Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-262-8 | CAS number: 56-23-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study along OECD GL 414, 2 doses only, exposure gestation days 6 - 15, no evaluation details given.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 974
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- GLP compliance:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Carbon tetrachloride
- EC Number:
- 200-262-8
- EC Name:
- Carbon tetrachloride
- Cas Number:
- 56-23-5
- Molecular formula:
- CCl4
- IUPAC Name:
- tetrachloromethane
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): carbon tetra chloride
- Lot/batch No.: Lot No. 9256, Burdick & Jackson Lab. Inc., Muskegon, Michigan
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Spartan
- Age at study initiation:
- Weight at study initiation: average 250 g
- Fasting period before study: not reported
- Housing: wire bottom cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Purina Rat Chow, Ralston Purina Co. St. Louis, Missouri
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: not reported
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): controlled, temperature not reported
- Humidity (%): controlled, exact humidity not reported
- Air changes (per hr): not reported
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): controlled, exact light cycle not reported
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- inhalation: vapour
- Type of inhalation exposure (if applicable):
- whole body
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on exposure:
- GENERATION OF TEST ATMOSPHERE / CHAMBER DESCRIPTION
- Exposure apparatus: 3.7 m³ stainless steel, cubical dynamic exposure chamber
- Method of holding animals in test chamber: not reported
- Source and rate of air: not reported
- Method of conditioning air: not reported
- System of generating vapours: by metering the liquid at known rates into a temperature controlled evaporating flask and diluting this vapours with filtered room air at a rate calculated to give the desired concentration. The nominal concentration of each compound in the chamber atmosphere was calculated from the ratio of the material delivery rate to the rate of total air flow through the chamber.
- Temperature, humidity, pressure in air chamber: not reported
- Air flow rate: not reportes
- Air change rate: not reported
- Method of particle size determination: not applicable
- Treatment of exhaust air:
TEST ATMOSPHERE
- Brief description of analytical method used: 3 times daily using a Beckman IR10 infrared spectrophotometer and in addition by using combustion conductivity analysis
- Samples taken from breathing zone: yes
VEHICLE (if applicable)
- no vehicle used - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- The analytical concentration was determined by analyzing the chamber atmosphere 3 times daily using a Beckman IR10 infrared spectrophotometer with a multipath gas cell having a variable path length of 1-10 m and a volume of 4.5 liters. In addition, the concentration in the chambers was continuously monitored using combustion conductivity analysis to assure the absence of significant deviations from the desired level.
- Details on mating procedure:
- - Impregnation procedure: cohoused
- If cohoused:
- M/F ratio per cage: not reported
- Length of cohabitation: not reported.
- Further matings after two unsuccessful attempts: not reported
- Verification of same strain and source of both sexes: not reported
- Proof of pregnancy: sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy
- Any other deviations from standard protocol: none reported - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 7 hours
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily from gestation day 6 to 15
- Duration of test:
- in total 20 days (pregnancy duration)
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
300 and 1000 ppm (2137 and 6425 mg/m3).
Basis:
nominal conc.
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
334 and 1004 ppm (2137 and 6425 mg/m3).
Basis:
analytical conc.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- litter size 22 -23
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: not reported
- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random): not reported
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: No data
- Time schedule: not reported
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: No data
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: not reported
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study): Yes
- Food consumption of each animal was measured at 2-day intervals throughout the experimental period.
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): No
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on gestation day 20
- Organs examined: in addition to the reproductive organs: livers, possibly others as well, but not reported - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes - Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: Yes, but not detailed
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes, but not detailed
- Skeletal examinations: Yes, but not detailed
- Head examinations: Yes, but not detailed
see table 2 for details - Statistics:
- Fisher Exact Probability test and ANOVA + Dunnett's test
- Indices:
- not calculated
- Historical control data:
- not reported
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Maternal toxic effects:yes
Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Feed consumption of rats at both dose levels was reduced throughout the 10 day exposure period (see Tables 3 and 4 of attached document).
Body weight gain was reduced in a dose dependent manner in both treated groups.
- Hepatotoxicity is reflected by significant increases in SGPT activities during all exposure days, but not thereafter (see Table 5 of attached document). Gross changes in the appearance of the liver characteristic of CTC intoxication (pale, mottled livers) were evident immediately following the last exposure but were not evident 6 days later. The relative liver weight of exposed rats was significantly increased at both doses while absolute liver weight was not always (see Table 6 of attached document).
- There were no gross observations during exposure on demeanor or or signs of toxicity.
Effect levels (maternal animals)
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEC
- Effect level:
- 2.11 mg/L air (analytical)
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
Results (fetuses)
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:no effects
Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Reproductive parameters (see Table 1 of attached document):
Exposure to Carbon terachloride had no effect on reproductive parameters except for reduced foetal body weight and crown-rump length.
- Foetal examinations (see Table 2 of attached document):
A significant incidence of subcutanous edema was observed at 300 ppm but not at 1000 ppm. The incidence of sternebral anomalies was significantly increased in the foetuses exposed to 1000 ppm.
Effect levels (fetuses)
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEC
- Effect level:
- 2.11 mg/L air (analytical)
- Basis for effect level:
- other: teratogenicity
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEC
- Effect level:
- 2.11 mg/L air (analytical)
- Basis for effect level:
- other: fetotoxicity
Fetal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
Overall developmental toxicity
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
Any other information on results incl. tables
- Analytical concentration: in inhalation chambers: mean of 334 ± 48 and 1004 ± 90 ppm for the 300 and 1000 ppm groups, respectively.
- Table 1: Effect of inhaled carbon tetrachloride on observations made at Cesarean Section
Statistic |
Air control |
Carbon |
tetrachloride |
CTC concentration |
-- |
334 ppm |
1004 ppm |
No. of litters |
43 |
22 |
23 |
% pregnancy |
91(43/47) |
92(22/24) |
82(22/28 |
Corp. lutea/dam |
14±2 |
14±2 |
14±3 |
Implantation sites /litterb |
11±3 |
13±2 |
10±4 |
Live fetuses/litterb |
11±3 |
12±2 |
9±4 |
% resorptions/impl. sites |
7(34/492) |
6(16/284) |
10(25/239) |
% litters with resorption |
44(19/43) |
41(9/22) |
48(11/23) |
Litters totally resorbed |
0/43 |
0/22 |
1/23 |
Resorptions/litter with resorptions |
1.8(34/19) |
1.8(16/9) |
2.3(25/11) |
Sex ratio, M/F |
56:44 |
55:45 |
55:45 |
Fetal body weight (g)c |
5.64±0.34 |
5.29±0.34e |
4.96±0.68e |
Fetal crown-rump length (mm)c |
43.7±1.0 |
42.2±1.0c |
41.8±2.2e |
b Mean ± SD
c Mean of Litter means ±SD
e Significantly different from control by an analysis of variance and Dunnett’s test, p<0.05
- Table 2: Effect of inhaled carbon tetrachloride on the incidence of fetal anomalies among rat litters
Air control |
Carbon 334 ppm |
Tetrachloride 1004 ppm |
|
Number of litters examined |
22 |
22 |
22 |
% of Litters affected (No. of litters) |
|||
Gross |
(0) |
(0) |
(0) |
Skeletal |
|||
Skull anomalies (delayed ossific.) |
12(5) |
9(2) |
9(2) |
Lumbar ribs or spurs |
24(10) |
41(9) |
27(6) |
Vertebral anomalies (bipartite centra) |
21(9) |
27(6) |
14(3) |
Sternebral anomalies (unpooled controls) |
61(14) |
68(15) |
|
(bipartite; delayed ossific.) (unp. cont.) |
11(2) |
59(13)c |
|
Total skeletal |
58(25) |
91(20)c |
68(15) |
Soft tissue |
|||
Subcuatneous oedema |
33(14) |
59(13)c |
50(11) |
Dilated Ureters |
12(5) |
14(3) |
5(1) |
Total soft tissue |
51(22) |
68(15 |
59(13) |
c Incidence significantly different from control by the Fisher Exact Probability test, p<0.05
- Table 3: Effect of Carbon tetrachloride on rat maternal feed consumption (g/rat/day ± SD)
Feed consumption on day |
|||||||||
n |
4-5 |
6-7 |
8-9 |
10-11 |
12-13 |
14-15 |
16-17 |
18-19 |
|
Control |
43 |
20±3 |
20±3 |
20±3 |
23±2 |
23±2 |
23±3 |
25±5 |
27±3 |
300 ppm |
22 |
18±2 |
12±3c |
13±3c |
13±3c |
16±4c |
18±4c |
23±3 |
NDb |
1000 ppm |
23 |
19±3 |
9±3c |
13±3c |
14±3c |
12±4c |
12±5c |
23±7 |
28±7 |
ND not determined
c Significantly different from control by Dunnett’s test p<0.05
- Table 4: Effect of Carbon tetrachloride on maternal rat body weight (g, mean ± SD)
Control |
334 ppm |
1004 ppm |
|
No. of dams |
43 |
22 |
23 |
Gestation day |
|||
6 |
283±17 |
290±21 |
275±19 |
13 |
317±18b |
281±25b |
253±22b |
21 |
397±24b |
368±33b |
336±57b |
b Significantly different from control by Dunnett’s test, p<0.05
- Table 5: Effect of inhaled Carbon tetrachloride on SGPT activiy in rats (SE units ±SD)
Day of exp. |
N |
Control |
334 ppm |
1004 ppm |
2nd |
10 |
63±3 |
159±20b |
NDc |
4th |
10 |
75±2 |
154±21b |
81±5b |
7th |
10 |
57± |
218±51b |
ND |
10th |
10 |
56±2 |
241±68b |
154±11b |
6 days after last exp. |
||||
Non-pregnant |
6 |
57±3 |
52±5 |
46±4 |
Pregnant |
10 |
72±3 |
62±3 |
ND |
b Significantly different from control by Tukey’s test, p0.05
ND not determined
- Table 6: Effect of inhaled Carbon tetrachloride on absolute and relative liver weights
Parameter |
Control |
334 ppm |
1004 ppm |
|
Following last exp., nonpregnant (n04) |
Abs. liver weight, g, mean±SD |
9.0 ±0.6 |
10.0 ±1.4 |
10.4 ±1.5 |
Six days after last Exposure, nonpregnant, (n=6) |
Abs. liver weight, g, mean±SD |
9.3 ±0.8 |
9.9 ±1.9 |
11.4 ±1.4 |
Six days after last Exposure, pregnant, (n=) |
Abs. liver weight, g, mean±SD |
14.7 ±1.2 |
14.9 ±2.1 |
14.8 ±2.4 |
Following last exposure, non pregnant (n=4) |
Rel. liver weight, mg liver/g bw, mean±SD |
34 ±1 |
43 ±3b |
49 ±4b |
Six days after last exposure, nonpregnant, (n=6) |
Rel. liver weight, mg liver/g bw, mean±SD |
34 ±3 |
39 ±5 |
48 ±3b |
Six days after last exposure, |
Rel. liver weight, mg liver/g bw, mean±SD |
37 ±3 |
40 ±3b |
45 ±6b |
b Significantly different from control by Dunnett’s test, p< 0.05
- Table 7: Summary of the toxicity of inhaled Carbon tetrachloride to pregnant rats
334 ppm |
1004 ppm |
|
Embryo- and fetotoxicity |
||
Resorptions |
-- |
-- |
Fetal body measurements |
dec |
dec |
Incidence of: |
||
Gross anomalies |
-- |
-- |
Skeletal anomalies |
inc |
inc |
Soft tissue anomalies |
inc |
-- |
Maternal toxicity |
||
Weight gain during gestation |
dec |
dec |
Feed consumption |
dec |
dec |
Conception rate |
-- |
-- |
No. of implantations |
-- |
-- |
Litter size |
-- |
-- |
SGPT activity |
inc |
inc |
Absolute liver weight |
-- |
-- |
Relative liver weight |
inc |
inc |
Gross liver pathology |
inc |
inc |
Demeanor |
-- |
-- |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Inhalation exposure of pregnant rats to carbon tetra chloride at levels of 300 and 1000 ppm resulted in maternal toxicity and retarded foetal development. No teratogenic effects were reported.
- Executive summary:
Sprague Dawley rats were exposed by inhalation to 300 or 1000 ppm carbon tetrachloride for 7h/day on days 6-15 of pregnancy. During the dosing period, food consumption by the dams was markedly reduced, resulting in a mean decrease in body weight of 7% (300 ppm) and 15% (1000 ppm) by day 21 in comparison with controls. Evidence of maternal hepatotoxicity was seen in both groups; serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) was significantly elevated during exposure but had returned to normal by day 21 when relative liver weights were significantly increased but absolute weights unchanged. There was no statistically significant effect on resorptions though 1/23 litters was fully resorbed in the 1000 ppm group. No gross external abnormalities were seen in any group. The data on internal and skeletal anomalies is estimated difficult to evaluate: only information on the number and percentage of litters affected is given, with no data on the numbers of fetuses affected. However, no significant increases in anomalies are reported, except for subcutaneous oedema in the 300 ppm group and sternebral anomalies in the 1000 ppm group. These increases are unlikely to be of any biological significance since oedema was not significantly elevated in the 1000 ppm group and the incidence of sternebral anomalies varied considerably in the two control groups. Fetal body weight and crown-rump length were significantly decreased in a dose related manner but this is not unexpected in view of the severe effect on food consumption in the dams.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.