Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Repeated dose toxicity: oral

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
short-term repeated dose toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Remarks:
Reasonably well documented study meeting generally accepted scientific principles but not conducted in compliance with GLP. Study acceptable for assessment.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1976
Report date:
1976

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
In a non-standard study, groups of 10 rats of each sex were treated by gavage for 5 successive days with a further 10 days observation. Body weights were recorded prior to treatment and following the 5th administration. (Group numbers are not given in the 2-page report seen by this reviewer, however SIAR (2001), reviewing the same study (possibly with a fuller report). has identified group numbers.)
GLP compliance:
no
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Citric acid
EC Number:
201-069-1
EC Name:
Citric acid
Cas Number:
77-92-9
Molecular formula:
C6H8O7
IUPAC Name:
2-hydroxypropane-1,2,3-tricarboxylic acid

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
not specified
Sex:
male/female

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
not specified
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
not specified
Duration of treatment / exposure:
administration on 5 successive days.
Frequency of treatment:
daily
No. of animals per sex per dose:
10 (based on data from SIAR, 2001)
Control animals:
not specified

Results and discussion

Effect levels

open allclose all
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
4 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
other: overall effects clinical signs; mortality; body weight NOAEL values for males and females were identical.
Dose descriptor:
LOAEL
Effect level:
8 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
other: overall effects clinical signs; mortality; body weight LOAEL values for males and females were identical

Target system / organ toxicity

Critical effects observed:
not specified

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Study design - Animal assignment

Test Group

Dose to each sex (mg/kg bw)

1

2000 

2

4000

3

 8000

4

 16000

Table 2: Mortality and body weight gains during 5 days of treatment and 10 days of observation

Male

Female

Dose rate (g/kg bw/day)

Mortality%

(treatment day)

Mortality%

(after 10 days observation)

Total Weight Gain 24 h after 5th administration

(g)

Mortality%

(treatment day)

Mortality%

(after 10 days observation)

Total Weight Gain 24 h after 5th administration

(g)

1

2

3

4

5

1

2

3

4

5

2

 0

0

0

0

0

0

19.4

 0

0

0

0

0

0

14.0

4

 0

0

0

0

0

0

15.9

 0

0

0

0

0

0

17.7

8

30

70

80

80

100

100

-

70

80

80

90

100

100

-

16

 70

100

100

100

100

100

-

 100

100

100

100

100

100

-

 

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
A fairly limited report of an unspecified study without guideline or GLP compliance, identified 5-day NOAEL and LOAEL values in male and female rats of 4 and 8 g/kg bw/day, respectively. The 5-day LD50 was given as 5600 (+/- 440) mg/kg bw/day. For each of these values, the results for males and females, tested separately, were identical.