Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 242-362-4 | CAS number: 18479-58-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2009-11-10 to 2010-03-18
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 010
- Report date:
- 2010
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- No. 440/2008 of 30 May 2008
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2,6-dimethyloct-7-en-2-ol
- EC Number:
- 242-362-4
- EC Name:
- 2,6-dimethyloct-7-en-2-ol
- Cas Number:
- 18479-58-8
- Molecular formula:
- C10H20O
- IUPAC Name:
- 2,6-dimethyloct-7-en-2-ol
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- Thymidine kinase heterozygous system, TK +/- to TK -/- conversion
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- L5178Y TK +/- 3.7.2c mouse lymphoma cell line, obtained from Dr. J. Cole of the MRC Cell Mutation Unit, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Rat liver microsomal S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Preliminary Toxicity Test:
0, 6.09, 12.19, 24.38, 48.75, 97.5, 195, 390, 780, 1560 µg/mL
Main Experiment, 4-Hour, Without S9:
0, 12.5, 25, 50, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200 µg/mL
Main Experiment, 4-Hour, With S9:
0, 25, 50, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 250 µg/mL
Main Experiment, 24-Hours, Without S9:
0, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150 µg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- Dimethyl sulfoxide
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- Without S9 activation: Sigma batch 1419706 and 15108051 at 400 µg/mL (4 hour) and 150 µg/mL (24-hour)
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- With S9 activation: Acros batch A0164185 at 2 µg/mL
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Cell Culture
Cells were stored in liquid nitrogen at -196°C. Cells were cultured at 37°C with 5% CO2 in air in RPMI 1640 medium with Glutamax-1 and HEPES buffer (20 mM) supplemented with Penicillin (100 units/mL), Streptomycin (100 μg/mL), Sodium pyruvate (1 mM), Amphotericin B (2.5 μg/ml) and 10% donor horse serum (giving R10 media). Cells had a generation time of approximately 12 hours and were sub-cultured accordingly. RPMI 1640 with 20% donor horse serum (R20) and without serum (R0) were used during the course of the study. Master cultures of stock cells were checked and found to be mycoplasma free.
Preparation of test and control materials
The test material was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and the appropriate dilutions were made. The maximum dose level investigated in the preliminary toxicity test was 1560 μg/mL which was equivalent to approximately 10 mM. Analysis for concentration, homogeneity and stability of the test material preparations were not a requirement of the test method and were therefore not performed.
Vehicle and positive controls were used in parallel with the test material. Solvent (DMSO) treatment groups were used as the vehicle controls. Ethylmethanesulphonate (EMS) at 400 μg/mL and 150 μg/mL for the 4-hour and 24-hour exposures respectively, was used as the positive control in the absence of metabolic activation. Cyclophosphamide (CP) 2 μg/ml was used as the positive control in the presence of metabolic activation.
Preliminary toxicity test
A preliminary toxicity test was performed on cell cultures at 5 x 10^5 cells/mL, using a 4-hour exposure time both with and without metabolic activation (S9), and at 1.5 x 10^5 cells/mL using a 24-hour exposure without S9. The dose range used in the preliminary toxicity test was 6.09 to 1560 μg/mL for all three of the exposure groups. Following the exposure period the cells were washed twice with R10, resuspended in R20 medium, counted using a coulter counter and then serially diluted to 2 x 10^5 cells/mL.
The cultures were incubated and sub-cultured after 24 hours by counting and diluting to 2 x 10^5 cells/mL. After a further 24 hours, the cultures were counted and then discarded. The cell counts were then used to calculate Suspension Growth values (SG). The SG values were then adjusted to account for immediate post treatment toxicity, and a comparison of each treatment SG value to the concurrent vehicle control performed to give a % Relative Suspension Growth Value (%RSG).
Results from the preliminary toxicity test were used to set the test material dose levels for the mutagenicity experiment. Maximum dose levels were selected using the following criteria:
i) Maximum recommended dose level, 5000 μg/ml or 10 mM.
ii) The presence of excessive precipitate where no test material-induced toxicity was observed.
iii) Test material-induced toxicity, where the maximum dose level used should produce 10 to 20% survival (the maximum level of toxicity required).
Mutagenicity test (main test)
4-Hour exposures, with and without metabolic activation
An exponentially growing stock culture of cells was set up to provide an excess of cells on the morning of the experiment. The cells were counted and processed to give 1 x 10^6 cells/ml in 10 mL aliquots in R10 medium in sterile plastic universals. The treatments were performed in duplicate (A + B), both with and without metabolic activation (S9-mix) at eight dose levels of the test material (12.5 to 200 μg/mL in the absence of metabolic activation, and 25 to 250 μg/mL in the presence of metabolic activation), vehicle and positive controls. To each universal was added 2 mL of S9-mix if required, 0.2 mL of the treatment dilutions, (0.2 mL for the positive control) and sufficient R0 medium to bring the total volume to 20 mL.
The treatment vessels were incubated at 37°C for 4 hours with continuous shaking using an orbital shaker within an incubated hood.
24-Hour exposures, without metabolic activation
Cells were counted and processed (as above) to give 0.3 x 10^6 cells/mL in 10 mL duplicate cultures established in 25 cm2 tissue culture flasks. To each culture was added 2 mL of the treatment dilutions (0.2 mL for the positive control) and sufficient R10 medium to give a final volume of 20 mL. The dose range of the test material was 6.25 to 150 μg/mL. The treatment vessels were incubated at 37°C with continuous shaking using an orbital shaker for 24 hours.
Cell processing following treatment periods
At the end of the treatment periods for each experiment, the cells were washed twice using R10 medium then resuspended in R20 medium at a cell density of 2 x 10^5 cells/mL. The cultures were incubated and subcultured every 24 hours for the expression period of two days, by counting and dilution to 2 x 10^5 cells/mL.
On Day 2 of the experiment, the cells were counted, diluted to 10^4 cells/mL and plated for mutant frequency (2000 cells/well) in selective medium containing 4 μg/mL 5-trifluorothymidine (TFT) in 96-well microtitre plates. Cells were also diluted to 10 cells/mL and plated (2 cells/well) for viability (%V) in non-selective medium. The daily cell counts were used to obtain a Relative Suspension Growth (%RSG) value that gives an indication of post treatment toxicity during the expression period as a comparison to the vehicle control, and when combined with the Viability (%V) data a Relative Total Growth (RTG) value.
Plate scoring
Microtitre plates were scored using a magnifying mirror box after ten to fourteen days incubation. The number of positive wells (wells with colonies) was recorded together with the total number of scorable wells (normally 96 per plate). The numbers of small and large colonies seen in the TFT mutation plates were also recorded. Colonies were scored manually by eye using qualitative judgment. Large colonies were defined as those covering approximately ¼ to ¾ of the surface of the well and were generally no more than one or two cells thick. As a rule of thumb, all colonies less than 25% of the average area of the large colonies were scored as small colonies. Small colonies were normally observed to be more than two cells thick. To assist the scoring of the TFT mutant colonies 0.025 ml of MTT solution (2.5 mg/mL in PBS) was added to each well of the mutation plates. The plates were incubated for approximately two hours. the MTT vital stain was taken up by viable cells to give a brown/black color, thus aiding the visualization of the mutant colonies, particularly the small colonies. - Evaluation criteria:
- The normal range for mutant frequency per survivor is 50-200 x 10^-6 for the TK+/- locus in L5178Y cells at this testing laboratory. Vehicle control results should ideally be within this range, although minor errors in cell counting and dilution or exposure to the metabolic activation system may cause this to be slightly elevated. Experiments where the vehicle control values are markedly greater than 250 x 10^-6 mutant frequency per survivor are not normally acceptable and will be repeated. Positive control chemicals should induce at least three to five fold increases in mutant frequency greater than the corresponding vehicle control.
For a test material to demonstrate a mutagenic response it must produce a statistically significant increase in the induced mutant frequency (IMF) over the concurrent vehicle mutant frequency value. A Global Evaluation Factor (GEF) value was set following International Workshop (Moore et al., 2003; Moore et al, 2006) at 126 x 10^-6 for the microwell method. Therefore any test material dose level that has a mutation frequency value that is greater than the corresponding vehicle control by the GEF of 126 x 10^-6 will be considered positive. However, if a test material produces a modest increase in mutant frequency, which only marginally exceeds the GEF value and is not reproducible or part of a dose-related response, then it may be considered to have no toxicological significance. Conversely, when a test material induces modest reproducible increases in the mutation frequencies that do not exceed the GEF value then scientific judgment will be applied. If the reproducible responses are significantly dose-related and include increases in the absolute numbers of mutant colonies then they may be considered to be toxicologically significant. - Statistics:
- Small significant increases designated by the UKEMS statistical package will be reviewed using the above criteria, and may be disregarded at the Study Director's discretion.
Robinson W D et al (1989) Statistical evaluation of bacterial/mammalian fluctuation tests. In: Statistical Evaluation of Mutagenicity Test Data, UKEMS sub-committee on guidelines for mutagenicity testing (Kirkland D J Ed.), Cambridge University Press Report part III, pp102-140.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- The maximum dose level used was limited by test material toxicity.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- Preliminary toxicity test
The results for Relative Suspension Growth (%RSG) are as shown in Table 1:
A precipitate of the test material was observed at and above 195 μg/mL in the 4-hour exposure group in the absence of metabolic activation, and at and above 390 μg/ml in both the 4-hour exposure group in the presence of metabolic activation and the 24-hour exposure group in the absence of metabolic activation. The precipitate was observed to become greasy and oily in appearance at 1560 μg/mL in both of the 4-hour exposure groups.
Mutagenicity test results
4-Hour exposures with and without metabolic activation (Table 2):
There was evidence of toxicity following exposure to the test material in both the absence and presence of metabolic activation, as indicated by the %RSG and RTG values. There was no evidence of any significant reductions in (%V) viability in either the absence or presence of metabolic activation, therefore indicating that no residual toxicity had occurred. Near optimum levels of toxicity were achieved in the absence of metabolic activation. Optimum levels of toxicity were not achieved in either the absence or presence of metabolic activation due to the sharp onset of toxicity, despite using a very narrow dose interval. However, a dose level that exceeded the usual acceptable upper limit of toxicity was plated for viability and TFT resistance for each of the exposure groups. It was therefore considered that with no evidence of any toxicologically significant increases in mutant frequency at any of the dose levels, including the dose levels that exceeded the usual upper limit of acceptable toxicity, or in the 24-hour exposure group where optimum levels of toxicity were achieved, the test material had been adequately tested. The excessive toxicity observed at 200 μg/mL in the absence of metabolic activation, and at 250 μg/mL in the presence of metabolic activation, resulted in these doses not being plated for viability or 5-TFT resistance. Acceptable levels of toxicity were seen with both positive control substances.
24-Hour exposure without metabolic activation (Table 3):
As was seen in the Preliminary Toxicity Test, there was evidence of a marked reduction in % RSG and RTG values in cultures dosed with the test material. There was also evidence of a modest reduction in (%V) viability, therefore indicating that residual toxicity had occurred. Optimum levels of test material-induced toxicity were achieved. The positive control induced acceptable levels of toxicity.
The 24-hour exposure without metabolic activation (S9) treatment, demonstrated that the extended time point had an effect on the toxicity of the test material. The vehicle control mutant frequency value was within the acceptable range of 50 to 200 x 10^-6 viable cells. The positive control produced marked increases in the mutant frequency per viable cell indicating that the test system was operating satisfactorily.
The test material induced a small statistically significant dose related (linear-trend) in the mutant frequency x 10^-6 per viable cell (Table 9). However, statistically significant increases in mutant frequency were not observed at any of the individual dose levels, the GEF was not exceeded at any of the individual dose levels, and the mutant frequency values observed were within the acceptable range for vehicle controls. Therefore, the response was considered to be spurious and of no toxicological significance. Precipitate of the test material was not observed at any of the dose levels.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Preliminary Toxicity Test Results
Dose (mg/mL) | % RSG (-S9) 4-Hour Exposure | %RSG (+ S9) 4-Hour Exposure | %RSG (-S9) 24-Hour Exposure |
|
|
|
|
0 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
6.09 | 93 | 103 | 94 |
12.19 | 87 | 116 | 81 |
24.38 | 87 | 111 | 80 |
48.75 | 90 | 103 | 62 |
97.5 | 84 | 101 | 34 |
195 | 0 | 28 | 0 |
390 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
780 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1560 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
|
|
|
Table 2: Experimental Results
4-Hour Test Without S9 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Treatment (mg/mL) | %RSG | RTG | MF |
|
|
|
|
0 | 100 | 1.00 | 118.34 |
12.5* | 95 |
|
|
25 | 92 | 1.16 | 91.83 |
50 | 88 | 1.05 | 101.08 |
100 | 84 | 0.99 | 104.88 |
125 | 73 | 0.81 | 120.90 |
150 | 37 | 0.38 | 122.92 |
175** | 1 | 0.03 | 143.07 |
200*** | 0 | - | - |
Linear trend |
|
| NS |
EMS |
|
|
|
400 | 74 | 0.60 | 684.79 |
4-Hour Test With S9 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
0 | 100 | 1.00 | 149.96 |
12.5* | 92 |
|
|
25 | 90 | 0.98 | 91.37 |
50 | 83 | 0.88 | 147.57 |
100 | 83 | 0.97 | 150.12 |
125 | 77 | 0.81 | 106.33 |
150 | 50 | 0.50 | 116.61 |
175** | 9 | 0.12 | 111.16 |
200* | 0 | - | - |
Linear trend |
|
| NS |
CP |
|
|
|
2 | 48 | 0.24 | 781.04 |
* Not plated for viability or 5-TFT resistence.
** Treatment excluded from statistics due to toxicity.
Table 3: Experimental Results
24-Hour Test Without S9 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Treatment (mg/mL) | %RSG | RTG | MF |
|
|
|
|
0 | 100 | 1.00 | 115.95 |
6.25* | 104 |
|
|
12.5 | 108 | 0.92 | 91.35 |
25 | 99 | 0.96 | 98.55 |
50 | 71 | 0.66 | 121.85 |
75 | 46 | 0.43 | 101.71 |
100 | 30 | 0.16 | 149.79 |
125 | 11 | 0.10 | 158.82 |
150* | 2 | - | - |
Linear trend |
|
| p < 0.05 |
EMS |
|
|
|
150 | 66 | 0.45 | 1007.15 |
* Not plated for viability or 5-TFT resistence.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The test material did not induce any toxicologically significant increases in the mutant frequency at the TK +/- locus in L5178Y cells and was not considered to be mutagenic under the conditions of the test.
- Executive summary:
The GLP compliant study was conducted according to a method that was designed to assess the potential mutagenicity of the test material on the thymidine kinase, TK +/-, locus of the L5178Y mouse lymphoma cell line. The method used meets the requirements of the OECD (476), Method B17 of Commission Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008 of 30 May 2008. One main experiment was performed. In this main experiment, L5178Y TK +/- 3.7.2c mouse lymphoma cells (heterozygous at the thymidine kinase locus) were treated with the test material at eight dose levels, in duplicate, together with vehicle (DMSO) and positive controls. The exposure groups used were as follows: 4-hour exposures both with and without metabolic activation, and 24 hours without metabolic activation. The dose range of test material was selected following the results of a preliminary toxicity test and was 12.5 to 200 |jg/ml for the 4-hour exposure group in the absence of metabolic activation, 25 to 250 |jg/ml for the 4-hour exposure group in the presence of metabolic activation, and 6.25 to 150 \ig/m\ for the 24-hour exposure group in the absence of metabolic activation. The maximum dose level used was limited by test material-induced toxicity. Precipitate of test material was not observed at any of the dose levels in the Mutagenicity Test. The vehicle (solvent) controls had acceptable mutant frequency values that were within the normal range for the L5178Y cell line at the TK +/- locus. The positive control materials induced marked increases in the mutant frequency indicating the satisfactory performance of the test and of the activity of the metabolising system. The test material did not induce any toxicologically significant dose-related increases in the mutant frequency at any dose level, either with or without metabolic activation, in any of the three exposure groups. The test material was considered to be non-mutagenic to L5178Y cells under the conditions of the test.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.