Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 205-500-4 | CAS number: 141-78-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1985
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Remarks:
- A published study which contains sufficient experimental detail to be able to judge it as reliable. Basic experimental detail provided.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Teratological assessment of methanol and ethanol at high inhalation level in rats.
- Author:
- Nelson, B., Brightwell, W., MacKenzie, D., et al.
- Year:
- 1 985
- Bibliographic source:
- Fundam Appl Toxicol 5:727-736.
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- low number of pregnant females, longer exposure period.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Method: other
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Ethanol
- EC Number:
- 200-578-6
- EC Name:
- Ethanol
- Cas Number:
- 64-17-5
- Molecular formula:
- C2H6O
- IUPAC Name:
- ethanol
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): ethanol absolute-200 proof
- Analytical purity: 96.5%
- Impurities (identity and concentrations): Analysis for water and benzene detected none.
- Ethanol is the in vivo hydrolysis product of ethyl acetate.: (Morris, J.B. (1990): Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 102, 331 - 345; Gallaher, E.J., Loomis, T.A. (1975): Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 34, 309 - 313; Section 5.10 Records 15 and 16).
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Breeding Laboratories
- Age at study initiation: not stated
- Weight at study initiation: 200-300g
- Fasting period before study: no
- Housing: 3 per cage in stainless-steel cages except whilst in chamber
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): purina or comparable-grade lab chow ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water ad libitum
- Acclimation period:1-2 weeks
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 24
- Humidity (%): 20-60
- Air changes (per hr):
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light):12/12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- inhalation
- Type of inhalation exposure (if applicable):
- whole body
- Vehicle:
- other: air in chamber
- Details on exposure:
- 0.5m3 Hinner-type exposure chambers under negative pressure. Controls were placed in similar cage as the exposed animals with adjacent exposure chamber for the same hours.
- Method of holding animals in test chamber: Females were placed into 13 X 25 X 18-cm compartments in stainlesssteel wire-mesh caging within the exposure chambers.
- Method of conditioning air: The vapor generation equipment was housed above the exposure chambers in glove boxes whlen were maintained under negative pressure to prevent any cage of contaminants into the room. Reagent-grade methanol (Matheson, Coleman, and Bell Manufacturing Chemists. Cincinnati. Ohio) or reagent-grade (absolute-200 proof ethanol (AAPER Alcohol and Chemical Co. Louisville. Ky.) was placed into a flask. A low-flow purn,: RP model lab pump; Fluid Metering Inc. Oyster Bal N.Y.) circulated liquid from the reservoir flask into a 10-ml syringe contained within the flask such that the syringe was constantly overflowing. Thus the syringe provided a constant head of chemical for a second pump (controlled by a micrometer adjustment) which injected the specified amount of liquid into a three-way valve which was attached to a Greensmith impinger. Heated compressed air was introduced through the second inlet of the threeway valve. Alcohol evaporation was controlled by regulating the preheating of compressed air. The impinger provided increased contact time between the air and the liquid to assure total evaporation. In generation of high concentrations, glass beads were also placed at the bottom of the impinger to further increase the heat transfer area between the alcohol and the compressed air. This vapor and air mixture was introduced into the chamber air flow prior to positioning of the orifice plate. The turbulence resulting from the pressure drop created by the orifice plate provided uniform mixing of the vapor and air before the mixture entered the chamber
- Air flow rate: Air flow through the chambers provided approximately one air change per minute. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Two methods used: Continuously by a Miran 1A general purpose infrared analyzer (Wilkes/Foxboro Analytical), on an hourly basis; and concentration samples taken from chamber atmosphere by charcoal tube. Sampling times 10-30 mins. 5-10 samples/week. Analysed by NIOSH 1977b-No. S-56 Method with slight modifications.
- Details on mating procedure:
- - Impregnation procedure: cohoused
- If cohoused:
- M/F ratio per cage: 1:1
- Proof of pregnancy: sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy
- Housing of pregnant females: individually into 30 X 34 X 17-cm polycarbonate cages having autoclavable polyester filter covers. Bedding consisted of cleaned. heat-treated sawdust from a local supplier (Absorb-Dri. from Tasty Foods, Cincinnati, Ohio). - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 7 hours per day in exposure chamber on gestation days 1-19. Animals left in the chambers for degassing for approximately half an hour after vapor generation terminated.
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily (7 days/week)
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 10 000 ppm
- Dose / conc.:
- 16 000 ppm
- Dose / conc.:
- 20 000 ppm
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- not explicitly stated but from other data in the study report believed to be approximately 16.
- Control animals:
- not specified
- Details on study design:
- Sex: female
Duration of test: Days 1-19 of gestation
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- - No organs from dams examined at necropsy.
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Most females were also weighed each morning for the first week of exposure and weekly thereafter.
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Weekly
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Weekly
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes, euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation
- Sacrifice on gestation day # 20
OTHER:
- Blood levels of ethanol - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: implants and resorptions were recorded as was litter weight.
- Other: vaginal smears were taken. - Fetal examinations:
- Foetuses were examined externally and internally for malformations;
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes: half per litter were placed into Bouin's solution and subsecuentlv examined for visceral malformations and variations using a razor blade cross-sectioning technique (Wilson, 1965).
- Skeletal examinations: Yes: half per litter were randomly selected, placed into 80% ethanol and subsequently eviscerated, macerated in 1.5% OH stained in alizarin red S and examined. - Statistics:
- Statistical Method: Multivariate analysis, Kruskal-Wallis test, analysis of variance and Fisher's exact test.
- Indices:
- Number of pregnant animals per dose group, Litter sizes/weights, Sex ratios.
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
General toxicity (maternal animals)
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The lower two concentrations of ethanol seemed to cause hyperactivity after exposure, whilst the high dose caused complete narcosis by the end of the exposure (described as severe toxicity).
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Maternal weight gains were not affected by treatment
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Food consumption was significantl lowered in the high-dose group during week 1 of exposure.
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Number of abortions:
- not specified
- Pre- and post-implantation loss:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The number of implantations were 14-16/litter in all ethanol-treated groups and 15/litter in the control group. The number of corpora lutea were 14-16/litter.
- Total litter losses by resorption:
- no effects observed
- Early or late resorptions:
- no effects observed
- Dead fetuses:
- no effects observed
- Changes in pregnancy duration:
- not specified
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Migrated Data from removed field(s)
Field "Effects on pregnancy duration" (Path: ENDPOINT_STUDY_RECORD.DevelopmentalToxicityTeratogenicity.ResultsAndDiscussion.ResultsMaternalAnimals.MaternalDevelopmentalToxicity.EffectsOnPregnancyDuration): not specified - Changes in number of pregnant:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The number of pregnant per dose level were 15/15, 15/15, 15/16 and 14/16 in the control, low, medium and high dosage groups. The effect was slight but significant in the high dose group.
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Blood alcohol levels ranged from 0.02 to 0.03 mg/ml at 10000 ppm, 0.42 to 0.84 mg/ml at 16000ppm and 1.48 to 1.93 mg/ml at 20000 ppm. Measurements were made on non-pregnant rats and represent the ranges of the average values measured at days 1, 10 and 19.
Effect levels (maternal animals)
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 16 000 ppm
- Basis for effect level:
- clinical signs
- food consumption and compound intake
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Effect level:
- 20 000 ppm
- Basis for effect level:
- clinical signs
- food consumption and compound intake
Maternal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
Results (fetuses)
- Fetal body weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- LItter weights were not significantly affected by ethanol treatments. Weights of males (but not females) were reported as significantly lowered although the tabulated data does not indicate this as statistically significant (% reduction 2.4%, 4.5%, 3.2% L/M/H dose respectively) and suggests that there was a 7.8% drop in female weights in the high dose group. As the changes were below 10% they may be treatment related are not considered adverse.
Migrated Data from removed field(s)
Field "Fetal/pup body weight changes" (Path: ENDPOINT_STUDY_RECORD.DevelopmentalToxicityTeratogenicity.ResultsAndDiscussion.ResultsFetuses.FetalPupBodyWeightChanges): no effects observed - Reduction in number of live offspring:
- no effects observed
- Changes in sex ratio:
- no effects observed
- Changes in litter size and weights:
- no effects observed
- Changes in postnatal survival:
- not examined
- Skeletal malformations:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Grossly visible abnormalities are given in detail but the frequency of each did not differ significantly between groups. The only finding was urinary - hydronephrosis but this was not seen in the mid dose group (no dose response)
- Visceral malformations:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No significant findings other than those seen spontaneously in control animals.
- Other effects:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- More litters contained abnormal foetuses in the 20,000 ppm group compared to th concurrent contrl but differences were only of borderline statistical significance and the rate of skeletal malformations in this group was similar to those seen in the control from the first experiment.
Effect levels (fetuses)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
Fetal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
Overall developmental toxicity
- Developmental effects observed:
- no
Any other information on results incl. tables
Skeletal malformations
|
Control 1 |
10,000ppm |
16,000ppm |
Number of litters (foetuses) observed |
15 (99) |
15 (100) |
15 (107) |
|
|
|
|
Cranial –abnormal nasal |
1(1) |
|
|
Cranial - Shortened maxilla |
1(1) |
|
|
Cranial – split basisphenoid |
|
|
|
Vertebral – fused thoracic centra |
|
|
|
Vertebral – fused cervical arches |
1(1) |
|
|
Ribs – rudimentary cervical |
1(1) |
|
2(2) |
Ribs – wavy fused |
2(2) |
|
|
Ribs - missing |
|
|
1(1) |
|
|
|
|
Total malformations |
4(4) |
0 |
2(3) |
|
Control 2 |
10,000ppm |
Number of litters (foetuses) observed |
15 (90) |
14 (92) |
|
|
|
Vertebral – Lordosis |
|
1(1) |
Ribs – rudimentary cervical |
|
2(2) |
Ribs – wavy fused |
|
2(3) |
|
|
|
Total malformations |
0 |
4(5) |
Visceral malformations
|
Control 1 |
10,000ppm |
16,000ppm |
Number of litters (foetuses) observed |
15 (107) |
15 (106) |
15 (114) |
|
|
|
|
Urinary - hydronephrosis |
0 |
2(2) |
0 |
|
Control 2 |
20,000ppm |
Number of litters (foetuses) observed |
15 (99) |
14 (97) |
|
|
|
Urinary - hydronephrosis |
0 |
4(4) |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- No definite evidence of malformations due to ethanol exposure were seen although the incidence of abnormal changes at the highest concentration was of borderline statistical significance. There was clear maternal toxicity at this concentration however.
- Executive summary:
Pregnant female rats were exposed to ethanol by inhalation at concentrations of 10000, 16000, or 20000ppm in a chamber for 7 hours per day on gestation days 1 -19. On day 20 the animals were euthanized and their fetuses examined. There was no definite increase in malformations at any level of ethanol exposure. There was clear maternal toxicity evident at the highest dose (narcosis, food intake reduction).
Synposis
NOAEL (maternal toxicity) :16,000ppm (30,400mg/m3)
NOAEL (teratogenicity): 20,000ppm (38,000mg/m3)
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.