Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 227-930-1 | CAS number: 6041-94-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Toxic effect type:
- dose-dependent
Effects on fertility
Description of key information
PR022
A combined repeated dose toxicity study with the reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test with the test item administered by oral gavage in Sprague Dawley rats (12/sex/dose) was performed according to OECD TG 422. The dose levels for this study were 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day for a total of 37 days (males) and through mating, gestation and delivery until day 4 of lactation (females).
There were no effects on reproduction or development; therefore, the NOAEL for the reproductive/developmental toxicity was considered to be 1000 mg/kg/day in both parental animals and offspring.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Remarks:
- based on test type (migrated information)
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2001
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study (according to OECD 422 and GLP)
- Justification for type of information:
- See rationale and justification for the analogue read-across approach for the registration of the nanoform of Pigment Red 002 (chapter 13).
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Japan, Inc. (Atsugi Breeding center)
- Age at study initiation: 8 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: males 309-355 g, females: 206 to 232 g
- Housing: individually; mating period: 1 male, 1 female; 1 litter during lactation
- Diet: autoclaved pellet die for laboratory animals (CRF-1, Oriental Yeast Industry Co., LTD), ad libitum
- Water: sterile tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 6 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 +/-2
- Humidity (%): 55 +/- 15
- Air changes (per hr): 12
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- other: 0.5 % sodium-carboxymethylcellulose (CMC-NA) aqueous solution containing 0.1 % Tween 80
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of test substance : once or twice a week
- Storage temperature of suspension: 4°C
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): no data
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 10 mL/kg bw - Details on mating procedure:
- - M/F ratio per cage: 1:1
- Length of cohabitation: 14 days
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug or sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy
- Further matings after two unsuccessful attempts: no data - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- At the first preparation, the dosing formulations were analyzed by HPLC and it was confirmed that the concentrations were within the target value +/-10%.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- males: from 14 days before mating and through the mating period until the day before necroscopy for a total of 37 days
females: from 14 days beformating, through the matingand gestation periods and delivery until day 4 of lactation for a total of 42 to 47 days. Non-delivering females, however, were treated until the day before necropsy. - Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Details on study schedule:
- no data
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 100, 300, 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Basis:
actual ingested - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 12
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: highest dose is the upper limit dose level stipulated in the OECD guideline
- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random): stratified-by-weight randomization methodon the basis of the body weights to get almost the same mean body weights for each group. - Positive control:
- none
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- For deatails on parental animals see section 7.5.1 (repeated dose toxicity oral).
- Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
- From the first day of dosing to the start of mating, the estrous cycle was examined by collecting vaginal smears every day in the morning for all females of each group, and the mean estrous cycle length of each female was calculated. Females that had an estrous cycle length other than 4 to 6 days were judged as having irregular estrous cycles.
- Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- no data
- Litter observations:
- PARAMETERS EXAMINED
The following parameters were examined in F1 offspring:
number and sex of pups, stillbirths, live births, postnatal mortality, presence of gross anomalies
GROSS EXAMINATION OF DEAD PUPS: yes - Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- For deatials on parental animals see section 7.5.1 (repeated dose toxicity oral).
Examination of the ovary and uteri of the dams for the numbers of corpora lutea and implantations. - Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- SACRIFICE
- The F1 offspring were sacrificed at 4 days of age.
- These animals were subjected to postmortem examinations (macroscopic and microscopic examination) as follows:
GROSS NECROPSY
- Gross necropsy consisted of external and internal examinations including the cervical, thoracic, and abdominal viscera. - Statistics:
- Multiple comparison test:
Body weight, body weight gain, food consumption, hematology, blood chemistry, organ weight, number of corpora lutea, number of implantations, number of offspring
Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunnett-type multiple comparison test:
Days until copulation, number of estrus stages without copulation, mean estrous cycle length, gestation length, implantation index, delivery index, live birth index, incidence of offspring with external anomaly, viability index an Day 4
Chi-square test: Histopathological findings
Fisher's exact probability test:
Incidence of females with irregular estrous cycles, copulation index, fertility index, gestation index, sex ratio (rnale/fernale), incidence of dams with externally abnormal offspring - Reproductive indices:
- (1) Days until copulation: Number of days from the start of mating to detection of copulation
(2) Number of estrus stages without copulation
(3) Copulation index (%): (Number of animals with successful copulation/Number of animals paired) x 100
(4) Fertility index (%): (Number of pregnant animals/Number of animals with successful copulation) x 100
(5) Gestation length: Days until completion of delivery from Day 0 of gestation
(6) Gestation index (%): (Number of females with live offspring/Number of pregnant females) x 100
(7) Implantation index (%): (Number of implantations/Number of corpora lutea) x 100
(8) Delivery index (%): (Total number of offspring born/Number of implantations) x 100
- Offspring viability indices:
- (1) Live birth index (%): (Number of offspring born alive/ Total number of offspring born) x 100
(2) Viability index on Day 4 (%): (Number of live offspring on Day 4/ Number of offspring born alive) x 100 - Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- not examined
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- no effects observed
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not examined
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: There were no effects on reproduction or development up to the highest dose tested.
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality / viability:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Sexual maturation:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings:
- not examined
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: There were no effects on reproduction or development up to the highest dose tested.
- Reproductive effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of the test, there were no effects on reproduction or development; therefore, the NOAEL for the reproductive / developmental toxicity was considered to be 1000 mg/kg bw/day in both parental animals and offspring.
- Executive summary:
A combined repeated dose toxicity study with the reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test with the test item administered by oral gavage in Sprague Dawley rats (12/sex/dose) was performed according to OECD TG 422. The dose levels for this study were 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day for a total of 37 days (males) and through mating, gestation and delivery until day 4 of lactation (females).
There were no effects on reproduction or development; therefore, the NOAEL for the reproductive/developmental toxicity was considered to be 1000 mg/kg/day in both parental animals and offspring.
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Remarks:
- based on test type (migrated information)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2001
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study (according to OECD 422 and GLP)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Japan, Inc. (Atsugi Breeding center)
- Age at study initiation: 8 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: males 309-355 g, females: 206 to 232 g
- Housing: individually; mating period: 1 male, 1 female; 1 litter during lactation
- Diet: autoclaved pellet die for laboratory animals (CRF-1, Oriental Yeast Industry Co., LTD), ad libitum
- Water: sterile tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 6 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 +/-2
- Humidity (%): 55 +/- 15
- Air changes (per hr): 12
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- other: 0.5 % sodium-carboxymethylcellulose (CMC-NA) aqueous solution containing 0.1 % Tween 80
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of test substance : once or twice a week
- Storage temperature of suspension: 4°C
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): no data
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 10 mL/kg bw - Details on mating procedure:
- - M/F ratio per cage: 1:1
- Length of cohabitation: 14 days
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug or sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy
- Further matings after two unsuccessful attempts: no data - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- At the first preparation, the dosing formulations were analyzed by HPLC and it was confirmed that the concentrations were within the target value +/-10%.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- males: from 14 days before mating and through the mating period until the day before necroscopy for a total of 37 days
females: from 14 days beformating, through the matingand gestation periods and delivery until day 4 of lactation for a total of 42 to 47 days. Non-delivering females, however, were treated until the day before necropsy. - Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Details on study schedule:
- no data
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 100, 300, 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Basis:
actual ingested - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 12
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: highest dose is the upper limit dose level stipulated in the OECD guideline
- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random): stratified-by-weight randomization methodon the basis of the body weights to get almost the same mean body weights for each group. - Positive control:
- none
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- For deatails on parental animals see section 7.5.1 (repeated dose toxicity oral).
- Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
- From the first day of dosing to the start of mating, the estrous cycle was examined by collecting vaginal smears every day in the morning for all females of each group, and the mean estrous cycle length of each female was calculated. Females that had an estrous cycle length other than 4 to 6 days were judged as having irregular estrous cycles.
- Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- no data
- Litter observations:
- PARAMETERS EXAMINED
The following parameters were examined in F1 offspring:
number and sex of pups, stillbirths, live births, postnatal mortality, presence of gross anomalies
GROSS EXAMINATION OF DEAD PUPS: yes - Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- For deatials on parental animals see section 7.5.1 (repeated dose toxicity oral).
Examination of the ovary and uteri of the dams for the numbers of corpora lutea and implantations. - Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- SACRIFICE
- The F1 offspring were sacrificed at 4 days of age.
- These animals were subjected to postmortem examinations (macroscopic and microscopic examination) as follows:
GROSS NECROPSY
- Gross necropsy consisted of external and internal examinations including the cervical, thoracic, and abdominal viscera. - Statistics:
- Multiple comparison test:
Body weight, body weight gain, food consumption, hematology, blood chemistry, organ weight, number of corpora lutea, number of implantations, number of offspring
Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunnett-type multiple comparison test:
Days until copulation, number of estrus stages without copulation, mean estrous cycle length, gestation length, implantation index, delivery index, live birth index, incidence of offspring with external anomaly, viability index an Day 4
Chi-square test: Histopathological findings
Fisher's exact probability test:
Incidence of females with irregular estrous cycles, copulation index, fertility index, gestation index, sex ratio (rnale/fernale), incidence of dams with externally abnormal offspring - Reproductive indices:
- (1) Days until copulation: Number of days from the start of mating to detection of copulation
(2) Number of estrus stages without copulation
(3) Copulation index (%): (Number of animals with successful copulation/Number of animals paired) x 100
(4) Fertility index (%): (Number of pregnant animals/Number of animals with successful copulation) x 100
(5) Gestation length: Days until completion of delivery from Day 0 of gestation
(6) Gestation index (%): (Number of females with live offspring/Number of pregnant females) x 100
(7) Implantation index (%): (Number of implantations/Number of corpora lutea) x 100
(8) Delivery index (%): (Total number of offspring born/Number of implantations) x 100
- Offspring viability indices:
- (1) Live birth index (%): (Number of offspring born alive/ Total number of offspring born) x 100
(2) Viability index on Day 4 (%): (Number of live offspring on Day 4/ Number of offspring born alive) x 100 - Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- not examined
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- no effects observed
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not examined
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: There were no effects on reproduction or development up to the highest dose tested.
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality / viability:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Sexual maturation:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings:
- not examined
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: There were no effects on reproduction or development up to the highest dose tested.
- Reproductive effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of the test, there were no effects on reproduction or development; therefore, the NOAEL for the reproductive / developmental toxicity was considered to be 1000 mg/kg bw/day in both parental animals and offspring.
- Executive summary:
A combined repeated dose toxicity study with the reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test with the test item administered by oral gavage in Sprague Dawley rats (12/sex/dose) was performed according to OECD TG 422. The dose levels for this study were 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day for a total of 37 days (males) and through mating, gestation and delivery until day 4 of lactation (females).
There were no effects on reproduction or development; therefore, the NOAEL for the reproductive/developmental toxicity was considered to be 1000 mg/kg/day in both parental animals and offspring.
Referenceopen allclose all
In the estrous cycle examination, there was no significant difference in the mean estrous cycle length between the control and treated groups. Moreover, there were no females with irregular estrous cycles in any group including the control group.
REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
As a results of mating, all the mating pairs of each group copulated including the control group, and there was no significant difference in the copulation index, nor were there any in the number of estrus stages without copulation or the days until copulation between the control and treated groups. Moreover, there were only 1 and 2 non-pregnant females in the 100 and 300 mg/kg groups, respectively, and no significant difference was found in the fertility index between the control and treated groups.
There were no significant differences in the number of offspring born or born alive, sex ratio, live birth index or viability index on Day 4 between the control and each treated group. In the clinical observation, subcutaneous hemorrhage and abdominal hemorrhage were observed in 1 or 2 pups each in the control and 100 mg/kg groups, respectively; however, they were judged not treatment-related because of the lack of dose-dependency in their incidences. Although loss of suckling was observed in some neonates on the birthday in the control, 300 and 1000 mg/kg groups, it was judged not treatment-related because all pups were confirmed to have been suckled by the dams on the next day. Moreover, no abnormal external features were found in neonates in any group including the control group.
2) Body weight
There were no significant differences in body weight or body weight gain of either sex between the control and treated groups.
3) Necropsy findings
Hemorrhage in the abdominal cavity, and white and yellow patches on the liver were observed only in 1 male in the 100 mg/kg group, as was dilatation of the renal pelvis in 2 males in the 1000 mg/kg group. However, they were judged not treatrnent-related, because the same findings did not occur frequently in the 1000 mg/kg group. Moreover, there were no abnormal findings in pups that died until postnatal Day 4.
In the estrous cycle examination, there was no significant difference in the mean estrous cycle length between the control and treated groups. Moreover, there were no females with irregular estrous cycles in any group including the control group.
REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
As a results of mating, all the mating pairs of each group copulated including the control group, and there was no significant difference in the copulation index, nor were there any in the number of estrus stages without copulation or the days until copulation between the control and treated groups. Moreover, there were only 1 and 2 non-pregnant females in the 100 and 300 mg/kg groups, respectively, and no significant difference was found in the fertility index between the control and treated groups.
There were no significant differences in the number of offspring born or born alive, sex ratio, live birth index or viability index on Day 4 between the control and each treated group. In the clinical observation, subcutaneous hemorrhage and abdominal hemorrhage were observed in 1 or 2 pups each in the control and 100 mg/kg groups, respectively; however, they were judged not treatment-related because of the lack of dose-dependency in their incidences. Although loss of suckling was observed in some neonates on the birthday in the control, 300 and 1000 mg/kg groups, it was judged not treatment-related because all pups were confirmed to have been suckled by the dams on the next day. Moreover, no abnormal external features were found in neonates in any group including the control group.
2) Body weight
There were no significant differences in body weight or body weight gain of either sex between the control and treated groups.
3) Necropsy findings
Hemorrhage in the abdominal cavity, and white and yellow patches on the liver were observed only in 1 male in the 100 mg/kg group, as was dilatation of the renal pelvis in 2 males in the 1000 mg/kg group. However, they were judged not treatrnent-related, because the same findings did not occur frequently in the 1000 mg/kg group. Moreover, there were no abnormal findings in pups that died until postnatal Day 4.
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effects on developmental toxicity
Description of key information
PR022
A combined repeated dose toxicity study with the reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test with the test item administered by oral gavage in Sprague Dawley rats (12/sex/dose) was performed according to OECD TG 422. The dose levels for this study were 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day for a total of 37 days (males) and through mating, gestation and delivery until day 4 of lactation (females).
There were no effects on reproduction or development; therefore, the NOAEL for the reproductive/developmental toxicity was considered to be 1000 mg/kg/day in both parental animals and offspring.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2001
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study (according to OECD 422 and GLP)
- Justification for type of information:
- See rationale and justification for the analogue read-across approach for the registration of the nanoform of Pigment Red 002 (chapter 13).
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Japan, Inc. (Atsugi Breeding center)
- Age at study initiation: 8 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: males 309-355 g, females: 206 to 232 g
- Housing: individually; mating period: 1 male, 1 female; 1 litter during lactation
- Diet: autoclaved pellet die for laboratory animals (CRF-1, Oriental Yeast Industry Co., LTD), ad libitum
- Water: sterile tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 6 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 +/-2
- Humidity (%): 55 +/- 15
- Air changes (per hr): 12
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- other: 0.5 % sodium-carboxymethylcellulose (CMC-NA) aqueous solution containing 0.1 % Tween 80
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of test substance : once or twice a week
- Storage temperature of suspension: 4°C
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): no data
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 10 mL/kg bw - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- At the first preparation, the dosing formulations were analyzed by HPLC and it was confirmed that the concentrations were within the target value +/-10%.
- Details on mating procedure:
- - M/F ratio per cage: 1:1
- Length of cohabitation: 14 days
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug or sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy
- Further matings after two unsuccessful attempts: no data - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- males: from 14 days before mating and throught he mating period until the day before necroscopy for a total of 37 days
females: from 14 days beformating, through the matingand gestation periods and delivery until day 4 of lactation for a total of 42 to 47 days. Non-delivering females, however, were treated until the day before necropsy. - Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Duration of test:
- till day 4 postnatally
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 12
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: highest dose is the upper limit dose level stipulated in the OECD guideline
- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random): stratified-by-weight randomization methodon the basis of the body weights to get almost the same mean body weights for each group. - Maternal examinations:
- For details on parental animals see section 7.5.1 (repeated dose toxicity oral).
- Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes microscopically
- Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: Yes: (all)
- Soft tissue examinations: No
- Skeletal examinations: No
- Head examinations: No - Statistics:
- Multiple comparison test:
Body weight, body weight gain, food consumption, hematology, blood chemistry, organ weight, number of corpora lutea, number of implantations, number of offspring
Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunnett-type multiple comparison test:
Days until copulation, number of estrus stages without copulation, mean estrous cycle length, gestation length, implantation index, delivery index, live birth index, incidence of offspring with external anomaly, viability index an Day 4
Chi-square test: Histopathological findings
Fisher's exact probability test:
Incidence of females with irregular estrous cycles, copulation index, fertility index, gestation index, sex ratio (rnale/fernale), incidence of dams with externally abnormal offspring - Indices:
- Reproductive indices
(1) Days until copulation: Number of days from the start of mating to detection of copulation
(2) Number of estrus stages without copulation
(3) Copulation index (%): (Number of animals with successful copulation/Number of animals paired) x 100
(4) Fertility index (%): (Number of pregnant animals/Number of animals with successful copulation) x 100
(5) Gestation length: Days until completion of delivery from Day 0 of gestation
(6) Gestation index (%): (Number of females with live offspring/Number of pregnant females) x 100
(7) Implantation index (%): (Number of implantations/Number of corpora lutea) x 100
(8) Delivery index (%): (Total number of offspring born/Number of implantations) x 100
Offspring viability indices
(1) Live birth index (%): (Number of offspring born alive/ Total number of offspring born) x 100
(2) Viability index on Day 4 (%): (Number of live offspring on Day 4/ Number of offspring born alive) x 100 - Historical control data:
- no data
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Maternal toxic effects:yes. Remark: details see below
Details on maternal toxic effects:
Effects observed in females were judged not to be adverse, for details see section 7.5.1 (NOAEL 1000 mg/kg bw/d) - Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:no effects
Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
1) Observation of offspring
There were no significant differences in the number of offspring born or born alive, sex ratio, live birth index or viability index on Day 4 between the control and each treated group. In the clinical observation, subcutaneous hemorrhage and abdominal hemorrhage were observed in 1 or 2 pups each in the control and 100 mg/kg groups, respectively; however, they were judged not treatment-related because of the lack of dose-dependency in their incidences. Although loss of suckling was observed in some neonates on the birthday in the control, 300 and 1000 mg/kg groups, it was judged not treatment-related because all pups were confirmed to have been suckled by the dams on the next day. Moreover, no abnormal external features were found in neonates in any group including the control group.
2) Body weight
There were no significant differences in body weight or body weight gain of either sex between the control and treated groups.
3) Necropsy findings
Hemorrhage in the abdominal cavity, and white and yellow patches on the liver were observed only in 1 male in the 100 mg/kg group, as was dilatation of the renal pelvis in 2 males in the 1000 mg/kg group. However, they were judged not treatrnent-related, because the same findings did not occur frequently in the 1000 mg/kg group. Moreover, there were no abnormal findings in pups that died until postnatal Day 4. - Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Development was not impaired at any dose level.
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of the test there were no effects on reproduction or development; therefore, the NOAEL for the reproductive / developmental toxicity was considered to be 1000 mg/kg bw/day in both parental animals and offspring.
- Executive summary:
A combined repeated dose toxicity study with reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test with the test item administered by oral gavage in Sprague Dawley rats (12/sex/dose) was performed according to OECD TG 422. The dose levels for this study were 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day for a total of 37 days (males) and through mating, gestation and delivery until day 4 of lactation (females).
There were no effects on reproduction or development; therefore, the NOAEL for the reproductive/developmental toxicity was considered to be 1000 mg/kg/day in both parental animals and offspring.
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2001
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study (according to OECD 422 and GLP)
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Japan, Inc. (Atsugi Breeding center)
- Age at study initiation: 8 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: males 309-355 g, females: 206 to 232 g
- Housing: individually; mating period: 1 male, 1 female; 1 litter during lactation
- Diet: autoclaved pellet die for laboratory animals (CRF-1, Oriental Yeast Industry Co., LTD), ad libitum
- Water: sterile tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 6 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 +/-2
- Humidity (%): 55 +/- 15
- Air changes (per hr): 12
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- other: 0.5 % sodium-carboxymethylcellulose (CMC-NA) aqueous solution containing 0.1 % Tween 80
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of test substance : once or twice a week
- Storage temperature of suspension: 4°C
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): no data
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 10 mL/kg bw - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- At the first preparation, the dosing formulations were analyzed by HPLC and it was confirmed that the concentrations were within the target value +/-10%.
- Details on mating procedure:
- - M/F ratio per cage: 1:1
- Length of cohabitation: 14 days
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug or sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy
- Further matings after two unsuccessful attempts: no data - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- males: from 14 days before mating and throught he mating period until the day before necroscopy for a total of 37 days
females: from 14 days beformating, through the matingand gestation periods and delivery until day 4 of lactation for a total of 42 to 47 days. Non-delivering females, however, were treated until the day before necropsy. - Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Duration of test:
- till day 4 postnatally
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 12
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: highest dose is the upper limit dose level stipulated in the OECD guideline
- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random): stratified-by-weight randomization methodon the basis of the body weights to get almost the same mean body weights for each group. - Maternal examinations:
- For details on parental animals see section 7.5.1 (repeated dose toxicity oral).
- Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes microscopically
- Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: Yes: (all)
- Soft tissue examinations: No
- Skeletal examinations: No
- Head examinations: No - Statistics:
- Multiple comparison test:
Body weight, body weight gain, food consumption, hematology, blood chemistry, organ weight, number of corpora lutea, number of implantations, number of offspring
Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunnett-type multiple comparison test:
Days until copulation, number of estrus stages without copulation, mean estrous cycle length, gestation length, implantation index, delivery index, live birth index, incidence of offspring with external anomaly, viability index an Day 4
Chi-square test: Histopathological findings
Fisher's exact probability test:
Incidence of females with irregular estrous cycles, copulation index, fertility index, gestation index, sex ratio (rnale/fernale), incidence of dams with externally abnormal offspring - Indices:
- Reproductive indices
(1) Days until copulation: Number of days from the start of mating to detection of copulation
(2) Number of estrus stages without copulation
(3) Copulation index (%): (Number of animals with successful copulation/Number of animals paired) x 100
(4) Fertility index (%): (Number of pregnant animals/Number of animals with successful copulation) x 100
(5) Gestation length: Days until completion of delivery from Day 0 of gestation
(6) Gestation index (%): (Number of females with live offspring/Number of pregnant females) x 100
(7) Implantation index (%): (Number of implantations/Number of corpora lutea) x 100
(8) Delivery index (%): (Total number of offspring born/Number of implantations) x 100
Offspring viability indices
(1) Live birth index (%): (Number of offspring born alive/ Total number of offspring born) x 100
(2) Viability index on Day 4 (%): (Number of live offspring on Day 4/ Number of offspring born alive) x 100 - Historical control data:
- no data
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Maternal toxic effects:yes. Remark: details see below
Details on maternal toxic effects:
Effects observed in females were judged not to be adverse, for details see section 7.5.1 (NOAEL 1000 mg/kg bw/d) - Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:no effects
Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
1) Observation of offspring
There were no significant differences in the number of offspring born or born alive, sex ratio, live birth index or viability index on Day 4 between the control and each treated group. In the clinical observation, subcutaneous hemorrhage and abdominal hemorrhage were observed in 1 or 2 pups each in the control and 100 mg/kg groups, respectively; however, they were judged not treatment-related because of the lack of dose-dependency in their incidences. Although loss of suckling was observed in some neonates on the birthday in the control, 300 and 1000 mg/kg groups, it was judged not treatment-related because all pups were confirmed to have been suckled by the dams on the next day. Moreover, no abnormal external features were found in neonates in any group including the control group.
2) Body weight
There were no significant differences in body weight or body weight gain of either sex between the control and treated groups.
3) Necropsy findings
Hemorrhage in the abdominal cavity, and white and yellow patches on the liver were observed only in 1 male in the 100 mg/kg group, as was dilatation of the renal pelvis in 2 males in the 1000 mg/kg group. However, they were judged not treatrnent-related, because the same findings did not occur frequently in the 1000 mg/kg group. Moreover, there were no abnormal findings in pups that died until postnatal Day 4. - Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Development was not impaired at any dose level.
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of the test there were no effects on reproduction or development; therefore, the NOAEL for the reproductive / developmental toxicity was considered to be 1000 mg/kg bw/day in both parental animals and offspring.
- Executive summary:
A combined repeated dose toxicity study with reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test with the test item administered by oral gavage in Sprague Dawley rats (12/sex/dose) was performed according to OECD TG 422. The dose levels for this study were 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day for a total of 37 days (males) and through mating, gestation and delivery until day 4 of lactation (females).
There were no effects on reproduction or development; therefore, the NOAEL for the reproductive/developmental toxicity was considered to be 1000 mg/kg/day in both parental animals and offspring.
Referenceopen allclose all
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
No Classification, as no adverse effects were observed.
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.