Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 500-066-5 | CAS number: 28961-43-5 1 - 6.5 moles ethoxylated
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Biodegradation in water: screening tests
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 25 Mar - 23 Apr 2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 301 B (Ready Biodegradability: CO2 Evolution Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.4-C (Determination of the "Ready" Biodegradability - Carbon Dioxide Evolution Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- activated sludge, domestic, non-adapted
- Details on inoculum:
- - Source of inoculum/activated sludge (e.g. location, sampling depth, contamination history, procedure):
Not adapted activated sludge from the aeration tank of the ARA Werdhölzli (8048 Zürich, Switzerland), a municipal biological waste water treatment plant.
- Sampling: 23 March 2010, 11:00 a.m.
- Pretreatment: The activated sludge was used after sampling from the treatment plant without adaptation. However, the sludge was pre-conditioned for 2 days (aerated but not fed) to reduce the amount of CO2 produced by the blank controls.
Prior to the test the sludge was washed twice with tap water. After centrifugation the sludge, at a tenfold concentration of the final concentration to be achieved for the test, was suspended in test medium as described in Table 1 (see below).
- Concentration of sludge: 30 mg/l dry matter in the final mixture - Duration of test (contact time):
- 28 d
- Initial conc.:
- 34 mg/L
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Initial conc.:
- 20 mg/L
- Based on:
- other: TOC
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- CO2 evolution
- Details on study design:
- TEST CONDITIONS
- Composition of medium: according to OECD guideline
- Additional substrate: none
- Solubilising agent (type and concentration if used): none
- Test temperature: 22± 2 °C
- pH: 7.4± 0.2
- pH adjusted: yes (at beginning of test, with NaOH or HCl, if necessary)
- CEC (meq/100 g): no data
- Aeration of dilution water: aerated with CO2-free air
- Suspended solids concentration: 30 mg/l dry matter in the final mixture
- Continuous darkness: yes
- Other: Concentration of test substance and reference material: The test substance and reference material were applied by direct addition to give a final test concentration of about 20 mg/l with respect to the total organic carbon (TOC).
TEST SYSTEM
- Culturing apparatus: 2500 ml closed gas bottle
- Number of culture flasks/concentration: For each test series the following number of test flasks was set up: Test suspension containing inoculum, test medium and test substance (three replicates)
- Method used to create aerobic conditions: The test vessels were stirred thoroughly and aerated with synthetic CO2-free air
- Test performed in closed vessels due to significant volatility of test substance: -
- Test performed in open system: yes
- Details of trap for CO2 and volatile organics if used: The air leaving the individual vessels was passed through gas-absorption bottles filled with KOH (125 ml of 0.13 M KOH).
- Other: -
SAMPLING
- Sampling frequency: The biodegradation of the test material was followed by CO2 measurements at frequent intervals to allow the assessment of the 10-d window (after 0, 1, 4, 7, 12, 14, 18, 21, 26, 28 days).
- Sampling method: not specified
- Sterility check if applicable: -
- Sample storage before analysis: -
- Other: -
CONTROL AND BLANK SYSTEM
- Inoculum blank: Inoculum blank containing inoculum and test medium (three replicates)
- Abiotic sterile control: Abiotic sterile control: containing test substance, test medium and 0.2 mM HgCl2 as sterilizing agent to prevent microbial decomposition (one replicate)
- Toxicity control: Toxicity control: containing inoculum + test medium + test substance + sodium benzoate as ready biodegradable reference compound (one replicate). In the toxicity control about 20 mg/l test substance and about 20 mg/l reference substance with respect to the total organic carbon (TOC) were tested as a mixture.
- Other: Procedure control: Procedure control containing inoculum, test medium and sodium benzoate as ready biodegradable reference compound (three replicates)
STATISTICAL METHODS: - - Reference substance:
- benzoic acid, sodium salt
- Remarks:
- 100% pure
- Preliminary study:
- not conducted.
- Key result
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 58 - 61
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: range of 2 replicates
- Details on results:
- Based on the data of the individual inorganic carbon determinations, the mean biodegradability in the CO2 Evolution Test of the test substance was calculated to be 60% (Table 2, Figure 1) after 28 days. The biodegradation of the test substance reached 43% at the end of the 10-d window. Biodegradation of the test substance was observed without any significant lag phase.
- Results with reference substance:
- The positive control, sodium benzoate, reached 100% biodegradation after 14 days, thus confirming suitability of inoculum and test conditions (Table 3, Figure 2).
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Interpretation of results:
- readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- The test substance did not reach the pass level of 60% for ready biodegradability in the CO2 Evolution Test within the 10-d window. However, the pass level was reached after 28 days of incubation. As the test substance is aan UVCB, the 10-day window criterion does not apply. Therefore, the test substance is considered readily biodegradable.
- Executive summary:
The biodegradability of the test substance exposed to microorganisms derived from the activated sludge of a municipal sewage treatment plant was investigated under aerobic static exposure conditions.
The biodegradability - based on CO2evolution - of the test substance
was calculated to be 60% of the theoretical value (ThCO2) after an incubation time of 28 days.
The biodegradation of the test substance reached 43% at the end of the 10-d window.
Biodegradation of the test substance was observed without any significant lag phase.
The positive control, sodium benzoate, reached 100% biodegradation after 14 days, thus confirming suitability of inoculum and test conditions.
As the test substance is a mixture of homologues, the 10-day window does not apply. Therefore, the test substance is considered readily biodegradable.
Reference
Table 2: CO2produced by the test units, the inoculum blank and the corresponding degradation data.
Inoculum | Test unit no. 1 | Test unit no. 2 | ||||
blank * | containing test material | containing test material | ||||
Total CO2 | Total CO2 | Total CO2 | Mean | |||
Time | release | release | Degradation | release | Degradation | Degradation |
(days) | in test | in test | (%) ** | in test | (%) ** | of no. 1+2 |
sample | sample | sample | (%) | |||
(mg IC/l) | (mg IC/l) | (mg IC/l) | ||||
0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
1 | -0.1 | 0.4 | 3 | 0.9 | 5 | 4 |
4 | 2.5 | 3.7 | 6 | 4.4 | 10 | 8 |
7 | 4.8 | 7.3 | 13 | 7.9 | 16 | 14 |
12 | 7.3 | 14.5 | 36 | 12.9 | 28 | 32 |
14 | 7.6 | 16.7 | 45 | 14.9 | 37 | 41 |
18 | 8.7 | 18.8 | 50 | 17.8 | 46 | 48 |
21 | 9.3 | 19.7 | 52 | 19.2 | 49 | 51 |
26 | 9.5 | 21.1 | 58 | 20.9 | 57 | 57 |
28 | 9.8 | 21.4 | 58 | 22.0 | 61 | 60 |
* | Mean of two replicates | |||||
** | The calculation is based on an organic carbon concentration | |||||
in mg/l of | 20.0 | (Test unit no. 1) | ||||
20.0 | (Test unit no. 2) |
Table 3: CO2produced by the procedure control, the inoculum blank and the corresponding degradation data.
Inoculum | Procedure control | Toxicity control (test | Abiotic | |||
blank * | (sodium benzoate) | material + sodium benzoate) | control | |||
Total CO2 | Total CO2 | Total CO2 | Total CO2 | |||
Time | release | release | Degradation | release | Degradation | release |
(days) | in test | in test | (%) ** | in test | (%) *** | in test |
sample | sample | sample | sample | |||
(mg IC/l) | (mg IC/l) | (mg IC/l) | (mg IC/l) | |||
0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
1 | -0.1 | 2.7 | 14 | 1.4 | 4 | 0.0 |
4 | 2.5 | 12.5 | 50 | 16.4 | 35 | 0.4 |
7 | 4.8 | 18.3 | 68 | 21.8 | 42 | 0.7 |
12 | 7.3 | 25.6 | 91 | 33.0 | 64 | 1.4 |
14 | 7.6 | 27.9 | 101 | 36.1 | 71 | 1.5 |
18 | 8.7 | 29.3 | 103 | 40.3 | 79 | 1.5 |
21 | 9.3 | 29.9 | 103 | 42.2 | 82 | 1.4 |
26 | 9.5 | 30.7 | 106 | 45.5 | 90 | 0.7 |
28 | 9.8 | 30.9 | 105 | 46.2 | 91 | 0.6 |
* | Mean of two replicates | |||||
** | The calculation is based on an organic carbon concentration in mg/l of | 20.0 | ||||
*** | The calculation is based on an organic carbon concentration in mg/l of | 40.0 | ||||
(sum of test substance and procedure control) |
Results of additional controls:
Toxicity control
At the applied initial test concentration Photomer 4149 F showed no significant toxic effect on the microbial population, since the biodegradation of the mixture (test substance + reference compound sodium benzoate) was within the expected theoretical value during thewhole test period (Table 3, Figure 2). The test was considered valid, since more than 25 % degradation occurred within 14 days.
Abiotic sterile control
Photomer 4149 F was not abiotically degraded (by processes producing CO2) during thewhole test period of 28 days in the absence of microorganisms as confirmed by the determinations of the inorganic carbon concentrations
Further remarks:
At the end of the test the pH value of both inoculum blanks and the procedure control was 7.4, respectively. The pH values of the test units and the toxicity control were 7.3 and 7.5, respectively.
Description of key information
In a study according to OECD test guideline 301B, the test substance was biodegraded to 60% after 28 days. As the test substance is an UVCB, the 10 -day window criterion does not apply. Hence, the test substance is considered readily biodegradable.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Biodegradation in water:
- readily biodegradable
Additional information
The biodegradability of the test substance exposed to microorganisms derived from the activated sludge of a municipal sewage treatment plant was investigated under aerobic static exposure conditions. The biodegradability - based on CO2 evolution - of the test substance was calculated to be 60% of the theoretical value (ThCO2) after an incubation time of 28 days.
As the test substance is an UVCB, the 10-day window criterion does not apply. Hence, the test substance is considered readily biodegradable.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.