Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 274-581-6 | CAS number: 70356-09-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- short-term repeated dose toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1979-11-08 - 1980-06-27
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 980
- Report date:
- 1980
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 410 (Repeated Dose Dermal Toxicity: 21/28-Day Study)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- : use of intact as well as abraded skin
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 1-[4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)phenyl]-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)propane-1,3-dione
- EC Number:
- 274-581-6
- EC Name:
- 1-[4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)phenyl]-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)propane-1,3-dione
- Cas Number:
- 70356-09-1
- Molecular formula:
- C20H22O3
- IUPAC Name:
- 1-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)propane-1,3-dione
- Test material form:
- solid
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material : BMDBM
- Substance type: light yellowish powder
- Physical state: solid
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Hacking & Churchill Ltd. Wyton, Huntingdon, Cambs., England
- Age at study initiation: 11 -14 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2.0 - 2.8 kg
- Housing: individually
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 20 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19 °C
- Humidity (%): 45 ± 10 %
- Air changes (per hr): 19
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 1979-11-08 To:1979-11-30
Administration / exposure
- Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Vehicle:
- other: Carbitol (diethylene glycol monoethyl ether)
- Details on exposure:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: mid dorsal
- % coverage: approx. 10 % of body surface
- Type of wrap if used: occlusive bandage consisting of a gauze covered with Elastoplast elastic adhesive dressing backed with impervious Sleek plaster.
- Time intervals for shavings or clippings: Abrasion was carried out weekly and hair clipping was repeated daily.
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: with warm tap water
- Time after start of exposure: 6 h
TEST MATERIAL
- Concentration: 30, 100, and 360 mg/kg bw/day
- Constant volume used: yes
- For solids, paste formed: yes
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): Carbinol, due to the good solubility of the test item
- Amount(s) applied: 2 mL/kg bw/day
- Lot/batch no.: 19431787 and B711019
USE OF RESTRAINERS FOR PREVENTING INGESTION: yes - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- no
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 6 h per day
- Frequency of treatment:
- 21 days
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 30 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 360 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10 males and 10 females per dose group. Half of the animals were tested with intact the other half was tested with abraded skin.
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: tested up to the highest soluble concentration
- Positive control:
- No positive control used.
Examinations
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: daily
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: daily
DERMAL IRRITATION (if dermal study): Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: daily, prior to application
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: at the start of dosing and then twice weekly (days 1, 5, 8, 12, 15, 19, and 22)
FOOD CONSUMPTION:
- Food consumption for each animal determined: Yes
WATER CONSUMPTION: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: only during week 3
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: No
HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: prior to treatment and then during the 3rd week of treatment
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: No
- Animals fasted: Yes
- How many animals: prior to treatment: all animals; during the 3rd week of treatment: 5 male and 5 female rabbits with abraded skin from each group
- Parameters checked in table 1 were examined.
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: prior to treatment and then during the 3rd week of treatment
- Animals fasted: Yes
- How many animals: prior to treatment: all animals; during the 3rd week of treatment: 5 male and 5 female rabbits with abraded skin from each group
- Parameters checked in table 1 were examined.
URINALYSIS: No
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: No - Sacrifice and pathology:
- GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes (see table)
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes (see table) / No / No data - Statistics:
- Analysis of variance followed by Student's t-test was used to assess the significance of intergroup differences in clinical laboratory data.
Results and discussion
Results of examinations
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No behavioural changes or signs of toxicosis were observed amongst surviving rabbits during the study period. Soft faeces and/or diarrhoea of a sporadic nature were observed in surviving rabbits from all groups, including the controls. This finding was considered to be incidental and not related to treatment with butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane (BMDBM).
- Dermal irritation:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- (Tables 5a and b)
Sporadic slight erythema was observed in three negative control rabbits during week 3 of the study.
Slight dermal reactions were generally seen in all rabbits treated with Carbitol (vehicle control) during weeks 2 and 3 of the study and well-defined erythema was recorded in five rabbits of this group during week 3.
The severity of dermal reactions of rabbits receiving BMDBM was generally greater than the controls and increased in a dosage-related manner. Slight to well-defined dermal reactions were observed from Day 6 to the end of the treatment period in all rabbits treated with BMDBM 30 or 100 mg/kg/day, although well-defined reactions were more persistent in rabbits of Group 4 (BMDBM, 100 mg/kg/day). Well-defined to moderate dermal reactions were generally seen in all rabbits treated with BMDBM, 360 mg/kg/day during this period.
Dryness and sloughing of the epidermis was observed in the majority of rabbits treated with BMDBM and the incidence was seen to increase with dosage. This finding was also observed in only 3 rabbits treated with Carbitol (vehicle control) but was not observed in procedural control rabbits.
There were no apparent differences in the dermal reactions of rabbits with intact or abraded skin condition within each group. - Mortality:
- mortality observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence):
- Five rabbits died during the study period and one rabbit was sacrificed in extremis. The distribution of the animal mortality was not dependent on test item treatment and is tabulated in table 3.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No treatment-related trends were apparent (Table 4). Bodyweight losses on day 19 in the majority of the control and treated rabbits with abraded skin were considered to be a result of overnight food deprivation prior to removal of blood samples on day 19.
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No treatment-related trends were apparent.
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No treatment-related trends were apparent.
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no changes that were considered to be related to treatment with BMDBM.
Statistical analysis of values from the week 3 investigations revealed statistical significances in comparison to the controls. These differences were not considered to be of toxicological importance and variations in values for individual rabbits were considered to bias statistical analysis in these instances. - Clinical biochemistry findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no apparent changes that were considered to be directly related to treatment with BMDBM.
Statistical analysis of values from the week 3 investigations revealed statistical significances in comparison to the controls. These differences were not considered to be of toxicological importance and variations in values for individual rabbits were considered to bias statistical analysis in these instances. - Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No changes were seen that were considered to be related to treatment with BMDBM.
Group mean organ weights for some groups attained statistical significance in comparison with control values. These findings were not considered to be of toxicological importance and variations in values for individual rabbits were considered to bias statistical analysis in these instances. - Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No changes were seen that were considered to be indicative of a treatment-related effect.
- Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Skin: No abnormalities were seen in skin taken from procedural control group rabbits or from the untreated control sites on the animals in the treated groups. In treated skin samples from the vehicle control group and the treatment groups a minimal focal to moderate generalised increase in epidermal thickness was recorded. This was occasionally but in frequently associated with a minimal cutaneous inflammatory infiltration. No quantitative differences could be determined between animals with intact or abraded skin.
The severity of the epidermal change showed no dose-relationship in treated groups and this was considered to be similar to the severity if this change observed in the vehicle control group.
Liver: Pericholangitis characterised by occasional parenchymal or portal foci if mononuclear cell infiltration in a proportion of animals from each group. Hepatocyte necrosis in occasional rabbits.
Kidneys: Varying degrees of chronic interstitial nephritis and fibrosis in a large proportion of rabbits from both control and treatment groups. No significant differences in terms of severity are distinguishable that might be ascribed to the vehicle or the test compound.
Gastro-intestinal tract: Chronic inflammatory bowel lesions of the gastro-intestinal mucosa in a small number of rabbits at termination and in all decedents. These lesions were probably due to a localised infection and considered a contributing factor to death in the decedents in this study. This was considered to be unrelated to treatment.
Brain: Perivascular inflammatory cuffing and cerebral gliosis and granulomata in a proportion of rabbits from all groups. These lesions were probably indicative of an enzephalitozoon infestation. - Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
Effect levels
open allclose all
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- systemic
- Effect level:
- 360 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Remarks:
- systemic
- Effect level:
- > 360 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: As the animals showed no systemic signs of toxicity with the highest concentration used, no LOAEL for systemic toxicity could be identified.
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Remarks:
- local
- Effect level:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: In this concentration, distinct local effects (formation of erythema / edema) were visible after treatment.
Target system / organ toxicity
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 3: Summarized mortalities after repeated dermal application of butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane (BMDBM) to rabbits.
Group |
Mortalities |
Total per group |
Mortality |
||
Males |
Females |
||||
1 |
Negative control |
0 |
2 |
2/20 |
10 % |
2 |
Vehicle control |
2 |
0 |
2/20 |
10 % |
3 |
BMDBM 30 mg/kg bw/day |
0 |
1 |
1/20 |
5 % |
4 |
BMDBM 100 mg/kg bw/day |
0 |
0 |
0/20 |
0 % |
5 |
BMDBM 360 mg/kg bw/day |
1 |
0 |
1/20 |
5 % |
Table 4: Group mean bodyweights (g) of rabbits after repeated dermal application of BMDBM.
Group |
Skin |
Bodyweight [g] on day |
Bodyweight change days 1 - 22 |
as % of controls |
|||||||
0 |
5 |
8 |
12 |
15 |
19 |
22 |
|||||
Male |
|||||||||||
1 |
Negative control |
Intact Abraded |
2927 2968 |
2895 3026 |
2939 3068 |
3037 3177 |
3088 3262 |
3063 3171 |
3106 3270 |
179 302 |
- - |
2 |
Vehicle control |
Intact Abraded |
2928 2962 |
2936 2980 |
2931 3023 |
2990 3162 |
3086 3203 |
2994 3134 |
3360 3286 |
432 324 |
241 107 |
3 |
BMDBM 30 mg/kg bw/day |
Intact Abraded |
2962 2947 |
2976 2992 |
3013 3046 |
3082 3127 |
3156 3201 |
3194 3056 |
3212 3216 |
250 269 |
140 89 |
4 |
BMDBM 100 mg/kg bw/day |
Intact Abraded |
2943 2938 |
2981 2935 |
3010 3012 |
3093 3100 |
3195 3171 |
3237 3130 |
3263 3213 |
320 275 |
179 91 |
5 |
BMDBM 360 mg/kg bw/day |
Intact Abraded |
2934 2942 |
2950 2926 |
2934 2981 |
3047 3077 |
3056 3157 |
3114 3109 |
3151 3252 |
217 310 |
121 103 |
Female |
|||||||||||
1 |
Negative control |
Intact Abraded |
2873 2854 |
2907 2781 |
2912 2910 |
2923 2984 |
2961 3085 |
3022 3030 |
3002 3080 |
129 226 |
- -
|
2 |
Vehicle control |
Intact Abraded |
2871 2871 |
2928 2910 |
3047 2903 |
3145 3028 |
3224 3093 |
3296 3105 |
3329 3184 |
458
313 |
355 138 |
3 |
BMDBM 30 mg/kg bw/day |
Intact Abraded |
2888 2866 |
2875 2860 |
2910 2897 |
2949 3004 |
3008 3120 |
3116 3049 |
3131 3189 |
243 323 |
188 143 |
4 |
BMDBM 100 mg/kg bw/day |
Intact Abraded |
2861 2861 |
2934 2917 |
2980 2948 |
3072 3007 |
3122 3082 |
3240 3114 |
3255 3114 |
394 253 |
305 112 |
5 |
BMDBM 360 mg/kg bw/day |
Intact Abraded |
2856 2785 |
2927 2858 |
2961 2908 |
3063 2988 |
3165 3084 |
3213 2971 |
3280 3128 |
424 343 |
329 152 |
Table 5a: Mean erythema (E) and oedema (O) scores after repeated dermal application of butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane (BMDBM) to 5 male rabbits (intact skin).
Day |
Negative control |
Vehicle control |
BMDBM [mg/kg bw/day] |
|||||||
30 |
100 |
360 |
||||||||
Erythema/Oedema: |
E |
O |
E |
O |
E |
O |
E |
O |
E |
O |
1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
0.6 |
0.2 |
0.6 |
0.8 |
4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
0.0 |
1.2 |
0.8 |
1.0 |
1.2 |
5 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.4 |
0.2 |
1.0 |
0.8 |
1.6 |
1.0 |
1.2 |
1.8 |
6 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
1.8 |
1.8 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
7 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
1.2 |
0.8 |
1.6 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
8 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.6 |
0.2 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.6 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
9 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
0.6 |
1.6 |
1.2 |
2.0 |
1.8 |
101 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.8 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
0.8 |
1.8 |
1.4 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
11 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
0.8 |
0.6 |
1.6 |
1.4 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
12 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
0.6 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
13 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.8 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
0.6 |
1.6 |
1.2 |
2.0 |
2.2 |
14 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.8 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.8 |
1.8 |
1.2 |
2.0 |
2.4 |
15 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.8 |
0.3 |
1.2 |
0.8 |
2.0 |
1.6 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
16 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.8 |
0.3 |
1.2 |
0.6 |
2.0 |
1.6 |
2.0 |
1.6 |
17 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.8 |
0.3 |
1.2 |
0.8 |
2.0 |
1.6 |
2.0 |
1.8 |
18 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.8 |
0.3 |
1.2 |
0.8 |
2.0 |
1.8 |
2.0 |
1.8 |
19 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
1.3 |
0.5 |
1.2 |
1.0 |
1.6 |
1.8 |
2.0 |
2.2 |
20 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
0.5 |
1.2 |
1.0 |
1.8 |
1.8 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
21 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.3 |
0.5 |
1.2 |
1.0 |
2.0 |
1.8 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
222 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.3 |
0.3 |
1.2 |
1.0 |
2.0 |
1.8 |
2.0 |
2.2 |
23 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.3 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
1 1 out of 5 animals was found dead in the negative control group
2 1 out of 5 animals was found dead in the negative control group
Table 5b: Mean erythema (E) and oedema (O) scores after repeated dermal application of butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane (BMDBM) to 5 female rabbits (intact skin).
|
Negative control |
Vehicle control |
BMDBM [mg/kg bw/day] |
|||||||
30 |
100 |
360 |
||||||||
Erythema/Oedema: |
E |
O |
E |
O |
E |
O |
E |
O |
E |
O |
1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
0.6 |
0.0 |
0.6 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
0.6 |
0.0 |
0.8 |
0.4 |
1.4 |
0.8 |
5 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.8 |
0.4 |
1.4 |
1.4 |
1.2 |
1.4 |
2.0 |
1.8 |
6 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
1.2 |
1.0 |
1.8 |
1.6 |
2.2 |
2.0 |
7 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.4 |
0.2 |
1.0 |
1.2 |
1.6 |
1.8 |
2.2 |
2.0 |
81 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
1.3 |
1.4 |
1.8 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
9 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
0.3 |
1.6 |
1.2 |
2.0 |
1.8 |
10 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
0.8 |
1.6 |
1.4 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
11 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.8 |
0.4 |
1.0 |
0.5 |
1.8 |
1.4 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
122 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.8 |
0.4 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
2.0 |
1.6 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
13 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.8 |
0.2 |
1.0 |
0.8 |
2.0 |
1.4 |
2.0 |
2.2 |
14 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.8 |
0.2 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
2.0 |
1.8 |
2.0 |
2.4 |
15 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.8 |
0.2 |
1.5 |
1.0 |
2.0 |
1.6 |
2.2 |
2.2 |
163 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.8 |
0.4 |
1.3 |
0.3 |
2.0 |
1.0 |
1.8 |
2.0 |
17 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.8 |
0.6 |
1.3 |
0.5 |
2.0 |
1.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
18 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.8 |
0.6 |
1.5 |
0.8 |
2.0 |
1.2 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
19 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
0.8 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.6 |
1.2 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
20 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.8 |
1.4 |
2.0 |
2.2 |
21 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.2 |
0.8 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
2.0 |
1.6 |
2.0 |
2.6 |
22 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
0.8 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.8 |
1.8 |
2.0 |
2.2 |
23 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.3 |
1 1 out of 5 animals was found dead in the 30 mg/kg bw group
2 1 out of 5 animals was found dead in the negative control group
3 1 out of 5 animals was found dead in the negative control group
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Repeated (21 days) dermal application of BMDBM (30, 100, and 360 mg/kg bw/day) to the intact or abraded skin of rabbits caused no deaths. Therefore, the NOAEL for systemic toxicity was set to the highest applied dose of 360 mg/kg bw/day. There was a dosage-related increase in the severity of dermal reactions of rabbits treated with BMDBM, including slight to moderate erythema and edema. The respective vehicle control exhibited only slight dermal reactions.
- Executive summary:
BMDBM, a crystalline sun protection substance, was prepared freshly each day as 1.5, 5 and 18 % w/v solutions in Carbitol and applied to the skin of rabbits once daily at dosage levels of 30, 100 and 360 mg/kg bw/day, for an exposure period of six hours each day, for twenty-one consecutive days.
There was a dosage-related increase in the severity of dermal reactions of rabbits treated with BMDBM. Slight to well-defined dermal reactions were generally observed in rabbits treated with BMDBM 30 or 100 mg/kg bw/day, although well-defined reactions were more persistent in rabbits treated with BMDBM, 100 mg/kg bw/day. Well-defined to moderate dermal reactions were generally seen in rabbits treated with BMDBM, 360 mg/kg/day. Slight dermal reactions occurred in the vehicle control animals (Carbitol). Microscopic examination of the treated skin sites revealed an increased incidence of epidermal thickening in rabbits from the vehicle control and treatment groups when compared to the untreated control group. Five rabbits were found dead during the study and one rabbit was sacrificed. The death of these animals was not considered to be directly related to treatment. Histopathological examination revealed gastrointestinal infection to be a factor contributory to the death of each animal.
In all other aspects including general health, bodyweights, food consumption, water consumption, haematology, blood chemistry, organ weights macroscopic pathology, and microscopic pathology of tissues excluding skin, rabbits treated with BMDBM were similar to the procedural and vehicle controls. Therefore, the NOAEL, based on systemic effects, can be considered to be 360 mg/kg bw/day.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.