Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-441-9 | CAS number: 106-91-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effects on fertility
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 30 mg/kg bw/day
Additional information
Reproductive/developmental toxicity
Reproductive toxicity
[SIDS data] Oral toxicity study was performed in SD (Crj: CD) rats by an OECD combined repeated dose and reproductive/developmental toxicity screening test (OECD TG 422). Administration was conducted by gavage at doses of 10, 30 and 100 mg/kg/day from 14 days before mating to 14 days after mating in males and from 14 days before mating to day 3 of lactation in females. (MHW, Japan: 1997)
The fertility index (number of delivered animals/ number of mated animals) decreased significantly at 100 mg/kg. There were no effects on the estrous cycle, copulation index, or gestation length. No significant changes in the numbers of corpora lutea, implants, pups born and live pups as well as the implantation and delivery indices were observed. There were no significant differences in the gestation index, live birth index or viability index on day 4. Histopathological analysis of the gonads showed no significant effect considered to cause infertility in all treatment groups. No change in the number of gonocyte per Sertoli cell was observed in epithelium of seminiferous tubule (stage VIII) of all survival males at 100 mg/kg. No abnormalities attributable to the administration of this chemical were noted in the body weights of live pups or on necropsy of pups in any treated group. Therefore, NOAELs for reproductive performance of parents and pup development were considered to be 30 mg/kg/day and 100 mg/kg/day, respectively. This key study was used for the derivation of the fertility DNEL.
Male mice injected i.p. with 5 consecutive daily doses of 0, 25, 50 or 100 mg/kg/day showed an increase in the percentage of abnormal sperm and decrease in the number of sperm (Xie et al.: 1990). These results were confirmed in a subsequent study where mice were dosed i.p. with 0, 5, 25 or 100 mg/kg for five consecutive days (Vedula et al., 1994). At 100 mg/kg, mice had decreased caudal epididymal weights, slightly lower testicular weights, decreased sperm counts and increased abnormal sperm. Mice given 25 mg/kg/day showed decreased sperm counts and increased abnormal sperm. These results might support the decreased fertility index of rat study at 100 mg/kg/day.
Developmental toxicity
Glycidyl methacrylate was administered by gavage to rats during day 5 to day 15 of gestation at doses of 5.38, 10.76, 21.52 and 108.0 mg/kg/day. The animals were sacrificed on day 19 of pregnancy. (OuYang et al.: 1988)
As maternal toxicity, there was significant decrease in body weight gain at 108.0 mg/kg. There was a statistically significant increase in the fetal resorption rate at the 108.0 mg/kg. The percentage of pups stillborn was somewhat higher than control at all dose levels. However, because this change was not dose-dependent and statistically significant change was only at 10.76 mg/kg, this was not considered to be chemical-related change. Neither birth defects nor fetal abnormalities were noted in rats treated with this chemical. There was also no significant difference in fetal body weight from the control. Therefore, NOAELs were considered to be 21.52 mg/kg/day for maternal toxicity and 108.0 mg/kg/day for teratogenicity.
There were two inhalation tests on developmental toxicity.
Rabbits were exposed to glycidyl methacrylate at concentrations of 29.1, 58.2 and 291 mg/m3, 6 hours/day, daily during day 7 to day 19 of gestation (Vedula et al.: 1995). Daily intake is calculated as 2.62, 5.24 and 26.2 mg/kg/day. Respiratory distress and decrease in feed consumption was observed at 291 mg/m3. Less severe signs of ocular and respiratory irritation consisting of reddened eyes, wet muzzle and sneezing after exposure were observed at 58.2 mg/m3. Treatment-related histopathologic alterations of the nasal tissues (hyperplasia, necrosis, etc.) were present in all animals treated with this chemical. Because of respiratory distress, animals at 291 mg/m3 were removed early from study after the third exposure. Therefore, evaluation of reproductive and embryonal/fetal parameter was precluded. There was no adverse effect on any reproductive and embryo/fetal parameter at 29.1 and 58.2 mg/m3. LOAEL for maternal toxicity was 29.1 mg/m3 (2.62 mg/kg/day) and NOAEL for teratogenicity was 58.2 mg/m3 (5.24 mg/kg/day).
Rabbits were also exposed to glycidyl methacrylate at concentrations of 2.91, 11.6 and 58.2 mg/m3, 7 hours/day, daily during day 7 to day 19 of gestation (Vedula et al.: 1995). Daily intake is calculated as 0.31, 1.22, 6.11 mg/kg/day. The principal indication of maternal toxicity was inflammation of the nasal olfactory and respiratory epithelium at the 11.6 and 58.2 mg/m3. There was no adverse effect on any reproductive and embryo/fetal parameter at any doses. Therefore, NOAEL for maternal toxicity was 2.91 mg/m3 (0.31 mg/kg/day) and NOAEL for teratogenicity was 58.2 mg/m3 (6.11 mg/kg/day).
As three reliable developmental studies by two different routes, oral and inhalation, indicated no teratogenicity even at the highest doses which showed the maternal toxicity, glycidyl methacrylate is not considered to have developmental toxicity.
Effects on developmental toxicity
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 108 mg/kg bw/day
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEC
- 58.2 mg/m³
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available studies classification under REACH and CLP of glycidyl methacrylate for developmental toxicity is not required.
However based on the same studies the substance must be classified under these Regulations as Toxic to Reproduction Category 1B (H360F), the cause probably being its metabolism to glycidol.
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.