed in tester strain TA98 in the presence of 5 and 10 %(v/v) S9-mix. The substance did not induce a significant dose-related increase in the number of revertant (His+) colonies in each of the four tester strains (TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100) and in the number of revertant (Trp+) colonies in tester strain WP2 uvrA both in the absence and presence of S9-metabolic activation. These results were confirmed in an independently repeated experiment. In this study, the negative and strain-specific positive control values were within the laboratory historical control data ranges indicating that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system functioned properly. Under the study conditions, the test substance was not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay (Verspeek-Rip, 2014).
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- From 27 March 1996 to 17 May 1996
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- Only four S. typhimurium strains tested
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Histidine
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA1535, TA1537, TA1538, TA98 and TA100
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 liver microsomal fraction
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Without metabolic activation: 5 to 1500 µg/plate
With metabolic activation: 0, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO)
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- not specified
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (Without metabolic activation)
- Positive control substance:
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- Remarks:
- TA100: N-ethyl-N'-nitrosoguanidine- 3 µg/plate; TA1535: N-ethyl-N'-nitrosoguanidine- 5 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- not specified
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (Without metabolic activation)
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- Remarks:
- TA1537: 9-aminoacridine- 80 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- not specified
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (Without metabolic activation)
- Positive control substance:
- other: 4-Nitro-o-phenylenediamine
- Remarks:
- TA1538: 4-Nitro-o-phenylenediamine- 5 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- not specified
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (Without metabolic activation)
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- Remarks:
- TA98: 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide- 0.2 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- 2-Aminoanthracene (Without metabolic activation)
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- not specified
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- not specified
- Positive control substance:
- not specified
- Remarks:
- TA100: 2-Aminoanthracene- 1 µg/plate; TA1535 and TA1537: 2-Aminoanthracene- 2 µg/plate; TA1538 and TA98: 2-Aminoanthracene- 0.5 µg/plate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION:
Known aliquots (0.1 mL) of one of the bacterial suspensions were dispensed into sets of sterile test tubes followed by 2.0 mL of molten, trace histidine supplemented, top agar at 45°C, 0.1 mL of the appropriately diluted test material or vehicle control and either 0.5 mL of the S9 liver microsome mix or 0.5 mL of phosphate buffer. The contents of each test tube were mixed and equally distributed onto the surface of Vogel-Bonner Minimal agar plates (one tube per plate).
Incubation and Assessment of Plates: All of the plates were incubated at 37'C for approximately 48 h and the frequency of revertant colonies assessed using a Domino colony counter.
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Triplicate
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: The cytotoxicity was rated as follows:
C= contaminated
p= precipitate
S= sparse background lawn
V= very thin background lawn
T= toxic
X= plate unscorable
- Evaluation criteria:
- For a substance to be considered positive in this test system, it should have induced a dose-related and statistically significant increase in mutation rate in one or more strains of bacteria in the presence and/or absence of the S9 microsomal enzymes in both experiments at sub-toxic dose levels.
- Statistics:
- Dunnett's method of linear regression
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA1535, TA1537, TA1538, TA98 and TA100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Under the study conditions, the test substance was found to be non-mutagenic.
- Executive summary:
A study was conducted to evaluate the in vitro genetic toxicity of the test substance, C8-18 and C18-unsatd. MEA, according to OECD Guideline 471, in compliance with GLP. Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA1538, TA98 and TA100 were treated in triplicate with the test substance at up to seven concentration levels (5 to 1500 µg/plate, without metabolic activation (10% liver S9 in standard co-factors): 0, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate, with metabolic activation), as determined in a preliminary toxicity assay. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test produced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with and without metabolic activation. Amides, C8-18 and C18-unsatd., N-(hydroxyethyl) was non-mutagenic under the conditions of this test. The vehicle (DMSO) control plates produced counts of revertant colonies within the normal range. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test produced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with and without the metabolising system. The test substance caused a visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial lawn to all of the strains of Salmonella tested both with and without S9-mix. The first evidence of toxicity was observed at 500 µg/plate in several Salmonella tester strains. The substance was tested either up to a maximum recommended dose of 5000 µg/plate or the toxic limit. A precipitate was observed at and above 1500 µg/plate; this did not interfere with the scoring of the revertants. No significant increase in the frequency of revertant colonies was recorded for any of the bacterial strains with any doe of the test substance, either with or without metabolic activation. Under the study conditions, the test substance was found to be non-mutagenic (Thompson, 1996).
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Not reported
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes:
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: RPMI 1640 medium (Invitrogen Corporation), supplemented with 20% (v/v) heat-inactivated (56°C; 30 min) foetal calf serum, L-glutamine (2 mM), penicillin/streptomycin (50 U/ml and 50 µg/mL respectively) and 30 U/mL heparin.
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 was prepared after inducing metabolizing enzymes by injection of rats with phenobarbitone and β-naphthoflavone.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Dose range finding study:
- At 3 h exposure time: 3, 10, 33, 100 and 333 µg/mL culture medium with and without S9-mix.
- At 24 and 48 h continuous exposure time: 3, 10, 33, 100, 333 and 1000 µg/mL culture medium without S9-mix
Experiment 1 (First cytogenetic assay):
Without and with S9-mix: 33, 100 and 200 µg/mL culture medium (3 h exposure time, 24 h fixation time)
Experiment 2 (Second cytogenetic assay):
- Without S9-mix: 10, 50, 100, 150, 175, 200, 225, 250, 275 and 300 µg/mL culture medium (24 h exposure time, 24 h fixation time)
10, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175 and 200 µg/mL culture medium (48 h exposure time, 48 h fixation time)
- With S9-mix: 50, 100 and 200 µg/mL culture medium (3 h exposure time, 48 h fixation time) - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Test material was soluble in DMSO - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- no
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation: 10 µg/mL 3 h exposure period (24 h fixation time)
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- no
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- mitomycin C
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation: 0.1 µg/mL (48 h exposure), 0.2 (24 h exposure) and 0.5 µg/mL (3 h exposure)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 3h (Experiment 1), 24 and 48 h (Experiment 2 without S9 mix) and 3h (Experiment 2 with S9 mix)
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 24 h (Experiment 1), 24 and 48 h (Experiment 2 without S9 mix) and 48 h (Experiment 2 with S9 mix)
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): Colchicine (0.5 µg/mL medium)
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Two
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 1000 cells
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: Yes
- Determination of endoreplication: Yes - Evaluation criteria:
- Evaluation criteria
A test substance was considered clastogenic if:
a) A dose-related statistically significant (Chi-square test, one-sided, p < 0.05) increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations
b) A significant and biologically relevant increase in the frequencies of the number of cells with chromosome aberrations in the absence of a clear dose-response relationship
A test substance was considered non-clastogenic if:
a) None of the tested concentrations induced a statistically significant increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations. - Statistics:
- Statistics
One sided, Chi-square test to calculate dose-related statistically significant increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations - Key result
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: Human
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
At the 24 and 48 h exposure time, test material was tested beyond the limit of solubility to obtain adequate toxicity data. - Precipitate of the test material was seen at 333 µg/mL
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
Yes, test data were within the laboratory historical control data range
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
Increased number of polyploid cells in the absence of S9-mix in a dose dependent manner in the first cytogenetic assay indicating potential to inhibit mitotic processes and to induce numerical chromosome aberrations. - Conclusions:
- Under the study conditions, the test substance was considered to be non-clastogenic in cultured human lymphocytes in vitro.
- Executive summary:
A study was conducted to evaluate the in vitro genetic toxicity of the test substance, C8-18 and C18-unsatd. MEA, according to OECD Guideline 473 and EU Method B. 10, in compliance with GLP. Peripheral human lymphocytes were treated with the test substance (experiment 1: 33, 100 and 200 µg/mL without and with S9-mix; experiment 2: 10–300 µg/mL without S9-mix, 50, 100 and 200 µg/mL with S9-mix) for either 3, 24 or 48 h. The frequency of cells with aberrations in the vehicle control group was within the historical control data range. Both of the positive control substances induced significant increases in the frequency of aberrations indicating the satisfactory performance of the test and of the activity of the metabolising system. The test substance did not induce any significant or biologically relevant increases in the frequency of cells with chromosome aberrations in the presence or absence of metabolic activation, in either independent repeat experiment. No effects on the number of polyploid cells were observed both in the absence and presence of S9-mix. The substance did not disturb the mitotic processes, cell cycle progression and did not induce numerical chromosome aberrations. Under the study conditions, the test substance was considered to be non-clastogenic in cultured human lymphocytes in vitro (Verspeek-Rip, 2009).
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Not reported
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Thymidine kinase
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: Basic medium: RPMI 1640 Hepes buffered medium (Dutch modification) (Invitrogen Corporation) containing penicillin/streptomycin (50 U/mL and 50 µg/mL, respectively) , 1 mM sodium pyruvate and 2 mM L-glutamin.
Growth medium: Basic medium, supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum (=R10 medium).
Exposure medium: For 3 h exposure cells were exposed to the test substance in basic medium supplemented with 5% (v/v) heat inactivated horse serum (R5-medium) and for 24 h exposure: Cells were exposed to the test substance in basic medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat inactivated horse serum (R10-medium).
Selective medium: Selective medium consisted of basic medium supplemented with 20% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum (total amount of serum = 20%, R20) and 5 µg/mL trifluorothymidine (TFT).
Non-selective medium: Non-selective medium consisted of basic medium supplemented with 20% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum (total amount of serum = 20%, R20). - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 was prepared after inducing metabolizing enzymes by injection of rats with phenobarbitone and β-naphthoflavone.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- First mutagenicity test:
Without S9-mix: 0.3, 1, 3, 10, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 and 100 µg/mL exposure medium
With 8% (v/v) S9-mix: 0.3, 1, 3, 10, 30, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300 and 350 µg/mL exposure medium
Second mutagenicity test:
Without S9-mix: 0.3,1,3,10,15,20,22.5,25,27.5,30,32.5,35,40,45 and 50 µg/mL exposure medium
With 12% (v/v) S9-mix: 0.3, 1, 3, 10, 30, 50, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 225 and 250 µg/mL exposure medium - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Dimethyl sulfoxide
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- Without metabolic activation Migrated to IUCLID6: 15 and 5 µg/mL for a 3 and 24 h treatment period
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- With metabolic activation Migrated to IUCLID6: 7.5 µg/mL
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 3h (Experiment 1), 24 and 48 h (Experiment 2 without S9 mix) and 3h (Experiment 2 with S9 mix)
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): For expression of the mutant phenotype, the remaining cells were cultured for 2 d after the treatment period. During this culture period at least 4 x 106 cells (if possible) were subcultured every day in order to maintain log phase growth. Two days after the end of the treatment with the test substance the cells were plated for determination of the cloning efficiency (CE day 2) and the mutation frequency (MF).
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): Trifluorothymidine 0.5 mg/mL
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Two
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cloning efficiency - Evaluation criteria:
- A test substance is considered positive (mutagenic) in the mutation assay if:
a) It induces a MF of more then MF(controls) + 126 in a dose-dependent manner; or
b) In case a repeat experiment is performed when a positive response is observed in one of the tester strains, the positive response should be reproducible in at least one independently repeated experiment.
An observed increase should be biologically relevant and will be compared with the historical control data range.
A test substance is considered equivocal (questionable) in the mutation assay if no clear conclusion for positive or negative result can be made after an additional confirmation study.
A test substance is considered negative (not mutagenic) in the mutation assay if:
a) None of the tested concentrations reaches a mutation frequency of MF(controls) + 126.
b) The results are confirmed in an independently repeated test. - Statistics:
- No data
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
In the absence of S9-mix, no toxicity in the relative suspension growth was observed up to concentrations of 33 µg/mL compared to the relative suspension growth of the solvent control. No cell survival was observed at test substance concentrations of 100 µg/mL and above. In the presence of S9-mix, no toxicity in the relative suspension growth was observed up to concentrations of 100 µg/mL compared to the relative suspension growth of the solvent control. Hardly any cell survival was observed at the test substance concentration of 333 µg/mL.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
The spontaneous mutation frequencies in the solvent-treated control cultures were between the minimum and maximum value of the historical control data range and within the acceptability criteria of this assay.
Evaluation of the mutagenicity: No significant increase in the mutation frequency at the TK locus was observed after treatment with Ninol CMF-E either in the absence or in the presence of S9-mix. The numbers of small and large colonies in the test material-treated cultures were comparable to the numbers of small and large colonies of the solvent controls.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
First mutagenicity test: Evaluation of toxicity: In the absence of S9-mix, the relative total growth of the highest test substance concentration was reduced by 74% compared to the total growth of the solvent controls. In the presence of S9-mix, the relative total growth of the highest test substance concentration was reduced by 77% compared to the total growth of the solvent controls.
Second mutagenicity test: In the absence of S9-mix, the relative total growth of the highest test substance was reduced by 95% compared to the total growth of the solvent controls. In the presence of S9-mix, the relative total growth of the highest test substance concentration was reduced by 72% compared to the total growth of the solvent controls. - Conclusions:
- Under the study conditions, the test substance was not mutagenic in the TK mutation test system both with and without metabolic activation.
- Executive summary:
A study was conducted to evaluate the in vitro genetic toxicity of the test substance, C8-18 and C18-unsatd. MEA, according to OECD Guideline 476 and EU method B.17, in compliance with GLP. The test was performed in two independent experiments with L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells, in the absence and presence of S9-mix. In the first experiment, the substance was tested up to concentrations of 60 and 200 µg/mL in the absence and presence of 8% (v/v) S9-mix. The incubation time was 3 h. Test material was tested up to cytotoxic levels of 74 and 77% in the absence and presence of S9-mix, respectively. In the second experiment, test material was tested up to concentrations of 45 and 225 µg/mL in the absence and presence of 12% (v/v) S9-mix with incubation times of 24 and 3 h, respectively. The substance was tested up to the cytotoxic level of 95% (absence of S9-mix) and up to 72% (presence of S9-mix), but failed to induce a significant increase in the frequency of mutations. The spontaneous mutation frequencies in the solvent-treated control cultures were within historical control data range and therefore within the acceptability criteria of the assay. Mutation frequencies in positive control cultures were elevated 8.2- and 16-fold for MMS (absence of S9-mix), and 10- and 13-fold for CP (presence of S9-mix). Negative results were confirmed in an independent repeat experiment with extended exposures. Under the study conditions, the test substance was not mutagenic in the TK mutation test system both with and without metabolic activation (Verspeek-Rip, 2009).
Referenceopen allclose all
Dose range finding test/Experiment 1
The test substance was tested in the tester strains TA100 and WP2 uvrA with concentrations of 3, 10, 33, 100, 333, 1000, 3330 and 5000 µg/plate in the absence and presence of S9-mix. Based on the results of the dose range finding test, the test substance was tested in the first mutation assay at a concentration range of 3 to 666 µg/plate in the absence of S9-mix and at a concentration range of 10 to 1000 µg/plate in the presence of 5% (v/v) S9-mix in the tester strains TA1535, TA1537 and TA98.
Precipitate
Dose range finding test: Precipitation of the test substance on the plates was observed at the start and at the end of the incubation period at concentrations of 3330 and 5000 µg/plate. First mutation experiment: Precipitation of the test substance on the plates was observed at the start of the incubation period at concentrations of 666 and 1000 µg/plate and no precipitate was observed at the end of the incubation period. Except in tester strain TA98 where no precipitate was observed at the start or at the end of the incubation period.
Toxicity
To determine the toxicity of the test substance, the reduction of the bacterial background lawn, the increase in the size of the microcolonies and the reduction of the revertant colonies were examined. In tester strain WP2 uvrA, the bacterial background lawn was not reduced at any of the concentrations tested. No biologically relevant decrease in the number of revertants was observed up to the dose level of 3330 μg/plate. Since the test substance precipitated heavily on the plates at the test substance concentration of 5000 μg/plate, the number of revertants of this dose level could not be determined. The reduction of the bacterial background lawn and the reduction in the number of revertants in the other tester strains are presented in Table 1.
Table1: Toxicity of Amides, C8-18(even numbered) and C18 unsatd., N-(hydroxyethyl) in the dose range finding/first experiment
(Reduction of the bacterial background lawn and in the number of revertant colonies)
Strain |
Without S9-mix |
With S9-mix |
|
Dose Bacterial Revertant (μg/plate) background lawn colonies |
Dose Bacterial Revertant (µg/plate) background lawn colonies |
||
TA1535 |
333 moderate -2 666 extreme microcolonies |
333 slight -1 666 slight -2 1000 moderate -2 |
|
TA1537 |
333 moderate -1 666 extreme microcolonies |
333 slight -1 666 slight -2 1000 moderate extreme |
|
TA98 |
666 normal extreme |
1000 normal -2 |
|
TA100 |
333 slight moderate 1000 extreme microcolonies 3330 absent complete 5000 absent -3 |
1000 moderate extreme 3330 absent complete 5000 absent -3 |
|
-1 No reduction in the number of revertant colonies
-2 Reduction in the number of revertant colonies, but not less than the minimal value of the historical control data range.
-3 Due to the amount of precipitate no colony determination was possible
Experiment 2
To obtain more information about the possible mutagenicity of the test substance, a second mutation experiment was performed in the absence of S9-mix and in the presence of 10% (v/v) S9-mix. Based on the results of the first mutation assay, the following dose range was selected for the second mutation assay: TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100: Without S9-mix: 3, 10, 33, 100, 333 and 666 μg/plate and with S9-mix: 10, 33, 100, 333, and 1000 μg/plate WP2 uvrA: Without and with S9-mix: 10, 33, 100, 333, 1000 and 3300 µg/plate.
Precipitate
Precipitation of the test substance on the plates was only observed in tester strain WP2 uvrA at the start of the incubation period at concentrations of 1000 and 3330 µg/plate in the absence of S9-mix and at 3330 µg/plate in the presence of S9-mix. At the end of the incubation period, precipitation on the plates was only observed at 3330 µg/plate in the absence of S9-mix.
Toxicity
In tester strain WP2 uvrA, no reduction of the bacterial background lawn and no biologically relevant decrease in the number of revertants were observed. The reduction of the bacterial background lawn and the reduction in the number of revertants in the other tester strains is presented in Table 2.
Table2: Toxicity of the test substance in second experiment (Reduction of the bacterial background lawn and in the number of revertant colonies)
Strain |
Without S9-mix |
With S9-mix |
|
Dose Bacterial Revertant (μg/plate) background lawn colonies |
Dose Bacterial Revertant (µg/plate) background lawn colonies |
||
TA1535 |
333 moderate -2 666 extreme absent |
1000 moderate -1 |
|
TA1537 |
333 slight moderate 666 extreme microcolonies |
1000 normal -2 |
|
TA98 |
666 moderate extreme |
1000 normal moderate |
|
TA100 |
100 slight moderate 333 moderate extreme 1000 extreme microcolonies |
333 normal moderate 666 moderate extreme 1000 moderate extreme |
|
-1 No reduction in the number of revertant colonies
-2 Reduction in the number of revertant colonies, but not less than the minimal value of the historical control data range.
Experiment 3
In the first experiment in tester strain TA98 and in the second experiment in the tester strains TA1537 and WP2 uvrA no toxicity or precipitate on the plates was observed in the presence of S9-mix. Therefore a third mutation experiment was performed with these strains and tester strain TA98 in the presence of S9-mix at a concentration range of 333 to 5000 µg/plate.
Precipitate
Precipitation of the test substance on the plates was observed at the start and at the end of the incubation period at concentrations of 3330 and 5000 µg/plate.
Toxicity
Due to precipitate of the test substance on the plates the bacterial background could not be determined at the dose levels of 3330 and 5000 μg/plate, except at tester strain WP2 uvrA. Cytotoxicity, as evidenced by a decrease in the number of revertants, was observed in tester strain TA98 in the presence of 5 and 10 %(v/v) S9-mix. Mutagenicity In the third mutation assay, no increase in the number of revertants was observed upon treatment with the test substance under all conditions tested.
Table of Test Results: Spontaneous Mutation Rates
Experiment 1
Number of Revertants (Number of Colonies per plate) |
||||
Base-pair Substitution Type |
Frameshift Type |
|||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1538 |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
123 117 (123) 128 |
26 23 (25) 25 |
9 12 (9) 7 |
19 12 (16) 18 |
5 9 (9) 12 |
Experiment 2
Number of Revertants (Number of Colonies per plate) |
||||
Base-pair Substitution Type |
Frameshift Type |
|||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1538 |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
123 117 (123) 128 |
26 23 (25) 25 |
9 12 (9) 7 |
19 12 (16) 18 |
5 9 (9) 12 |
The doses selected for scoring of chromosome aberrations:
Without S9-mix: 50, 100 and 150 µg/mL culture medium (24 h exposure time, 24 h fixation time).
50, 100 and 125 µg/mL culture medium (48 h exposure time, 48 h fixation time)
With S9-mix:50, 100 and 200 µg/mL culture medium (3 h exposure time, 48 h fixation time)
The growth rate over the two-day expression period for cultures treated with DMSO was between 13 and 23 (3 h treatment) and 37 and 38 (24 h treatment). Mutation frequencies in cultures treated with positive control chemicals were increased by 8.2 and 16-fold for MMS in the absence of S9-mix, and by 10- and 13-fold for CP in the presence of S9-mix, in the first and second experiment respectively. It was therefore concluded that the test conditions, both in the absence and presence of S9-mix, were appropriate for the detection of a mutagenic response and that the metabolic activation system (S9-mix) functioned properly. In addition the observed mutation frequencies of the positive control substances were within the acceptability criteria of this assay.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
In vitro
In vitro gene mutation in bacteria
A study was conducted to evaluate the in vitro genetic toxicity of the test substance, C8-18 and C18-unsatd. MEA, according to OECD Guideline 471, in compliance with GLP. The substance was tested in the Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay with four histidine-requiring strains of Salmonella typhimurium (TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100) and in the Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay with a tryptophan-requiring strain of Escherichia coli (WP2 uvrA). The test was performed in two independent experiments in the presence and absence of S9-mix (rat liver S9-mix induced by Aroclor). An additional experiment was performed with the strains TA1537, TA98 and WP2 uvrA in the presence of S9-mix. In the dose range finding test, the substance was tested up to concentrations of 5000μg/plate in the absence and presence of S9-mix in the strains TA100 and WP2 uvrA. The substance precipitated on the plates at dose levels of 3330 and 5000μg/plate. In tester strain TA100, toxicity was observed at dose levels of 333μg/plate and upwards in the absence of S9-mix and at dose levels of 1000μg/plate and upwards in the presence of S9-mix. In tester strain WP2 uvrA, the bacterial background lawn was not reduced at any of the concentrations tested. No biologically relevant decrease in the number of revertants was observed up to the dose level of 3330μg/plate. Since the test substance precipitated heavily on the plates at the test substance concentration of 5000μg/plate, the number of revertant colonies of this dose level could not be determined. Based on the results of the dose range finding test, the substance was tested in the first mutation assay at a concentration range of 3 to 666μg/plate in the absence of S9-mix and at a concentration range of 10 to 1000μg/plate in the presence of 5% (v/v) S9-mix in tester strains TA1535, TA1537 and TA98. The test substance did not precipitate on the plates at this dose level. Toxicity was observed in all tester strains, except in TA98 in the presence of S9-mix. In an independent repeat of the assay with additional parameters, the substance was tested at a concentration range of 3 to 666μg/plate in the absence of S9-mix and at a concentration range of 10 to 1000μg/plate in the presence of 10% (v/v) S9-mix in tester strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100 and at 10 to 3330μg/plate in tester strain WP2 uvrA in the absence and presence of 10% (v/v) S9-mix. Precipitate on the plates was only observed at the dose level of 3330μg/plate in the absence of S9-mix. Toxicity was observed in all tester strains, except in TA1537 and TA98 in the presence of S9-mix and in WP2 uvrA in the absence and presence of S9-mix. Since in the first experiment in tester strain TA98 and in the second experiment in the tester strains TA1537, TA98 and WP2 uvrA no toxicity or precipitate on the plates was observed, a third mutation experiment was performed with these strains in the presence of S9-mix (5% %(v/v) S9-mix and 10 %(v/v) S9-mix, for experiment 1 and 2, respectively). The substance was tested up to 5000μg/plate. The test substance precipitated on the plates at dose levels of 3330 and 5000μg/plate. Due to the precipitate of the test substance on the plates the bacterial background could not be determined at the dose levels of 3330 and 5000μg/plate, except at tester strain WP2 uvrA. Cytotoxicity, as evidenced by a decrease in the number of revertants, was observed in tester strain TA98 in the presence of 5 and 10 %(v/v) S9-mix. The substance did not induce a significant dose-related increase in the number of revertant (His+) colonies in each of the four tester strains (TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100) and in the number of revertant (Trp+) colonies in tester strain WP2 uvrA both in the absence and presence of S9-metabolic activation. These results were confirmed in an independently repeated experiment. In this study, the negative and strain-specific positive control values were within the laboratory historical control data ranges indicating that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system functioned properly. Under the study conditions, the test substance was not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay (Verspeek-Rip, 2014).
A study was conducted to evaluate the in vitro genetic toxicity of the test substance, C8-18 and C18-unsatd. MEA, according to OECD Guideline 471, in compliance with GLP. Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA1538, TA98 and TA100 were treated in triplicate with the test substance at up to seven concentration levels (5 to 1500 µg/plate, without metabolic activation (10% liver S9 in standard co-factors): 0, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate, with metabolic activation), as determined in a preliminary toxicity assay. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test produced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with and without metabolic activation. Amides, C8-18 and C18-unsatd., N-(hydroxyethyl) was non-mutagenic under the conditions of this test. The vehicle (DMSO) control plates produced counts of revertant colonies within the normal range. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test produced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with and without the metabolising system. The test substance caused a visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial lawn to all of the strains of Salmonella tested both with and without S9-mix. The first evidence of toxicity was observed at 500 µg/plate in several Salmonella tester strains. The substance was tested either up to a maximum recommended dose of 5000 µg/plate or the toxic limit. A precipitate was observed at and above 1500 µg/plate; this did not interfere with the scoring of the revertants. No significant increase in the frequency of revertant colonies was recorded for any of the bacterial strains with any doe of the test substance, either with or without metabolic activation. Under the study conditions, the test substance was found to be non-mutagenic (Thompson, 1996).
In vitro cytogenicity or micronucleus formation / chromosomal aberration assay
A study was conducted to evaluate the in vitro genetic toxicity of the test substance, C8-18 and C18-unsatd. MEA, according to OECD Guideline 473 and EU Method B. 10, in compliance with GLP. Peripheral human lymphocytes were treated with the test substance (experiment 1: 33, 100 and 200 µg/mL without and with S9-mix; experiment 2: 10–300 µg/mL without S9-mix, 50, 100 and 200 µg/mL with S9-mix) for either 3, 24 or 48 h. The frequency of cells with aberrations in the vehicle control group was within the historical control data range. Both of the positive control substances induced significant increases in the frequency of aberrations indicating the satisfactory performance of the test and of the activity of the metabolising system. The test substance did not induce any significant or biologically relevant increases in the frequency of cells with chromosome aberrations in the presence or absence of metabolic activation, in either independent repeat experiment. No effects on the number of polyploid cells were observed both in the absence and presence of S9-mix. The substance did not disturb the mitotic processes, cell cycle progression and did not induce numerical chromosome aberrations. Under the study conditions, the test substance was considered to be non-clastogenic in cultured human lymphocytes in vitro (Verspeek-Rip, 2009).
In vitro gene mutation in mammalian cells
A study was conducted to evaluate the in vitro genetic toxicity of the test substance, C8-18 and C18-unsatd. MEA, according to OECD Guideline 476 and EU method B.17, in compliance with GLP. The test was performed in two independent experiments with L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells, in the absence and presence of S9-mix. In the first experiment, the substance was tested up to concentrations of 60 and 200 µg/mL in the absence and presence of 8% (v/v) S9-mix. The incubation time was 3 h. Test material was tested up to cytotoxic levels of 74 and 77% in the absence and presence of S9-mix, respectively. In the second experiment, test material was tested up to concentrations of 45 and 225 µg/mL in the absence and presence of 12% (v/v) S9-mix with incubation times of 24 and 3 h, respectively. The substance was tested up to the cytotoxic level of 95% (absence of S9-mix) and up to 72% (presence of S9-mix) but failed to induce a significant increase in the frequency of mutations. The spontaneous mutation frequencies in the solvent-treated control cultures were within historical control data range and therefore within the acceptability criteria of the assay. Mutation frequencies in positive control cultures were elevated 8.2- and 16-fold for MMS (absence of S9-mix), and 10- and 13-fold for CP (presence of S9-mix). Negative results were confirmed in an independent repeat experiment with extended exposures. Under the study conditions, the test substance was not mutagenic in the TK mutation test system both with and without metabolic activation (Verspeek-Rip, 2009).
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the results of in vitro testing on the test substance, no classification for genetic toxicity is warranted according to CLP (EC 1272/2008) criteria.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.