Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 271-846-8 | CAS number: 68609-97-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to soil microorganisms
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to soil microorganisms
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- This study was conducted between 07 November 2016 and 05 December 2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 017
- Report date:
- 2017
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 216 (Soil Microorganisms: Nitrogen Transformation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 2000
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.21 (Soil Microorganisms: Nitrogen Transformation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- EC No. 440/2008
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
Test material
- Details on test material:
- Alkyl (C12-C14) glycidyl ether
Label: Epoxide 8
51% C12 Glycidyl ether
21% C14 Glycidyl ether
5% C16 Glycidyl ether
13% N +1's
4% alpha addition Products
94% total active (label claim)
- Physical state: Clear colorless liquid
- Storage condition of test material: ambient
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Identification: Oxirane, mono[(C12-14-alkyloxy) methyl] derivs
Physical state/Appearance: clear colorless liquid
Batch: AAD1326100
Purity: not applicable as is a UVCB
Expiry Date: 29 August 2019
Storage Conditions: approximately 4 ºC in the dark
Sampling and analysis
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Remarks:
- As it was not a requirement of the Test Guidelines no analysis was conducted to determine the homogeneity, concentration or stability of the test item formulation. This exception with regard to GLP has been reflected in the GLP compliance statement.
Test substrate
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on preparation and application of test substrate:
- Test Item Preparation
The test item was prepared in a preliminary solvent stock solution.
Nominal amounts of test item (1600 and 5000 mg) were separately dissolved in acetone and the volumes adjusted to 10 mL to give 1600 mg/10 mL and 5000 mg/10 mL solvent stock solutions respectively. Serial dilutions from the 5000 mg/10 mL were made to give 500 and 50 mg/10 mL stock solutions. Additionally, a serial dilution from the 1600 mg/10 mL solvent stock solution was made to give a 160 mg/10 mL solvent stock solution.
Aliquots (1 mL) of the solvent stock solutions were dispensed separately onto dry quartz sand (5 g) and the solvent allowed to evaporate to dryness. The test item/sand combination and an amount of powdered Lucerne-green-grass-meal*** (2.5 g) was then added to a final bulk soil weight of 500 g* and thoroughly mixed (Kenwood Chef Mixer) prior to the addition of an aliquot (57 mL) of water to give the required test concentrations of 10, 32, 100, 320,
1000 mg/Kg with a nominal moisture content of 45% of the Water Holding Capacity (WHC). Three 50 g* aliquots were then taken for Day 0 analysis. The remaining soil bulk was incubated in glass bottles.
The control soil was prepared in an identical manner but not exposed to the test item or solvent. The solvent control was prepared as the test item vessels but exposed to solvent and not test item. Three replicate 50 g* aliquots were removed for Day 0 analysis from the control and solvent control preparations and the remaining soil bulk was incubated.
* Dry Weight
** Wet Weight
*** Carbon/Nitrogen ratio calculated to be 16.3. This work was performed outside the slope of the study plan for this project by Warwick Analytical Service
Test organisms
- Test organisms (inoculum):
- soil
Study design
- Total exposure duration:
- 28 d
Test conditions
- Test temperature:
- 20 ± 2”C
- Moisture:
- 18.9g/100g i.e. 45% of the Water Holding Capacity (WHC)
- Details on test conditions:
- Test System and Supporting Information
The soil for the study was obtained on 21 October 2016 from LUFA Speyer, Germany. The sampling site had not been treated with crop protection products or organic fertilizer for at least 3 years prior to sampling (data from supplier).
The pH of the soil in water was 7.3 (information supplied by LUFA Speyer). The organic carbon content was determined to be 0.67 ± 0.03% whilst the sand content of the soil was determined to be 57.5% (information supplied by LUFA Speyer) and so satisfied the recommendations of the Test Guidelines.
The microbial biomass of the soil was shown to be 17.60 C/g (ISO 14240-2, 1997). This was equivalent to 2.6% of the total soil organic carbon content.
The total nitrogen content of the soil was 56 mg/100 g (information supplied by LUFA Speyer, see Annex 1) and the initial nitrate content of the soil determined on the day the test was initiated was 2.2 mg/100 g.
Experimental Design and Study Conduct
Preparation of Soil
On arrival at Envigo Research Limited, Shardlow, UK the soil was stored at temperatures of between 3 and 4 ºC prior to use. Prior to the start of the test, an amount of soil (approximately 11 kg) was removed and stored at temperatures of between 20 and 21 ºC for 12 days and shielded from light.
The moisture content of the soil was determined prior to the start of the test by drying an amount of soil (100 g) at 105 C (± 10%) until a constant weight was obtained. The moisture content of the soil, expressed as a percentage of the dry weight, was determined to be 4%. The Water Holding Capacity (WHC) of the soil supplied by LUFA Speyer was 35.6 g/100 g± 1.4 and hence 57 mL of deionized reverse osmosis water per 0.5 kg* of soil was added. This gave a final water content of 15.9 g/100 g**. i.e. 45% of the WHC as recommended by the Test Guidelines.
A positive control (Envigo Research Limited, Study Number: SD86WH) used 2-Chloro-6-(trichlormethyl)pyridine as the test item.
Preliminary Solubility Work
Preliminary solubility work showed that the test item was insoluble in water. The test item was soluble in acetone at 5000 mg/10 mL. Therefore, for the purposes of the test, the test concentrations were prepared by dissolving the test item in acetone and adding an aliquot of this to sand prior to dispersal in soil.
Test Item Preparation
The test item was prepared in a preliminary solvent stock solution.
Nominal amounts of test item (1600 and 5000 mg) were separately dissolved in acetone and the volumes adjusted to 10 mL to give 1600 mg/10 mL and 5000 mg/10 mL solvent stock solutions respectively. Serial dilutions from the 5000 mg/10 mL were made to give 500 and 50 mg/10 mL stock solutions. Additionally, a serial dilution from the 1600 mg/10 mL solvent stock solution was made to give a 160 mg/10 mL solvent stock solution.
Aliquots (1 mL) of the solvent stock solutions were dispensed separately onto dry quartz sand (5 g) and the solvent allowed to evaporate to dryness. The test item/sand combination and an amount of powdered Lucerne-green-grass-meal (2.5 g) was then added to a final bulk soil weight of 500 g and thoroughly mixed (Kenwood Chef Mixer) prior to the addition of an aliquot (57 mL) of water to give the required test concentrations of 10, 32, 100, 320,
1000 mg/Kg with a nominal moisture content of 45% of the Water Holding Capacity (WHC). Three 50 g aliquots were then taken for Day 0 analysis. The remaining soil bulk was incubated in glass bottles.
The control soil was prepared in an identical manner but not exposed to the test item or solvent. The solvent control was prepared as the test item vessels but exposed to solvent and not test item. Three replicate 50 g aliquots were removed for Day 0 analysis from the control and solvent control preparations and the remaining soil bulk was incubated.
Exposure Conditions
The soil samples were incubated in glass jars. The test vessels were sealed with polyurethane foam stoppers in order to minimize moisture loss by evaporation and maintained in a temperature controlled room at 20 ± 2 C in darkness.
Assessments
Environmental Measurements
Room temperature was recorded daily throughout the test. Each individual test vessel was weighed on Day 0 and deionized reverse osmosis water added on a weight basis on days 7, 14, 21 and 28 in order to maintain the moisture content within ±5% of the initial moisture content.
Sampling
On Days 0 and 28 three aliquots (50 g*) of soil were removed from one of the control, solvent control and test item vessels for nitrate analysis.
Nitrate Analysis
The samples were transferred to polyethylene bottles and an aliquot (250 mL) of potassium chloride (0.1M) added. The mixtures were then shaken (200 rpm, 30 minutes) using an INFORS TR-225 orbital platform shaker prior to removal of the aqueous phase by filtration (0.45 µm AcroCap filter).
To an aliquot (35 mL) of acid mixture was added 5 mL of the soil filtrate followed by 5 mL of 2,6-dimethylphenol solution. The mixture was thoroughly mixed and allowed to stand for between 15 and 25 minutes prior to determination of the absorbance at 324 nm.
A calibration curve was prepared outside the scope of this study by measuring absorbance values at 324 nm of standard solutions of potassium nitrate at the following concentrations: 1.0, 5.0, 10, 15, 20 and 25 mg NO3- N/L. The standard solutions were treated in the same manner as the test samples. Linear regression analysis of the standard curve data produced an equation for the best-fit line into which the test sample extract absorbance values were substituted to determine the nitrate nitrogen concentration.
The concentration of nitrate (mg/L) in the test sample extracts was obtained by multiplying the nitrate nitrogen concentration (mg/L) by a factor of 4.427.
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal
- Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- 2-Chloro-6-(trichlormethyl)pyridine
Results and discussion
Effect concentrationsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- nitrate formation rate
- Key result
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- nitrate formation rate
- Details on results:
- Absorbance readings and nitrate concentrations determined on each sampling day are given in Table 1. The nitrate formation rates and percentage inhibition of nitrogen transformation activity on Day 28 are given in Table 2. (Below)
Validation Criteria
The variation between replicate solvent control nitrification rates was less than 15% and therefore satisfied the validation criterion given in the Test Guidelines.
Environmental Measurements
Temperature was maintained at 20 ± 2 ºC throughout the test and the moisture content of each control, solvent control and test vessel was adjusted to 45% of the WHC (± 5%) of the soil on days 7, 14, 21 and 28. - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- A positive control (Envigo Research Limited, Study Number: SD86WH) used 2-Chloro-6-(trichlormethyl)pyridine as the test item at concentrations of 0.10, 1.0 and 10 mg/kg.
Exposure conditions and data evaluation for the positive control were similar to those in the definitive test.
Exposure of the soil to the test item gave the following results:
EC10 : 1.2 mg/Kg
EC16 : 1.7 mg/Kg
EC50 : 3.9 mg/Kg, 95% confidence limits 3.5 – 4.4 mg/Kg
EC80 : 7.0 mg/Kg
The results from the positive control with 2-Chloro-6-(trichlormethyl)pyridine were within the normal ranges for this test item.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1 Absorbance Values and Nitrate Concentration Values
Day 0:
Nominal Concentration (mg/kg) | Absorbance (324nm) | Nitrate Concentration (mg NO3/kg) | |
Control | R1 | 0.1541 | 53.15 |
R2 | 0.1479 | 51.05 | |
R3 | 0.1584 | 54.60 | |
MEAN | - | 52.93 | |
SD | - | 52.93 | |
CV% | - | 2 | |
Solvent Control | R1 | 0.1602 | 55.20 |
R2 | 0.1545 | 53.20 | |
R3 | 0.1586 | 54.70 | |
MEAN | - | 54.40 | |
SD | - | 0.98 | |
CV% | - | 2 | |
10 | R1 | 0.1636 | 56.35 |
R2 | 0.1534 | 52.90 | |
R3 | 0.1566 | 54.00 | |
MEAN | - | 54.42 | |
SD | - | 1.76 | |
CV% | - | 3 | |
32 | R1 | 0.1404 | 58.65 |
R2 | 0.1667 | 57.40 | |
R3 | 0.1655 | 57.00 | |
MEAN | - | 57.68 | |
SD | - | 0.86 | |
CV% | - | 1 | |
100 | R1 | 0.1531 | 52.80 |
R2 | 0.1558 | 53.75 | |
R3 | 0.1469 | 50.70 | |
MEAN | - | 52.42 | |
SD | - | 1.56 | |
CV% | - | 3 | |
320 | R1 | 0.1613 | 55.60 |
R2 | 0.1612 | 55.55 | |
R3 | 0.1777 | 60.90 | |
MEAN | - | 57.35 | |
SD | - | 3.07 | |
CV% | - | 5 | |
1000 | R1 | 0.1738 | 59.80 |
R2 | 0.1706 | 58.75 | |
R3 | 0.1655 | 57.00 | |
MEAN | - | 58.52 | |
SD | - | 1.41 | |
CV% | - | 2 |
Day 28:
Nominal Concentration (mg/kg) | Absorbance (324nm) | Nitrate Concentration (mg NO3/kg) | |
Control | R1 | 0.4761 | 164.95 |
R2 | 0.4326 | 157.40 | |
R3 | 0.4651 | 158.25 | |
MEAN | - | 159.20 | |
SD | - | 2.42 | |
CV% | - | 2 | |
Solvent Control | R1 | 0.4914 | 167.15 |
R2 | 0.4740 | 161.25 | |
R3 | 0.4563 | 155.30 | |
MEAN | - | 161.23 | |
SD | - | 5.93 | |
CV% | - | 4 | |
10 | R1 | 0.4327 | 147.30 |
R2 | 0.4482 | 152.55 | |
R3 | 0.4688 | 159.50 | |
MEAN | - | 153.12 | |
SD | - | 6.12 | |
CV% | - | 4 | |
32 | R1 | 0.4768 | 162.20 |
R2 | 0.4636 | 157.75 | |
R3 | 0.4979 | 169.35 | |
MEAN | - | 163.10 | |
SD | - | 5.85 | |
CV% | - | 4 | |
100 | R1 | 0.5251 | 178.55 |
R2 | 0.4852 | 165.05 | |
R3 | 0.4606 | 156.75 | |
MEAN | - | 166.78 | |
SD | - | 11.00 | |
CV% | - | 7 | |
320 | R1 | 0.4448 | 151.40 |
R2 | 0.4654 | 158.35 | |
R3 | 0.4851 | 165.00 | |
MEAN | - | 158.25 | |
SD | - | 6.80 | |
CV% | - | 4 | |
1000 | R1 | 0.4517 | 153.75 |
R2 | 0.4877 | 165.90 | |
R3 | 0.4740 | 161.25 | |
MEAN | - | 160.30 | |
SD | - | 6.13 | |
CV% | - | 4 |
Table 2: Inhibition of Nitrogen Transformation Activity Day 28
Nominal Concentration (mg/kg soil) |
Nitrate Formation Rate (mg NO3/kg/d) |
% Inhibition |
Control |
3.80 |
- |
Solvent Control |
3.82 |
+ |
10 |
3.53 |
8 |
32 |
3.77 |
1 |
100 |
4.08 |
[7] |
320 |
3.60 |
6 |
1000 |
3.64 |
5 |
[Increasing nitrate formation rate as compared to controls]
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The effect of the test item on the nitrogen transformation activity of the soil microorganisms gave an EC50 of greater than 1000 mg/Kg. The No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC) after 28 days exposure was 1000 mg/Kg.
- Executive summary:
A study was performed to assess the long-term effect of the test item, after a single exposure, on the nitrogen and carbon transformation activity of soil microorganisms.
Methods
Soil microorganisms were exposed to the test item at concentrations of 10, 32, 100, 320 and 1000 mg/kg for 28 days at temperatures of between 18 and 21 C in the dark with the addition of powdered Lucerne-green-grass meal to act as a respiratory substrate.
The inhibitory effect of the test item on nitrogen transformation was assessed by the determination of nitrate concentration in the soil samples on Days 0 and 28 and compared to data obtained from solvent control soil samples.
Results
The effect of the test item on the nitrogen transformation activity of the soil microorganisms gave an EC50 of greater than 1000 mg/kg. The No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC) was 1000 mg/kg.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
Welcome to the ECHA website. This site is not fully supported in Internet Explorer 7 (and earlier versions). Please upgrade your Internet Explorer to a newer version.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.
Find out more on how we use cookies.