Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 272-713-7 | CAS number: 68909-79-5 An inorganic pigment that is the reaction product of high temperature calcination of principally chromium (III) oxide forming a crystalline hematite. Its composition may include any one or a combination of the modifiers Al2O3, Fe2O3, or Mn2O3.
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin irritation: not irritating (equivalent or similar to OECD 404)
Eye irritation: not irritating (equivalent or similar to OECD 405)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
- Remarks:
- Minor deviations without an effect on the results: - According to the guideline, the relative humidity in the animal room should be 30 - 70 %. In this study the humidity was slightly higher (55% +/- 25 %). - According to the guideline, approx. 24 h before the test the fur should be removed by clipping or shaving. In this study it was not stated when the fur was removed. - According to the guideline, justification for choice of vehicle must be stated. In the report it was not stated, if the test substance (solid) was moistened with water or a vehicle. - According to the guideline, the age, the weight at the conclusion of the test and the source of the animals should be stated. This information was missing in the report. - According to the guideline a narrative description of the degree and nature of irritation observed must be included in the report. This was missing in this report. Only the scoring of erythema and oedema were stated.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Version / remarks:
- 1992-07-17
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- , see "rational for reliability"
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Authorised supplier
- Weight at study initiation: animal #1: 2652 g; animal #2: 2501 g; animal #3: 2654 g
- Housing: Individual stainless steel cages, brand Tecniplast
- Diet: Daily dose of 150 g of special diet for experimental rabbits, provided by an authorised provider
- Drink (ad libitum): Automatic, treated and filtered at 5 µm
- Acclimation period: 7 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 21 ° C (+/- 2°C)
- Relative humidity: 55 % (+/- 25 %)
- Air: Renewed 15 times per hour and prefiltered at 5 µm
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- shaved
- Vehicle:
- other: No data: "In case of solid samples, 0.5 g are applied humidifying sufficiently with water (or appropriate fluid) to ensure a good contact with skin."
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 g are applied humidifying sufficiently with water (or appropriate fluid) to ensure a good contact with skin.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- maximum time of exposure was 4 hours
- Observation period:
- 1 hour, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, 7 days and 14 days after removal of the bandages
- Number of animals:
- 3 male rabbits
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: The rabbits were shaved at the back retro-scapular area close to the vertebral column, in a 20 cm long, 13 cm wide rectangle. Once the rabbit has been shaved, the sample was applied directly on the skin, on a surface approx. 6 cm^2.
- Type of wrap if used: The test site was covered with a bandage, it was held with plaster and covered with a hypoallergenic plaster bandage.
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): The studied sample was softly removed with water or appropriate solvent.
- Time after start of exposure:Once the period of exposure was over.
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring system - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 days
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- All skin effects observed were reversed by day 14.
1-hour observation in rabbits:
Animal #1:
Erythema: Score 1 (very slight (hardly perceptible)
Oededma: Score 0 (none)
Animal #2:
Erythema: Score 1 (very slight (hardly perceptible)
Oededma: Score 0 (none)
Animal #3:
Erythema: Score 1 (very slight (hardly perceptible)
Oededma: Score 0 (none) - Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Given that a mean value of 2 or higher was not observed in any of the tested animals, it can be concluded that the sample submitted "VERDE-D7 (B2240) ((Hematite chromium green black) does not generate skin irritation.
According to the EC Regulation No. 1272/2008 and subsequent regulations, the test item is not classified as skin irritant.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
- Remarks:
- Minor deviations from the guideline without effect on the results of the study: - According to the guideline, adult albino rabbits should be used for the test. The age of the animals was missing in the report. - According to the guideline, the humidity in the animal room should be 30 -70 %. In this study the humidity was slightly higher (55 % +/- 25%). - According to the guideline, after the substance has been placed in the conjunctival sac the eyelids are gently held together for about one second. This statement was missing in the report.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Version / remarks:
- 1987-02-24
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- , see "rational for reliability"
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Authorised supplier
- Weight at study initiation: animal #1: 2067 g; animal #2: 2430 g; animal #3: 2025 g
- Housing: Individual stainless steel cages, brand Tecniplast
- Diet: Daily dose of 150 g of special diet for experimental rabbits, provided by an authorised provider
- Drink (ad libitum): Automatic, treated and filtered at 5 µm
- Acclimation period: 7 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 21 °C (+/- 2°C)
- Relative humidity: 55 % (+/- 25 %)
- Air: Renewed 15 times per hour and prefiltered at 5 µm
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 g is administered, separating the lower eyelid in the conjunctival bag of one of the eyes. The other one will be used as reference. - Observation period (in vivo):
- 1 hour, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and 7 days after administration
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3 male rabbits
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
Not stated
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize Scoring system
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: In order to faciliatate the evaluation of the reactions, light from a manual lamp will be used and after 24 hours of administration, fluorescein will also be used to check injuries in the cornea. - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- Animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: At the 1 and 24 hour readings, opacity of the cornea of level 1 was observed, affecting 1/4 of the eyeball, which disappeard within 48 hours.
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.67
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.67
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: At the 1 and 24 hour readings, opacity of the cornea of level 1 was observed, affecting 1/4 of the eyeball, which disappeared within 48 hours.
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 hours
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.67
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: At the 1 and 24 hour readings, opacity of the cornea of level 1 was observed, affecting 1/4 of the eyeball, which disappeared within 48 hours.
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 hours
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.67
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- All ocular effects observed reversed by day 7.
1 hour observation of the rabbits:
Rabbit #1:
- Cornea: Score 1 ( Dispersed or diffuse opacity areas (different from a slight decrease from normal brightness), details of iris clearly visible)
- Iris: Score 1 (Folding clearly deeper, congestion, swelling, moderate pericornea hyperemia, or injected conjunctivia, either of these symptoms or any of their combination, iris still reacts to light (slow reaction is a positive)
- Erythema of conjunctiva: Score 2 (Diffuse crimson colouration, individual blood vessels easily distinguishable)
- Oedema of the conjunctiva: Score 2 (Obvious tumefaction with partial destruction of eyelids)
Rabbit #2:
- Cornea: Score 1 ( Dispersed or diffuse opacity areas (different from a slight decrease from normal brightness), details of iris clearly visible)
- Iris: Score 1 (Folding clearly deeper, congestion, swelling, moderate pericornea hyperemia, or injected conjunctivia, either of these symptoms or any of their combination, iris still reacts to light (slow reaction is a positive)
- Erythema of conjunctiva: Score 2 (Diffuse crimson colouration, individual blood vessels easily distinguishable)
- Oedema of the conjunctiva: Score 2 (Obvious tumefaction with partial destruction of eyelids)
Rabbit #3:
- Cornea: Score 1 ( Dispersed or diffuse opacity areas (different from a slight decrease from normal brightness), details of iris clearly visible)
- Iris: Score 1 (Folding clearly deeper, congestion, swelling, moderate pericornea hyperemia, or injected conjunctivia, either of these symptoms or any of their combination, iris still reacts to light (slow reaction is a positive)
- Erythema of conjunctiva: Score 2 (Diffuse crimson colouration, individual blood vessels easily distinguishable)
- Oedema of the conjunctiva: Score 2 (Obvious tumefaction with partial destruction of eyelids) - Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Given the extent of the observed eye effects, the substance "Verde D7" (B2240) (Hematite chromium green black) is not considered to require classification for eye irritation, for the following reasons:
- according to the criteria previously specified by Directive 67/548/EEC and subsequent regulations, this substance clearly does not require classification as an eye irritant.
- however, according to EC Regulation No. 1272/2008 and subsequent regulations, the test item would qualify as a borderline case for classification as eye irritant merely resulting from slight change in the interpretation criteria between the current Directive 67/548/EEC (basis for REACH) and the future EC Regulation No. 1272/2008.
- the criteria for assessment of the observed conjunctival redness is only mildly exceeded, whereas all other effects observed are far from any level that would require classification and are fully reversible within 7 days.
- finally, long-term industrial experience in practical handling and use shows an absence of human eye irritation incidents.
In conclusion, by applying a weight-of-evidence approach, a classification of the pigment hematite chromium green black according to EC Regulation No. 1272/2008 is considered to be obsolete. This proposal is also supported by the following statement in EC Regulation No. 1272/2008, Annex I, 3.3.2.7.2:"for those substances where there is pronounced variability among animal responses, this information shall be taken into account in determining the classification."
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Additional information
One study on skin irritation according to OECD TG 404 has been performed.that indicated a mean erythema score of 1.0, 1.0, 1.0 at time point 1, 24, 48h respectively after exposure, hence "Verde D7" (B2240) (Hematite chromium green black) does not generate skin irritation. All skin effects observed were reversed by day 14..
One study on eye irritation according to OECD TG 405 has been performed. All ocular effects observed reversed by day 7.Given the extent of the observed injuries the sample submitted "Verde D7" (B2240) (Hematite chromium green black) does not irritate the eyes.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Skin irritation in vivo:
erythema, mean animal #1, 24 -72h after application: score=1
edema, mean animal #1, 24 -72h after application: score=0
erythema, mean animal #2, 24 -72h after application: score=1
edema, mean animal #2, 24 -72h after application: score=0
erythema, mean animal #3, 24 -72h after application: score=1
edema, mean animal #3, 24 -72h after application: score=0
Given that a mean value of 2 or higher was not observed in any of the tested animals, it can be concluded that the sample submitted "VERDE-D7 (B2240) ((Hematite chromium green black) does not generate skin irritation. All skin effects observed were reversed by day 14.
According to the criteria specified by Directive 67/548/EEC and subsequent regulations, the test item is not classified as skin irritant. According to the EC Regulation No. 1272/2008 and subsequent regulations, the test item is not classified as skin irritant.
Eye irritation in vivo:
conjunctivae score, mean animal #1, 24 -72h: score=1.67 (fully reversible within 7d)
conjunctivae score, mean animal #2, 24 -72h: score=2 (fully reversible within 7d)
conjunctivae score, mean animal #3, 24 -72h: score=2 (fully reversible within 7d)
cornea score, mean animal #1, 24 -72h: score=0.33 (fully reversible within 48h)
cornea score, mean animal #2, 24 -72h: score=0.33 (fully reversible within 48h)
cornea score, mean animal #3, 24 -72h: score=0.33 (fully reversible within 48h)
iris score, mean animal #1, 24 -72h: score=0
iris score, mean animal #2, 24 -72h: score=0.33 (fully reversible within 48h)
iris score, mean animal #3, 24 -72h: score=0.33 (fully reversible within 48h)
chemosis score, mean animal #1, 24 -72h; score=0.67 (fully reversible within 72h)
chemosis score, mean animal #2, 24 -72h; score=0.67 (fully reversible within 72h)
chemosis score, mean animal #3, 24 -72h; score=0.67 (fully reversible within 72h)
Given the extent of the observed eye effects, the substance "Verde D7" (B2240) (Hematite chromium green black) is not considered to require classification for eye irritation, for the following reasons:
- according to the criteria previously specified by Directive 67/548/EEC and subsequent regulations, this substance clearly does not require classification as an eye irritant.
- however, according to EC Regulation No. 1272/2008 and subsequent regulations, the test item would qualify as a borderline case for classification as eye irritant merely resulting from slight change in the interpretation criteria between the current Directive 67/548/EEC (basis for REACH) and the future EC Regulation No. 1272/2008.
- the criteria for assessment of the observed conjunctival redness is only mildly exceeded, whereas all other effects observed are far from any level that would require classification and are fully reversible within 7 days.
- finally, long-term industrial experience in practical handling and use shows an absence of human eye irritation incidents.
In conclusion, by applying a weight-of-evidence approach, a classification of the pigment hematite chromium green black according to EC Regulation No. 1272/2008 is considered to be obsolete. This proposal is also supported by the following statement in EC Regulation No. 1272/2008, Annex I, 3.3.2.7.2:"for those substances where there is pronounced variability among animal responses, this information shall be taken into account in determining the classification."
Respiratory irritation
The classification as respiratory irritant is covered under the endpoint specific target organ toxicity- single exposure. Please refer to the endpoint summaries on acute toxicity (endpoint 7.2) for further information.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.