Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 442-080-3 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Basic toxicokinetics
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- basic toxicokinetics in vivo
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study is well described and scientifically acceptable. Justification for read across approach is explained in the endpoint summary.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 973
Materials and methods
- Objective of study:
- excretion
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The aim of this study was to compare the amount of piperazine excreted in the urine over 24 hrs after oral administration of a newly developed syrup formula, equivalent to 3.5 g. piperazine hexahydrate, against a commercial syrup sample. This dose was chosen according to the normal adult dose range for the treatment of ascariasis.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- Pre GLP
Test material
Reference
- Name:
- Unnamed
- Type:
- Constituent
Test animals
- Species:
- human
- Strain:
- other: Caucasian
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: ranging from 23 to 38 years of age.
- Health: normal state of health, determined by physical and laboratory medical examination.
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Vehicle:
- other: syrup
- Duration and frequency of treatment / exposure:
- Each experiment was repeated five times.
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
Each subject was administered an oral dosage of 35 ml of piperazine citrate syrup equivalent to 3.5 g. piperazine hexahydrate.
- No. of animals per sex per dose / concentration:
- Three men and two women.
- Control animals:
- other: Prior to the oral administration of either syrup sample, a urine sample was collected from each individual to be used as an internal control.
- Details on study design:
- In this work, a modified colorimetric method of Rogers* was used to achieve higher sensitivity and more accurate results. In Rogers' method, readings were taken at 480 nm. after standing for 10 min. The present work has shown that this length of time would allow neither for the optimum stability and intensity of the colour derivative nor for the reading at its maximum wavelength.
*Rogers E. W., Brit. Med. J., 1, 13 (1958).
DETERMINATION of PIPERAZINE in URINE
Piperazine was determined quantitatively in urine by its colour reaction with Folin's amino acid reagent (Sodium 1.2-naphthoquinone-4-sulfate).
The colour intensity increased rapidly from 0 to 18 min and was stable for 10 min. The maximum absorbance of the colour was determined by scanning the developed colour under visible light at a range of from 800 to 320 nm and was found to be at 490 nm.
The colour obeyed Beer's law in concentrations between 0 and 200 mcg/ml.
Each urine sample was measured for the exact volume and a dilution of 1 :25 with water was made for each sample including the control urine. This dilution was used for testing using the various reagents in the tabulating order (see the table below).
After standing for 20 min, readings were carried out within 5 min at 490 nm. The value of the unknown sample was then compared with the standard sample reading.
The validity of this method was verified by adding various known amounts of piperazine citrate to the urine. This urine was tested and assayed for the amount of piperazine present according to the described method.
CALCULATION of PIPERAZINE in URINE
The values obtained for the samples were corrected by subtracting the value of the normal urine reading for each individual. Piperazine concentration in the diluted urine sample was then calculated by comparing these corrected values with the standard reading carried out simultaneously.
The total piperazine concentration in the urine sample was calculated by multiplying its dilution factor and urine volume. The total amount of piperazine excreted and the percentage of excretion of each individual was then ascertained as piperazine hexahydrate. - Details on dosing and sampling:
- Urine samples were collected, whenever possible, at 1, 2.5, 4.5. 6.5, 9, 13, 20, and 24 hrs after oral administration.
Results and discussion
Any other information on results incl. tables
Results of the total urinary excretion of piperazine calculated as hexahydrate after the oral administration of an amount equivalent to 3.5 g of piperazine hexahydrate
Subject (a) | Dose (b) | 1 hrs | 2.5 hrs | 4.5 hr. | 6.5 hrs | 9 hrs | 13 hrs | 20 hrs | 24 hrs | Total percentage excretion | t (c) Value |
A | I | 50 | 633 | 761 | 528 | 429 | 127 | (d) | (d) | 72 | 0.0982 |
27, 110 | II | 76 | 682 | 927 | 458 | 412 | 109 | (d) | (d) | 75 | |
B | I | 156 | 479 | 604 | 305 | 216 | 356 | 347 | (d) | 70 | |
33, 73 | II | 196 | 176 | 530 | 340 | 275 | 391 | 353 | 77 | 75 | |
C | I | 153 | 562 | 647 | 372 | 261 | 177 | 50 | 18 | 64 | |
38, 79 | II | 66 | 596 | 588 | 318 | 306 | 220 | 70 | 27 | 63 | |
D | I | 103 | 502 | 688 | 293 | 223 | 158 | 65 | 41 | 59 | |
23, 57 | II | 46 | 334 | 582 | 413 | 486 | 104 | 73 | 61 | 60 | |
E | I | 54 | 263 | 160 | 30 | (d) | (d) | (d) | (d) | 15 | |
29, 56 | II | 96 | 127 | 219 | 106 | (d) | (d) | (d) | (d) | 15 |
(a) The first number is for age (years) and the second number is for body weight (kilograms).
(b) I = new syrup formula, 3.5 g. piperazine hexahydrate. II = commercial syrup sample, 3.5 g piperazine hexahydrate.
(c) The r test of significance, where t = mean1 - (mean2/S) √ (n1n2/n1 + n2); p = 0.05, and df = 8 [“Remington’s Pharmaceutical Sciences,” 14th ed., Mack Publishing Co., Easton, Pa., 1970, p. 129]. The t value was calculated with the pooled variance of the two syrup samples.
(d) Zero excretion.
The percentage and pattern of urinary excretion of piperazine calculated as hexahydrate varied from individual to individual, as seen in the five subjects. The total urinary recovery varied from 15 to 75 %. However, the results and pattern of urinary excretion for both syrup formulas compared favorably within each individual.
Urinary excretion began 1 hrs after the oral administration, and the rate was maximal between 2 and 6 hrs. Excretion was nearly completed in 24 hrs.
CONCLUSION
1. The modified colorimetric method of analysis of piperazine in urine is accurate and simple to perform.
2. The percentage and pattern of urinary excretion of piperazine varied from individual to individual.
3. The percentage and pattern of urinary excretion after oral administration of the newly developed syrup formula, equivalent to 3.5 g. piperazine hexahydrate, compared favourably with that of the commercial syrup sample with each individual.
4. The maximum urinary excretion occurred 2-6 hrs after oral administration and was nearly completed at 24 hrs for both syrup formulas under investigation.
5. The t test of significance, where the t-value was calculated with the pooled variance of the two syrup samples, showed no significant difference.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): bioaccumulation potential cannot be judged based on study results
Within 24 hours between 60 to 75 % of the administered dose was excreted and the total recovery in urine collected during 24 hours varied from 15 to 75%. - Executive summary:
A modified colorimetric method using Folin's amino acid reagent was used for the quantitative determination of piperazine in human urine.
The aim of this study was to compare the amount of piperazine excreted in the urine over 24 hrs after oral administration of a newly developed syrup formula, equivalent to 3.5 g. piperazine hexahydrate, against a commercial syrup sample. This dose was chosen according to the normal adult dose range for the treatment of ascariasis.
The modified colorimetric method of analysis of piperazine in urine resulted accurate and simple to perform.
The percentage and pattern of urinary excretion after oral administration of the newly developed syrup formula, equivalent to 3.5 g. piperazine hexahydrate, compared favourably with that of the commercial syrup sample with each individual.
The percentage and pattern of urinary excretion of piperazine varied from individual to individual, nevertheless the maximum urinary excretion occurred 2-6 hrs after oral administration and was nearly completed at 24 hrs for both syrup formulas under investigation.
Conclusion
Within 24 hours between 60 to 75 % of the administered dose was excreted and the total recovery in urine collected during 24 hours varied from 15 to 75%.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.