Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-905-0 | CAS number: 111-76-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
SKIN IRRITANCY: 3 key studies. Some variability in degree of acute irritation (slight to severe experience, but primarily erythema rather than odema) characterised by persistency and very slow disappearance of effects.
EYE IRRITANCY: 1 key study and 10 reliable supporting studies: All consistency conclude that 2-butoxyethanol is irritant. Lesions characterised particularly by conjunctival reaction (redness) and persistence of effects.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Eye irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Additional information
SKIN IRRITATION
A number of reliable skin irritation studies have been performed. These consistently show that 2 -butoxyethanol causes moderate irritation to severe irritation (primarily manifest as erythema but also oedema) when applied occlusively on the skin for a period of up to 24 hours. The irritant effects are particularly slow to recover, with erythema persisting for up to 14 days and beyond.
EYE IRRITATION
A number of studies have been performed to assess the eye irritation properties of 2 -butoxyethanol (2BE) . Not all have been performed according to guidelines, particularly regarding observation periods, but overall, the studies consistently record that 2BE is irritant or severely irritant to the eyes of rabbits with effects on iris and cornea and particularly conjunctivae. In one well performed study 2BE produced irreversible effects on the conjunctivae and on the cornea in at least one treated rabbit. However, this study was performed according to the old guideline. In the current guideline, it is possible to rinse the treated eye for animal welfare purposes and to more closely simulate the human situation where lachrymation would clear the substance from the eye. In a GLP test, performed according the recent guidelines, 2BE was only irritant (R36) as all symptoms reversed within 21 days. In other respects, the studies produced similar results. It was also demonstrated that dilution of 2BE in water decrease its irritant properties to the extent that a 70% solution did not produce the level of corneal swelling that had been correlated with the classification threshold for R36.
RESPIRATORY IRRITATION
There are no specific studies on this end point recorded here. Chapter 7.9.3 records a study by Kane where sensory irritation was evaluated using an in vivo method with mice (Kane, 1980). In an animal study, mice were exposed to 2 -butoxyethanol to assess the suppression of respiratory rate with increasing vapour concentration to enable the calculation of the RD50 (50% depression) as a measure of sensory irritation. The response obtained within the 150 -1500ppm concentration range tested was less than a 50 % decrease in respiratory rate, ie a relatively shallow dose response curve was obtained. The RD50 calculated by extrapolation was 2825 ppm, a value well in excess of the saturated vapour pressure. This was in excellent correlation with a QSAR model for RD50 generated at a later date, which predicts a value of 2818ppm. When compared with the author's criteria of evaluation, 0.01 RD50 (about 28 ppm) would cause minimal or no sensory irritation whereas 0.1 RD50 (about 280 ppm) would cause definite but tolerable sensory irritation.
Human volunteer studies are reported elsewhere. Three volunteers were exposed to 100 and 200 ppm of 2 -butoxyethanol for periods of up to 4 hours (Mellon institute, chapter 7.10.3)). Immediate irritation of the nose and throat, followed by ocular irritation and disturbed taste was reported by all three subjects Whether such ‘irritation’ was physiological or merely discomfort is not clear.
In other human volunteer inhalation studies (Johanson 1986, Kumagai, 1999 - chapter 7.1.1) 2 -butoxyethanol was not irritant to the eyes or respiratory tract at doses of 20 ppm for 2 hours or 25 ppm for exposure periods of 10 minutes. In a more recent study (Jones, 2003 -chapter 7.1.2) four volunteers reported no signs of irritation were reported after exposure to 50 ppm 2 -butoxyethanol for 2 hour periods on multiple occasions.
Ovarall the available informatin in both animals and humans does not indicate that 2 -butoxyethanol has any significant potential for respiratory irritation. No classification is required for this end point.
Effects on skin irritation/corrosion: irritating
Effects on eye irritation: irritating
Justification for classification or non-classification
SKIN IRRITATION
Because of the nature of the irritant response and the slow recovery time of effects seen in animals, 2 -butoxyethanol can be considered to be a skin irritant. Classification R38 is needed under the DSD and as a category 2 skin irritant under the EU GHS regulation.
EYE IRRITATION
The general response is similar to skin irritancy, with the actual effects sometimes not being severe enough to even trigger an irritancy classification but the effects are quite persistent. However, from the data available, it appears that this persistency is related to whether the eyes are washed or not. In the GLP study to the current protocol where the eyes were washed after 24 hours, full recovery occured. This situation is considered more representative of the hazard to and likely response of humans. On this basis, the more recent result should therefore be given precedence and a classification of R36 under the DSD and a category 2 eye irritancy classification under the EU GHS regulation is warranted.
RESPIRATORY IRRITATION
No data indicating a classification should be considered.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
