Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 246-807-3 | CAS number: 25307-17-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP, Fully OECD 417 compliant
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 005
- Report date:
- 2005
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Version / remarks:
- Also OECD guideline No 471
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2,2'-(octadec-9-enylimino)bisethanol
- EC Number:
- 246-807-3
- EC Name:
- 2,2'-(octadec-9-enylimino)bisethanol
- Cas Number:
- 25307-17-9
- Molecular formula:
- C22H45NO2
- IUPAC Name:
- 2,2'-(Octadec-9-enylimino)bisethanol
- Test material form:
- liquid
- Details on test material:
- Chemical name : 2,2'-(octadec-9-enylimino)bisethanol
EC number : 246-807-3
Based on the qualitative and quantitative information on the composition, the sample used are representative of the boundary composition shared and agree by each registrant.
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- The five strains of Salmonella typhimurium (a): TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102. Each strain derived from Salmonella typhimurium LT 2 contains one mutation in the histidine operon, resulting in a requirement for histidine.
In addition, to increase their sensitivity to mutagenic items, further mutations have been added:
• the rfa mutation causes partial loss of the lipopolysaccharide barrier that coats the surface of
the bacteria and increases permeability to large molecules that do not penetrate the normal
bacteria cell wall,
• the uvrB mutation is a deletion of a gene coding for the DNA excision repair system, which
renders the bacteria unable to use this repair mechanism to remove the damaged DNA,
• the addition of the plasmid pKM 101 to strains TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 enhances their
sensitivity of detection to some mutagens,
• in case of TA 102 strain, the histidine mutation is located on the multicopy plasmid pAQ1.
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 Mix from Aroclor 1254 treated rats
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- PRELIMINARY TOXICITY TEST
The test item was freely soluble in the vehicle (DMSO) at 100 mg/mL. Consequently, with a treatment volume of 50 μL/plate, the dose-levels were 10, 100, 500, 1000, 2500 and 5000 μg/plate.
MUTAGENICITY EXPERIMENTS
Since the test item was toxic in the preliminary test, the choice of the highest dose-level was
based on the level of toxicity, according to the criteria specified in the international guidelines.
Experiments without S9 mix:
The selected treatment-levels were:
⋅ 2.34, 4.69, 9.38, 18.75, 37.5 and 75 μg/plate, for all the strains in the first experiment,
⋅ 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 μg/plate, for all the strains in the second experiment
Experiments with S9 mix:
The selected treatment-levels were:
⋅ 18.75, 37.5, 75, 150 and 300 μg/plate, for the TA 98, TA 1537 and TA 102 strains in the first experiment,
⋅ 9.38, 18.75, 37.5, 75 and 150 μg/plate, for the TA 100 and TA 1535 strains in the first experiment,
⋅ 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 and 100 μg/plate, for all the strains in the second experiment
2.1.3 Positive controls
without S9 mix:
• 1 μg/plate of sodium azide (NaN3): TA 1535 and TA 100 strains,
• 50 μg/plate of 9-Aminoacridine (9AA): TA 1537 strain,
• 0.5 μg/plate of 2-Nitrofluorene (2NF): TA 98 strain,
• 0.5 μg/plate of Mitomycin C (MMC): TA 102 strain.
with S9 mix:
• 2 μg/plate of 2-Anthramine (2AM): TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100 strains,
• 10 μg/plate of 2-Anthramine (2AM): TA 102 strain. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO batch K33208450 435 (Merck Eurolab, Fontenay-Sous-Bois, France or distilled water for the Mitomycin C positive control.
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: To achieve necessary solubility for test substance and the positive control substances.
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-Anthramine
- Remarks:
- With S9 Mix
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: Sodium Azide TA 1535 -TA100, 9-Aminoacridine TA 1537, 2-nitrofluorene TA 98, Mitomycin C TA102
- Remarks:
- Without S9 mix
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation) was used for the preliminary test and for the first experiment both without S9 mix and the first experiment with S9 mix.
preincubation; was used for the second experiment with S9.
The direct plate incorporation method was performed as follows: test item solution (0.05 mL),
S9 mix when required or phosphate buffer pH 7.4 (0.5 mL) and bacterial suspension (0.1 mL)
were mixed with 2 mL of overlay agar (containing traces of the relevant aminoacid and biotin
and maintained at 45°C). After rapid homogenization, the mixture was overlaid onto a Petri
plate containing minimum medium.
The preincubation method (b, c) was performed as follows: test item solution (0.05 mL), S9 mix (0.5 mL) and the bacterial suspension (0.1 mL) were incubated for 60 minutes at 37°C, under shaking, before adding the overlay agar and pouring onto the surface of a minimum agar plate. After 48 to 72 hours of incubation at 37°C (see § 2.5), revertants were scored with an automatic counter (Cardinal counter, Perceptive Instruments, Suffolk CB9 7 BN, UK).
Preliminary toxicity test
To assess the toxicity of the test item to the bacteria, six dose-levels (one plate/dose-level) were tested in the TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 strains, with and without S9 mix. The evaluation of the toxicity was performed on the basis of the observation of the decrease in the number of revertant colonies and/or a thinning of the bacterial lawn.
Mutagenicity experiments
In two independent experiments, using three plates/dose-level, each strain was tested, with and without S9 mix, with:
• at least five dose-levels of the test item,
• the vehicle control,
• the appropriate positive control.
The sterility of the S9 mix was checked before the beginning and at the end of each experiment and was found to be satisfactory. - Evaluation criteria:
- In each experiment, for each strain and for each experimental point, the number of revertants per plate was scored. The individual results and the mean number of revertants, with the corresponding standard deviation and ratio (mutants obtained in the presence of the test item/mutants obtained in the presence of the vehicle), are presented in tabular form.
Acceptance criteria
This study is considered valid if the following criteria are fully met:
• the number of revertants in the vehicle controls is consistent with the historical data of the
testing facility
• the number of revertants in the positive controls is higher than that of the vehicle controls and is consistent with the historical data of the testing facility.
Evaluation criteria
A reproducible 2-fold increase (for the TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 strains) or 3-fold increase (for the TA 1535 and TA 1537 strains) in the number of revertants compared with the vehicle controls, in any strain at any dose-level and/or evidence of a dose-relationship was considered as a positive result. Reference to historical data or other considerations of biological relevance may also be taken into account in the evaluation of the data obtained.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Any other information on results incl. tables
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
The test item was freely soluble in the vehicle (DMSO) at 100 mg/mL.
Consequently, with a treatment volume of 50 μL/plate, the dose-levels were 10, 100, 500, 1000, 2500 and 5000 μg/plate. A marked precipitate was observed in the Petri plates when scoring the revertants at dose-levels ≥ 2500 μg/plate.
A moderate to marked toxicity was noted at dose-levels ≥ 100 μg/plate towards the three strains used without S9 mix and in the TA 100 strain with S9 mix and ≥ 500 μg/plate in the TA 98 and TA 102 strains with S9 mix
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
All values were within the historical control means for the vehicle and positive controls for each strain..
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
A marked toxicity was observed in all strains at dose-levels ≥ 150 μg/plate.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Under our experimental conditions, the test item CECAJEL 210 (batch No. 9194) did not show any mutagenic activity in the bacterial reverse mutation test with Salmonella
- Executive summary:
The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of the test item CECAJEL 210
(batch No. 9194) to induce reverse mutation inSalmonella typhimurium. The study was performed according to the international guidelines (OECD 471, Commission Directive No. B13/14) and in compliance with the Principles of Good Laboratory Practice Regulations.
Methods
A preliminary toxicity test was performed to define the dose-levels of CECAJEL 210 to be used for the mutagenicity study. The test item was then tested in two independent experiments, with and without a metabolic activation system, the S9 mix, prepared from a liver microsomal fraction (S9 fraction) of rats induced with Aroclor 1254. Both experiments were performed according to the direct plate incorporation method except for the second test with S9 mix, which was performed according to the preincubation method (60 minutes, 37°C). Five strains of bacteriaSalmonella typhimurium: TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 were used. Each strain was exposed to at least five dose-levels of the test item (three plates/dose-level). After 48 to 72 hours of incubation at 37°C, the revertant colonies were scored.
The evaluation of the toxicity was performed on the basis of the observation of the decrease in the number of revertant colonies and/or a thinning of the bacterial lawn.
The test item CECAJEL 210 was dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO).
The dose-levels of the positive controls were as follows:
without S9 mix:
• 1 μg/plate of sodium azide (NaN3): TA 1535 and TA 100 strains,
• 50 μg/plate of 9-Aminoacridine (9AA): TA 1537 strain,
• 0.5 μg/plate of 2-Nitrofluorene (2NF): TA 98 strain,
• 0.5 μg/plate of Mitomycin C (MMC): TA 102 strain.
with S9 mix:
• 2 μg/plate of 2-Anthramine (2AM): TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100 strains,
• 10 μg/plate of 2-Anthramine (2AM): TA 102 strain.
Results
The number of revertants for the vehicle and positive controls was as specified in the acceptance criteria. The study was therefore considered valid. Since the test item was toxic in the preliminary test, the choice of the highest dose-level was based on the level of toxicity, according to the criteria specified in the international guidelines.
Experiments without S9 mix:
The selected treatment-levels were:
⋅2.34, 4.69, 9.38, 18.75, 37.5 and 75 μg/plate, for all the strains in the first experiment,
⋅1.25, 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 μg/plate, for all the strains in the second experiment.
No precipitate was observed in the Petri plates when scoring the revertants at any dose-level. A moderate to marked toxicity was noted in all strains at dose-levels ≥ 10 μg/plate. The test item did not induce any noteworthy increase in the number of revertants, in any of the five strains.
Experiments with S9 mix:
The selected treatment-levels were:
⋅18.75, 37.5, 75, 150 and 300 μg/plate, for the TA 98, TA 1537 and TA 102 strains in the
first experiment,
⋅9.38, 18.75, 37.5, 75 and 150 μg/plate, for the TA 100 and TA 1535 strains in the
first experiment,
⋅6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 and 100 μg/plate, for all the strains in the second experiment.
No precipitate was observed in the Petri plates when scoring the revertants at any dose-level. A marked toxicity was observed in all strains at dose-levels ≥ 150 μg/plate. The test item did not induce any noteworthy increase in the number of revertants, in any of the five strains.
Conclusion
Under our experimental conditions, the test item CECAJEL 210 (batch No. 9194) did not show any mutagenic activity in the bacterial reverse mutation test withSalmonella
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.