Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-905-0 | CAS number: 111-76-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effects on fertility
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 720 mg/kg bw/day
Additional information
In all sub-acute, sub-chronic and chronic studies, not all reported in this chapter, no direct effects were seen on male or female reproductive organs at all doses tested (even sub-lethal doses). Unlike 2-methoxyethanol and 2-ethoxyethanol, 2-butoxyethanol seems to have no specific effects on fertility (no effects were seen in the continuous breeding study using dosing by drinking water and neither macroscopic nor microscopic effects on reproductive organs in the repeated dose toxicity studies at doses which does not exhibit severe general toxicity.) A NOAEL of 720 mg/kg was derived from the continuous breeding study for fertility effects (it should be noted that effects seen at the higher doses used in this study are due to general toxicity).
There were no effects on the testis/epididymis in a 14-week rat repeat dose toxicity study in mice. Some changes were seen in male rats but these were mild effects on the testis and epididymi and were not regarded as specific toxicity to the reproductive organs, as numerous tissues were affected and systemic toxicity was significant; therefore reproductive effects were secondary to primary general toxicity. Similarly, no specific toxicity was seen in females, with the only possible effects seen in female rats attributed to unusual results for control animals.
In all sub-acute, sub-chronic and chronic studies no direct effects were seen on male or female reproductive organs at all doses tested (even sub-lethal doses). Metabolism of 2-butoxyethanol leads to the formation of mainly butoxyacetic acid, which is not a male reproductive toxic substance, unlike methoxyacetic acid or ethoxyacetic acid (main metabolites of 2-methoxyethanol and 2-ethoxyethanol respectively).
Short description of key information:
Information from reliable studies:
Continuous breeding study: NOAEL=720mg/kg/day (mice)
90 day study with reproductive toxicity end points-mouse: NOAEL
>694mg/kg/day (males), >1306mg/kg/day (females)
90 day study with reproductive toxicity end points-rat: NOAEL
>452mg/kg/day (males), >470mg/kg/day (females)
Effects on developmental toxicity
Description of key information
NOAEL (rat, oral): 30mg/kg/day (maternal), 100mg/kg/day (developmental)
NOAEL (mouse, oral): 350mg/kg/day (maternal), 650mg/kg/day (developmental)
NOAEL (mouse, oral): <1180mg/kg/day (maternal), <1180mg/kg/day (developmental)
NOAEL (rat, inhalation): 50ppm (maternal), 100ppm (developmental)
NOAEL (rabbit, inhalation): 50ppm (maternal), 100ppm (developmental)
NOAEL (rat, inhalation): <150ppm (maternal), >200ppm (developmental)
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
ORAL ROUTE
One study is available in rats and 2 studies in mice. The lowest foetal NOAEL is 100 mg/kg/day in the RTI (1988) rat study. It is based on effects seen at 200 mg/kg/day: increase foetal lethality without malformations. These effects were seen with maternal toxicity (haemolytic anaemia) and retarded body weight gain evidenced from 100 mg/kg/day. The maternal NOAEL is 30 mg/kg/day in this study.
INHALATION ROUTE
In the most reliable studies, a developmental NOAEL of 100 ppm can be taken into account for the risk assessment based on the data from rats. These effects are seen in presence of clear maternal toxicity (haemolytic anaemia) which was seen at 100 ppm and higher. The maternal NOAEL for this effect was 50 ppm. In another study performed on rats, no effects were seen at the highest tested dose (200ppm). Rabbits appear to be less sensitive than rats.
OVERALL CONCLUSION
For developmental toxicity, studies performed on animals via various administration routes did not demonstrate any teratogenic potential, but foetotoxicity and embryotoxicity (lethality and resorptions) were often observed in relation with maternal toxicity (regenerative haemolytic anaemia). Other effects seen on foetuses were an increase in the incidence of skeletal variations which are generally described as ossification delays. In vitro studies showed some adverse effects on development with 2-butoxyethanol and its metabolite BAA, but only in conjunction with growth effects. Effects seen in foetuses are certainly related to maternal toxicity. Some supporting studies, including those with another substance, clearly demonstrate that anaemia itself can produce very similar effects to those seen with 2 -butoxyethanol at doses that cause maternal haemotoxicity (resorption, growth retardation and variations).
Haemotoxicity (typical adverse effect seen in animals with this compound) generally occurred at low doses of 2-butoxyethanol whatever the route of administration used. In theses studies, data on haemolysis were often observed with acute dosing. Developmental toxicity studies would require daily dosing with test material, which may produce more marked effects on haematopoietic parameters. In addition, female mice and rats were more affected by 2-butoxyethanol haemolysis than males. Thus, these data demonstrate that the concentrations of 2-butoxyethanol used in these developmental toxicity studies were sufficient to produce severe maternal anemia of the magnitude sufficient to trigger effects on embryo/fetal survival. These data give sound support to the hypothesis that the effects seen in developmental toxicity studies with 2-butoxyethanol were due to haemolysis and subsequent maternal anemia.
Overall, it is not therefore not possible to obtain a meaningful NOAEL for developmental toxicity relevant for humans that is based on animals studies. From the data available, it can be concluded that 2 -butoxyethanol does not share the same profile of toxic effects seen in the lower monoalkyl glycol ethers and that that developmental toxicity due to 2-butoxyethanol in humans could not be expected without maternal toxicity. Consequently, there is no concern for this end-point and any DNEL derived for repeat dose toxicity will be protective for any theoretical developmental effects.
Justification for classification or non-classification
No evidence for direct developmental toxicity. Any effects that are seen have been established as secondary to maternal toxicity. No classification therefore required.
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.