Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

In a skin sensitisation Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) according to OECD TG 429 using the substance oligomerisation and alkylation reaction products of 2-phenylpropene and phenol (OAPP), a SI of 2.68 was observed for the 3 % preparation. SI for the 30 % preparation was 16.35. An EC3 of 3.63 % was determined by linear interpolation between the 3 % and 30 % data points. Based on this data, OAPP is considered to be a moderate skin sensitiser.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.42 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Novares LA 300 (phenol, methylstyrenated)
- Lot/batch No.: 28166
- Composition of test material: composition is specified in IUCLID Sect. 13 - Assessment reports under Certificate of Analysis_Novares LA 300_phenol, methylstyrenated
- Stability under test conditions: no measured data; based on chemical structure assumed to be stable
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature, exclusion of light
Species:
mouse
Strain:
Balb/c
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Breeding farm VELAZ s.r.o., Koleč u Kladna, Czech Republic
- Age at study initiation: 8 - 10 wks
- Weight at study initiation: 17 - 19 g
- Housing: macrolon cages
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 +- 3
- Humidity (%): 30 – 70
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12

Vehicle:
other: DAE 433
Concentration:
mixture of 40% dimethylacetamide, 30% acetone and 30% ethanol
No. of animals per dose:
5
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:
- Compound solubility: dispersion
- Irritation: no
- Lymph node proliferation response: not examined


MAIN STUDY
ANIMAL ASSIGNMENT AND TREATMENT
- Criteria used to consider a positive response:
Stimulation index (SI) is ≥ 3
Response increases in dose-related manner
Criteria for irritation potential: individual and mean ear weight


TREATMENT PREPARATION AND ADMINISTRATION:
Days 1-3: 25 µL test suspension in DAE 433 , 1x on day 1, 2, and 3
Days 4 and 5: no treatment
Day 6: Injection of 250 μL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 7.5 x105 Bq (c. 21 µCi) of 3H-methyl thymidine
into all test and control mice via the tail vein. Five hours later, the animals were killed.



Positive control substance(s):
other: DNCB (dinitrochlorbenzene, 0.5% (w/v) solution)
Statistics:
Non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test, and then the non-parametric two-group Mann-Whitney rank test (probability level 0.05) was applied to all two-group comparisons [using software Statgraphic ® Centurion (version XV, USA)].
Key result
Parameter:
EC3
Value:
3.63
Parameter:
SI
Value:
2.36
Test group / Remarks:
0.3% test substance in vehicle; 5 animals
Parameter:
SI
Value:
2.68
Test group / Remarks:
3% test substance in vehicle; 5 animals
Parameter:
SI
Value:
16.35
Test group / Remarks:
30% test substance in vehicle; 5 animals

Table 1: Individual and mean radioactivity in cell suspensions (Report Table 4)

Activity (DPM)

Animal No.

NC

(1-5)

PC

(6-10)

30%

(11-15)

3%

(16-20)

0.3%

(21-25)

1

550.98

11374.69

9354.53

1425.77

1232.24

2

485.39

10401.94

9984.31

1475.60

1484.48

3

568.93

10347.82

11634.71

1367.08

1128.80

4

526.30

8837.38

9107.79

1301.28

1222.94

5

596.74

9493.34

4517.77

1748.67

1091.42

 Group

mean

545.67

10091.03

8919.82

1463.68

1231.98

SI

1.00

18.49

16.35

2.68

2.26

NC = vehicle control; PC = positive control

Table 2: Individual and average ear weights (Report Table 5)

Weight of ear biopsies (milligrams)

Animal No.

NC

(1-6)

PC

(7-12)

30%

(13-18)

3%

(19-24)

0.3%

(25-30)

1

24.5

27.4

32.7

25.0

21.8

2

25.2

27.5

28.4

23.0

23.1

3

23.8

26.5

34.2

21.4

21.4

 4

23.4

26.7

29.4

21.5

21.0

5

24.7

27.2

41.2

21.7

25.0

 Group mean

24.32

27.06*

33.18*

22.52

22.46

SD

0.72

0.44

5.07

1.53

1.62

NC = vehicle control; PC = positive control

* statistically significant with p =< 0.05, Mann-Whitney test

Table 3:  Summary table (Report Table 6)

Group

Radioisotope incorporation

in lymph nodes

Ear weight

Mean DPM

SI

Mean (mg)

NC

545.67

1.0

24.32

PC

10091.03

18.49+

27.06

30%

8919.82

16.35+

33.18

3%

1463.68

2.68

22.52

0.3%

1231.98

2.26

22.46

Bold figures with + = values >= 3

Interpretation of results:
Category 1B (indication of skin sensitising potential) based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
In this LLNA according to OECD TG 429, an EC3 of 3.63 was determined for the substance oligomerisation and alkylation reaction products of 1-phenylpropene and phenol. Resulting EU/GHS classification is skin sensitising Cat. 1B (EC3 > 2).
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (sensitising)
Additional information:

In a mouse local lymph node assay according to OECD TG 429 performed under GLP conditions using 0.3, 3, and 30 % preparations of the test substance in vehicle (mixture of 40 % dimethylacetamide, 30 % acetone, and 30 % ethanol), an increase of the Stimulation Index (SI) for the test groups over controls was observed (SI = 2.26, 2.68, and 16.35). For a concentration of 30 % the SI was > 3 demonstrating a sensitising response of the test animals following the treatment with test substance. The mean ear weight was below (0.3 and 3 % test group, 22.46 and 22.52 mg, respectively) and above (30 % test group = 33.18 mg) the ear weight of the controls (24.32 mg). The SI > 3 for the 30 % test group indicates a sensitising potential for OAPP (Brabnikova/VUOS 2010). An EC3 of 3.63 can be calculated by linear interpolation between the data points 3 % and 30 % indicating a moderate skin sensitising potential.

Based on the positive results of the mouse LLNA (Brabnikova/VUOS 2010), OAPP is rated as a potential contact allergen.

Respiratory sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Additional information:

There is no data for respiratory sensitisation.

Justification for classification or non-classification

The substance oligomerisation and reaction products of 2-phenylpropene and phenol showed a skin sensitising effect in a mouse LLNA test. EC3 was determined to be > 2% (3.63%). According to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, the substance is classified as skin sensitising Cat 1B, H317.

There is no data to support respiratory sensitisation as such. No classification is required under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.