Registration Dossier

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

kin and eye irritation data were not available for cyclopentane. Three read-across skin irritation studies were available, two for n-pentane and one for 2-methylbutane. These studies consisted of an animal study (OECD 401 and EU Method B.4) conducted with n-pentane and two human studies (non-guideline) conducted with either n-pentane or 2-methylbutane.  All studies indicate that petanes were not irritating in either rabbits or humans. One key eye irritation study (OECD 405) is available for n-pentane, in which the test material was not irritating in the eye of the rabbit.  Data (key or read acorss) were not available on respiratory irritation.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Additional information

Skin and eye irritation data were not available for cyclopentane. Consequently, three read-across skin irritation studie, two for n-pentane and one for 2 -methylbutane, were used to assess this endpoint. These studies consisted of an animal study conducted with n-pentane and two human studies conducted with either n-pentane or 2-methylbutane. With regard to the animal study on n-pentane, 4 male and 2 female New Zealand White rabbits were dermally exposed to 0.5 mL of n-pentane for 4 hours to dorsal surface from the shoulder region to the lumbar region of each rabbit (Trimmer, 1990). Animals were then observed for 7 days. Irritation was scored by the Draize method of scoring. The mean erythema and oedema score over 72 hours (0.5 and 0.06, respectively) are considered non-irritating based on EU guidelines.

 

For the human studies, 30 human volunteers were dermally exposed to n-pentane or 2 -methylbutane for 24 hours, via a semi-occlusive patch. Thirty minutes after patch removal, the test sites were scored, and were scored again 24 hours after patch removal (Rue and Plaza, 1991). Test subjects remained under observation for a maximum of 4 hours after exposure. If the test material elicited severe reactions, the patches were removed. The average dermal irritation score for this test material was 0.27 on a scale from 0 to 7 for n-pentane. The average dermal irritation score for this test material was 0.33 on a scale from 0 to 7 for 2 -methylbutane. Therefore, both test substances were not likely to be irritating to humans.

 

One read-across eye irritation study is available for n-pentane (Frank, 1996). n-Pentane was tested for ocular irritation in 3 New Zealand White rabbits at a single 0.1 mL dose. Observations were made at 1, 24, 48, and 72 hours after application for indications of ocular irritation. Reactions were scored based on the Draize Standard Eye Irritation Grading Scale (Draize, 1959). n-Pentane caused ocular irritation of the conjunctiva in all three test animals. All animals showed signs of redness at 1 hour and 24 hours after the installation. In only one animal did redness persist until the 48 hour observation period; this same animal was the only one to exhibit chemosis and discharge responses (at the 1 hour interval). All 3 animals were cleared of any ocular irritation at the 72 hour observation.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on read-across data, it can be inferred that cyclopentanes does not meet the criteria for classification as a skin irritantas defined by EU Dangerous Substances Directive 67/548/EEC or CLP EU Regulation 1272/2008 (GHS aligned). Cyclopentane is, however, classified under EU Dangerous Substances Directive 67/548/EEC as R66, Repeated exposure may cause skin dryness or cracking.

Based on read-across data, it can be inferred that cyclopentane does not meet the criteria for classification as an eye irritant as defined by EU Dangerous Substances Directive 67/548/EEC or CLP EU Regulation 1272/2008 (GHS aligned).