Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-849-9 | CAS number: 75-21-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Neurotoxicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- neurotoxicity: chronic inhalation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 996
Materials and methods
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The present study of oxide neurotoxicity was one component of a more comprehensive evaluation of the chronic inhalation toxicity of EtO and PO.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Ethylene oxide
- EC Number:
- 200-849-9
- EC Name:
- Ethylene oxide
- Cas Number:
- 75-21-8
- Molecular formula:
- C2H4O
- IUPAC Name:
- oxirane
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Physical appearance: gas
- Purity: 99.7%
Test animals
- Species:
- monkey
- Strain:
- Macaca fascicularis
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Mean body weight: 5.26 kg for the control group, 5.39 kg for 50 ppm, 5.21 kg for for 100 ppm.
Animals were housed in stainless steel primate cages and provided with Purina monkey chow once a day and water ad libitum.
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- inhalation
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 months
- Frequency of treatment:
- 7 h/day, 5 d/weeks
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 50 ppm (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 ppm (nominal)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 12
- Control animals:
- yes, sham-exposed
Examinations
- Observations and clinical examinations performed and frequency:
- Body weight measurement, MCV testing, electroencephalograms, neuropathology
Results and discussion
Results of examinations
- Details on results:
- Body Weight: Following the initiation of exposures, the mean weights of all five groups declined below base line. With the exception of the EtO 100 group, mean weights recovered to baseline levels within 5-13 weeks. Results in the 50 ppm EtO group did not differ statistically from
those found in the control group, with each group showing a 12.0% increase in mean body weight over the two years of exposure. The 100 ppm EtO group, however, did not recover but remained at about 95% of baseline weight throughout the exposure period. By week 25, the EtO group weight was significantly lower than controls and remained lower throughout the phase 1. This decreased mean weight relative to controls continued in the animals that were retained during the subsequent 7-year-observation period (phase 2).
MCV: There was no significant difference between oxide exposure groups and controls. For two animals in the 100 ppm EtO group, however, a large reduction in sciatic MCV was found after 12 months of exposure. These two animals had normal MCVs of 59.2 and 73.7 m/s at the onset of the study, but these MCVs declined below 40 m/s by the end of 12 months. These MCVs remained stable at this level for the remaining 12 months of exposure. The multivariate analyses of MCVs in EtO-exposed animals were: sciatic-tibial nerve and ulnar nerve. MCV data obtained from ten monkeys in phase 2 (at the end of study year) were not statistically significant for either the sciatic nerve or the ulnar nerve.
Peak-to-peak amplitude in response to nerve stimulation was also unaffected by the exposures and did not differ among exposure conditions in phases 1 and 2 of the study. No univariate analyses were performed for individual sessions because the multivariate analyses were not significant.
Electroencephalograms: EtO exposure resulted in no detectable between-group effects on EEG; however, RMS power declined in all groups over the first 12 months of exposure. The percentages of delta, theta, alpha and beta EEG activities did not vary significantly from session to session or between groups as assessed by a multivariate analysis. A similar lack of effect was found for RMS power. An analysis of occipital lead EEGs also found no group differences.
Neuropathology (Phase 1): As the total ionic strength of the fixative was twice that of the intracellular sodium ion concentration, the perfusate was hypertonic, resulting in perfusion fixation artifacts. The artifacts mimicked demyelination in peripheral nerve sections and therefore precluded interpretation of that tissue. However, spinal cord and brain tissues were not compromised. Evaluations of spinal cord, cerebral white matter, cortex, nuclei, and tracts were conducted using a single-blind procedure by neuropathologists at the Midwest Research Institute, Kansas City, Missouri. Lesions of indicating axonal dystrophy, as defined by Pentschew and Schwartz (1962) and Cowen and Olmstead (1963), were present in the area of the medulla oblongata, restricted to the nucleus gracilis of the oxide-exposed animals, but not the controls. Axonal bodies in the nudeus gracilis were counted on each side. Severity of the lesion was graded according to Sung (1964), based on the work of Fujisawa (1967) as follows: (1) negative/trace (0-1 body in one nuclear area only); (2) slight (1-5 bodies in each nuclear area); (3) moderate (6-10 bodies), or (4) severe (>11 bodies in each nuclear area). Using this grading scheme, results for each of the two animals for the various exposure and control conditions were: 50 ppm EtO, slight, severe; 100 ppm EtO, negative, slight. One control animal was rated negative/trace, and the other control animal had no axonal bodies. In addition, demyelination in the extreme distal portion of the fasciculus gracilis was found in two EtO monkeys, one from each exposure group. Statistical analyses of these data were not conducted because of the small sample sizes.
Neuropathology (Phase 2): The foIlow-up neuropathology assessments were conducted by Experimental Pathology Laboratories, Incorporated, Hemdon, Virginia, seyen years after the exposure terminated. Microscopic grading of axonal bodies in the nucleus gracilis were the same as those employed by the Midwest Research Institute. The results were: 50 ppm EtO, slight, moderate; 100 ppm EtO, slight, moderate; controls, slight, moderate.
Effect levels
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEC
- Effect level:
- 50 ppm
- Based on:
- test mat.
Target system / organ toxicity
- Critical effects observed:
- no
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Multiple axonal bodies were found in the nucleus gracilis in seven of eight oxide-exposed animals, and demyelination was found in two monkeys exposed to ethylene oxide. In contrast, a single axonal body was found in one of the two sham-control monkeys. However, the lack of a dose-response relationship suggests that this effect may not be related to oxide exposure. In a follow-up study, nerve conduction velocity and neuropathology were assessed in the remaining monkeys seven years after exposure terminated, but again, treatment-related effects could not be detected.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.