Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-936-7 | CAS number: 101-37-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 2.12 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 25
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 52.89 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- According to predictions obtained from the Danish (Q)SAR database (2009), gastrointestinal absorption is presumed to be 100 %. The inhalative absorption is considered to be in the same order of magnitude as the oral absorption. Therefore no additional factor is applied for differences between the oral and inhalative intake.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose response relationship is considered unremarkable.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- Default conversion AF subchronic to chronic exposure.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Respiratory interspecies differences are fully covered by the factors used for route to route extrapolation.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- There is no evidence for species differences in the general mode of action or kinetics. However, standard AF is applied.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- Default AF for the worker.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The quality of the whole database is considered to be sufficient and uncritical.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- The approach used for DNEL derivation is conservative. No further AFs are required.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 134.4 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 12.5
- DNEL extrapolated from long term DNEL
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 1 680 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- According to predictions obtained from the Danish (Q)SAR database (2009), gastrointestinal absorption is presumed to be 100 %. The inhalative absorption is considered to be in the same order of magnitude as the oral absorption. Therefore no additional factor is applied for differences between the oral and inhalative intake.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose response relationship is considered unremarkable.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Respiratory interspecies differences are fully covered by the factors used for route to route extrapolation.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- There is no evidence for species differences in the general mode of action or kinetics. However, standard AF is applied.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- Default AF for the worker.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The quality of the whole database is considered to be sufficient and uncritical.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- The approach used for DNEL derivation is conservative. No further AFs are required.
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.5 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 100
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 150 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- According to QSAR predictions obtained from the Danish (Q)SAR database (2009), gastrointestinal absorption is presumed to be 100%, whereas dermal uptake is predicted to be low (0.001 mg/cm2/event). Based on this, a dermal uptake of 20% is assumed. No differences in dermal absorption between rats and humans are presumed.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose response relationship is considered unremarkable.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- Default conversion AF subchronic to chronic exposure.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- Default allometric scaling factor for differences between rats and humans.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- There is no evidence for species differences in the general mode of action or kinetics. However, standard AF is applied.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- Default AF for the worker.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The quality of the whole database is considered to be sufficient and uncritical.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- The approach used for DNEL derivation is conservative. No further AFs are required.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - workers
Workers might be exposed to triallyl cyanurate (liquid or vapour) during manufacture, processing or filling in appropriate containers. During formulation, triallyl cyanurate-coated silica particles containing 50 or 70 % TAC are obtained. Exposure may occur to liquid triallyl cyanurate or the vapour; however, the predominant relevant way of exposure is via triallyl cyanurate-coated silica particles.
Since no usable dose descriptors for the dermal and inhalation exposure route are available, the only usable dose descriptor (oral route) to derive long-term DNELs, the dermal as well as inhalation DNELs, regarding acute and long-term effects on workers were determined using route-to-route extrapolation, according to the ECHA guidance document "Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.8: Characterisation of dose [concentration]-response for human health", November 2012.
For the derivation of all relevant DNELs a NOAEL of 30 mg/kg bw/day obtained in a 90-day gavage study in rats was used. The establishment of an acute toxicity DNEL set for effects occurring after a single exposure of a few minutes up to 24 hours is unnecessary for TAC, as the long-term DNEL is sufficient to ensure, that these effects do not occur. TAC has a very low vapour pressure at room temperature and as a consequence, the formation of aerosols can be considered negligible. Thus, peak exposure significantly higher than the average daily exposure and the long-term DNEL are very unlikely. In addition since TAC did not show any irritating effects, no DNELs for local effects were derived. The assessment of hazards for acute systemic effects and local effects are sufficiently covered by derivation of the DNEL for long-term systemic exposure.
As starting point for derivation of the DNELs, a NOAEL of 30 mg/kg bw/day (for systemic effects) was used which was found in a subchronic toxicity study performed according to OECD 408 (2012-0288-DGT). In this GLP guideline study TAC was administered via gavage at concentrations of 10, 30 and 120 mg/kg bw/day for 90 days. Additional satellite animals for the control, mid and high dose group for observation of reversibility, persistence or delayed occurrence of toxic effects were included for 56 days post treatment. A NOAEL of 30 mg/kg/day was derived based on the significant histopathological changes in the liver in male rats dosed with 120 mg/kg bw/day at the end of the treatment period (which have mainly subsided after the recovery period) and other evidence of toxicity as clinical signs, reduced body weight, effects on functional observational battery parameters, and increased liver weights observed in both female and male animals dosed with 120 mg/kg bw/day. Thus, the NOAEL value of 30 mg/kg bw/day was selected as relevant dose descriptor.
Dermal
To convert an oral NOAEL (in mg/kg bw/day) into a dermal NOAEL (in mg/kg bw/day, the differences in absorption between routes as well as differences in dermal absorption between rats and humans have to be accounted for. According to QSAR predictions obtained from the Danish (Q)SAR database (2009), gastrointestinal absorption is presumed to be 100%, whereas dermal uptake is predicted to be low (0.001 mg/cm2/event). Based on this, a dermal uptake of 20% is assumed. No differences in dermal absorption between rats and humans are presumed.
The conversion of the oral NOAEL into the dermal NOAEL is performed using the following equation:
Corrected dermal NOAEL = oral NOAEL x ABS oral / ABS dermal
= 30 mg/kg bw/day x 100 / 20 = 150 mg/kg bw/day
Subsequently, the following assessment factors are taken into account for the final DNEL calculation: interspecies differences (4), remaining interspecies-differences (2.5), intraspecies differences (5) and duration extrapolation: subchronic - chronic (2), resulting in an overall assessment factor of 100.
As a consequence, the resulting DNEL for long-term dermal systemic effects is 1.5 mg/kg bw/day for workers.
Inhalation
For calculation of the DNEL for long-term inhalative systemic effects, the dose descriptor has to be converted into a corrected starting point by route-to-route extrapolation. According to QSAR predictions obtained from the Danish (Q)SAR database (2009), gastrointestinal absorption is presumed to be 100 %. The inhalative absorption is considered to be in the same order of magnitude as the oral absorption. Therefore no additional factor is applied for differences between the oral and inhalative intake.
The conversion of an oral NOAEL into an inhalation NOAEC is performed using the following equation:
For workers (light activity):
Corrected inhalatory NOAEC = oralNOAEL x 1/sRVanimal x ABSoral / ABS inhalation x sRVhuman / wRV
The standard respiratory volume for the 8 h exposure is 0.38 m3/kg bw for rats and 6.7 m3 (per person) in humans. The default 8-h respiratory volume of a worker is 10 m³ taking increased activity into account.
For a short-term scenario of 15 min exposure, different standard parameters are used. The standard respiratory volume for the 15 min exposure is 0.012 m3/kg bw for rats and 0.21 m3 in humans. The default 15 min respiratory volume of a worker is 0.3125 m³.
This results in the following equations:
For 8 h exposure:
Corrected inhalatory NOAEC = oralNOAEL x 1/0.38 m3/kg bw x 6.7 m3 / 10 m3
For 15 min exposure:
Corrected inhalatory NOAEC = oralNOAEL x 1 / 0.012m3/kg x 0.21 m3 / 0.3125 m3
Subsequently assessment factors (AF) are listed, which have to be taken into account for the final DNEL calculation: remaining interspecies-differences (2.5), intraspecies differences (5), duration extrapolation: subchronic - chronic (2), resulting in an overall assessment factor of 25 for long-term exposure and 12.5 for short-term exposure (no duration extrapolation applied). The inhalative DNELs for workers are calculated according to the formula DNEL = (corrected starting point)/(overall AF). Thus, the resulting DNEL for long-term inhalative systemic effects is 2.12 mg/m³ and the resulting DNEL for short-term inhalative systemic effects is 134.4 mg/m³.
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.52 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 50
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 30 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 26 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
most relevant study
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- default
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- default
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- default
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- default
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- default
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- no remaining uncertainties
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.75 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 200
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 30 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 150 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Conversion of oral NOAEL into dermal NOAEL under consideration of dermal and oral absorption. Please refer to discussion.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- default
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- default
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- default
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- default
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- default
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- no remaining uncertainties
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.15 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 200
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 30 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 30 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
most relevant study
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- default
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- default
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- default
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- default
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- default
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- no remaining uncertainties
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - General Population
Consumers might be exposed to triallyl cyanurate at mentioned life-cycle stages.
Since no usable dose descriptors for the dermal and inhalation exposure route are available, the only usable dose descriptor (oral route) to derive long-term DNELs, the dermal as well as inhalation DNELs, regarding acute and long-term effects on workers were determined using route-to-route extrapolation, according to the ECHA guidance document "Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.8: Characterisation of dose [concentration]-response for human health", November 2012.
For the derivation of all relevant DNELs a NOAEL of 30 mg/kg bw/day obtained in a 90-day gavage study in rats was used. The establishment of an acute toxicity DNEL set for effects occurring after a single exposure of a few minutes up to 24 hours is unnecessary for TAC, as the long-term DNEL is sufficient to ensure, that these effects do not occur. TAC has a very low vapour pressure at room temperature and as a consequence, the formation of aerosols can be considered negligible. Thus, peak exposure significantly higher than the average daily exposure and the long-term DNEL are very unlikely. In addition, since TAC did not show any irritating effects, no DNELs for local effects were derived. The assessment of hazards for acute systemic effects and local effects are sufficiently covered by derivation of the DNEL for long-term systemic exposure.
As starting point for derivation of the DNELs, a NOAEL of 30 mg/kg bw/day (for systemic effects) was used which was found in a subchronic toxicity study performed according to OECD 408 (2012-0288-DGT). In this GLP guideline study TAC was administered via gavage at concentrations of 10, 30 and 120 mg/kg bw/day for 90 days. Additional satellite animals for the control, mid and high dose group for observation of reversibility, persistence or delayed occurrence of toxic effects were included for 56 days post treatment. A NOAEL of 30 mg/kg/day was derived based on the significant histopathological changes in the liver in male rats dosed with 120 mg/kg bw/day at the end of the treatment period (which have mainly subsided after the recovery period) and other evidence of toxicity as clinical signs, reduced body weight, effects on functional observational battery parameters, and increased liver weights observed in both female and male animals dosed with 120 mg/kg bw/day. Thus, the NOAEL value of 30 mg/kg bw/day was selected as relevant dose descriptor.
Dermal
To convert an oral NOAEL (in mg/kg bw/day) into a dermal NOAEL (in mg/kg bw/day, the differences in absorption between routes as well as differences in dermal absorption between rats and humans have to be accounted for. According to QSAR predictions obtained from the Danish (Q)SAR database (2009), gastrointestinal absorption is presumed to be 100%, whereas dermal uptake is predicted to be low (0.001 mg/cm2/event). Based on this, a dermal uptake of 20% is assumed. No differences in dermal absorption between rats and humans are presumed.
The conversion of the oral NOAEL into the dermal NOAEL is performed using the following equation:
Corrected dermal NOAEL = oral NOAEL x ABS oral / ABS dermal
= 30 mg/kg bw/day x 100 / 20 = 150 mg/kg bw/day
Subsequently, the following assessment factors are taken into account for the final DNEL calculation: interspecies differences (4), remaining interspecies-differences (2.5), intraspecies differences (10) and duration extrapolation: subchronic - chronic (2), resulting in an overall assessment factor of 200.
As a consequence, the resulting DNEL for long-term dermal systemic effects is 0.75 mg/kg bw/day for general population.
Inhalation
For calculation of the DNEL for long-term inhalative systemic effects, the dose descriptor has to be converted into a corrected starting point by route-to-route extrapolation. According to QSAR predictions obtained from the Danish (Q)SAR database (2009), gastrointestinal absorption is presumed to be 100 %. The inhalative absorption is considered to be in the same order of magnitude as the oral absorption. Therefore, no additional factor is applied for differences between the oral and inhalative intake.
The conversion of an oral NOAEL into an inhalation NOAEC is performed using the following equation (assuming 100 % absorption for both routes in both species):
For general population:
corrected inhalation NOAEC = oral NOAEL x 1/sRVrat
= 30 x 1/1.15
The corrected inhalation NOAECgeneral population (24 h) is therefore:
= 26 mg/m³ (24 h)
The standard respiratory volume for the 8 h exposure is 0.38 m3/kg bw for rats and 6.7 m3 (per person) in humans. The default 8-h respiratory volume of a worker is 10 m³ taking increased activity into account.
Subsequently assessment factors (AF) are listed, which have to be taken into account for the final DNEL calculation: remaining interspecies-differences (2.5), intraspecies differences (10), duration extrapolation: subchronic - chronic (2), resulting in an overall assessment factor of 50 for long-term exposure. The inhalative DNEL for general population are calculated according to the formula DNEL = (corrected starting point)/(overall AF). Thus, the resulting DNEL for long-term inhalative systemic effects is 0.52 mg/m³.
Oral
Start value: NOAEL 30 mg/kg bw/d
Route of original study: oral (no route-to-route extrapolation required)
Subsequently assessment factors (AF) are listed, which have to be taken into account for the final DNEL calculation: allometric scaling factor (4), remaining interspecies-differences (2.5), intraspecies differences (10), duration extrapolation: subchronic - chronic (2), resulting in an overall assessment factor of 200 for long-term exposure. The oral DNEL for general population are calculated according to the formula DNEL = (starting point)/(overall AF). Thus, the resulting DNEL for long-term inhalative systemic effects is 0.15 mg/kg.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.