Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Acute Toxicity: oral

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1973
Report date:
1973

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 401 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
there are no data given for test substance, enviromental conditions of test animals and some animal data are missing, post observation period 7 days
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
prior to GLP-introduction
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Barium bis[2-chloro-5-[(2-hydroxy-1-naphthyl)azo]toluene-4-sulphonate]
EC Number:
225-935-3
EC Name:
Barium bis[2-chloro-5-[(2-hydroxy-1-naphthyl)azo]toluene-4-sulphonate]
Cas Number:
5160-02-1
Molecular formula:
C17H13ClN2O4S.1/2Ba
IUPAC Name:
barium(2+) bis(5-chloro-2-[(1E)-2-(2-hydroxynaphthalen-1-yl)diazen-1-yl]-4-methylbenzene-1-sulfonate)
Test material form:
solid: nanoform
Details on test material:
Test materials used in this dossier are all considered to fall under the definition of nano-materials according to the European Commission Recommendation 2011/696/EU as the synthesis and manufacturing of this pigment always yields particulate material with a fine particle size distribution.

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
other: Tif. RAI
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Ciba-Geigy Ltd, in-house breeding
- Age at study initiation: 6-7 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 160-180 g
- Fasting period before study: 1 night before administration
- Housing: groups of five
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: /

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 +/- 1
- Humidity (%): 50
- Air changes (per hr): /
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): /

IN-LIFE DATES: From: To: /

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
CMC (carboxymethyl cellulose)
Remarks:
2%
Details on oral exposure:
VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle: 50%
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): /

MAXIMUM DOSE VOLUME APPLIED:
DOSAGE PREPARATION (if unusual): weighed into an Erleimieyer flask on a Mettler balance. It was suspended at 50 % with carboxymethyl-cellulose
2 % and administered by oral intubation. Before treatment the suspension was homogeneously dispersed with an Ultra-Turrax and during treatment it was kept stable with a magnetic stirrer.
Doses:
6000 mg/kg bw and 10.000 mg/kg bw
No. of animals per sex per dose:
10 per sex and dose
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 7 days
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
- Other examinations performed: gross necroscopy

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 10 000 mg/kg bw
Remarks on result:
other: no mortality occurred
Mortality:
no mortalities
Clinical signs:
other: Within 2 hours after treatunent the rats in both dosage groups showed dyspnoea, exophthalmus, curved position and ruffled fur. These symptoms became more accentuated as the dose was increased. The animals had recovered within 3 to 6 days.
Gross pathology:
No substance related gross organ changes were seen

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met