Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 204-009-2 | CAS number: 112-84-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin irritation / corrosion (EU Method B.4): not irritating
Eye irritation (EU Method B.5): not irritating
Respiratory irritation: no data available
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 01 - 04 Mar 1988
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study was conducted according to an established protocol and similar to an appropriate OECD guideline and in compliance with GLP.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.4 (Acute Toxicity: Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Version / remarks:
- (1984)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Broekman Institute, Someren, The Netherlands
- Age at study initiation: young adults
- Housing: Animals were individually housed in plastic cages with a perforated floor
- Diet: 100 g per day (LK-01 and LK-04) standard laboratory animal diet (Hope Farms, Woerden, The Netherlands)
- Water: (tap/filtered) water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least five days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 - 21
- Humidity (%): 50 - 60
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- clipped
- Vehicle:
- water
- Controls:
- other: untreated sites of the same animal served as control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 g
- Concentration (if solution): 50% (w/v)
VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 mL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 h
- Observation period:
- 3 days
Reading time points: 1, 24, 48 and 72 h - Number of animals:
- 3 females
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 6 cm² of the left flank of the animals
- Type of wrap if used: The test substance was spread on a patch of Metalline and mounted on permeable tape. This was applied to the left flank of each animal, the right flank being covered with the same dressing without test substance. Finally, the animals were wrapped in flexible bandage.
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): The remaining test substance was removed using a dry tissue and subsequently a tissue moistened with tap water.
- Time after start of exposure: 4 h
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring system - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- other: mean of 3 animals
- Time point:
- other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: reversibility: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- other: mean of 3 animals
- Time point:
- other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: reversibility: not applicable
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- The test substance caused only very slight erythema in all three animals 1 h after removal of the test substance and were fully reversible within 24 hours post-application. Neither edema nor any signs of systemic toxicity were observed in any of the rabbits during the study period.
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- CLP: not classified
DSD: not classified - Executive summary:
A sample of Unislip 1753 was tested in the rabbit primary dermal irritation/corrosion test to determine its possible irritating or corrosive effects.
The flank skin of 3 albino rabbits was exposed to 0.5 gram of the test substance moistened with 0.5 ml Milli-RO water for 4 hours using semi-occlusive dressings. The test substance caused only very slight erythema in all three animlas, 60 minutes after removal of the dressings.
The primary skin irritaiton index amounted to 0. Based on these results, the test substance should be considered as minimally irritating to the skin.
According to the criteria laid own in Annex VI of the EEC Council Directive 76/548/EEC (amended by Directive 832/467/EEC), the test substance need not be labelled as a skin irritant.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 29 Feb - 07 Mar 1988
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study was conducted according to an established protocol and similar to an appropriate OECD guideline and in compliance with GLP.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Version / remarks:
- (1984)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Broekman Institute, Someren, The Netherlands
- Age at study initiation: 10 weeks
- Housing: Animals were individually housed in plastic cages with a perforated floor
- Diet: 100 g per day (LK-01 and LK-04) standard laboratory animal diet (Hope Farms, Woerden, The Netherlands)
- Water: (tap/filtered) water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least five days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19 - 20
- Humidity (%): 50 - 65
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: untreated contralateral eye served as control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- single application without rinsing
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 7 days
Reading time points: 1, 24, 48, 72 h and 7 days post-application - Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3 females
- Details on study design:
- SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring system
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: Pocket flash-light - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- other: mean of 3 animals
- Time point:
- other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: reversibility: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- other: mean of 3 animals
- Time point:
- other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- other: reversibility: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- other: mean of 3 animals
- Time point:
- other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- other: mean of 3 animals
- Time point:
- other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0.89
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Approximately 1 h post-application two animals showed diffuse conjunctival redness and slight chemosis; the other animal showed slight conjunctival redness and slight chemosis. The conjuctival redness was fully reversible in one animal by day 3 and in the other two animals between days 3 and 7. The chemosis resolved within 24, 48 or 72 hours for each rabbit separately. Treatment of the eyes with fluorescein 24 hours after exposure revealed no epithelial damage in any of the animals.
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- CLP: not classified
DSD: not classified - Executive summary:
Instillation of approximately 60 mg of the test substance in one of the eyes of each of three albino rabbits resulted in slight to diffuse redness of the conjuctivae and slight chemosis. The conjuctival redness had resolved in one animal by day 3 and in the other two animals between days 3 and 7. The chemosis resolved within 24, 48 or 72 hours for each rabbit separately. Based on the estimated Draize score of 6 (60 minutes) the test substance should be classified as mildly irritating according to the scheme of Kay and Calandra. According to the criteria laid down in Annex VI of the EEC Council Directive 67/548/EC (amended by Directive 83/467/EEC), the test substance need not be labelled as an eye irritant.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Skin irritation / corrosion
The skin irritating properties of CAS 112-84-5 were tested in a study according to EU Method B.4 under GLP conditions (Daamen, 1988). In the study, 0.5 g of the test substance moistened with 0.5 mL vehicle (water), was applied to the clipped skin of three female New Zealand White rabbits for 4 hours using a semi-occlusive dressing. The treated skin was observed and evaluated at 1, 24, 48 and 72 h post-application according to the Draize Scoring System. The test substance induced only very slight erythema (grade 1) in all animals one hour after the removal of the test substance. These effects were fully reversible within 24 hours post-application. Neither edema nor any signs of systemic toxicity were observed in any of the rabbits during the remaining study period.
Eye irritation
The eye irritating properties of CAS 112-84-5 were tested in a study according to EU Method B.5 under GLP conditions (Daamen, 1988). For the assessment of the eye irritation properties 0.1 mL of the undiluted test substance was instilled into the eyes of three female New Zealand White rabbits as a single treatment without rinsing of the eye. The eyes were examined and the changes were graded according to the Draize scoring system 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours as well as 7 days post-application. One hour post-application two animals showed diffuse conjunctival redness (grade 2) and slight chemosis (grade 1). The other animal showed slight conjunctival redness (grade 1) and slight chemosis (grade 1). The conjunctival redness was fully reversible in one animal by day 3 and in the other two animals between days 3 and 7. The chemosis resolved within 24, 48 or 72 hours for each rabbit separately. Mean values for chemosis and conjunctival redness were calculated to be 0.33 and 0.89, respectively No effects on cornea and iris were observed during the study period.
Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion endpoint:
The study was carried out in accordance with an appropriate EU Method and in compliance with GLP.
Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
The study was carried out in accordance with an appropriate EU Method and in compliance with GLP.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The available data on skin irritation of CAS 112-84-5 do not meet the criteria for classification according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 or Directive 67/548/EEC, and are therefore conclusive but not sufficient for classification.
The available data on eye irritation of CAS 112-84-5 do not meet the criteria for classification according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 or Directive 67/548/EEC, and are therefore conclusive but not sufficient for classification.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
