Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
Reaction mass of 2,2'-[(3,3'-dichloro[1,1'-biphenyl]-4,4'-diyl)bis(azo)]bis[N-(2,4-dimethylphenyl)-3-oxobutyramide] and 2,2'-[(3,3'-dichloro[1,1'-biphenyl]-4,4'-diyl)bis(azo)]bis[N-(2-methylphenyl)-3-oxobutyramide] and 2-[[3,3'-dichloro-4'-[[1-[[(2,4-dimethylphenyl)amino]carbonyl]-2-oxopropyl]azo][1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yl]azo]-3-oxo-N-(o-tolyl)butyramide
EC number: 911-715-0 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
A close analogue of the test item did not exert mutagenic activity in the reverse bacterial mutation assay (plate incorporation assay and pre-incubation assay according to Prival) with and without metabolic activation.
A close analogue of the test item w
as tested for DNA-damaging effects on rat hepatocytes and human fibroblasts in vitro. The investigations were performed with concentrations of 2, 10, 50 and 250 µg/ml. Testing of higher concentrations was not possible, because higher concentrations caused strong precipitations which rendered the microscopical evaluation of the specimens impossible. There were no marked differences in the number of silver grains per nucleus in the vehicle control and in the cultures treated with the various concentrations of the test item. The results with the positive control substance were within the normal range.
Induction of chromosome aberrations by the test item has been investigated in Chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro in the presence (induced rat liver S9) and absence of metabolic activation. A close analogue of the test item did not induce chromosome aberrations in tests concentrations up to 16 µg/ml (with metabolic activation) or 50 µg/ml (without metabolic activation) under these test conditions.
Induction of mammalian cell gene mutations in vitro has been investigated in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells in the presence (rat liver S9) and absence of metabolic activation. A close analogue of the test item did not induce gene mutations in concentrations up to 0.5 µg/ml under the tested conditions.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 14 JUL 2006 to 25 JUL 2006
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study (OECD TG 471), with Prival modification for azo-dyes
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- in accordance with German Chemikaliengesetz and Directive 88/320/EEC
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- rat liver S9 (experiment I); hamster liver S9 (experiment II)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment I: 3, 10, 33, 100, 333, 1000, 2500, 5000 µg/plate
Experiment II: 33, 100, 333, 1000, 2500, 5000 µg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: solubility properties of the solvent and its relative non-toxicity to the bacteria - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: sodium azide (TA 1535 and TA 100), 4-Nitro-o-phenylene-diamine (TA 1537 and TA 98), methyl methane sulfonate (WP2 uvrA)
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation (rat liver S9 mix)
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene (TA 1535, TA 100, TA 1537, WP2 uvrA), congo red (TA 98)
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation (hamster liver S9 mix)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION:
Experiment I: plate incorporation assay with induced rat liver S9 mix (induction with phenobarbital/ß-naphthoflavone)
Experiment II: preincubation assay with non-induced hamster liver S9 mix
DURATION
- Preincubation period: Experiment II: 30° C for 30 up to 35 (strains TA 98, TA 100, WP2 uvrA) minutes
- Exposure duration: at least 48 hours
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 plates per strain and dose level, including the controls - Evaluation criteria:
- A test item is considered as a mutagen if a biologically relevant increase in the number of revertants exceeding the threshold of twice (strains TA 98, TA 100, WP2 uvrA) or thrice (strains TA 1535, TA 1537) the colony count of the corresponding solvent colony is observed.
A dose dependent increase is considered biologically relevant if the threshold is exceeded at more than one concentration.
An increase exceeding the threshold at only one concentration is judged as biologically relevant if reproduced in an independent second experiment.
A dose dependent increase in the number of revertant colonies below the thresshold is regarded as an indication of mutagenic potential if reproduced in an independent second experiment. however, whenever the colony counts remain within the historical range of negative annd solvent controls such as an increase is not considered biologically relevant. - Statistics:
- Arithmetic means and standard deviation of the counted colonies were calculated.
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: of the test item occured at concentrations of 1000 µg/plate and more. Nevertheless the colonies could be counted manually.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: there were no biologically relevant deviations - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
The test item did not exert mutagenic activity in the reverse bacterial mutation assay (plate incorporation assay and pre-incubation assay according to Prival) with and without metabolic activation. - Executive summary:
Mutagenic activity of the test item was investigated in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA98 and TA100 as well as Escherichia coli strain WP2 uvrA with (induced rat liver S9 mix) and without metabolic activation at concentrations of 3, 10, 33, 100, 333, 1000, 2500 and 5000 µg/plate using the plate incorporation assay. Due to the test items characteristic as an azo-dye the test was also conducted using the Prival modification, i.e. testing the above mentioned bacterial strains in the preincubation assay with uninduced hamster liver S9 mix for metabolic activation. This test was performed using the concentrations 33, 100, 333, 1000, 2500 and 5000 µg/plate.
The test item did not reveal any mutagenic activity under the conditions tested. The appropriate reference mutagenes showed distinct positive mutagenic effects.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro DNA damage and/or repair study
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: DNA damage and/or repair
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 25 MAR 1985 to 29 APR 1985
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions (e.g. no replication of study results, purity and compositions of test item not given)
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 482 (Genetic Toxicology: DNA Damage and Repair, Unscheduled DNA Synthesis in Mammalian Cells In Vitro)
- Deviations:
- not applicable
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- DNA damage and repair assay, unscheduled DNA synthesis in mammalian cells in vitro
- Species / strain / cell type:
- hepatocytes: rat
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 2, 10, 50, 250 µg/ml
- Vehicle / solvent:
- ethyl alcohol
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- N-dimethylnitrosamine
- Species / strain:
- hepatocytes: rat
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: At the concentrations of 500 and 1000 µg/ml strong precipitations of the test substance rendered impossible any microscopical evaluation of the specimens in the pretest. Therefore, 250 µg/ml was chosen as the highest concentration. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results:
negative
There was no evidence of induction of DNA damage by the test item under the given experimental conditions. - Executive summary:
The test item was tested for DNA-damaging effects on rat hepatocytes in vitro. The investigations were performed with concentrations of 2, 10, 50 and 250 µg/ml. Testing of higher concentrations was not possible, because higher concentrations caused strong precipitations which rendered the microscopical evaluation of the specimens impossible. There were no marked differences in the number of silver grains per nucleus in the vehicle control and in the cultures treated with the various concentrations of the test item. The results with the positive control substance were within the normal range.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro DNA damage and/or repair study
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: DNA damage and/or repair
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 16 APR 1985 to 7 MAY 1985
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions (e.g. no replication of study results, purity and composition of test item not given)
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 482 (Genetic Toxicology: DNA Damage and Repair, Unscheduled DNA Synthesis in Mammalian Cells In Vitro)
- Deviations:
- not applicable
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- DNA damage and repair assay, unscheduled DNA synthesis in mammalian cells in vitro
- Species / strain / cell type:
- other: human fibroblasts (CRL 1121)
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 2, 10, 50, 250 µg/ml
- Vehicle / solvent:
- ethyl alcohol
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- Species / strain:
- other: human fibroblasts (CRL 1121)
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: At the concentrations of 500 and 1000 µg/ml strong precipitations of the test substance rendered impossible any microscopical evaluation of the specimens in the pretest. Therefore, 250 µg/ml was chosen as the highest concentration. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
There was no evidence of induction of DNA damage by the test item under the given experimental conditions. - Executive summary:
The test item was tested for DNA-damaging effects on human fibroblasts in vitro. The investigations were performed with concentrations of 2, 10, 50 and 250 µg/ml. Testing of higher concentrations was not possible, because higher concentrations caused strong precipitations which rendered the microscopical evaluation of the specimens impossible. There were no marked differences in the number of silver grains per nucleus in the vehicle control and in the cultures treated with the various concentrations of the test item. The results with the positive control substance were within the normal range.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro DNA damage and/or repair study
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: DNA damage and/or repair
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- See read across jusitification document in chapter 13
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Type of assay:
- DNA damage and repair assay, unscheduled DNA synthesis in mammalian cells in vitro
- Vehicle / solvent:
- ethyl alcohol
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- other: human fibroblasts (CRL 1121)
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Endpoint:
- in vitro DNA damage and/or repair study
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- See read across justification document in chapter 13
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Species / strain / cell type:
- hepatocytes: rat
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- hepatocytes: rat
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Executive summary:
The test item was tested for DNA-damaging effects on rat hepatocytes in vitro. The investigations were performed with concentrations of 2, 10, 50 and 250 µg/ml. Testing of higher concentrations was not possible, because higher concentrations caused strong precipitations which rendered the microscopical evaluation of the specimens impossible. There were no marked differences in the number of silver grains per nucleus in the vehicle control and in the cultures treated with the various concentrations of the test item. The results with the positive control substance were within the normal range.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- year of publication: 1987
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor 1254-induced rat or hamster liver S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 100, 333, 1000, 3333, 10000 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: sodium azide (TA 1535, TA 100), 9-aminoacridine (TA 1537), 4-nitro-o-phenylenediamine (TA98)
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: preincubation
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20 minutes 37°C without shaking
- Exposure duration: 2 days
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 plates per strain and dose level, including the controls; experiments were repeated - Evaluation criteria:
- An individual trial was judged as:
- mutagenic: if dose-related increase over the corresponding solvent control was seen
- weakly mutagenic: if low-level dose response
- questionable: if dose-related increase was judged to be insufficiently high to be called weakly mutagenic or only a single dose was elevated or a non -dose-related increase was seen
A chemical was judged mutagenic, if it produced a reproducible, dose-related increase in revertants over the corresponding solvent control in replicate trials. - Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: was observed at all tested concentrations, the revertant colonies were counted manually - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results:
negative
The test item did not exert mutagenic activity in the reverse bacterial mutation assay (preincubation assay, also with Prival modification) with and without metabolic activation. - Executive summary:
Mutagenic activity of the test item was investigated in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA98 and TA100 with (Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver S9 mix or with Aroclor 1254-induced hamster liver S9 mix; i.e. modified Prival test) and without metabolic activation at concentrations of 100, 333, 1000, 3333 and 10000 µg/plate using the preincubation method.
The test item did not reveal any mutagenic activity under the conditions tested. The appropriate reference mutagenes showed distinct positive mutagenic effects.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- year of publication: 1984
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test: NTP-Chinese hamster Ovary Cell Cytogenetics
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix from Aroclor 1254-induced male Sprague Dawley rats
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 1.6, 5, 16, 50, 160 µg/ml without metabolic activation (highest concentration not evaluated)
0.5, 1.6, 5, 16, 50 µg/ml with metabolic activation (highest concentration not evaluated) - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- mitomycin C
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 8-12 h without metabolic activation; 2 h with metabolic activation
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 10 h (with metabolic activation)
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 2 h
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): up to 12 h
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): colcemid
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: no data
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 100 first-division metaphase cells; only 50 first-division metaphase cells for the second dose of the positive control Mitomycin C
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- "simple" aberrations: breaks and terminal deletions
- complex" aberrations: rearrangements and translocations
- "other" aberrations: pulverized cells, despiralized chromosomes, cells containing 10 or more aberrations
- Evaluation criteria:
- For a positive response the presence of a dose-response and the significance of the individual dose points compared to the vehicle control were mandatory.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results:
negative with metabolic activation
negative without metabolic activation
The test item Diarylanilide yellow did not induce chromosome aberrations under the conditions tested. - Executive summary:
Induction of chromosome aberrations by the test item has been investigated in Chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro in the presence (induced rat liver S9) and absence of metabolic activation. The test item did not induce chromosome aberrations in tests concentrations up to 16 µg/ml (with metabolic activation) or 50 µg/ml (without metabolic activation) under these test conditions.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- no data
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Mouse Lymphoma Study
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Target gene:
- thymidine kinase locus
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 from the livers of either Aroclor 1254-induced or non-induced male Fischer 344 rats
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0.0312, 0.0625, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5 µg/ml (Nonactivation Trial 1)
0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5 (Nonactivation Trial 2; Induced S9 Trial 1, 2, 3) - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: methylmethanesulfonate, ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 3-methylcholanthrene
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4 h
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 48 h
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 10-12 days
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): trifluorothymidine
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: all treatment levels within an experiment were performed in duplicate; experiments were performed twice (nonactivated) or in triplicate (S9)
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cloning efficiency - Statistics:
- statistical analysis for trend and peak responses
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results:
negative with metabolic activation
negative without metabolic activation
The test item did not induce mammalian cell gene mutations under the conditions tested. - Executive summary:
Induction of mammalian cell gene mutations in vitro has been investigated in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells in the presence (rat liver S9) and absence of metabolic activation. The test item did not induce gene mutations in concentrations up to 0.5 µg/ml under the tested conditions.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- Please refer to attached read across justification document (Chapter 13).
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- The toxicity potential of registration substance is assessed using analogue approach.
Interpretation of results:
negative
The test item did not exert mutagenic activity in the reverse bacterial mutation assay (preincubation assay, also with Prival modification) with and without metabolic activation. - Executive summary:
The toxicity potential of registration substance is assessed using analogue approach.
Mutagenic activity of the test item was investigated in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA98 and TA100 with (Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver S9 mix or with Aroclor 1254-induced hamster liver S9 mix; i.e. modified Prival test) and without metabolic activation at concentrations of 100, 333, 1000, 3333 and 10000 µg/plate using the preincubation method.
The test item did not reveal any mutagenic activity under the conditions tested. The appropriate reference mutagenes showed distinct positive mutagenic effects.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
[Please provide information for all of the points below. Indicate if further information is included as attachment to the same record, or elsewhere in the dataset (insert links in 'Cross-reference' table)]
1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
Please refer to attached read across justification document (Chapter 13).
2. SOURCE AND TARGET CHEMICAL(S) (INCLUDING INFORMATION ON PURITY AND IMPURITIES)
Please refer to attached read across document (Chapter 13).
3. ANALOGUE APPROACH JUSTIFICATION
Please refer to attached read across justification document (Chapter 13).
4. DATA MATRIX
Please refer to attached read across justification document (Chapter 13). - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- The toxicity potential of registration substance is assessed using analogue approach.
Interpretation of results:
negative with metabolic activation
negative without metabolic activation
The test item Diarylanilide yellow did not induce chromosome aberrations under the conditions tested. - Executive summary:
The toxicity potential of registration substance is assessed using analogue approach.
Induction of chromosome aberrations by the test item has been investigated in Chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro in the presence (induced rat liver S9) and absence of metabolic activation. The test item did not induce chromosome aberrations in tests concentrations up to 16 µg/ml (with metabolic activation) or 50 µg/ml (without metabolic activation) under these test conditions.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
[Please provide information for all of the points below. Indicate if further information is included as attachment to the same record, or elsewhere in the dataset (insert links in 'Cross-reference' table)]
1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
Please refer to attached read across justification document (Chapter 13).
2. SOURCE AND TARGET CHEMICAL(S) (INCLUDING INFORMATION ON PURITY AND IMPURITIES)
Please refer to attached read across document (Chapter 13).
3. ANALOGUE APPROACH JUSTIFICATION
Please refer to attached read across justification document (Chapter 13).
4. DATA MATRIX
Please refer to attached read across justification document (Chapter 13). - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results:
negative with metabolic activation
negative without metabolic activation
The toxicity potential of registration substance is assessed using analogue approach.
The test item did not induce mammalian cell gene mutations under the conditions tested. - Executive summary:
The toxicity potential of registration substance is assessed using analogue approach.
Induction of mammalian cell gene mutations in vitro has been investigated in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells in the presence (rat liver S9) and absence of metabolic activation. The test item did not induce gene mutations in concentrations up to 0.5 µg/ml under the tested conditions.
Referenceopen allclose all
The test item showed no mutagenic activity in both experiments (plate incorporation assay, preincubation assay) each with and without metabolic activation.
The test item did not increase the mean value of silver grains per nucleus in comparison to controls. The positive control substance (100 mM) yielded a marked increase in the mean value of silver grains per nucleus.
The test item did not increase the mean value of silver grains per nucleus in comparison to controls. The positive control substance (5 µM) yielded a marked increase in the mean value of silver grains per nucleus.
The test item showed no mutagenic activity in the preincubation test performed with modifications similar to Prival with (induced rat and hamster liver S9) and without metabolic activation.
Frequency of effects:
Without metabolic activation:
1, 1, 2, 2% cells with aberrations at 1.6, 5.0, 16 and 50 µg/ml, respectively; DMSO control: 1%
With metabolic activation:
2, 1, 4, 0% cells with aberrations at 0,5, 1.6, 5.0 and 16 µg/ml, respectively; DMSO control: 1%
- results without metabolic activation were negative in two replicates, the tested concentrations were non-toxic
Trial 1 (mean mutant frequency): 36, 40, 44, 40 and 46 at 0.03, 0.06, 0.125, 0.25 and 0.5 µg/ml; DMSO control: 31
Trial 2 (mean mutant frequency): 30, 30, 45, 38 and 37 at 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 µg/ml; DMSO control: 30
- with metabolic activation one trial revealed increased mutant frequencies at concentrations >/= 0.2 µg/ml in comparison to the vehicle control, but without dose response relationship; in two further trials negative responses were observed
Trial 1 (mean mutant frequency): 25, 61, 68, 69 and 62 at 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 µg/ml; DMSO control: 30
Trial 2 (mean mutant frequency): 48, 57, 62, 61 and 60 at 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 µg/ml; DMSO control: 54
Trial 3 (mean mutant frequency): 79, 68, 76, 94 and 88 at 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 µg/ml; DMSO control: 71
- solvent and positve controls were within the normal range
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
No classification
The test item did no show any potential for mutagenicity or DNA damage.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.