Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 274-581-6 | CAS number: 70356-09-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- Comparable to guideline study.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 984
- Report date:
- 1984
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation test using the Hprt and xprt genes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 1-[4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)phenyl]-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)propane-1,3-dione
- EC Number:
- 274-581-6
- EC Name:
- 1-[4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)phenyl]-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)propane-1,3-dione
- Cas Number:
- 70356-09-1
- Molecular formula:
- C20H22O3
- IUPAC Name:
- 1-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)propane-1,3-dione
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- HGPRT
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: MEM medium + 10 % FCS
- Properly maintained: yes - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 liver microsomal fraction obtained from Aroclor 1254-induced male Sprague-Dawley rats.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 5, 10, 15, 20 µg/mL
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene
- ethylmethanesulphonate
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- 20 µg/mL reduced the plating efficiency to 12.8 %
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Mutagenicity and toxicity data (experiment 1)
|
Concentration [µg/mL] |
S9 mix |
Mean number of mutant colonies |
Mutant colonies per 106cells |
Plating efficiency [%] |
Negative control |
0.0 |
- + |
3.6 ± 0.9 4.6 ± 1.8 |
12.8 17.7 |
67.1 65.7 |
Negative control + solvent |
0.0 |
- + |
3.4 ± 1.8 3.8 ± 1.3 |
9.7 18.8 |
70.2 65.6 |
Positive control (EMS) |
1000 |
- |
73.6 ± 12.3 |
220.3 |
71. |
Positive control (DMBA) |
15.4 |
+ |
51.6 ± 2.5 |
318.9 |
60.9 |
Test compound |
5.0 |
- + |
4.8 ± 2.7 4.8 ± 1.8 |
17.7 19.5 |
68.7 65.1 |
|
10.0 |
- + |
3.8 ± 2.2 6.7 ± 2.3 |
15.4 27.7 |
62.4 69.6 |
|
15.0 |
- + |
8.6 ± 1.1 3.3 ± 2.1 |
38.3 12.8 |
52.3 67.0 |
|
20.0 |
- + |
4.0 ± 1.7 5.4 ± 1.5 |
15.3 21.1 |
37.6 68.6 |
Table 2: Mutagenicity and toxicity data (experiment 2)
|
Concentration [µg/mL] |
S9 mix |
Mean number of mutant colonies |
Mutant colonies per 106cells |
Plating efficiency [%] |
Negative control |
0.0 |
- + |
1.6 ± 0.5 2.6 ± 1.7 |
4.3 11.3 |
66.7 64.4 |
Negative control + solvent |
0.0 |
- + |
4.8 ± 1.1 3.8 ± 1.6 |
12.9 9.9 |
68.2 69.3 |
Positive control (EMS) |
1000 |
- |
64.4 ± 12.2 |
190.3 |
67.2 |
Positive control (DMBA) |
15.4 |
+ |
28.4 ± 5.2 |
105.0 |
53.5 |
Test compound |
5.0 |
- + |
7.4 ± 2.9 6.0 ± 2.9 |
17.8 22.5 |
64.1 62.7 |
|
10.0 |
- + |
4.8 ± 1.5 1.8 ± 0.8 |
10.8 8.4 |
51.8 60.3 |
|
15.0 |
- + |
2.4 ± 1.3 3.6 ± 0.9 |
6.9 11.7 |
50.0 63.8 |
|
20.0 |
- + |
4.0 ± 2.9 0.6 ± 0.9 |
10.8 2.1 |
44.6 52.9 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- It is concluded that under the experimental conditions described in the report neither butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane (BMDBM) per se nor one of its metabolites formed by rat liver enzymes induced mutations at the HGPRT locus in Chinese hamster cells in vitro.
- Executive summary:
The test compound butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane (BMDBM) was assessed for mutagenic properties in two independent experiments in the HGPRT-test with V79 cells. In a pre-experiment concentrations of the test compound solubilised in methanol higher than 20 µg/mL lead to precipitation in the nutrient medium. However, 20 µg/mL reduced the plating efficiency (PE; = survival) to 12.8 % in the absence of S9 mix. In the presence of S9 mix the test compound was only slightly toxic: PE = 91.2 %. With the four concentrations up to 20 µg/mL no indication of mutagenic activity was recorded, neither in the presence nor in the absence of S9 mix. The variations of the mutant clonies/106 cells in both experiments do not show any tendency with regard to an enhancement of mutation rates.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
