Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 235-921-9 | CAS number: 13048-33-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Remarks:
- However, only a single dose was tested which showed maternal toxicity and embryotoxic effects.
Data source
Referenceopen allclose all
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 983
- Report date:
- 1983
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 983
- Report date:
- 1983
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 982
- Report date:
- 1982
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- ; only a single dose was tested.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The aim of the study was to evaluate the embryo/fetal toxicity and teratogenic effects of the test substance when administered by gavage to pregnant rats from day 6 to day 15 of gestation. The test material was administered to a group of 22 female rats at a single dose level of 750 mg/kg bw. Another group served as a common control and received only corn oil.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Hexamethylene diacrylate
- EC Number:
- 235-921-9
- EC Name:
- Hexamethylene diacrylate
- Cas Number:
- 13048-33-4
- Molecular formula:
- C12H18O4
- IUPAC Name:
- hexane-1,6-diyl bisacrylate
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): 1,6-Hexanediol diacrylate; coded as C-255
- Analytical purity: no data given
- Impurities (identity and concentrations): no data given
- Lot/batch No.: 3-81
- Physical state: light amber liquid
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Breeding Laboratories, Inc. Kingston, New York
- Age at study initiation: ca. 5 weeks
- Weight at study initiation:
- Fasting period before study:
- Housing: individual in elevated wire-mesh cages; during mating two females were housed with one male
- Diet: Purina Rodent Laboratory Chow, ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: ca. 9 weeks
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 24-25 °C
- Humidity (%): 57 +- 4.8 %
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
The amount of compound required for each group was weighed, filled to volume with the vehicle and stirred on a magnetic stirrer. The prepared dilutions were transferred to amber bottles and labelled. Before use, the prepared dilutions were well shaken and the animals were dosed while the solutions were mixed on a magnetic stirrer. Fresh solutions were prepared weekly.
VEHICLE:
- Duke´s Corn Oil, a yellow liquid was received from the C.F. Sauer Co. Richmond, Virginia and used as vehicle.
- Lot/batch no.: 80235 - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- no
- Details on mating procedure:
- Following a health status examination by a staff veterinarian, the males and females (1 male per 2 females) were placed in breeding cages for a maximum of 3 weeks. Females were rotated after the tenth day of mating. Mating was confirmed by the presence of a vaginal plug or by daily examination of vaginal smears for the presence of sperm. The day that mating was confirmed was designated as day 0 of gestation for each female placed on study.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- day 6 to day 15 of gestation
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Duration of test:
- until day 20 of gestation
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
750 mg/kg bw
Basis:
nominal conc.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 22 mated females
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: mortality, moribundity and clinical signs
- Time schedule: daily
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: on day 0, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 20 of gestation
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE:
- Time schedule for examinations: on day 6-8, 9-11, 12-14, 15-17 and 18-20 of gestation
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS:
- Sacrifice on gestation day 20:
On day 20 of gestation, females were sacrificed by carbon dioxide asphyxiation and the fetuses were taken by cesarean section. Following gross examination of each dam, the number of corpora lutea per ovary and the number and placement of implantation sites, early and late resorptions, and live and dead fetuses in each uterine horn were recorded. Fetuses were removed from the placenta, individually identified, examined externally, weighed, sexed, and measured from the frontal-parietal suture to the base of the tail (crown-rump distance). Gravid and nongravid uterine weights (with ovaries attached) were recorded.
- Organ Weights:
Following careful dissection and trimming to remove fat and other contiguous tissue in a uniform manner, the gravid and nongravid uterine weights (with ovaries attached) of each female were taken for organ weighing.
- Tissue Preservation:
The uterus and ovaries of each dam, in addition to unusual lesions, were preserved in 10 % neutral buffered formalin. - Fetal examinations:
- - Visceral Examination of Fetuses:
Approximately one-third of the fetuses from each litter were fixed in Bouin's solution, sectioned, and examined by Wilson's freehand razor technique (Wilson and Warkany, 1965), and sealed in plastic. The prepared sections were re-examined against a light box with the aid of magnification.
- Skeletal Examination of Fetuses:
After undergoing external examinations, approximately two-thirds of all fetuses from each litter were opened by longitudinal incision and the viscera examined grossly. The fetuses were then placed in M5 ethyl alcohol and the skeletons were stained in a potassium hydroxide - Alizarin red S solution (modified Staples and Schnell, 1964). Each skeleton was examined with the aid of magnification on a light box for bone alignment, degree of ossification, and anomalies. The number of sternebrae, ribs, caudal vertebrae, and bones of the extremities were noted and recorded. The fetuses examined by Wilson's technique were preserved In Bouin's solution and sealed in plastic after sectioning. The fetuses stained for skeletal examination were preserved in plastic in a glycerin ethanol (1:1) solution with several crystals of thymol to retard bacterial growth. - Statistics:
- Survival was statistically analyzed by the National Cancer Institute Package (Thomas, Breslow, & Gart, 1977).
The mean maternal body weight changes (Days 0-6, 6-15, 15-20, and 0-20), mean maternal food and water consumptions (Days 6-9, 9-12, 12-15, 15-18, 18-20, and 6-20), percent males per litter, mean fetal body weights and lengths, fetal viability, percent resorptions, implantation efficiency, gravid and nongravid uterine weights, and the incidence of visceral and skeletal anomalies and variants were analyzed by Box's test for homogeneity of variances (Box, 1949). This test was followed by a one-way classification analysis of variance (ANOVA), if the variances proved to be homogenous. If the variances proved to be heterogenous, a rank transformation of data was performed, which was followed by Box´s test and ANOVA. If ANOVA of untransformed or transformed data was significant, Dunnet´s T-test was used for control vs. treatment group mean comparisons.
Pregnancy rates were analyzed by a test of multiple proportions using one degree of freedom Chi-square test with Yates´continuity correction. All pairwise comparisons were evaluated at the 5.0 % probability (one-tailed) level.
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
Mortality and Clinical Signs:
No mortality occured during treatment. An increased incidence of clincal symptoms was noted (wheezing, dyspnea, urine stains, wasted feed, rough haircoat, hunched pasture, bloody crust on the eyes, nase, snouth, and frontpaws, salivation and alopecia).
- Body weights:
Mean body weight changes lower than the control, but not statistically significant were observed in the treated group during the treatment phase.
- Food and water consumption:
In the treated group a statistically significant increase in water consumption was noted on days 18 and 20 and in total water consumption, compared to control.
- Gross pathology:
The most distinct alterations attributed to treatment were noted in the stomachs of the treated animals. The findings consisted of discoloured material or fluid in the stomach; gas distending the stomach; discoloured, ulcerated or raised areas in the glandular or nonglandular portion of the stomach. glandular mucosa smooth; walls thick or thin/smooth; and nonglandular mucosa thin and pale, or thick and rough. Other gross pathology findings were considered to be incidental in nature and showed no relation to treatment.
- Pregnancy rates, Corpora Lutea and Implantations:
Pregnancy rates, corpora lutea and implantations, and mean implantation efficiency (number of implantations per number of corpora lutea) were generally comparable for treated animals and controls.
Effect levels (maternal animals)
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Effect level:
- 750 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
Results (fetuses)
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Gross Pathology:
Skeletal examinations included incidences of cleft palate in 1 pup. A high incidence of dilated ureters was noted in both treated and control groups.
- Visceral and Skeletal Examinations:
A higher than control mean incidence of visceral variants was noted (but not statistically significant). Statistically significant increased mean incidence of skeletal variants was observed. The majority of the findings were due to delayed ossification of the various bone structures examined. The authors suggested that this response was resulting from the maternal toxicity noted.
Effect levels (fetuses)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 750 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Basis for effect level:
- other: teratogenicity
Fetal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
Overall developmental toxicity
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
Any other information on results incl. tables
Only a single dose of 750 mg/kg bw was tested in this study. Taken together, maternal toxic effects as well as embryotoxic effects were observed. According to the authors, the embryotoxic effects resulted from maternal toxicity. Therefore, the results obtained for the offspring at a dose causing maternal toxicity (750 mg/kg bw/d), were not considered relevant for assessing the teratogenic potential of the test material.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.