Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-573-9 | CAS number: 64-02-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Carcinogenicity
Administrative data
Description of key information
Epidemiological studies are not available for evaluation of the carcinogenic potential of Na4EDTA. There are also no carcinogenicity studies of Na4EDTA available. Therefore, carcinogenicity studies with Na3EDTA have been used for evaluation. A study with Na3EDTA was conducted by administration of test material in the diet to Fischer 344 rats and B6C3F1 mice. These studies did not report specific data on kidney toxicity in either species even though histology was performed. Although, a variety of tumors occurred among test and control animals of both species, no tumors were treatment-related. Taking together the negative results of the carcinogenicity study and of the SHE cell transformation assays as well as the general non-mutagenicity after oral doses it can be concluded that there is no concern on a carcinogenic potential of EDTA.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Carcinogenicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- carcinogenicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- A study for possible carcinogenicity was conducted by administering the test material in feed to Fischer 344 rats. The chemical was administered to 50 males and 50 females at low and high concentrations, for 103 weeks. Matched-control groups were composed of 20 males and 20 females. Animals were analyzed for mortality, clinical signs, histopathological as well as gross pathological changes.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Fischer 344
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Schmidt, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- Weight at study initiation: 85-110 g
- Age at study initiation: 28 days
- Housing: four per cage in solid polycarbonate cages
- Diet: prepared from Wayne Lab Blox Meal (Allied Mills, Inc.) ad libitum
- Water: acidulated water ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 14 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21-25°C
- Humidity (%): 45-55%
- Air changes (per hr): 15 times per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 16/8 - Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on exposure:
- DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency): 3 times/week
- Mixing appropriate amounts with (Type of food): Wayne Lab Blox Meal (Allied Mills, Inc.)
- Storage temperature of food: 4°C - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- - Analyses were performed, using FDA methods to determine the efficiency of the mixing procedure and the stability of the test chemical in feed. Recoveries were found to be 90.3 + / -1.4% of the theoretical value at 7,500 ppm EDTA and 90.4 + / - 3.4% of the theoretical value at 3,750 ppm. It was concluded from these results that the preparations contained reasonably accurate concentrations of EDTA and were mixed homogeneously, and that the chemical was stable in feed for at least a week.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 103 weeks
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Post exposure period:
- none
- Dose / conc.:
- 248 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- original data: 3750 ppm; conversion according to EU risk assessment
- Dose / conc.:
- 495 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- original data: 7500 ppm; conversion according to EU risk assessment
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 50 (except for the control, which consisted of only 20 animals)
- Control animals:
- yes, plain diet
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: approximately once a month - Sacrifice and pathology:
- GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes; all major organs, not specified but presumably all organs used for histopathology: skin, lymph nodes, mammary gland, salivary gland, bone marrow, trachea, lungs and bronchi, heart, thyroids, parathyroids, esophagus, stomach, small intestine, large intestine, liver, gallbladder, pancreas, spleen, kidneys, adrenals, urinary bladder, prostate or uterus, testis or ovary, brain, and pituitary.
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes;
skin, lymph nodes, mammary gland, salivary gland, bone marrow, trachea, lungs and bronchi, heart, thyroids, parathyroids, esophagus, stomach, small intestine, large intestine, liver, gallbladder, pancreas, spleen, kidneys, adrenals, urinary bladder, prostate or uterus, testis or ovary, brain, and pituitary. - Statistics:
- - Statistical tests of differences in survival between groups are compared using the method of Cox (1972) for two groups and an extension of this method by Tarone (1975) for more than two groups.
- Statistical analysis of the incidence of tumors was made using the Fisher exact test (Cox, 1970) to compare a control group to a group of treated animals at each dose. In addition, the Armitage and Cochran test for linear trend in proportions, with continuity correction (Armitage, 1971), was used - Clinical signs:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No significant signs were observed among test animals during the first year of the study. In the 6 months preceding termination of the test, corneal opacities, ascites, and urine stains, occurred in both treatment and control groups.
- Description (incidence):
- The male rats exhibited a negative dose-related trend in survival with the probability level of P = 0.103; the treated and control groups of male rats can thus be considered as comparable to each other in survival. The female rats also exhibited a negative dose-related trend in survival, but in this case the effect was statitstically significant (p =0.029).
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Average body weights of treated male and female rats were comparable to those of the matched controls throughout the study.
- Gross pathological findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Inflammatory and degenerative changes were observed in about the same frequency in all groups. These lesions appeared to be related to age and no to the administration of the chemical.
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- A high incidence of neoplasms occurred in the reproductive and endocrine systems and lower in the hematopoietic, respiratory, integumentary, and digestive systems. No neoplasms were observed in the nervous, musculoskeletal, or urinary systems or in organs of special sense. A number of tumors occurred in other organ systems of both sexes, controls as well as treated animals. No tumor appeared in a statistically significant positive trend in either dose groups or sexes. A variety of endocrine tumors were found, some types occurring only in treated animals. However, these tumors occurred in low numbers and have frequently been seen in untreated animals in other studies. Therefore, they are probably unrelated to treatment.
Males: Interstitial-cell tumors of the testes were observed in nearly all male rats in each feeding group. This high incidence of interstitial-cell tumors in both treated and control animals reflects this commonly occurring age-related lesion in the male Fischer 344 rat.
Females: The distribution of neoplasms in the reproductive system among control and treated rats was random, the tumors occurred mainly in the uterus. The majority of these were endometrial stromal polyps. However, one adenocarcinoma and one leiomyosarcoma occurred at 495 ppm. An ovarian cystadenoma was detected in a single 248 ppm-dose rat. - Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- >= 495 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- histopathology: neoplastic
- Remarks on result:
- other: highest dose tested
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
Reference
Table 1: Analyses of the Incidence of Primary Tumors at Specific Sites in Male Rats Fed EDTA Trisodium Salt in the Diet
Morphology (p-value) | Control | 248 mg/kg bw/day | 495 mg/kg bw/day |
Hematopoietic System: Leukemia, Malignant Lymphoma and Lymphocytic Leukemia | 3/20 (n.s.) | 4/50 (n.s.) | 4/50 (n.s.) |
Weeks to first observed tumor: | 76 | 104 | 102 |
Adrenal: Pheochromocytoma | 2/20 (n.s.) | 5/49 (n.s.) | 4/50 (n.s.) |
Weeks to first observed tumor: | 104 | 104 | 67 |
Thyroid: C-cell Adenoma | 0/17 (n.s.) | 6/35 (p = 0 0.08) | 3/38 (n.s.) |
Weeks to first observed tumor: | - | 104 | 67 |
Pituitary: Chromophobe Adenoma | 0/18 | 3/47 (n.s.) | 5/44 (n.s.) |
Weeks to first observed tumor: | - | 88 | 104 |
Lung: Alveolar/Bronchiolar Adenoma and Carcinoma | 1/18 (n.s.) | 2/50 (n.s.) | 3/49 (n.s.) |
Weeks to first observed tumor: | 104 | 95 | 67 |
Liver: hepatocellular Adenoma and Neoplastic Nodule | 0/20 (n.s.) | 1/48 (n.s.) | 1/50 (n.s.) |
Weeks to first observed tumor: | - | 104 | 104 |
Testis: Interstitial-cell Tumor | 19/20 (n.s.) | 43/50 (n.s.) | 44/50 (n.s.) |
Weeks to first observed tumor: | 88 | 85 | 95 |
Table 2 Analyses of the Incidence of Primary Tumors at Specific Sites in Female Rats Fed EDTA Trisodium Salt in the Diet
Morphology (p-value) | Control | 248 mg/kg bw/day | 495 mg/kg bw/day |
Hematopoietic System: Leukemia, Malignant Lymphoma and Lymphocytic Leukemia | 1/20 (n.s.) | 8/50 (n.s.) | 0/50 (n.s.) |
Weeks to first observed tumor: | 104 | 80 | - |
Adrenal: Pheochromocytoma | 1/20 (n.s.) | 1/49 (n.s.) | 1/48 (n.s.) |
Weeks to first observed tumor: | 98 | 104 | 104 |
Thyroid: C-cell Adenoma | 0/11 (n.s.) | 0/36 (n.s.) | 1/37 (n.s.) |
Weeks to first observed tumor: | - | - | 104 |
Pituitary: Chromophobe Adenoma | 6/19 (n.s.) | 10/48 (n.s.) | 11/50 (n.s.) |
Weeks to first observed tumor: | 95 | 104 | 104 |
Lung: Alveolar/Bronchiolar Adenoma and Carcinoma | 0/20 (n.s.) | 3/48 (n.s.) | 2/48 (n.s.) |
Weeks to first observed tumor: | - | 104 | 104 |
Liver: Neoplastic Nodule | 0/20 (n.s.) | 1/48 (n.s.) | 0/48 (n.s.) |
Weeks to first observed tumor: | - | 104 | - |
Uterus: Endometrial Stromal Polyp | 5/20 (n.s.) | 6/50 (n.s.) | 7/50 (n.s.) |
Weeks to first observed tumor: | 104 | 96 | 85 |
Mammary Gland: Fibroadenoma | 4/20 (n.s.) | 3/50 (n.s.) | 3/50 (n.s.) |
Weeks to first observed tumor: | 85 | 96 | 97 |
n.s. = not significant
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 500 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- chronic
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- 103-week feeding study (Read-Across)
Carcinogenicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Carcinogenicity: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
Classification, Labelling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
The available data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008. Based on the available data, the substance is not considered to be classified for carcinogenicity under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, as amended for the ninth time in Regulation (EU) No 2016/1179.
Additional information
A standard carcinogenicity study on mice and rats using Na3EDTA did not demonstrate that the test substance is carcinogenic in experimental animals. 50 male and 50 female Fischer 344 rats were administered with 3750 and 7500 ppm (equivalent to about 248 and 495 mg/kg bw/day) daily in the diet for 103 weeks (NITS 1977). Matched control groups were composed of 20 male and 20 female animals. The average body weights of treated males and females were comparable to those of the matched controls throughout the study. No treatment-related clinical signs were observed and no statistically significant differences in survival noted. Inflammatory and degenerative changes were observed in about the same frequency in all groups. The lesions appeared to be related to age and not to the administration of the test substance. A high incidence of tumors has been observed in the reproductive and endocrine systems and low incidences occurred in the hematopoietic, respiratory, integumentary, and digestive systems. No neoplasms were observed in the nervous, musculoskeletal, or urinary systems. No tumor appeared in a statistically significant positive trend in either dose groups or sexes. A variety of endocrine tumors were found, some types occurring only in treated animals. However, these tumors occurred in low numbers and have frequently been seen in untreated animals in other studies. Therefore, they are probably unrelated to treatment. In a similar study in mice, 50 male and 50 female B6C3Fl mice were administered with the same dose concentrations (3750 and 7500 ppm, equivalent to about 469 and 938 mg/kg bw/day) daily in the feed for 103 weeks. Matched control groups were composed of 20 male and 20 female animals. In male mice only the high-dose group showed a decrease in average body weight compared to the controls throughout most of the study period. In female mice average body weights of the treatment groups were depressed in a dose-related manner during the study period, although the effect was small. No treatment-related clinical signs were observed and no statistically significant differences in survival noted. Inflammatory and degenerative changes were observed in about the same frequency in all groups. The lesions appeared to be related to age and not to the administration of the test substance. A variety of neoplasms were found in both treated and control animals that were well known from historical controls of the same strain. There was a high incidence of tumors in the hematopoictic, endocrine, digestive, and respiratory systems. The incidence of neoplasms in other systems was variable. For all tumor types observed no statistical significance were seen between incidences in dose groups and control groups. With the exception of a splenic hemangioma in a control female and a 3750 ppm-male, all of the tumors of the hematopoietic system were malignant lymphomas or leukemia. The distribution of endocrine tumors varied little between treated and control mice. For all groups, the incidences of hepatic neoplasms were considerably higher in males than in females. Liver tumors occurred in the 3750 ppm-dose (10/44, 22%) and 7500 ppm-dose (10/47, 21%) male groups. Percentage was approximately the same as in the male controls (3/19, 16%). Primary neoplasms of the respiratory system were observed in both treated and control groups. The highest incidence of pulmonary neoplasms was found in the 7500 ppm-dose male mice (control: 2/18, 11% ; 3750ppm: 8/44, 18%; 7500ppm: 12/45, 26%). This may suggest a treatment related effect. Lung tumors were frequently seen in mice of this strain and age, and therefore, the increase of incidence in this mouse study is probably not related to treatment. In conclusion, the non-significantly increased incidence of some tumor types observed in the study provides no clear evidence of carcinogenic effects in the mice.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.