Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 224-073-5 | CAS number: 4193-55-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From November 3 to 9, 1998
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study conducted according to internationally accepted testing guidelines and performed according to GLP. The OECD recommended combination of strains was tested.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 998
- Report date:
- 1998
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted July 21, 1997
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (no detrimental impact on the outcome of the study).
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (no detrimental impact on the outcome of the study).
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Disodium 4,4'-bis[6-anilino-[4-[bis(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]stilbene-2,2'-disulphonate
- EC Number:
- 224-073-5
- EC Name:
- Disodium 4,4'-bis[6-anilino-[4-[bis(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]stilbene-2,2'-disulphonate
- Cas Number:
- 4193-55-9
- Molecular formula:
- C40H44N12O10S2.2Na
- IUPAC Name:
- disodium 2-[(1E)-2-[4-({4-[bis(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-6-(phenylamino)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl}amino)-2-sulfonatophenyl]ethenyl]-5-({4-[bis(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-6-[(cyclohexa-1,3-dien-1-yl)amino]-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl}amino)benzene-1-sulfonate
Constituent 1
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- TA 1537, genotype his C 3076; rfa-; uvrB; frame shift mutations.
TA 98, genotype his D 3052; rfa-; uvrB; R-factor; frame shift mutations.
TA 1535, genotype his G 46; rfa-; uvrB; base-pair mutations.
TA 100, genotype his G 46; rfa-; uvrB; R-factor; base-pair mutations.
WP2, genotype trp; trp; uvrA; base-pair substitutions and others
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9-mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment II: 33, 100, 333, 1000, 2500 and 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- On the day of the experiment, the test article was dissolved in deionised water.
The solvent was chosen because of its solubility properties and its relative non- toxicity to the bacteria.
No precipitation of the test article occurred up to the highest investigated dose.
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- current untreated
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- methylmethanesulfonate
- other: 4-nitro-o-phenylene-diamine and 2-aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- Without met. act: NaN3 for TA 1535, TA 100; 4-NOPD for TA 1537, TA 98; MMS for WP2 uvrA. With met. act: 2-M for TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100, WP2 uvrA.
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- PRECULTURE
From the thawed ampoules of the strains 0.5 ml suspension was transferred into 250 ml Erlenmeyer flasks containing 20 ml nutrient medium. A solution of 20 µl ampicillin (25 µg/ml) was added to the strains TA 98 and TA 100.
This nutrient medium contains per litre:
8 9 Merck Nutrient Broth (MERCK, 0-64293 Darmstadt)
5 9 NaCI (MERCK, 0-64293 Darmstadt)
The bacterial cultures were incubated in a shaking water bath for 4 hours at 37° C.
Selective Agar: the plates with the selective agar were obtained from E. Merck, 0-64293 Darmstadt.
Overlay Agar: the overlay agar contains per litre:
for Salmonella strains:
6.0 g MERCK Agar Agar*
6.0 g NaCI*
10.5 mg L-Histidine x HCl x H2O*
12.2 mg Biotin*
For Escherichia coli:
6.0 g MERCK Agar Agar*
6.0 g NaCI*
2.5 mg Tryptophan*
* (MERCK, 0-64293 Darmstadt)
Sterilisations were performed at 121°C in an autoclave.
S9 PREPARATION
The bacteria used in this assay do not possess the enzyme systems which, in mammals, are known to convert promutagens into active DNA damaging metabolites. In order to over- come this major drawback an exogenous metabolic system is added in form of mammalian microsome enzyme activation mixture.
The S9 liver microsomal fraction was obtained from the livers of 8 - 12 weeks old male rats, strain Wistar Hanlbm which received daily applications of 80 mg/kg b.w. Phenobarbital ip. dissolved in aqua deionised and β-Naphthotlavone orally dissolved in corn oil on three subsequent days. The livers were prepared 24 hours after the last treatment.
After decapitation of the anaesthetised animals the livers of the animals were removed, washed in 150 mM KCl and homogenised. The homogenate was diluted 1+3 in KCl and centrifuged cold at 9,000 g for 10 minutes at 4 °C. A stock of the supernatant containing the microsomes was frozen in ampoules and stored at -80 °C. Small numbers of the ampoules are kept at - 20 °C for up to one week before use. The protein content was determined using an analysis kit of BioRad Laboratories, D-80939 Munchen.
The protein concentration in the S9 preparation was 23.7 mg/ml.
Before the experiment an appropriate quantity of S9 supernatant was thawed and mixed with S9 co-factor solution. The amount of S9 supernatant was 15% v/v in the S9 mix. Cofactors are added to the S9 mix to reach the following concentrations in the S9 mix:
8 mM MgCl2
33 mM KCI
5 mM Glucose-6-phosphate
5 mM NADP
in 100 mM sodium-ortho-phosphate-buffer, pH 7.4.
During the experiment the S9 mix was stored in an ice bath.
PRE-EXPERIMENT TOXICITY
To evaluate the toxicity of the test item a pre-experiment was performed with strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100, and WP2 uvrA. Eight concentrations were tested for toxicity and mutation induction with three plates each. The experimental conditions in this pre-experiment were the same as described below for the experiment I (plate incorporation test).
Toxicity of the test item results in a reduction in the number of spontaneous revertants or a clearing of the bacterial background lawn.
DOSE SELECTION
Based upon the results of this pre-experiment the concentrations applied in the main experiments were chosen. The concentration range covered two logarithmic decades. Two independent experiments were performed.
According to the dose selection criteria the test article was tested at the following concentrations: 33, 100, 333, 1000, 2500 and 5000 µg/plate .
TEST PERFORMANCE
For each strain and dose level including the controls, three plates were used.
The following materials were mixed in a test tube and poured onto the selective agar plates:
100 µl test solution at each dose level, solvent (negative control) or reference mutagen solution (positive control)
500 µl S9 mix (for test with metabolic activation) or S9 mix substitution buffer (for test without metabolic activation)
100 µl Bacteria suspension (cf. test system, pre-culture of the strains)
2000 µl Overlay agar
In the pre-incubation assay 100 µl test solution, 500 µl S9 mix / S9 mix substitution buffer and 100 µl bacterial suspension were mixed in a test tube and shaken at 37 °C for 60 minutes. After preincubation 2.0 ml overlay agar (45 °C) was added to each tube. The mixture was poured on selective agar plates.
After solidification the plates were incubated upside down for at least 48 hours at 37 °C in the dark. - Evaluation criteria:
- A test article is considered positive if either a dose related and reproducible increase in the number of revertants or a biologically relevant and reproducible increase for at least one test concentration is induced.
A test article producing neither a reproducible and dose related increase in the number of revertants, nor a biologically relevant and reproducibly positive response at any one of the test points is considered non-mutagenic in this system.
A mutagenic response is described as follows:
A test article is considered mutagenic if in the strains TA 98, TA 100, and WP2 uvrA the number of reversions will be at least twice as high and in the strains TA 1535 and TA 1537 at least three times higher as compared to the spontaneous reversion rate.
Also, a dose-dependent and reproducible increase in the number of revertants is regarded as an indication of possibly existing mutagenic potential of the test article regardless whether the highest dose induced the above described enhancement factors or not.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- No toxic effects, evident as a reduction in the number of revertants (below the indication factor of 0.5), occurred in the test groups with and without metabolic activation.
No substantial increase in revertant colony numbers of any of the five tester strains was observed following treatment with test item at any dose level, neither in the presence nor absence of metabolic activation (S9 mix). There was also no tendency of higher mutation rates with increasing concentrations in the range below the generally acknowledged border of biological relevance.
Appropriate reference mutagens were used as positive controls. They showed a distinct increase of induced revertant colonies. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Summary of results
without S9 mix
Conc. µg/plate | TA 1535 | TA 1537 | TA 98 | TA 100 | WP2 uvr A | |||||
I | II | I | II | I | II | I | II | I | II | |
Negative control | 16 | 12 | 20 | 9 | 22 | 15 | 81 | 110 | 40 | 34 |
Solvent control | 14 | 13 | 16 | 10 | 19 | 16 | 99 | 131 | 47 | 38 |
Positive control* | 1023 | 951 | 108 | 138 | 283 | 169 | 286 | 453 | 683 | 356 |
33 | 9 | 11 | 18 | 11 | 25 | 20 | 91 | 117 | 56 | 46 |
100 | 17 | 12 | 15 | 10 | 21 | 14 | 55 | 105 | 38 | 28 |
333 | 12 | 13 | 17 | 12 | 20 | 16 | 87 | 112 | 42 | 37 |
1000 | 14 | 18 | 14 | 11 | 19 | 14 | 46 | 127 | 40 | 35 |
2500 | 12 | 16 | 17 | 6 | 19 | 20 | 59 | 124 | 53 | 32 |
5000 | 18 | 18 | 20 | 10 | 19 | 15 | 94 | 127 | 48 | 31 |
with S9 mix
Conc. µg/plate | TA 1535 | TA 1537 | TA 98 | TA 100 | WP2 uvr A | |||||
I | II | I | II | I | II | I | II | I | II | |
Negative control | 17 | 17 | 17 | 6 | 34 | 27 | 78 | 125 | 70 | 40 |
Solvent control | 21 | 15 | 27 | 8 | 28 | 26 | 84 | 127 | 54 | 42 |
Positive control** | 120 | 89 | 127 | 93 | 204 | 60 | 416 | 401 | 167 | 112 |
33 | 21 | 20 | 23 | 14 | 25 | 18 | 68 | 119 | 52 | 33 |
100 | 24 | 18 | 16 | 8 | 27 | 24 | 69 | 115 | 44 | 36 |
333 | 17 | 20 | 25 | 12 | 28 | 25 | 77 | 129 | 52 | 44 |
1000 | 19 | 15 | 22 | 13 | 20 | 20 | 78 | 115 | 50 | 38 |
2500 | 20 | 17 | 19 | 11 | 38 | 28 | 77 | 115 | 59 | 55 |
5000 | 19 | 19 | 17 | 9 | 40 | 26 | 81 | 125 | 56 | 49 |
*Sodium azide (10.0 µg/plate) strains TA 1535 and TA 100
4 -nito-o-phenylene-diamine strains TA 1537 (50 µg/plate) and TA 98 (10.0 µg/plate)
Methyl methane snlfonate (5 µl/plate) strain WP2 uvrA
**2-aminoanthracene (2.5 µg/plate) strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
2 -aminoanthracene (10.0 µg/plate) strain WP2 11vrA
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
Test item is considered to be non-mutagenic in this Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay. - Executive summary:
Method
The study was performed to investigate the potential of test item to induce gene mutations according to the plate incorporation test (experiment I) and the pre-incubation test (experiment II) using the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100, and the Escherichia coli strain WP2 uvrA.
The assay was performed in two independent experiments both with and without liver microsomal activation. Each concentration, including the controls, was tested in triplicate. The test article was tested at the following concentrations: 33, 100, 333, 1000, 2500 and 5000 µg/plate.
Results
The plates incubated with the test article showed normal background growth up to 5000 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation in both independent experiments. No toxic effects, evident as a reduction in the number of revertants, occurred in the test groups with and without metabolic activation. No substantial increase in revertant colony numbers of any of the five tester strains was observed following treatment at any dose level, neither in the presence nor absence of metabolic activation (S9 mix). There was also no tendency of higher mutation rates with increasing concentrations in the range below the generally acknowledged border of biological relevance. Appropriate reference mutagens were used as positive controls and showed a distinct increase of induced revertant colonies.
Conclusion
In conclusion, it can be stated that during the described mutagenicity test and under the experimental conditions reported, the test article did not induce gene mutations by base pair changes or frameshifcs in the genome of the strains used. Therefore, test item is considered to be non-mutagenic in this Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.