Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP-report according to guideline.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2002

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2,4,6-triallyloxy-1,3,5-triazine
EC Number:
202-936-7
EC Name:
2,4,6-triallyloxy-1,3,5-triazine
Cas Number:
101-37-1
Molecular formula:
C12H15N3O3
IUPAC Name:
tris(prop-2-en-1-yloxy)-1,3,5-triazine

Method

Target gene:
not applicable
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
lymphocytes: human, healthy donors without medication
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
liver S9-mix of Aroclor 1254 induced rats
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
0, 31.25, 62.5, 125, 250, 500 µg/mL
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The solvent was chosen according to its solubility properties and its non-toxicity for the cells.
Controlsopen allclose all
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
DMSO 1% (v/v)
True negative controls:
not specified
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
mitomycin C
Remarks:
without metabolic activation

Migrated to IUCLID6: 0.1 or 0.2 µg/mL
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
DMSO 1% (v/v)
True negative controls:
not specified
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
cyclophosphamide
Remarks:
with metabolic activation

Migrated to IUCLID6: 10 or 20 µg/ mL
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium

DURATION
- Preincubation period: 48 h
- Exposure duration: 4 h or 24 h without metabolic activation, 4 h with metabolic activation
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 22 h



SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): colcemid 0.9 µg/mL
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa stain


NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: two cultures each two slide preparations


NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 100 metaphase per slide were evaluated


DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index


OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: yes
Evaluation criteria:
Comparison of the number of chromosome aberrations of the samples with those of the solvent control. Total number of cells with aberrations exclusive of gap damage are analysed.
evaluation criteria:
The test is regarded to have a positive result, if the number of chromosomal aberrations is significantly increased (p<=0.05) compared with the solvent control, this increase is dose-dependent and both duplicate cultures lead to the same results. The increase should not occur in the severly cytotoxic range (mitotic index < 0.25).
Statistics:
Fisher-test (p<= 0.05)

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
lymphocytes: human, healthy donors without medication
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
125 µg/ mL 24 h exposure, 250 µg/ mL 4 h exposure
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not specified
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: other: human peripheral lymphocytes
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Treatment

µg/mL

S9-mix

4 h exposure

24 h exposure

Mitotic index#

number of metaphases scored

% of cells with aberrations excluding gaps

Mitotic index#

number of metaphases scored

% of cells with aberrations excluding gaps

DMSO

-

-

1.00

200

1.5

1.00

200

2.0

test substance

31.25

-

-

-

-

0.86

200

2.5

62.5

-

0.92

200

1.5

0.55

200

3.5

125

-

1.27

200

1.5

0.47

164#

3.7

250

-

0.58

183#

4.5

0.28

35#

3.2

500

-

0.43

101#

5.2

-

-

-

Mitomycin C

0.2

-

0.62

200

12.0*

0.55

200

13.0*

the following concentrations were not evaluated:

31.25 µg/ mL (4 h exposure), 500 µg/ mL ( 24 h exposure) 0.1 µg mitomycin C (4 and 24 h exposure)

Treatment

µg/mL

S9-mix

4 h exposure

Mitotic index#

number of metaphases scored

% of cells with aberrations excluding gaps

DMSO

-

+

1.00

200

1.0

test substance

31.25

+

-

-

-

62.5

+

0.77

200

2.0

125

+

1.62

200

1.0

250

+

0.40

183#

4.5

500

+

0.13

11#

0.0

Cyclophosphamide

10

+

0.63

200

10.5*

the following concentrations were not evaluated:

31.25 µg/ mL, 20 µg/ mL cyclophosphamide

#          mitotic index: number of metaphases/ 1000 cells: negative control = 1.00
##        no more metaphase of sufficient quality for evaluation due to cytotoxicity of Triallylcyanurate
*          significantly different from negative control (p=0.05)

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative