Registration Dossier
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 201-291-9 | CAS number: 80-56-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- sub-chronic toxicity: inhalation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 14 weeks in 2005
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- Whole body exposure, and fixation of cauda tissue at 65°C
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 016
- Report date:
- 2016
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 413 (Subchronic Inhalation Toxicity: 90-Day Study)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- no data on food consumption, no ophthalmological examination, some organ weights were not recorded(Adrenals, Brain, Ovaries, Thyroids, Uterus), animals weighed weekly and not twice weekly at the beginning.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Not applicable
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Remarks:
- in compliance with Food and Drug Administration Good Laboratory Practice Regulations (21 CFR, Part 58).
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Pin-2(3)-ene
- EC Number:
- 201-291-9
- EC Name:
- Pin-2(3)-ene
- Cas Number:
- 80-56-8
- Molecular formula:
- C10H16
- IUPAC Name:
- 2,6,6-trimethylbicyclo[3.1.1]hept-2-ene
- Test material form:
- liquid
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - lot 4KB705 supplied from Millennium Specialty Chemicals (Jacksonville, FL), purity 96%
- water content of 27 ppm (Karl Fischer titration)
- 69% (+)-α-pinene and 31% (–)-α-pinene (GC/FID)
- Identified impurities: camphene (1.77%) and β-pinene (1.73%) identified by GC/FID, and tricyclene (0.51%) identified by GC/MS.
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Fischer 344
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Male and female F344/N rats were obtained from the NTP colony maintained at Taconic Farms, Inc. (Germantown, NY),
- age at the study initiate: 6 weeks
- Animals were quarantined for 13 day befor the study
- Rats were housed individually
- Feed was available ad libitum except during exposure periods; water was available ad libitum.
Chamber environment:
Temperature: 72° ± 3° F
Relative humidity: 50% ± 15%
Room fluorescent light: 12 hours/day
Chamber air changes: 15 ± 2/hour
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- inhalation
- Type of inhalation exposure:
- whole body
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Remarks on MMAD:
- MMAD / GSD: no data
- Details on inhalation exposure:
- No data
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Chamber and room concentrations of α-pinene were monitored by an on-line gas chromatograph. Samples were drawn from each exposure chamber approximately every 20 minutes during each 6-hour exposure period.
The average concentration measured were: 24.9 ± 1.1 ppm for the 25 ppm group, 49.8 ± 0.8 for the 50 ppm group, 99.6 ± 1.4ppm for the 100 ppm group, 200 ± 5 ppm for the 200 ppm group and 401 ± 6 ppm for the 400 ppm group. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 14 weeks; 6 hours plus T90 (10 minutes) per day .
Groups of 10 male and 10 female clinical pathology rats were exposed to the same concentrations for 23 days. - Frequency of treatment:
- five times per week, weekdays only
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 25 ppm
- Remarks:
- nominal conc.
- Dose / conc.:
- 50 ppm
- Remarks:
- nominal conc.
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 ppm
- Remarks:
- nominal conc.
- Dose / conc.:
- 200 ppm
- Remarks:
- nominal conc.
- Dose / conc.:
- 400 ppm
- Remarks:
- nominal conc.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10
- Control animals:
- yes
- Details on study design:
- - Before the studies began, five male and five female rats were randomly selected for parasite evaluation and gross observation for evidence of disease.
- Core study animals were weighed initially, and body weights and clinical findings were recorded on day 7 (female rats), day 8 (male rats), weekly thereafter, and at the end of the studies.
- Serologic analyses were performed on five male and five female sentinel rats at 1 week and at the end of the studies using the protocols of the NTP Sentinel Animal Program
- Animals were anesthetized with carbon dioxide, and blood was collected from the retroorbital plexus of clinical pathology rats on days 4 and 23 and from core study rats at the end of the studies for hematology and clinical chemistry analyses. - Positive control:
- No
Examinations
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes for moribundity and death
- Time schedule: twice daily, at least 6 hours apart (before 10:00 AM and after 2:00 PM)
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: No data
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: on Day 1 of the test, after 7 days and at weekly intervals thereafter
FOOD CONSUMPTION: No
FOOD EFFICIENCY: No
WATER CONSUMPTION: No
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: No
HAEMATOLOGY: No
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
URINALYSIS: No
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: No - Sacrifice and pathology:
- GROSS PATHOLOGY: : Yes
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes Complete histopathologic examinations were performed by the study laboratory pathologist on all chamber control and 400 ppm animals and 200 ppm female rats.
HEMATOLOGY: Yes
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes - Other examinations:
- SPERM MOTILITY AND VAGINAL CYTOLOGY: At the end of the study, sperm samples were collected for sperm motility evaluations. Sperm heads per testis and per gram testis, spermatid counts, and epididymal spermatozoal motility and concentration. were evaluated. The left cauda, left epididymis, and left testis were weighed. The numbers of motile and nonmotile spermatozoa were counted for five fields per slide by two observers. Sperm density was then determined microscopically with the aid of a hemacytometer
Vaginal samples were collected for up to 12 consecutive days prior to the end of the study for vaginal cytology evaluations. The percentage of time spent in the various estrous cycle stages and estrous cycle length were evaluated. - Statistics:
- Kaplan-Meier used for probability of survival. Statistical analyses used for possible dose-related effect on survival was Cox (Cox D.R. (1972) Regression models and life tables. J.R. Stat. Soc. B34: 187-220.) for testing two groups for equality; and Tarone’s (Tarone R.E. (1975) Tests for trend in life table analysis. Biometrika 62; 679-682) life table test for a dose-related trend
Fisher exact test (Gart et al., 1979), was used to determine significance.
Results and discussion
Results of examinations
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence):
- In the high dose group (400 ppm), 6 females were found dead before the end of the study (See Table 1 for more information)
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Males: the final mean body weights and mean body weight gains of exposed males were similar to those of the chamber controls.
Females: In the high dose group (400 ppm), the final mean body weights and the mean body weight gains of females exposed to 400 ppm were significantly less than those of the chamber controls.
(See Table 1 for more information) - Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not examined
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- On day 4, mild decreases in leukocyte and lymphocyte counts were observed in 200 and 400 ppm male rats. However, these findings were not observed in females, they can be considered as mild but not severe (23% and 26% from control values for leukocytes and lymphocytes counts, respectively) and are not persistent (not found at Day 23 and Week 14). Also, no histopathological findings could be associated to these changes. Therefore, these treatment-related effects can be considered as not toxicologically significant.
In males, limited decreases of 4, 4 and 5% of controls were observed for haemoglobin, haematocrit and erythrocytes, respectively. (See table 5)
Historical data from Charles River, 1984 on 19-21-week-old Fischer 344 male rats show ranges ± 2 SD between 13.5-17.1 g/dL, 41-51 % and 6.52-8.74 106/µL for haemoglobin, haematocrit and erythrocytes, respectively. Hematocrit and haemoglobin values found in the alpha-pinene study are within these ranges. The erythrocytes values from all groups are above the historical control range but the coefficient of variation (SD/mean=0.56/7.62=7%), that can be considered as the normal biological variability, is higher than the 5% decrease observed in this parameter. Also, Chayne, 2006 report hematology ranges in Fischer 344/Cr rats of 13.4-17.2 g/dL, 46-52.5% and 6.68-9.15 106/µL for haemoglobin, haematocrit and erythrocytes, respectively. Like the previous historical control data, values found in the alpha-pinene study are within these ranges except for erythrocytes values of control and 50 ppm groups that are slightly above this range. This means that the erythrocytes values obtained in the control group of this study may be high compared to normal values and the decrease observed in this parameter may therefore be due to those study-specific high control values. - Clinical biochemistry findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The remaining significant differences in clinical chemistry parameters were not considered to be toxicologically relevant. (See table 3 for details)
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The organ weight changes (liver, heart, thymus, spleen and kidneys) in male and female rats were not accompanied by histopathologic lesions except for the male kidney. The weight changes in lymphoid tissues were not accompanied by clinical chemistry or histopathologic changes indicative of immunotoxicity and, therefore, were not considered toxicologically relevant. (See table 2 for more information)
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Examination of the male kidneys at all dose levels revealed lesions including granular casts and hyaline droplets. The severities of these lesions increased with increasing exposure concentration. (See table 4)
The presence of these nonneoplastic lesions in the kidney is suggestive of α2μ-globulin nephropathy, a renal syndrome that occurs in male but not female F334/N rats and that has been linked to the development of renal tubule neoplasms. This syndrome has been produced by structurally diverse chemicals and is thought to be secondary to toxicity caused by accumulation of hyaline droplets within the renal tubule epithelial cells.
Alpha 2μ-globulin is a protein that is synthesized in vivo in large quantities exclusively by male rats. The presence of this protein renders male rats uniquely sensitive to a chemically induced syndrome that is manifest acutely as the accumulation of α2μ-globulin in renal proximal tubule cells. Alpha-pinene (like d-limonene, the prototypical compound for this effect) induces α2μ-globulin nephropathy (and renal tumors) in male rats. The accumulation of alpha2µ-globulin in the form of hyaline droplets in the renal tubules, and then a chronic renal cellular protein overload lead to renal cell necrosis and compensatory cell proliferation.
Ref: Meek M.E. et al. (2003) A Framework for Human Relevance Analysis of Information on Carcinogenic Modes of Action, Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 33(6): 591 -653.
The histopathological examination done in this study showed that the effects observed in male kidneys correspond to this kind of nephropathy. In addition, they were not observed in female rats and in mice. Therefore, this effect is sexe- and species-specific and not relevant for humans. - Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not specified
- Other effects:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Decreased sperm count in cauda epididymis in 200 and 400 ppm males vs control group (see table 6).
- Details on results:
- MORTALITY
In the high dose group (400 ppm), 6 females were found dead before the end of the study (4 on Day 36, 1 on Day 50 and 1 on Day 91). All other animals survived until terminal sacrifice.
CLINICAL EXAMINATION
No signs of toxicity (e.g., abnormal breathing or behavior) were noted during clinical observations
BODY WEIGHT AND WEIGHT GAIN
Males: the final mean body weights and mean body weight gains of exposed males were similar to those of the chamber controls.
Females: All surviving females at 400 ppm lost weight between week 12 and week 14. The final mean body weights of females exposed to 400 ppm were significantly less than those of the chamber controls (159g vs 194g in the control group) . The mean body weight gains of female exposed to 400 ppm were significantly less than those of the chamber controls (72g vs 105 g in the control group). .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
Males showed statistically significant reductions in sorbitol dehydrogenase activity at 400 ppm, alanine aminotransferase activity at levels ≥50 ppm, and alkaline phosphatase activity at levels ≥100 ppm. Females showed statistically significant reductions in alanine aminotransferase activity at levels ≥200 ppm, and alkaline phosphatase activity at the 400 ppm. There were significant decreases at lower levels of exposure for females but these changes were not dose-dependent. None of these changes in enzyme activity were related to organ weight changes or evidence of histopathology.
ORGAN WEIGHTS
Relative liver weights, were statistically increased in males at 100 ppm and greater and in all females treated groups. Absolute liver weights were statistically increased in males at 400 ppm and in females at 50, 100 and 200 ppm.
Absolute kidney weights were increased in males at 100 ppm and greater, and relative kidney weights were increased in males at 50 ppm and greater. In females, absolute liver weights were increased at levels of 50 and 200 ppm, relative were increased at level of 200 ppm and greater. There were no increases in either hepatic enzymes or any evidence of histopathological changes at any of these dose levels.
Females showed statistically significant decreases in absolute and relative thymus weights, and significant decreases in relative thymus weights at 200 ppm, and increased relative and absolute heart weight at the 100 ppm level.
With the exception of the male kidney, the organ weight changes in male and female rats were not accompanied by histopathologic lesions. Therefore, they are either considered as toxicologically not significant or only adaptative effects.
HISTOPATHOLOGY: NON-NEOPLASTIC
Examination of the male kidneys at all dose levels revealed lesions including granular casts and hyaline droplets indicative of α2u-globulin nephropathy. and the severities of these lesions increased with increasing exposure concentration.
In females there was no evidence of histopathology in any organ at any dose level. Specifically, there was no evidence of histopathological changes to the clitoris, ovaries, uterus, epididymis, preputial gland, seminal vesicles, and testes for any of the control or test groups of animals.
HEMATOLOGY: On day 4, there were mild exposure-related significant decreases in the leukocyte counts paired with mild significant decreases in the lymphocyte counts in 200 ppm male rats (7.57 ppm vs 9.08ppm) and in 400 ppm male rats (6.95ppm vs 9.08ppm) vs controls. These decreases ameliorated by day 23. The leukocyte changes likely represent a secondary treatment-associated stress effect.
At week 14, there were mild significant decreases in erythrocyte counts, hemoglobin concentrations, and hematocrit values in males exposed to 100 ppm or greater.
The remaining significant differences in hematology parameters were not considered to be toxicologically relevant
SPERM MOTILITY AND VAGINAL CYTOLOGY: There were significantly decreased sperm count in cauda epididymis in 200 and 400 ppm males vs control group.
Females in the 400 ppm group displayed an apparent increase in cycle length and a slight increase in the percentage of the cycle spent in metestrus, relative to the chamber control group. However, the apparent increase in cycle length may be secondary to stress, as evidenced by lower body weight and mortality in the 400 ppm group. Alternatively, the apparent changes in the 400 ppm females may have been an artifact of having too few animals available to allow for meaningful interpretation.
α-pinene exposure by inhalation exhibits the potential to be a reproductive toxicant in male rats, but not in female rats.
Effect levels
open allclose all
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEC
- Effect level:
- 100 ppm
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- organ weights and organ / body weight ratios
- other: increased incidences of kidney lesions in male
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEC
- Effect level:
- 200 ppm
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- mortality
Target system / organ toxicity
open allclose all
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 25 ppm
- System:
- urinary
- Organ:
- kidney
- Treatment related:
- yes
- Dose response relationship:
- yes
- Relevant for humans:
- no
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 100 ppm
- System:
- male reproductive system
- Organ:
- cauda epididymis
- Treatment related:
- yes
- Dose response relationship:
- yes
- Relevant for humans:
- yes
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1 Survival and Body Weights ; body weight gains of Rats
| Concentration (ppm) | Survivalb | Initial BodyWeight (g)
| Final BodyWeight (g) | Change in BodyWeight (g)
| Final Weight Relative to Controls(%)
|
Male
| 0 | 10/10 | 98 ± 3 | 335 ± 6 | 238 ± 5 |
|
25 | 10/10 | 98 ± 2 | 329 ± 11 | 231 ± 9 | 98 | |
50 | 10/10 | 98 ± 2 | 333 ± 6 | 235 ± 5 | 99 | |
100 | 10/10 | 98 ± 2 | 334 ± 7 | 236 ± 5 | 100 | |
200 | 10/10 | 96 ± 2 | 330 ± 4 | 234 ± 4 | 98 | |
400 | 10/10 | 97 ± 2 | 322 ± 6 | 225 ± 7 | 96 | |
Female | 0 | 10/10 | 89 ± 2 | 194 ± 3 | 105 ± 3 |
|
25 | 10/10 | 89 ± 2 | 199 ± 4 | 110 ± 4 | 102 | |
50 | 10/10 | 89 ± 2 | 206 ± 4 | 117 ± 4 | 106 | |
100 | 10/10 | 88 ± 2 | 199 ± 3 | 112 ± 2 | 103 | |
200 | 10/10 | 88 ± 2 | 201 ± 3 | 113 ± 2 | 104 | |
400 | 4/10c | 89 ± 2 | 159 ± 5** | 72 ± 5** | 82 |
** Significantly different (P≤0.01) from the chamber control group by Dunnett’s test
bNumber of animals surviving at 14 weeks/number initially in group
c Weeks of death: 6, 6, 6, 6, 8, 13
Table 2- Mean of absolute and relative organ weight
| Chamber control | 25 ppm | 50 ppm | 100 ppm | 200 ppm | 400 ppm |
Male
| ||||||
n | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Necropsy body wt | 335 ± 6 | 329 ± 11 | 333 ± 6 | 334 ± 7 | 330 ± 4 | 322 ± 6 |
R Kidney absolute | 1.025 ± 0.019 | 1.012 ± 0.037 | 1.061 ± 0.026 | 1.137 ± 0.027** | 1.209 ± 0.020** | 1.286 ± 0.039** |
R kidney relative | 3.058 ± 0.038 | 3.073 ± 0.037 | 3.186 ± 0.042* | 3.405 ± 0.036** | 3.660 ± 0.040** | 3.991 ± 0.056** |
Liver absolute | 10.54 ± 0.27 | 10.31 ± 0.40 | 10.44 ± 0.32 | 11.08 ± 0.36 | 11.37 ± 0.26 | 11.87 ± 0.45* |
Liver relative | 31.402 ± 0.375 | 31.270 ± 0.317 | 31.298 ± 0.490 | 33.152 ± 0.569* | 34.393 ± 0.531** | 36.807 ± 0.864** |
Spleen absolute | 0.628 ± 0.012 | 0.630 ± 0.013 | 0.663 ± 0.014 | 0.659 ± 0.009 | 0.655 ± 0.010 | 0.677 ± 0.023* |
Spleen relative | 1.874 ± 0.028 | 1.925 ± 0.045 | 1.997 ± 0.058 | 1.978 ± 0.030 | 1.983 ± 0.022 | 2.103 ± 0.057** |
Female | ||||||
n | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 4 |
Necropsy body wt | 194 ± 3 | 199 ± 4 | 206 ± 4 | 199 ± 3 | 201 ± 3 | 159 ± 5** |
Heart absolute | 0.584 ± 0.010 | 0.612 ± 0.012 | 0.618 ± 0.010 | 0.629 ± 0.012* | 0.638 ± 0.011** | 0.530 ± 0.006* |
Heart relative | 3.010 ± 0.039 | 3.081 ± 0.054 | 3.002 ± 0.041 | 3.156 ± 0.034* | 3.175 ± 0.049* | 3.349 ± 0.084** |
R Kidney absolute | 0.618 ± 0.011 | 0.641 ± 0.009 | 0.680 ± 0.013** | 0.659 ± 0.015 | 0.679 ± 0.014** | 0.595 ± 0.021 |
R kidney relative | 3.185 ± 0.040 | 3.230 ± 0.062 | 3.301 ± 0.041 | 3.307 ± 0.058 | 3.376 ± 0.050* | 3.757 ± 0.138** |
Liver absolute | 5.486 ± 0.179 | 5.990 ± 0.121 | 6.270 ± 0.115** | 6.269 ± 0.151** | 6.424 ± 0.144** | 4.840 ± 0.247 |
Liver relative | 28.216 ± 0.637 | 30.152 ± 0.550** | 30.438 ± 0.319** | 31.459 ± 0.586** | 31.916 ± 0.317** | 30.470 ± 0.715** |
Thymus absolute | 0.347 ± 0.012 | 0.349 ± 0.010 | 0.352 ± 0.010 | 0.346 ± 0.010 | 0.330 ± 0.014 | 0.204 ± 0.010** |
Thymus relative | 1.785 ± 0.054 | 1.751 ± 0.029 | 1.707 ± 0.041 | 1.739 ± 0.048 | 1.638 ± 0.058* | 1.286 ± 0.035** |
* Significantly different (P≤0.05) from the chamber control group by Williams’ or Dunnett’s test
** P≤0.01
Table 3: Chemistry data
Male | ||||||
Dose treatment (ppm) | 0 (control group) | 25
| 50 | 100 | 200 | 400 |
Urea nitrogen (mg/dL) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 7.5 ± 0.4 | 7.8 ± 0.4 | 7.5 ± 0.3 | 7.4 ± 0.3 | 7.0 ± 0.4 | 7.5 ± 0.4 |
Day 23 | 9.9 ± 0.5 | 8.9 ± 0.4 | 9.1 ± 0.2 | 9.5 ± 0.3 | 9.8 ± 0.4 | 11.4 ± 0.6 |
Week 14 | 12.3 ± 0.3 | 13.7 ± 0.3* | 12.8 ± 0.3 | 13.3 ± 0.2 | 13.3 ± 0.3 | 13.6 ± 0.4* |
Creatinine (mg/dL) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 0.29 ± 0.01 | 0.26 ± 0.02 | 0.23 ± 0.02* | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 0.24 ± 0.02 |
Day 23 | 0.30 ± 0.00 | 0.32 ± 0.01 | 0.32 ± 0.03 | 0.31 ± 0.01 | 0.36 ± 0.02** | 0.38 ± 0.01** |
Week 14 | 0.37 ± 0.02 | 0.37 ± 0.02 | 0.37 ± 0.03 | 0.39 ± 0.02 | 0.39 ± 0.01 | 0.40 ± 0.03 |
Glucose (mg/dL) Day 4 |
137 ± 3 |
134 ± 1 |
133 ± 5 |
137 ± 3 |
139 ± 6 |
130 ± 2 |
Day 23 | 145 ± 12 | 126 ± 7 | 134 ± 9 | 127 ± 5 | 117 ± 4 | 116 ± 5 |
Week 14 | 127 ± 2 | 130 ± 3 | 124 ± 2 | 129 ± 3 | 136 ± 6 | 128 ± 3 |
Total protein (g/dL) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 6.0 ± 0.0 | 6.0 ± 0.1 | 6.1 ± 0.1 | 6.0 ± 0.0 | 6.1 ± 0.1 | 6.1 ± 0.0 |
Day 23 | 6.5 ± 0.1 | 6.5 ± 0.1 | 6.5 ± 0.1 | 6.5 ± 0.1 | 6.8 ± 0.1** | 6.8 ± 0.1** |
Week 14 | 7.4 ± 0.1 | 7.4 ± 0.1 | 7.5 ± 0.1 | 7.4 ± 0.1 | 7.5 ± 0.1 | 7.5 ± 0.0 |
Albumin (g/dL) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 4.3 ± 0.0 | 4.3 ± 0.0 | 4.3 ± 0.0 | 4.3 ± 0.0 | 4.4 ± 0.0 | 4.4 ± 0.0 |
Day 23 | 4.6 ± 0.0 | 4.6 ± 0.0 | 4.5 ± 0.0 | 4.5 ± 0.1 | 4.7 ± 0.0 | 4.7 ± 0.1 |
Week 14 | 4.9 ± 0.1 | 4.9 ± 0.0 | 4.9 ± 0.1 | 4.8 ± 0.0 | 4.9 ± 0.0 | 4.9 ± 0.0 |
Globulin (g/dL) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 1.7 ± 0.0 | 1.7 ± 0.0 | 1.8 ± 0.0 | 1.7 ± 0.0 | 1.8 ± 0.0 | 1.8 ± 0.0 |
Day 23 | 1.9 ± 0.0 | 2.0 ± 0.0 | 2.0 ± 0.0 | 2.0 ± 0.0 | 2.1 ± 0.0** | 2.1 ± 0.0** |
Week 14 | 2.6 ± 0.0 | 2.5 ± 0.0 | 2.6 ± 0.0 | 2.5 ± 0.0 | 2.6 ± 0.0 | 2.6 ± 0.0 |
A/G ratio Day 4 |
2.5 ± 0.0 |
2.5 ± 0.0 |
2.5 ± 0.0 |
2.5 ± 0.0 |
2.5 ± 0.0 |
2.4 ± 0.0 |
Day 23 | 2.4 ± 0.0 | 2.4 ± 0.0 | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 2.3 ± 0.0 | 2.3 ± 0.0 | 2.2 ± 0.0** |
Week 14 | 1.9 ± 0.0 | 1.9 ± 0.0 | 1.9 ± 0.0 | 1.9 ± 0.0 | 1.9 ± 0.0 | 2.0 ± 0.0 |
Alanine aminotransferase (IU/L) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 57 ± 1 | 57 ± 1 | 55 ± 1 | 53 ± 1 | 55 ± 1 | 52 ± 1** |
Day 23 | 41 ± 1 | 41 ± 1 | 41 ± 1 | 39 ± 2 | 38 ± 1 | 35 ± 0** |
Week 14 | 85 ± 3 | 83 ± 3 | 70 ± 3** | 60 ± 2** | 56 ± 2** | 51 ± 2** |
Alkaline phosphatase (IU/L) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 575 ± 7 | 578 ± 10 | 566 ± 10 | 566 ± 11 | 554 ± 7 | 546 ± 11* |
Day 23 | 406 ± 6 | 423 ± 11 | 433 ± 9 | 407 ± 11 | 420 ± 8 | 404 ± 12 |
Week 14 | 223 ± 5 | 227 ± 7 | 211 ± 4 | 200 ± 3** | 204 ± 4** | 199 ± 6** |
Creatine kinase (IU/L) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 545 ± 121 | 507 ± 42 | 430 ± 52 | 449 ± 56 | 515 ± 54 | 434 ± 44 |
Day 23 | 404 ± 37 | 390 ± 40 | 409 ± 66 | 393 ± 37 | 354 ± 30 | 413 ± 45 |
Week 14 | 171 ± 8 | 186 ± 18 | 144 ± 14 | 155 ± 13 | 150 ± 14 | 183 ± 15 |
Sorbitol dehydrogenase (IU/L) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 13 ± 1 | 14 ± 0 | 13 ± 0 | 12 ± 0* | 14 ± 1 | 13 ± 0 |
Day 23 | 14 ± 1 | 14 ± 1 | 16 ± 1 | 15 ± 1 | 18 ± 1** | 15 ± 1 |
Week 14 | 24 ± 1 | 24 ± 1 | 22 ± 1 | 22 ± 1 | 21 ± 1* | 20 ± 1** |
Bile acids (µmol/L) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 4.7 ± 0.4 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 5.6 ± 0.8 | 4.6 ± 0.4 | 7.2 ± 1.3 | 4.6 ± 0.7 |
Day 23 | 5.7 ± 0.9 | 3.3 ± 0.2** | 4.9 ± 0.6* | 3.6 ± 0.3** | 3.8 ± 0.3** | 3.6 ± 0.7** |
Week 14 | 3.3 ± 0.1 | 3.5 ± 0.4 | 3.4 ± 0.3 | 3.2 ± 0.1 | 3.8 ± 0.6 | 3.0 ± 0.1 |
Female | ||||||
Dose treatment (ppm) | 0 (control group) | 25 | 50 | 100 | 200 | 400 |
Urea nitrogen (mg/dL) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 7.8 ± 0.4 | 8.5 ± 0.3
| 8.1 ± 0.3 | 8.3 ± 0.4
| 9.1 ± 0.3* | 8.6 ± 0.3
|
Day 23 | 11.5 ± 0.3 | 11.8 ± 0.4 | 11.5 ± 0.4 | 10.6 ± 0.4 | 10.8 ± 0.3 | 9.1 ± 0.4** |
Week 14 | 14.1 ± 0.4 | 14.4 ± 0.4 | 13.0 ± 0.5 | 13.6 ± 0.5 | 13.4 ± 0.5 | 11.3 ± 0.5* |
Creatinine (mg/dL) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 0.29 ± 0.01 | 0.28 ± 0.01 | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 0.26 ± 0.02 | 0.28 ± 0.01 | 0.26 ± 0.02 |
Day 23 | 0.31 ± 0.01 | 0.30 ± 0.00 | 0.28 ± 0.01 | 0.30 ± 0.00 | 0.30 ± 0.00 | 0.31 ± 0.01 |
Week 14 | 0.37 ± 0.02 | 0.35 ± 0.02 | 0.36 ± 0.02 | 0.38 ± 0.01 | 0.34 ± 0.02 | 0.35 ± 0.03 |
Glucose (mg/dL) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 138 ± 2 | 135 ± 2 | 136 ± 4 | 136 ± 2 | 139 ± 5 | 130 ± 2 |
Day 23 | 127 ± 3 | 123 ± 6 | 133 ± 5 | 123 ± 3 | 122 ± 3 | 122 ± 5 |
Week 14 | 141 ± 8 | 131 ± 5 | 123 ± 2 | 133 ± 3 | 131 ± 4 | 114 ± 12 |
Total protein (g/dL) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 5.9 ± 0.0 | 6.0 ± 0.1 | 6.1 ± 0.0 | 6.0 ± 0.0 | 6.1 ± 0.1* | 6.1 ± 0.0 |
Day 23 | 6.3 ± 0.1 | 6.4 ± 0.1 | 6.4 ± 0.1 | 6.5 ± 0.1 | 6.5 ± 0.1 | 6.6 ± 0.1 |
Week 14 | 7.5 ± 0.1 | 7.4 ± 0.1 | 7.5 ± 0.1 | 7.6 ± 0.1 | 7.5 ± 0.1 | 7.2 ± 0.1 |
Albumin (g/dL) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 4.3 ± 0.0 | 4.4 ± 0.0 | 4.4 ± 0.0 | 4.4 ± 0.0 | 4.4 ± 0.0 | 4.4 ± 0.0 |
Day 23 | 4.5 ± 0.0 | 4.6 ± 0.0 | 4.6 ± 0.0 | 4.6 ± 0.1 | 4.6 ± 0.0 | 4.7 ± 0.1 |
Week 14 | 5.2 ± 0.1 | 5.2 ± 0.1 | 5.2 ± 0.1 | 5.3 ± 0.0 | 5.2 ± 0.0 | 5.0 ± 0.1 |
Globulin (g/dL) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 1.6 ± 0.0 | 1.6 ± 0.0 | 1.6 ± 0.0 | 1.7 ± 0.0 | 1.7 ± 0.0* | 1.6 ± 0.0 |
Day 23 | 1.8 ± 0.0 | 1.8 ± 0.0 | 1.8 ± 0.0 | 1.9 ± 0.0* | 1.9 ± 0.0* | 2.0 ± 0.0** |
Week 14 | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 0.0 | 2.3 ± 0.0 | 2.3 ± 0.0 | 2.4 ± 0.0 | 2.2 ± 0.1 |
A/G ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 2.8 ± 0.0 | 2.7 ± 0.1 | 2.7 ± 0.0 | 2.7 ± 0.1 | 2.6 ± 0.1 | 2.7 ± 0.0 |
Day 23 | 2.6 ± 0.0 | 2.5 ± 0.0 | 2.5 ± 0.0 | 2.4 ± 0.0 | 2.5 ± 0.0 | 2.4 ± 0.0** |
Week 14 | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 2.4 ± 0.0 | 2.3 ± 0.0 | 2.3 ± 0.0 | 2.2 ± 0.0 | 2.4 ± 0.1 |
Alanine aminotransferase (IU/L) | ||||||
Day 4 | 47 ± 1 | 49 ± 1 | 49 ± 1 | 46 ± 1 | 45 ± 1 | 44 ± 2 |
Day 23 | 35 ± 1 | 36 ± 1 | 35 ± 1 | 36 ± 1 | 34 ± 1 | 31 ± 1 |
Week 14 | 69 ± 4 | 65 ± 5 | 55 ± 3** | 56 ± 4* | 47 ± 2** | 49 ± 5** |
Alkaline phosphatase (IU/L)
| ||||||
Day 4
| 487 ± 8
| 493 ± 10 | 475 ± 6
| 468 ± 7
| 454 ± 5** | 457 ± 8**
|
Day 23 | 305 ± 5 | 311 ± 8 | 304 ± 5 | 302 ± 8 | 289 ± 8 | 289 ± 7 |
Week 14 | 197 ± 6 | 182 ± 4 | 182 ± 8 | 177 ± 8** | 181 ± 5* | 164 ± 13* |
Creatine kinase (UI/L) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 364 ± 20b | 332 ± 27 | 388 ± 29b | 443 ± 74 | 460 ± 39b | 375 ± 48 |
Day 23 | 299 ± 30 | 305 ± 27 | 292 ± 41 | 369 ± 43 | 338 ± 26 | 250 ± 16 |
Week 14 | 162 ± 16 | 165 ± 38 | 172 ± 22 | 139 ± 14 | 170 ± 22 | 145 ± 26 |
Sorbitol dehydrogenase (IU/L |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 13 ± 1 | 13 ± 0 | 14 ± 0 | 12 ± 0* | 11 ± 1* | 12 ± 0* |
Day 23 | 14 ± 0 | 15 ± 1 | 15 ± 1 | 15 ± 1 | 14 ± 1 | 16 ± 0 |
Week 14 | 21 ± 1 | 20 ± 1 | 18 ± 1 | 17 ± 1 | 17 ± 1 | 18 ± 1 |
Bile acids (µmol/L) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 5.3 ± 0.5 | 5.0 ± 0.5 | 6.5 ± 1.1 | 5.8 ± 0.6 | 6.8 ± 1.3 | 4.9 ± 0.5 |
Day 23 | 4.0 ± 0.3 | 4.7 ± 0.4 | 5.4 ± 0.7 | 4.5 ± 0.4 | 3.9 ± 0.4 | 4.0 ± 0.7 |
Week 14 | 9.1 ± 2.3 | 4.9 ± 0.5** | 4.7 ± 0.4** | 4.3 ± 0.3** | 5.1 ± 1.1** | 16.9 ± 4.7* |
Table 4 Incidences of Non neoplastic Lesions of the Kidney in Male Rats
| Chamber control | 25 ppm | 50 ppm | 100 ppm | 200 ppm | 400 ppm |
Number Examined Microscopically |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
Casts, Granulara | 0 | 9** (1.0)b | 10** (1.2) | 10** (1.5) | 10** (2.5) | 10** (3.0) |
Accumulation, Hyaline Droplet | 1 (2.0) | 10** (1.1) | 10** (1.8) | 10** (2.0) | 10** (2.7) | 10** (3.0) |
Nephropathy | 9 (1.1) | 10 (1.6) | 10 (2.0) | 10 (2.0) | 10 (2.5) | 10 (3.0) |
** Significantly different (P≤0.01) from the chamber control group by the Fisher exact test
a Number of animals with lesion
b Average severity grade of lesions in affected animals: 1=minimal, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=marked
Table 5 Hematology data
Treatment dose (ppm) | 0 | 25 | 50 | 100 | 200 | 400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Male | ||||||
Hematocrit (spun) (%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 45.6 ± 0.3 | 45.1 ± 0.6 | 46.5 ± 0.6 | 45.5 ± 0.4 | 44.8 ± 0.5 | 44.4 ± 0.4 |
Day 23 | 47.9 ± 0.5 | 48.0 ± 0.6 | 47.4 ± 0.4 | 47.8 ± 0.4 | 47.7 ± 0.3 | 48.6 ± 0.5 |
Week 14 | 49.5 ± 0.5 | 48.3 ± 0.4 | 49.0 ± 0.3 | 48.3 ± 0.7* | 47.6 ± 0.3** | 47.7 ± 0.4** |
Packed cell volume (mL/dL) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 44.6 ± 0.4 | 44.1 ± 0.6 | 45.0 ± 0.6 | 44.2 ± 0.4 | 43.1 ± 0.3* | 43.3 ± 0.4* |
Day 23 | 47.4 ± 0.4 | 47.1 ± 0.5 | 46.5 ± 0.5 | 47.2 ± 0.4 | 46.9 ± 0.4 | 48.1 ± 0.4 |
Week 14 | 49.9 ± 0.5 | 48.9 ± 0.4 | 49.5 ± 0.3 | 48.3 ± 0.3* | 48.0 ± 0.3** | 47.8 ± 0.6** |
Hemoglobin (g/dL) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 13.5 ± 0.1 | 13.4 ± 0.2 | 13.7 ± 0.1 | 13.6 ± 0.2 | 13.3 ± 0.1 | 13.2 ± 0.1 |
Day 23 | 14.9 ± 0.1 | 14.9 ± 0.1 | 14.6 ± 0.1 | 15.0 ± 0.1 | 14.8 ± 0.1 | 15.1 ± 0.1 |
Week 14 | 15.7 ± 0.1 | 15.5 ± 0.1 | 15.5 ± 0.1 | 15.3 ± 0.1* | 15.0 ± 0.1** | 15.1 ± 0.2** |
Erythrocytes (106/µL) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 7.15 ± 0.09 | 7.12 ± 0.11 | 7.27 ± 0.07 | 7.26 ± 0.08 | 7.09 ± 0.07 | 7.06 ± 0.07 |
Day 23 | 8.06 ± 0.06 | 7.95 ± 0.07 | 7.84 ± 0.09 | 8.04 ± 0.08 | 7.92 ± 0.07 | 8.10 ± 0.06 |
Week 14 | 9.35 ± 0.07 | 9.09 ± 0.05 | 9.25 ± 0.06 | 8.94 ± 0.05** | 8.92 ± 0.08** | 8.86 ± 0.10** |
Mean cell volume (fL) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 62.3 ± 0.3 | 62.0 ± 0.4 | 61.8 ± 0.3 | 60.9 ± 0.5 | 60.9 ± 0.4* | 61.3 ± 0.4 |
Day 23 | 58.8 ± 0.2 | 59.2 ± 0.4 | 59.4 ± 0.2 | 58.8 ± 0.4 | 59.3 ± 0.4 | 59.4 ± 0.3 |
Week 14 | 53.4 ± 0.2 | 53.9 ± 0.4 | 53.5 ± 0.3 | 54.0 ± 0.4 | 53.9 ± 0.3 | 53.9 ± 0.3 |
Mean cell hemoglobin (pg) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 18.8 ± 0.1 | 18.8 ± 0.1 | 18.9 ± 0.0 | 18.8 ± 0.1 | 18.8 ± 0.1 | 18.7 ± 0.0 |
Day 23 | 18.5 ± 0.1 | 18.7 ± 0.1 | 18.7 ± 0.1 | 18.6 ± 0.1 | 18.6 ± 0.1 | 18.6 ± 0.1 |
Week 14 | 16.9 ± 0.1 | 17.0 ± 0.1 | 16.8 ± 0.1 | 17.1 ± 0.1 | 16.9 ± 0.1 | 17.1 ± 0.1 |
Mean cell hemoglobin concentration (g/dL) | ||||||
Day 4 | 30.2 ± 0.1 | 30.4 ± 0.2 | 30.5 ± 0.1 | 30.9 ± 0.2* | 30.9 ± 0.1** | 30.5 ± 0.1 |
Day 23 | 31.5 ± 0.2 | 31.7 ± 0.2 | 31.4 ± 0.2 | 31.7 ± 0.2 | 31.5 ± 0.1 | 31.4 ± 0.2 |
Week 14 | 31.6 ± 0.1 | 31.6 ± 0.1 | 31.4 ± 0.1 | 31.5 ± 0.1 | 31.3 ± 0.1 | 31.7 ± 0.2 |
Leukocytes (103/µL) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 9.08 ± 0.45 | 8.94 ± 0.32 | 9.75 ± 0.44 | 9.04 ± 0.72 | 7.57 ± 0.36* | 6.95 ± 0.25** |
Day 23 | 6.29 ± 0.23 | 7.10 ± 0.25 | 7.44 ± 0.29 | 8.12 ± 0.42** | 7.52 ± 0.64 | 7.20 ± 0.31 |
Week 14 | 7.01 ± 0.36 | 6.99 ± 0.39 | 7.86 ± 0.25 | 7.34 ± 0.37 | 6.71 ± 0.40 | 6.69 ± 0.47 |
Lymphocytes (103/µL) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 7.99 ± 0.40 | 7.82 ± 0.30 | 8.39 ± 0.38 | 7.75 ± 0.61 | 6.44 ± 0.33** | 5.88 ± 0.24** |
Day 23 | 5.25 ± 0.23 | 5.91 ± 0.25 | 6.38 ± 0.22d | 6.89 ± 0.40* | 6.10 ± 0.57 | 6.06 ± 0.27 |
Week 14 | 5.36 ± 0.35 | 5.31 ± 0.39 | 6.18 ± 0.25 | 5.66 ± 0.40 | 5.12 ± 0.41 | 4.93 ± 0.38 |
Treatment dose (ppm) | 0 | 25 | 50 | 100 | 200 | 400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
female | ||||||
Hematocrit (spun) (%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 47.7 ± 0.4 | 47.0 ± 0.2 | 47.0 ± 0.2 | 47.5 ± 0.3 | 47.1 ± 0.6 | 46.2 ± 0.4 |
Day 23 | 48.7 ± 0.4 | 49.2 ± 0.5 | 49.1 ± 0.4 | 49.2 ± 0.3 | 48.9 ± 0.5 | 49.7 ± 0.6 |
Week 14 | 48.9 ± 0.4 | 47.2 ± 0.4* | 47.8 ± 0.2 | 48.3 ± 0.4 | 48.7 ± 0.4 | 50.9 ± 0.8 |
Packed cell volume (mL/dL) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 46.7 ± 0.5 | 46.1 ± 0.3 | 46.0 ± 0.3 | 46.8 ± 0.4 | 46.1 ± 0.5 | 45.3 ± 0.5
|
Day 23 | 48.5 ± 0.4 | 49.0 ± 0.4 | 49.3 ± 0.3 | 49.2 ± 0.3 | 48.8 ± 0.3 | 50.0 ± 0.6* |
Week 14 | 49.1 ± 0.3 | 48.6 ± 0.3 | 48.7 ± 0. | 49.0 ± 0.5 | 49.7 ± 0.4 | 52.7 ± 0.4 |
Hemoglobin (g/dL) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 14.3 ± 0.1 | 14.2 ± 0.1 | 14.2 ± 0.1 | 14.5 ± 0.1 | 14.3 ± 0.1 | 14.1 ± 0.1 |
Day 23 | 15.3 ± 0.1 | 15.5 ± 0.1 | 15.5 ± 0.1 | 15.5 ± 0.1 | 15.3 ± 0.1 | 15.7 ± 0.1 |
Week 14 | 15.7 ± 0.1 | 15.4 ± 0.1 | 15.5 ± 0.1 | 15.6 ± 0.1 | 15.8 ± 0.1 | 16.7 ± 0.1 |
Erythrocytes (106/µL) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 7.64 ± 0.07
| 7.56 ± 0.05 | 7.56 ± 0.05 | 7.74 ± 0.07
| 7.67 ± 0.10 | 7.55 ± 0.08
|
Day 23 | 8.13 ± 0.08 | 8.13 ± 0.08 | 8.20 ± 0.07
| 8.24 ± 0.05
| 8.13 ± 0.06
| 8.31 ± 0.09 |
Week 14 | 8.67 ± 0.06 | 8.53 ± 0.05 | 8.54 ± 0.06 | 8.62 ± 0.09 | 8.71 ± 0.06 | 9.23 ± 0.09 |
Mean cell volume (fL) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 61.1 ± 0.3 | 60.9 ± 0.3 | 60.9 ± 0.2 | 60.5 ± 0.3 | 60.2 ± 0.5 | 60.0 ± 0.3* |
Day 23 | 59.6 ± 0.3 | 60.3 ± 0.3 | 60.1 ± 0.3 | 59.7 ± 0.3 | 60.1 ± 0.3 | 60.2 ± 0.2 |
Week 14 | 56.6 ± 0.2 | 56.9 ± 0.1 | 57.0 ± 0.1 | 56.9 ± 0.1 | 57.0 ± 0.2 | 57.1 ± 0.3 |
Mean cell hemoglobin (pg) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 18.7 ± 0.1 | 18.8 ± 0.1 | 18.8 ± 0.1 | 18.7 ± 0.1 | 18.7 ± 0.1 | 18.7 ± 0.1 |
Day 23 | 18.8 ± 0.1 | 19.0 ± 0.1 | 18.9 ± 0.1 | 18.8 ± 0.1 | 18.8 ± 0.1 | 18.9 ± 0.1 |
Week 14 | 18.1 ± 0.0 | 18.1 ± 0.1 | 18.2 ± 0.1 | 18.1 ± 0.1 | 18.1 ± 0.0 | 18.1 ± 0.0 |
Mean cell hemoglobin concentration (g/dL) | ||||||
Day 4 | 30.6 ± 0.2 | 30.8 ± 0.1 | 30.8 ± 0.1 | 31.0 ± 0.2 | 31.1 ± 0.2 | 31.2 ± 0.2 |
Day 23 | 31.6 ± 0.2 | 31.5 ± 0.1 | 31.4 ± 0.1 | 31.6 ± 0.1 | 31.4 ± 0.1 | 31.4 ± 0.1 |
Week 14
| 32.1 ± 0.1 | 31.8 ± 0.1 | 31.9 ± 0.1 | 31.9 ± 0.1 | 31.8 ± 0.1 | 31.7 ± 0.2 |
Leukocytes (103/µL) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 10.52 ± 0.52 | 10.89 ± 0.26 | 10.25 ± 0.34 | 11.26 ± 0.61 | 10.39 ± 0.63 | 8.52 ± 0.68 |
Day 23 | 7.96 ± 0.36 | 8.01 ± 0.24 | 7.87 ± 0.43 | 8.04 ± 0.39 | 7.78 ± 0.56 | 6.84 ± 0.48 |
Week 14 | 5.86 ± 0.27 | 5.70 ± 0.24 | 6.05 ± 0.29 | 5.60 ± 0.29 | 5.22 ± 0.33 | 6.08 ± 0.58 |
Lymphocytes (103/µL) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Day 4 | 9.34 ± 0.52 | 9.58 ± 0.25 | 8.90 ± 0.30 | 9.76 ± 0.59 | 9.19 ± 0.51d | 7.34 ± 0.62 |
Day 23 | 6.79 ± 0.35 | 6.86 ± 0.20 | 6.83 ± 0.41 | 6.96 ± 0.38 | 6.62 ± 0.54 | 5.83 ± 0.42 |
Week 14 | 4.67 ± 0.24 | 4.44 ± 0.25 | 4.67 ± 0.23 | 4.36 ± 0.28 | 4.17 ± 0.29 | 4.93 ± 0.53 |
* Significantly different (P≤0.05) from the chamber control group by Dunn’s or Shirley’s test
** P≤0.01
Table 6: Mean of epididymal spermatozoal measurements
| Chamber control | 100 ppm | 200 ppm | 400 ppm |
n | 10 | 10 | 9 | 10 |
Epididymal spermatozoal measurements | ||||
Sperm motility (%) | 91.73 ± 1.26 | 91.40 ± 0.93 | 91.24 ± 0.80 | 90.93 ± 0.89 |
Sperm (103/mg cauda epididymis) | 615.0 ± 34.3 | 596.5 ± 31.8 | 526.3 ± 19.0 | 547.4 ± 14.0 |
Sperm (106/cauda epididymis) | 120.89 ± 6.79 | 113.16 ± 3.11 | 97.52 ± 3.51** | 98.40 ± 3.02** |
** Significantly different (P≤0.01) from the chamber control group by Shirley’s test.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The effects observed on kidneys of male rats are not relevant to humans as they are based on renal effects linked to alpha2µ-globulin accumulation. When considering effects other than those on kidneys in males, significant decreased sperm counts in cauda epididymis at 200 and 400 ppm were observed when compared to controls. Therefore the NOAEC idenitified for male rats is 100 ppm.
A NOAEC could be defined in female rats at 200 ppm on the basis of mortality and a lower body weight gain at the next dose level when compared to controls.
The overall NOAEC relevant for humans is therefore 100 ppm.
However, the relevance of these effects can be questioned: first, the heat fixation at 65°C of caudae samples for sperm counts may have altered the integrity of the samples; secondly, these changes in sperm levels were not corroborated by other findings such as histopathological changes in other reproductive organs/tissues or other sperm parameters (motility, spermatid counts, etc.).
The study suffers from several limitations:
- animals were exposed whole body by inhalation which likely resulted in systemic exposure much higher than intended exposure from target doses (animals likely exposed by oral route through grooming);
- the heat fixation at 65°C of caudae samples for sperm counts may have altered the integrity of the samples. - Executive summary:
In a 90-day inhalation study conducted by NTP similarly to OECD guideline 413, groups of 10 animals per dose and per sex were administered for 6 hours per day, 5 weekdays per week at 0, 25, 50, 100, 200 and 400 ppm for a total of 14 weeks. The animals were observed twice per day and weighed once per week. A complete histopathologic evaluation including treatment-related gross lesions was performed on all animals, including early death animals. Treatment-related lesions (target organs) were identified and these organs and gross lesions were examined to a no-effect level.
A lower body weight gain than in controls was observed in the high dose group in female. In addition, 6 females died in the high dose group too. Female rats appeared to be more sensitive to α-pinene than male rats. A NOAEC could be defined in female rats at 200 ppm on the basis of mortality and a lower body weight gain at the next dose level when compared to controls.
Apart from lesions including granular casts and hyaline droplets indicative of alpha2µ-globulin nephropathy observed in all treated group males, a lower body weight gain than in controls was observed in the high dose group in males. The effects observed on kidneys of male rats are not relevant to humans as they are based on renal effects linked to alpha 2µ-globulin accumulation.
When considering effects other than those on kidneys in males, significant decreased sperm counts in cauda epididymis at 200 and 400 ppm were observed when compared to controls. Therefore the NOAEC idenitified for male rats is 100 ppm.
However, the relevance of these effects can be questioned: first, the heat fixation at 65°C of caudae samples for sperm counts may have altered the integrity of the samples; secondly, these changes in sperm levels were not corroborated by other findings such as histopathological changes in other reproductive organs/tissues or other sperm parameters (motility, spermatid counts, etc.).
In addition animals were exposed whole body by inhalation, which likely resulted in systemic exposure much higher than intended exposure from target doses (animals likely exposed by oral route through grooming).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

Route: .live2