Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Direct observations: clinical cases, poisoning incidents and other

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
direct observations: clinical cases, poisoning incidents and other
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Adopted according to EU risk assessment report, Cas No. 26447-40-5, methylenediphenyl diisocyanate (MDI), volume 59 (public available peer reviewed source)

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1994
Report date:
1994

Materials and methods

Study type:
clinical case study
Endpoint addressed:
eye irritation
Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline required
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
4,4'-methylenediphenyl diisocyanate
EC Number:
202-966-0
EC Name:
4,4'-methylenediphenyl diisocyanate
Cas Number:
101-68-8
Molecular formula:
C15H10N2O2
IUPAC Name:
1-isocyanato-4-[(4-isocyanatophenyl)methyl]benzene
Constituent 2
Reference substance name:
benzene, 1,1'- methylenebis[4-isocyanato-
IUPAC Name:
benzene, 1,1'- methylenebis[4-isocyanato-
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): 4,4'-MDI (Rock glue)
- Analytical purity: not reported

Method

Type of population:
occupational
Subjects:
- Number of subjects exposed: no data
Route of exposure:
ocular
Reason of exposure:
unintentional, occupational
Exposure assessment:
not specified

Results and discussion

Results of examinations:
symptoms of eye irritation were reported.

Applicant's summary and conclusion