Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 231-096-4 | CAS number: 7439-89-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Carbonyl iron and electrolytic iron were tested adequately for gene mutations in bacteria (Salmonella/microsome test) and in mammalian tissue culture cells in the TK +/- L5178Y mouse lymphoma test. Both of these particulate forms of metallic iron afforded negative results in the bacterial test. In the mammalian assay electrolytic iron again gave a negative response, while a positive result was obtained for carbonyl iron. The difference in mutagenicity between the two particulate forms of metallic iron in the mammalian test can be attributed to the fact that smaller carbonyl iron particles are phagocytosed by the cells, while the larger and more irregularly-shaped electrolytic iron particles are not.
The third in vitro test was waived on the grounds that the effects of carbonyl iron in the TK +/- L5178Y mouse lymphoma test were most probably the result of the general genotoxicity of poorly soluble particles (see Schins and Knaapen, 2007; summarized in IUCLID Section 7.12). A positive effect based on this particle-dependent effect is also expected in a cytogenetic assay with mammalian tissue culture cells when the iron particles are phagocytosed.
If no phagocytosis occurs, no effect is expected because metallic iron does not dissolve (ionize) at the pH of 7.4 of the tissue culture media, which means that no exposure to iron ions occurs. A third in vitro test can thus be deemed redundant.
Notwithstanding the positive TK +/- L5178Y mouse lymphoma test, in vivo genotoxicity testing with metallic iron powders is also waived, based on the following scientific arguments.
1) Systemic exposure to metallic iron is impossible because the particles are too large to translocate (the present dossier does not consider nanoparticles made of metallic iron; see IUCLID Section 7.1), no absorption of dissolved metallic iron is possible and the absorption in the duodenum of ionized iron formed at the low pH levels in the gastric juice is strictly regulated in healthy humans. So no genotoxic effects in organs/tissues/cells away from the port of entry are to be expected do to a lack of exposure.
2) In vivo studies aimed at the detection of local genotoxic effects, i.e., effects at the port of entry are also deemed redundant, because of the insolubility of metallic iron under physiological conditions and the expected particle-dependent genotoxicity of phagocytosed metallic-iron particles
Short description of key information:
Carbonyl iron and electrolytic iron were tested adequately for gene mutations in bacteria (Salmonella/microsome test) and in mammalian tissue culture cells (mouse lymphoma test). Both these particulate forms of metallic iron gave negative results in the bacterial test. In the mammalian assay electrolytic iron again gave a negative result, while a positive result was obtained for carbonyl iron. The difference in mutagenicity between the two particulate forms of metallic iron in the mammalian test is most probably the result of the fact that smaller carbonyl iron particles are phagocytosed by the cells, while the larger and more irregular electrolytic iron particles are not.
The third in vitro test and in vivo genotoxicity testing were waived based on the lack of solubility of metallic iron under physiological conditions, the limited systemic exposure and the known genotoxicity of phagocytosed particles as such, independent of the dissolution of their components.
Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)
Justification for classification or non-classification
As the genotoxicity of metallic iron is only related to the specific particle effects of phagocytosed metallic-iron particles, it is not justified to classify and label metallic iron for genotoxicity.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.