Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 284-325-5 | CAS number: 84852-15-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
Description of key information
Brooke (1993a) presented results for the preferred species, Daphnia magna, of 48hr LC50 (survival) = 0.085 mg/L nonylphenol. Test was performed according to ASTM 1991 E729-88a Standard guide for conducting acute toxicity tests with fishes, macroinvertebrates, and amphibians.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water invertebrates
Fresh water invertebrates
- Effect concentration:
- 0.085 mg/L
Marine water invertebrates
Marine water invertebrates
- Effect concentration:
- 0.051 mg/L
Additional information
Several aquatic studies with nonylphenol short-term exposure of 48 and 96 hours to aquatic invertebrates were found reliable. The reliable data included the preferred test species Daphnia magna and four other freshwater taxa with reported L(E)C50endpoints based on survival, immobility, and molting frequency, plus six marine taxa with L(E)C50 concentrations based on survival. The range of L(E)C50concentrations for freshwater organism exposure (48-hr) was 0.02 mg nonylphenol.L for Ceriodaphnia cornuta (Hong et al., 2007) to 0.47 mg nonylphenol/L for Ceriodaphnia dubia (Ankley et al., 1993) for survival and immobility, and up to 0.596 mg nonylphenol/L for loss of equilibrium after 96 hr exposure to Ophiogomphus sp. (Brooke 1993a). The L(E)C50values reported for the preferred test species Daphnia magna ranged from a single report of 0.085 mg nonylphenol/L based on survival (Brooke 1993) to nearly equal values of 0.13 to 0.19 mg nonylphenol/L based on immobility reported in four other studies (Hϋls 1992, Hirano et al., 2007, Comber et al., 1993, and Brennan et al., 2006). The range of effects on survival for marine species ranged from a 48 hr LC(E)50concentration of 0.03 mg nonylphenol/L for Mulinia lateralis to 0.2 mg nonylphenol/L at 96 hr exposure to Dyspanopeus sayi (Lussier et al., 2000).
Key studies selected for aquatic invertebrate exposure to nonylphenol were Hϋls (1992) and Brooke (1993a). Both studies provided toxicity information for the preferred species Daphnia magna, with Brooke (1993a) showing the lower end of the concentration range for survival (0.085 mg nonylphenol/L) and Hϋls (1992) reporting a value of 0.14 mg nonylphenol/L for immobility that was consistent with the findings of Hirano et al., (2004),Comber et al., (1993), andBrennan et al., (2006). In the interpretation of the results reported byHirano et al., (2004),Comber et al., (1993), and Brennan et al., (2006) the use of the term survival versus immobility as test endpoints could not be distinguished and were considered an equivalent determination of lethality. Results reported by Hong et al. (2007) implicate Ceriodaphnia cornuta (48 hr survival LC50of 0.02 mg nonylphenol/L) may be more sensitive to nonylphenol exposure than the preferred test species Daphnia magna, but it was difficult to confirm as there were no other reliable data available for C. cornutaas an individual taxon. However, test results for Ceriodaphnia dubia exposure to nonylphenol (Isidori et al., 2006 and Ankley et al., 1990) do not implicate the Ceriodaphnia genus to be more sensitive than Daphnia magna. Results of the Lussier et al., (2000) study conicide with results of Hirano et al., (2004) and Ward and Boeri (1990) suggest marine invertebrates may generally be more sensitive to the toxic effects of nonylphenol than freshwater invertebrates.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.