Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 285-561-1 | CAS number: 85117-09-5 Mixtures of chemical substances produced by burning (below 1200°C) natural variants of limestone or chalk containing from 10 to 20%, or more, of clayey or siliceous materials which are predominantly SiO2, Al2O3 and iron oxide. Consist primarily of 2CaOsb.2, Ca(OH)2, CaO and 2CaOsb.2O3. 3CaO.2SiO2, 4CaOsb.2O3. Fe2O3, 2CaOsb.2O3sb.2, CaCO3 and SiO2 may also be included.
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to soil microorganisms
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to soil microorganisms
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- May 23, 2007 - August 28, 2007
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- BBA Part VI, 1-1
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Guideline: BBA VI, 1-1 (1990) under consideration of OECD 216 (2000) and OECD 217 (2000).
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Vehicle:
- no
- Test organisms (inoculum):
- soil
- Total exposure duration:
- 96 d
- Moisture:
- Water content soil: 10.12 g/100 g soil d.w.
Water holding capacity: 39.70 g/100 g soil d.w. - Duration:
- 96 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 4 g/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: dehydrogenase activity
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 12 g/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: dehydrogenase activity
- Duration:
- 48 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 8.1 g/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: dehydrogenase activity
- Duration:
- 96 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 8.7 g/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: dehydrogenase activity
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Reference item must have an effect of at least 15% on day 28 after treatment. In the most recent study the reference item Dinoterb caused an inhibition of dehydrogenase activity of -69.4, -73.4 and -84.4% at 6.80, 16.00 and 27.00 mg per kg soil d.w.
- Conclusions:
- The pH of the soil increased with increasing concentrations of calcium dihydroxide. The high pH value of the soil is considered to be the toxic effect. At the highest concentration tested, the maximum pH level was 11.9 which decreased to 8.5 during the course of the study. At low test item concentration the dehydrogenase activity was stimulated.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to soil microorganisms
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- April 18, 2007 - July 25, 2007
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 216 (Soil Microorganisms: Nitrogen Transformation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Details on sampling:
- SOIL
- on days 0 (3 hours), 14, 28, 48 and 96 after application, soil samples were taken for the determination of the mineral nitrogen content of the soil. - Vehicle:
- yes
- Details on preparation and application of test substrate:
- COLLECTION
- soil removal: to a depth of 20 cm as mixed sample
- dried at room temperature
- passed through a 2 mm mesh sieve
- characterization: biologically active agricultural loamy sand soil (1.42% organic C, 9.9% clay, 39% silt, 51.2% sand), no fertilisation since 2003, last application of plant protection products in 1990
- origin: wassergut Canitz, Germany (12.694435960 degrees East, 51.403774567 degrees North)
STORAGE
- at a temperature of 4 °C
- in aerobic conditions in the dark
- before applicatin soil was adapted to test conditions
PREPARATION
1)
- 300 g soil (dry weight) (= one sub-sample) weighed per test vessel
- soil mixed with 0.5 % lucerne meal (i.e. 1.5 g/300 g soil d.w.) by means of a hand-stirrer
- vehicle: quartz meal
- water was added to the soil to achieve a water content of approx. 55 % of WHC
- incubation in wide-mouth glass flasks (500 mL) the below described test conditions
2)
- an additional soil sample (without lucerne meal) used for determination of initial NH4-N- and NO3-N-content
- NO3-N-content was 0.96 mg/100 g soil d.w. - Test organisms (inoculum):
- soil
- Total exposure duration:
- 96 d
- Test temperature:
- 19.9 - 21.9°C in a climatic room
- Moisture:
- 18.66-19.70 g/100 g soil d.w.
- Details on test conditions:
- - Illumination: darkness
- 3 replicates per concentrations (i.e. 3 subsamples of soil per concentration)
- humus content of soil: 2.44%
- initial pH 7.1
- microbial biomass 23.55 mg C/100 g soil d.w. (i.e. 1.66% compared to organic C content) - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- nominal concentrations: 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 10 and 12 g test item/kg soil dry weight
- Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- Dinoterb
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 8 g/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: nitrogen transformation
- Duration:
- 48 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 10 g/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: nitrogen transformation
- Duration:
- 96 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 12 g/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: nitrogen transformation
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 9.7 g/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: nitrogen transformation
- Duration:
- 48 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 10 g/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: nitrogen transformation
- Duration:
- 96 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 12 g/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: nitrogen transformation
- Details on results:
- not applicable
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- Dinoterb caused a stimulation of nitrogen transformation of 44.8% and 58.2% at 6.80 and 16.00 mg Dinoterb per kg soil dry weight, respectively, 28 days after application.
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- Not applicale
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- The coefficients of variation in the control group of the nitrogen transformation test were maximum 9.3% and thus fulfilled the demanded range (≤ 15%).
- Conclusions:
- The 96d-NOEC was 12 g/kg soil dry weight, the highest concentration tested. The pH of the soil increased with increasing concentrations of calcium dihydroxide. The high pH value of the soil is considered to be the toxic effect. At the highest concentration tested (12 g/kg soil), the maximum pH level was 11.9 which decreased to 8.5 during the course of the study. At high test concentrations, the nitrogen transformation activity of the soil microflora was shown to recover within 100 days of exposure to the test item. At low test item concentrations the nitrogen transformation was stimulated.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to soil microorganisms
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- 16 December 2009 to 17 February 2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 216 (Soil Microorganisms: Nitrogen Transformation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.21 (Soil Microorganisms: Nitrogen Transformation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on preparation and application of test substrate:
- APPLICATION OF TEST SUBSTANCE TO SOIL
- Method: The test item was mixed with quartz sand prior to dispersal in soil. An amount of test item (1000 mg) was mixed with dry quartz sand (10 g). The test item/sand combination and an amount of powdered Lucerne-green-grass-meal (5 g) was then added to a final bulk soil weight of 1000 g (dry weight) and thoroughly mixed. An aliquot (47 mL) of water was then added to give the required test concentration of 1000 mg/kg with a nominal moisture content of 40% of the Water Holding Capacity (WHC). The soil was then mixed again to ensure homogeneity prior to splitting into 18 replicates for incubation. - Test organisms (inoculum):
- soil
- Total exposure duration:
- 28 d
- Test temperature:
- 21 ± 1 °C
- Moisture:
- The moisture content of the soil, expressed as a percentage of the dry weight, was determined to be 9%. The Water Holding Capacity (WHC) of the soil as supplied was 35.1 g/100g and hence 47 mL of deionised reverse osmosis water per 1.0 kg of soil was added. This gave a final water content of 13.3 g/100 g i.e. 40% of the WHC as recommended by the Test Guidelines.
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test container (type, material, size): The soil samples were incubated in glass jars. The test vessels were covered with loosely fitted lids in order to minimise moisture loss by evaporation and maintained in a temperature controlled room at approximately 21 °C, in darkness.
- Amount of soil: 50 g (dry weight) of soil was used per vessel
- No. of replicates per concentration: 18 replicates
- No. of replicates per control: 9 replicates
SOIL INCUBATION
- Method: series of individual subsamples
SOURCE AND PROPERTIES OF SUBSTRATE (if soil)
- Geographical reference of sampling site (latitude, longitude): LUFA Speyer, Obere Langgasse 40, 67346 Speyer, Germany
- Vegetation cover: Uncultivated
- Treatments with pesticides or fertilizers: The sampling site had not been treated with crop protection products or organic fertiliser for at least 3 years prior to sampling.
- Depth of sampling: 20 cm
- Soil texture
- % sand: 61.9 ± 4.2%
- Soil classification system: Sandy loam
- pH (in water): 6.6 ± 0.5
- Initial nitrate concentration for nitrogen transformation test (mg nitrate/kg dry weight): 2.5 mg/100 g (ammonium <0.1 mg/100 g)
- Maximum water holding capacity (in % dry weight): 35.1%
- Pretreatment of soil: None
- Initial microbial biomass as % of total organic C: 121 µg C/g (equivalent to 1.2% of the total soil organic carbon content)
DETAILS OF PREINCUBATION OF SOIL: Not applicable
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED: On days 0, 7 and 28 triplicate control and six replicate test item vessels were sacrificed for nitrate analysis.
The contents of the test vessel were transferred to 500 mL polyethylene bottles and an aliquot (250 mL) of potassium chloride (0.1 M) added. The mixture was then shaken (150 rpm, 60 minutes) prior to removal of the aqueous phase by filtration (0.45 µm).
To an aliquot (35 mL) of acid mixture was added 5 mL of the particle free extract followed by 5 mL of 2,6-dimethylphenol solution. The mixture was thoroughly mixed and allowed to stand for 10 minutes prior to determination of the absorbance at 324 nm.
A calibration curve was prepared by measuring absorbance values at 324 nm of standard solutions of potassium nitrate at the following concentrations: 1.0, 5.0, 10, 15, 20 and 25 mg NO3- N/L. The standard solutions were treated in the same manner as the test samples. Linear regression analysis of the standard curve data produced an equation for the best-fit line into which the test sample extract absorbance values were substituted to determine the nitrate nitrogen concentration.
The concentration of nitrate (mg/L) in the test sample extracts was obtained by multiplying the nitrate nitrogen concentration (mg/L) by a factor of 4.427.
VEHICLE CONTROL PERFORMED: no
RANGE-FINDING STUDY
- Test concentrations: Nominal concentrations: 100 and 1000 mg/kg
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: The results showed no significant effect on nitrogen transformation activity. - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal concentration: 1000 mg/kg
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- nitrate formation rate
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- nitrate formation rate
- Details on results:
- Statistical analysis of the nitrate concentration values was carried out for the control and test item group using a Students t-test. The test item group was shown to have similar or not significantly different nitrate concentrations as the control group (P≥0.05). It was therefore considered that the test item exhibited no adverse effect on the nitrogen transformation rate.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- The variation between replicate control nitrification rates was less than 15% and therefore satisfied the validation criterion given in the Test Guidelines.
- Conclusions:
- The effect of the calcium carbonate (nano) on the nitrogen transformation activity of soil microorganisms has been investigated over a 28-day period and gave an EC50 value of greater than 1000 mg/kg. Correspondingly the NOEC was 1000 mg/kg.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to soil microorganisms
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
Common functional groups/mechanism of action.
2. SOURCE AND TARGET CHEMICAL(S) (INCLUDING INFORMATION ON PURITY AND IMPURITIES)
Target: Lie (chemical), hydraulic [CAS 85117-09-5; See section 1.2 for information on purity.
Source: calcium dihydroxide [CAS 1305-62-0; EC 215-137-3] 98.2%
3. ANALOGUE APPROACH JUSTIFICATION
In the environment, lime substances rapidly dissociate or react with water. These reactions, together with the equivalent amount of hydroxyl ions set free when considering 100mg of the lime compound (hypothetic example), are illustrated below:
Ca(OH)2 <-> Ca2+ + 2OH-
100 mg Ca(OH)2 or 1.35 mmol sets free 2.70 mmol OH-
Ca(OH)2 + Ca2SiO4 + CaCO3 + 3 H2O <-> 4Ca2+ + SiO2 + CO2 + 8OH-
100 mg lime (chemical) hydraulic or 0.27 mmol sets free 2.16 mmol OH-
It has to be noted that CO32- is not expected to directly release two hydroxyl ions under most environmental conditions (depends on CO2 concentrations and pH) and this is therefore a worst case assumption.
From these reactions it is clear that the effect of lime (chemical) hydraulic will be caused either by calcium or hydroxyl ions. Since calcium is abundantly present in the environment and since the effect concentrations are within the same order of magnitude of its natural concentration, it can be assumed that the adverse effects are mainly caused by the pH increase caused by the hydroxyl ions. Furthermore, the above mentioned calculations show that the base equivalents are within a factor 2 for lime (chemical) hydraulic and calcium hydroxide. As such, it can be reasonably expected that the effect on pH of lime (chemical) hydraulic is comparable to calcium hydroxide for a same application on a weight basis. Consequently, read-across from calcium hydroxide to lime (chemical) hydraulic is justified.
4. DATA MATRIX
Source: No studies available
Target: 96d-EC50 = 8.7 g/kg soil dw. and 96d-NOEC = 4 g/kg soil dw. for calcium dihydroxide for dehydrogenase activity; 96d-EC50 > 12 g/kg soil dw. and 96d-NOEC >= 12 g/kg soil dw. for calcium dihydroxide for nitrogen transformation - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Duration:
- 96 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 4 g/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: dehydrogenase activity
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 12 g/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: dehydrogenase activity
- Duration:
- 48 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 8.1 g/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: dehydrogenase activity
- Duration:
- 96 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 8.7 g/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: dehydrogenase activity
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1: AbsorbanceReadingsand Nitrate Concentrations from the Definitive Test
Nominal Concentration (mg/kg soil) |
Day 0 |
Day 7 |
Day 28 |
||||
Absorbance* (324 nm) |
Nitrate Concentration (mg NO3/kg) |
Absorbance* (324 nm) |
Nitrate Concentration (mg NO3/kg) |
Absorbance* (324 nm) |
Nitrate Concentration (mg NO3/kg) |
||
Control |
R1 |
0.097 |
32.00 |
0.160 |
54.15 |
0.556 |
193.50 |
R2 |
0.144 |
48.55 |
0.147 |
49.60 |
0.512 |
178.05 |
|
R3 |
0.146 |
49.25 |
0.178 |
60.50 |
0.432 |
149.90 |
|
Mean |
- |
43.27 |
- |
54.75 |
- |
173.82 |
|
CV% |
- |
23 |
- |
10 |
- |
13 |
|
1000 |
R1 |
0.178 |
60.50 |
0.228 |
78.10 |
0.528 |
183.65 |
R2 |
0.171 |
58.05 |
0.225 |
77.05 |
0.440 |
152.70 |
|
R3 |
0.175 |
59.45 |
0.230 |
78.80 |
0.539 |
187.55 |
|
R4 |
0.184 |
62.60 |
0.222 |
76.00 |
0.488 |
169.60 |
|
R5 |
0.184 |
62.60 |
0.206 |
70.35 |
0.527 |
183.30 |
|
R6 |
0.204 |
69.65 |
0.246 |
84.40 |
0.521 |
181.20 |
|
Mean |
- |
62.14 |
- |
77.45 |
- |
176.33 |
|
CV% |
- |
7 |
- |
6 |
- |
7 |
* Corrected for blank absorbance value
R1-R6 = Replicates 1 to 6
CV = Coefficient of Variation
Table 2: Inhibition of Nitrogen Transformation Activity
Nominal Concentration (mg/kg soil) |
Day 7 |
Day 28 |
||
Nitrate Formation Rate (mg NO3/kg/d) |
% Inhibition |
Nitrate Formation Rate (mg NO3/kg/d) |
% Inhibition |
|
Control |
1.64 |
- |
4.66 |
- |
1000 |
2.19 |
[34] |
4.08 |
12 |
[Increase in nitrate concentration as compared to controls]
Description of key information
Klimisch 1 study: 96d-EC50 = 8.7 g/kg soil dw. and 96d-NOEC = 4 g/kg soil dw. for calcium dihydroxide for dehydrogenase activity (Schulz, 2007a)
Klimisch 1 study: 96d-EC50 > 12 g/kg soil dw. and 96d-NOEC >= 12 g/kg soil dw. for calcium dihydroxide for nitrogen transformation (Schulz, 2007b)
Klimisch 1 study: 28-d EC50 >1000 mg/kg soil dw and the 28-d NOEC = 1000 mg/kg soil dw.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Long-term EC10 or NOEC for soil microorganisms:
- 4 000 mg/kg soil dw
Additional information
The chronic study on the effect of calcium dihydroxide on the dehydrogenase activity in an agricultural loamy sand soil (Schulz, 2007a) was conducted according to German guidelines for testing of plant protection products (BBA VI, 1-1, 1990). The methods and results are well documented. As such a Klimisch 1 score was assigned to the study. The pH of the soil increased with increasing concentrations of calcium dihydroxide. The high pH value of the soil is considered to be the toxic effect. At the highest concentration tested, the maximum pH level was 11.9 which decreased to 8.5 during the course of the study. At low test item concentration the dehydrogenase activity was stimulated.
The chronic study on the effect of calcium dihydroxide on the nitrogen transformation in an agricultural loamy sand soil (Schulz, 2007b) was carried out according to OECD 216. The study is well documented, all validity criteria are fulfilled. As such a Klimisch 1 score was assigned to the study. The 96d-NOEC was 12 g/kg soil dry weight, the highest concentration tested. The pH of the soil increased with increasing concentrations of calcium dihydroxide. The high pH value of the soil is considered to be the toxic effect. At the highest concentration tested (12 g/kg soil), the maximum pH level was 11.9 which decreased to 8.5 during the course of the study. At high test concentrations, the nitrogen transformation activity of the soil microflora was shown to recover within 100 days of exposure to the test item. At low test item concentrations the nitrogen transformation was stimulated.
The chronic effects of calcium carbonate (nano) at a nominal concentration of 1000 mg/kg soil dw on the nitrogen transformation activity of soil microorganisms were assessed in a study performed to OECD TG 216 under GLP (Clarke, 2010). No adverse effects on the nitrogen transformation rate were exhibited at the concentration tested. Hence, the 28 day EC50 for calcium carbonate (nano) was found to be >1000 mg/kg soil dw and the NOEC was 1000mg/kg soil dw. Calcium carbonate is therefore not toxic to soil microorganisms.
In both studies performed with calcium dihydroxide, effects due to pH were seen at high concentrations. Over time, the pH dropped, presumably as the calcium was converted to calcium carbonate and its availability decreased. Therefore it may be concluded that calcium dihydroxide of high purity represents a worse-case for all grades of lime (chemical) hydraulic, although in any case toxicity to soil microorganisms is low.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.