Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 500-066-5 | CAS number: 28961-43-5 1 - 6.5 moles ethoxylated
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Repeated dose toxicity: oral
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- sub-chronic toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 12 Jun 2019 - 18 Nov 2019
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- Please note: The Lead has been transferred recently form BASF Health and Care Products France S.A.S. to BASF SE. Accordingly its BASF SE (actual LEAD), who is submitting in time the requested information (OECD 408), which has been addressed as a Decision on a testing proposal to BASF Health and Care Products France S.A.S (old LEAD) before the LEAD change took place. Please do not hesitate to come back to us if you have open questions on this topic.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 020
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 408 (Repeated Dose 90-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents)
- Version / remarks:
- 2018
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.26 (Sub-Chronic Oral Toxicity Test: Repeated Dose 90-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents)
- Version / remarks:
- 2008
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.3100 (90-Day Oral Toxicity in Rodents)
- Version / remarks:
- 1998
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Glycerol, propoxylated, esters with acrylic acid
- EC Number:
- 500-114-5
- EC Name:
- Glycerol, propoxylated, esters with acrylic acid
- Cas Number:
- 52408-84-1
- Molecular formula:
- (C3H6O)m(C3H6O)n(C3H6O)oC12H14O6
- IUPAC Name:
- Poly[oxy(methyl-1,2-ethanediyl)], .alpha.,.alpha.',.alpha.''-1,2,3- propanetriyltris[.omega.-[(1-oxo-2-propenyl)oxy]]-
- Test material form:
- liquid
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Details on species / strain selection:
- The rat was chosen as the animal model for this study as it is an accepted rodent species for preclinical toxicity testing by regulatory agencies.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Deutschland, Sulzfeld, Germany
- Age at study initiation: 6-7 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: males weighed between 146 and 174 g and females weighed between 121 and 156 g
- Housing: in polycarbonate cages (Makrolon type IV)
- Diet: ad libitum, rodent diet (SM R/M-Z from SSNIFF® Spezialdiäten GmbH, Soest, Germany)
- Water: ad libitum, municipal tap water
- Acclimation period: 14 days
DETAILS OF FOOD AND WATER QUALITY: The feed was analyzed by the supplier for nutritional components and environmental contaminants. It was considered that there were no known contaminants in the feed that would interfere with the objectives of the study. Periodic analysis of the water was performed, and it was considered that there were no known contaminants in the water that would interfere with the objectives of the study.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21 to 23
- Humidity (%): 47 to 68
- Air changes (per hr): 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Details on oral exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
The dosing formulations were prepared weekly, filled out in daily portions and stored in the refrigerator protected from light. The dosing formulations were removed from the refrigerator and stirred for at least 30 minutes before dosing. The dosing formulations were dosed within 6 hours after adding the vehicle to the test item or removal from the refrigerator. Test item dosing formulations were kept at room temperature until dosing. If practically possible, the dosing formulations and vehicle were continuously stirred until and during dosing. Adjustment was made for specific gravity of the vehicle and test item. No correction was made for the purity/composition of the test item.
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): The test item is soluble in corn-oil.
- Concentration in vehicle: 0, 10, 30, 75 mg/mL
- Amount of vehicle: 5 mL/kg - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Acquity UPLC system
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- The concentrations analyzed in the formulations of Groups 2, 3 and 4 were in agreement with target concentrations (i.e. mean accuracies between 90% and 110%). At first instance, the mean accuracies for the formulation of Groups 2, 3 and 4, prepared for use in Week 1, were below the target concentration (i.e. 73%, 81% and 72% of target). Differences in peaks from the vehicle were observed and this could result in differences in test item concentration but also in poor homogeneity of the solutions. Therefore it was decided to shake the samples again and re-analyze. The concentrations re-analyzed in the formulations of all groups were in agreement with target concentrations. Therefore it was concluded that formulation were prepared accurately.
No test item was detected in the Group 1 formulations. The formulations of Group 2 and Group 4 were homogeneous (i.e. coefficient of variation ≤ 10%). - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 90 days
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- Group 1
- Dose / conc.:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- Group 2
- Dose / conc.:
- 150 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- Group 3
- Dose / conc.:
- 375 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- Group 4
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale:
The dose levels were selected based on results of a combined 28-day repeated dose toxicity study with reproduction/developmental toxicity screening with oral exposure of the test item. In the previous study, test item related mortality was noted at 750 mg/kg bw/day and adverse effects on the stomach were noted at 750 mg/kg bw/day and 375 mg/kg bw/day (males only), no adverse effects were noted at 375 mg/kg bw/day (females) and 175 mg/kg bw/day. Dose levels for this study were selected in an attempt to produce graded responses to the test item. The high-dose level should produce some toxic effects, but not excessive that would prevent meaningful evaluation. The mid-dose level is expected to produce minimal to moderate toxic effects. The low-dose level should produce no observable indications of toxicity.
- Fasting period before blood sampling for clinical biochemistry: yes - Positive control:
- None
Examinations
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: daily
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: weekly
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Animals were weighed individually weekly, starting on Day 1. A fasted weight was recorded on the day of necropsy.
In order to monitor the health status, Animal No. 35 was also weighed on Day 81.
FOOD CONSUMPTION: Yes
Food consumption was quantitatively measured weekly starting on Day 1 and continuing weekly throughout the Dosing Period.
WATER CONSUMPTION:
Subjective appraisal was maintained during the study, but no quantitative investigation introduced as no effect was suspected.
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: Yes
The eyes were examined using an ophthalmoscope after application of a mydriatic agent (Tropicol 5 mg/ml solution) during pretreatment in all animals, and at the end of the Dosing Period in Week 13 in all Group 1 and 4 animals.
HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: end of treatment
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: Yes, isoflurane
- Animals fasted: Yes
- How many animals: all
- Parameters checked: White blood cells (WBC), Neutrophil (absolute), Lymphocyte (absolute), Monocyte (absolute), Eosinophil (absolute), Basophil (absolute), Large unstained cells (LUC) (absolute), Red blood cells, Reticulocyte (absolute), Red Blood Cell Distribution Width (RDW), Haemoglobin, Haematocrit, Mean corpuscular volume (MCV), Mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH), Mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (MCHC), Platelet, Prothrombin Time (PT), Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT)
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: end of treatment
- Animals fasted: Yes
- How many animals: all
- Parameters checked: Alanine aminotransferase (ALAT), Glucose, Aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT), Cholesterol, Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), HDL and LDL Cholesterol, Total protein, Sodium, Albumin, Potassium, Total Bilirubin, Chloride, Urea, Calcium,
Creatinine, Inorganic Phosphate (Inorg. Phos)
URINALYSIS: No
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: Yes
Functional tests were performed on the first 5 animals per sex per group during Week 12-13. These tests were performed after dosing and after completion of clinical observations (including arena observation, if applicable).
- Battery of functions tested: Hearing ability (HEARING), Pupillary reflex (PUPIL L/R), Static righting reflex (STATIC R), Fore- and hind-limb grip strength, recorded as the mean of three measurements per animal, Locomotor activity
IMMUNOLOGY: No
OTHER:
Estrous Cycle Determination
On the day of necropsy a vaginal lavage was performed to determine the stage of the estrus for all females. Estrous cycles were evaluated by examining the vaginal cytology of samples obtained by vaginal lavage.
Data were only used for evaluation of extreme thyroid hormone effects in females and are not included in the results section.
Thyroid Hormone
Serum samples at a target volume of 1.0 mL were collected in tubes without anticoagulant. Blood samples were processed for serum, which was analyzed for the parameters Triiodothyronine (T3), Thyroxine (T4) and Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone (TSH) - Sacrifice and pathology:
- GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes
Main study and recovery animals were subjected to a complete necropsy examination, which included evaluation of the carcass and musculoskeletal system; all external surfaces and orifices; cranial cavity and external surfaces of the brain; and thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic cavities with their associated organs and tissues.
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes
See tabels - Statistics:
- Parametric/Non-Parametric:
Levene’s test was used to assess the homogeneity of group variances.
The groups were compared using an overall one-way ANOVA F-test if Levene’s test was not significant or the Kruskal-Wallis test if it was significant. If the overall F-test or Kruskal-Wallis test was found to be significant, then pairwise comparisons were conducted using Dunnett’s or Dunn’s test, respectively.
Non-Parametric:
The groups were compared using an overall Kruskal-Wallis test. If the overall Kruskal-Wallis test was found to be significant, then the above pairwise comparisons were conducted using Dunn’s test.
ANCOVA:
The data corresponding to a response variable of interest and to a related covariate were submitted to an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), including only groups with at least three non-missing paired values and if found to be significant, then pairwise comparisons were conducted using Dunnett’s test.
Incidence:
A Fisher’s exact test was used to conduct pairwise group comparisons of interest.
Statistics for data collected/processed in Toxdata:
All statistical tests were conducted at the 5% significance level. All pairwise comparisons were conducted using two sided tests and were reported at the 1% or 5% levels.
Parametric
Datasets with at least 3 groups (the designated control group and 2 other groups) were compared using Dunnett-test (many-to-one-t-test). For the motor activity data set (at least 3 groups) parametric (ANOVA) tests on group means were applied with Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. Mixed modelling techniques, comparing six different covariance structures, were used in order to select the best fitting statistical model.
Non-Parametric
Datasets with at least 3 groups were compared using a Steel-test (many-to-one rank test).
Incidence
An overall Fisher’s exact test was used to compare all groups. The above pairwise
comparisons were conducted using Fisher’s exact test whenever the overall test was significant.
Results and discussion
Results of examinations
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No toxicologically relevant clinical signs were noted in surviving animals during daily detailed clinical observations or during weekly arena observations.
Salivation seen after dosing among all animals treated at 150 and 375 mg/kg bw/day from Days 11 and 2 onwards, respectively, was considered not toxicologically relevant, taking into account the nature and minor severity of the effect and its time of occurrence (i.e. after dosing). This sign was considered to be a physiological response related to taste of the test item rather than a sign of systemic toxicity. Other clinical signs noted during the Dosing Period occurred within the range of background
findings to be expected for rats of this age and strain which are housed and treated under the conditions in this study and did not show any apparent dose-related trend. At the incidence observed, these were considered to be unrelated to treatment with the test item. - Mortality:
- mortality observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence):
- There were two premature deaths at 375 mg/kg bw/day, both on Day 81.
Male No. 31 was found dead on Day 81. No relevant signs preceded its death and body weight was normal. Noteworthy microscopic findings included erosion/ulcer, inflammation, and exudate in the caudal ventral nasal cavity and trachea, and erosion/ulcer in the larynx. Collectively, the type and distribution of these lesions is highly suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux and aspiration of gastric content/test item, which was considered to be the cause of death. Male No. 35 was euthanized due to poor condition on Day 81. This animal showed laboured breathing and abnormal breathing sounds, hunched posture and erected fur prior to sacrifice. Additionally, a body weight loss of 7% was recorded over the last 3 days prior to sacrifice.
Noteworthy microscopic findings included erosion/ulcer, inflammation and exudate in the trachea (without concurrent lesions in the nasal cavity, nasopharynx, or larynx), and this was considered to be the major factor contributing clinical signs leading to euthanasia in this animal. Without clear corroborative upper airway lesions, there is less evidence for nasogastric reflux/aspiration in this animal, thus the lesions in the trachea may be related to a gavage error. Similar to terminally euthanized animals at 375 mg/kg/day, test item-related squamous hyperplasia of the non-glandular stomach (forestomach) mucosa was also noted in both preterminal animals, and erosion/ulcer was present in Animal No. 31. - Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No toxicologically relevant effect on body weight and body weight gain was noted after treatment up to 375 mg/kg/day.
A reduced body weight gain was noted for males treated at 375 mg/kg/day from Day 78 onwards, resulting in lower mean body weights on Days 85 and 91 (-5%, not statistically significant) compared to controls. Based on the magnitude of the change this was considered not toxicologically relevant. - Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Food consumption of animals treated up to 375 mg/kg/day was similar to the control level over the study period.
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- no effects observed
- Ophthalmological findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No ophthalmology findings were noted that were considered to be related to treatment with the test item.
The nature and incidence of ophthalmology findings noted during the Pretreatment Period and in Week 13 was similar among the groups, and occurred within the range considered normal for rats of this age and strain. These findings were therefore considered to be unrelated to treatment with the test item. - Haematological findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No test item-related changes were noted in hematological parameters after treatment up to 375 mg/kg bw/day.
Basophil count was statistically significantly increased in females treated at 375 mg/kg/day compared to controls. Based on the absence of changes in other white blood cell parameters and on the minimal magnitude of the change, this was considered not toxicologically relevant. Other statistically significant changes in haematology parameters were considered to be unrelated to treatment as these occurred in the absence of a dose-related trend.
No test item-related changes were noted in coagulation parameters after treatment up to 375 mg/kg/day. The statistically significant lower prothrombin time (PT) of males treated at 50 and 375 mg/kg/day and females treated at 50 and 150 mg/kg/day was considered to be of no toxicological relevance as the opposite effect (i.e. an increase) would be expected in case of target organ toxicity. - Clinical biochemistry findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No test item-related changes were noted in clinical chemistry parameters after treatment up to 375 mg/kg bw/day.
An increased urea concentration was noted for females treated at 150 and 375 mg/kg bw/day (1.24x and 1.20x of controls, respectively). In absence of a dose related response and as all values remained within the historical control range1, this was considered not toxicologically relevant. - Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Hearing ability, pupillary reflex, static righting reflex and grip strength were normal in all examined animals. Motor activity was similar between treated and control groups. All groups showed a similar motor activity habituation profile with a decreasing trend in activity over the duration of the test period.
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no test item-related alterations in organ weights.
Any differences, including those that reached statistical significance were considered not to be related to treatment with the test item due to the direction of the change, lack of doserelated pattern, and/or general overlap and variability in individual values. - Gross pathological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Test item-related macroscopic changes were observed in the stomach of males and females dosed at 375 mg/kg bw/day group males and females. In the non-glandular mucosa of the stomach (forestomach), irregular mucosal surface was noted in 7/8 males and 6/10 females. The remainder of the recorded macroscopic findings were within the range of background gross observations encountered in rats of this age and strain.
- Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Test item-related microscopic findings after treatment with the test item were noted in the stomach of the 150 and 375 mg/kg bw/day males and females.
Squamous cell hyperplasia of the stomach (forestomach), up to moderate degree, was noted in males and females starting at 150 mg/kg/day, with a dose-related increase in incidence and severity. This was characterized by diffuse thickening of the squamous mucosa, accompanied by hyperkeratosis (predominantly orthokeratotic). When mild or moderate, the epithelium was often thrown into simple folds, without cellular atypia.
Focal or multifocal erosion/ulcer of the non-glandular mucosa (forestomach) was noted, in conjunction with hyperplasia in males and females at 375 mg/kg/day. There were no other test item-related histologic changes. The remainder of the recorded
microscopic findings were within the range of background pathology encountered in rats of this age and strain. There was no test item-related alteration in the prevalence, severity, or histologic character of those incidental tissue alterations. A single (minimal) focal erosion/ulcer at the limiting ridge, specifically at the junction between the squamous and glandular mucosa was noted in one female in each of the control, 50 mg/kg/day, and 150 mg/kg/day group and was interpreted to be a spontaneous change when only observed at that location. - Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
Effect levels
open allclose all
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- local
- Effect level:
- 150 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
- Remarks on result:
- other: These findings are consistent with a response to an irritant material.
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- systemic
- Effect level:
- 375 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: highest dose tested
Target system / organ toxicity
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- no
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The administration of the read-across substance (GPTA) - Glycerol, propoxylated, esters with acrylic acid (CAS 52408-84-1) by daily oral gavage according to OECD TG 408 at dose levels of 50, 150 and 375 mg/kg bw/day was well tolerated in rats at levels up to 150 mg/kg bw/day (ReachCentrum, 2020). At 375 mg/kg bw/day adverse findings were noted in the forestomach only. These findings are consistent with a response to an irritant material. Based on these results, the following was concluded:
Parental (systemic): 375 mg/kg bw/day
Parental (local): 150 mg/kg bw/day - Executive summary:
The administration of the read-across substance (GPTA) - Glycerol, propoxylated, esters with acrylic acid (CAS 52408-84-1) by daily oral gavage according to OECD TG 408 at dose levels of 50, 150 and 375 mg/kg bw/day was well tolerated in rats at levels up to 150 mg/kg bw/day (ReachCentrum, 2020). At 375 mg/kg bw/day adverse findings were noted in the forestomach only. These findings are consistent with a response to an irritant material. Based on these results, the following was concluded:
Parental (systemic): 375 mg/kg bw/day
Parental (local): 150 mg/kg bw/day
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.