Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 215-693-7 | CAS number: 1344-37-2 This substance is identified in the Colour Index by Colour Index Constitution Number, C.I. 77603.
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Two Ames mutagenicity tests in S. typhimurium TA100 are available that were done with and without S9 metabolic activation at concentrations of 0.2 -1.6 and 10 -500 µg/plate, respectively. Neither test followed a specific guideline. The former test proofed positive even at these very low concentrations of 0.2 -1.6 µg/plate, the latter was negative on account of a coating that reduced the availability of the toxicophore chromium(VI). Two sister chromatide exchange assays, one conducted similar to the OECD guideline 479 protocol, were positive in chinese hamster ovary cells at concentrations of 0.1 or 5 -150 µg/mL. Exposure of the same cell line in chromosomal aberration tests (one similar to the OECD guideline 479 protocol) did not lead to an increase in chromosomal aberrations at concentrations of 5 µg/L -5 mg/L. An in vivo mincronucleus test that was conducted at concentrations of 15, 50 and 2x 100 mg/kg bw with intraperitoneal administration of chrome yellow in comparison with soluble chromates was negative. The soluble compounds (zinc potassium chromate, zinc tetroxy chromate and sodium dichromate) were all tested positive at concentrations up to 50 mg/kg bw.
Short description of key information:
Several in vitro studies addressing Ames-mutagenicity, sister chromatid exchange and chromosomal aberration are available. Most of them do not follow a guideline but all give a positive result if there were done with uncoated material in the presence of a metabolizing system. Additionally, an in vivo micronucleus test is available with intraperitoneal adminstration of 25, 50 and 100 mg/kg bw of the test material that proofed negative.
Endpoint Conclusion:
Justification for classification or non-classification
Although most in vitro genotoxicty tests were positive, a genotoxic potential could not be verified in vivo. Therefore, a classification is not warranted.
However, the negative results in the micronucleus test of the test substance, which presented a very low water solubility (1%; as opposed to 6-8% for zinc potassium chromate or to 2380 g/l for sodium dichromate), are likely not reliable, because the treatment with the chemical did not show evidence for absorption and transport to the bone marrow, as evidenced by a lack of reduction in PCEs frequency. Thus, although the in vivo genetic toxicity test gave negative, chromium and its compounds, particularly chromium(VI), may cause chromosomal effects, indicating carcinogenic potential because interactions with DNA have been linked with the mechanism of carcinogenicity.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
