Registration Dossier

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Original report not available.

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
secondary source
Title:
IUCLID dataset
Author:
IUCLID4
Year:
2000
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1983

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-ethylhexyl laurate
EC Number:
243-697-9
EC Name:
2-ethylhexyl laurate
Cas Number:
20292-08-4
Molecular formula:
C20H40O2
IUPAC Name:
2-ethylhexyl laurate
Details on test material:
- Analytical purity: not given

Method

Target gene:
his operon
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
not specified
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
8, 40, 200, 1000 and 5000 µg/plate
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
not specified
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
not specified
True negative controls:
not specified
Positive controls:
not specified
Positive control substance:
not specified

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
not specified
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
not specified
Vehicle controls validity:
not specified
Untreated negative controls validity:
not specified
Positive controls validity:
not specified
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative