Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 236-050-7 | CAS number: 13122-18-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2014-03-20 until 2014-04-10
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 211 (Daphnia magna Reproduction Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 02 October 2012
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 850.1300 (Daphnid Chronic Toxicity Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 1996
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- Since the concentration of the test item was not expected to remain within ± 20 per cent of the nominal before renewal, as shown during analytical method validation analysis was performed from each testing concentration at the start and at the end of each water renewal period. Controls were analysed at the start of each water renewal period.
- Vehicle:
- yes
- Details on test solutions:
- The test solutions used in the test were prepared by mechanical dispersion using acetone as water-miscible organic solvent and then diluted with Elendt M4 medium. The test solutions were freshly prepared at the beginning of the experiment and subsequently at the start of each water renewal period in the testing laboratory.
The test item is poorly water soluble material. With respect to the difficult separation of the non-dissolved part of the test substance, the test solutions were prepared using water-miscible solvent (acetone) in order to obtain constant initial concentrations at each water renewal period and thus minimise the variability of the individual concentrations during the exposure period. The test concentrations were below the solubility level of the test item in the test medium in each case.
For preparation of the test concentrations, individual stock solutions were first prepared by dissolving an appropriate amount of test item in acetone. The test solutions of the chosen test concentrations were prepared by appropriate diluting of these stock solutions in the dilution water (Elendt M4 medium) using approx. 5 min stirring. The concentration of the solvent (acetone) was 0.1 mL/L in each test concentration and in the additional solvent control. - Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Daphnia magna (Straus)
- Source: Laboratory of Hydrobiology (Central Agricultural Office, Directorate of Plant-, and Soil Protection) 2100 Gödöllő, Kotlán S. u. 3. Hungary
- Age of parental stock: less than 24 hours at the start of the test
- Feeding during test: The Daphnia were fed daily and the supplied diet was based on the amount of organic carbon (C) provided to each parent animal. This amount was 0.15 mg C/Daphnia/day
ACCLIMATION
The stock animals were maintained in same culture conditions (light, temperature, medium, feeding etc.) as that used during the exposure period, therefore additional acclimatisation to avoid stressing the parent animals prior to test was not necessary. Parent animals used in the test were not the first brood progeny - Test type:
- semi-static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 21 d
- Post exposure observation period:
- No
- Hardness:
- The measured hardness values were in the range of 201 – 231 mg/L (> 140 mg/L) expressed in CaCO3
- Test temperature:
- The measured values were in the range of 18 – 22 °C and did not vary by more than 2 °C
- pH:
- 7.64 – 8.98 (the pH remained within the range of 6 – 9)
- Dissolved oxygen:
- 6.46 – 9.23 mg/L (all measured value were > 3 mg/L)
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal test concentrations: 0.19, 0.38, 0.75, 1.50, 3.00 mg/L.
Measured concentrtaions: 0.12, 0.22, 0.44, 0.89, 1.65 mg/L. - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: Sealed glass beakers (50 mL volume) with approx. 50 mL test medium
- Type: closed
- Aeration: not aerated
- Renewal rate of test solution: this reproduction test was carried out in a semi-static renewal system. Based on the results of the analytical method validation study the test item is not stable in the test medium (Elendt M4 medium) for at least two days in lower concentrations (i.e. below 80 % of initial concentration), therefore the frequency of test solution renewal was daily.
When the medium was renewed a second series of test vessels was prepared and the parent animals transferred to them by a pipette of suitable diameter. The volume of test medium transferred with the Daphnia was minimized.
- No. of organisms per vessel: 1
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 10
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 10
- No. of vessels per vehicle control (replicates): 10
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
Elendt M4 Medium (during the breeding and during the test)
The Elendt M4 Medium (according to OECD 211) was prepared as follows:
Separate stock solutions of individual trace elements were first prepared in deionised water. From these different stock solutions a second single stock solution was prepared, which contained all trace elements (combined solution).
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: The test was carried out without adjustment of pH
- Photoperiod: 16 h light : 8 h dark
- Light intensity: The measured light intensity values were in the range of 15-20 µE m-2s-1
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED:
The mortality among the parent animal was recorded daily. The length of the parent animals (i.e. body length excluding the anal spine) was measured at the end of the test. The length of the parent animals (i.e. body length excluding the anal spine) was measured at the end of the test. Other parameters: including time to production of first brood (and subsequent broods), number of broods per surviving parent animal, number of aborted broods were noticed.
(The temperature, oxygen concentration and pH values were measured at least once a week in fresh and old media, in the controls and in the highest test item concentration. In addition, the temperature was continuously monitored (with a min/max thermometer) within the climate chamber during the experimental period. Measurement of hardness was performed at least in each batch of reconstituted water prepared for the experiment. The light intensity was confirmed at the start and at the end of the test within the climate chamber).
VEHICLE CONTROL PERFORMED: yes
RANGE-FINDING STUDY
- Test concentrations: 1, 2, 5 mg/L
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study:
By nominal concentrations of 0, 1, 2, 5 mg/L the following results (number of immobilised animals at 48 h) were obtained respectively: 0/10 (daphnis), 0/10, 0/10 and 8/10. - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- potassium dichromate
- Key result
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 0.22 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 0.44 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 0.58 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95 % confidence limits: 0.43 – 2.66 mg/L
- Key result
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 0.33 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95 % confidence limits: 0.28 – 0.36 mg/L
- Details on results:
- Mortality of parents:
The mortality among the parent animal was recorded daily.
Twenty per cent mortality was observed for parent animals of the untreated control and 10 % mortality was observed in the solvent control group. The occurred mortality was similar in the concentrations of 0.12 and 0.22 mg/L (20 and 10 % respectively).
Statistically significantly different mortality (70 %) was observed in the two highest concentrations (20 and 10 % respectively). Somewhat higher mortality (40 %) was observed in the 0.44 mg/L concentration, however the statistical evaluation (Bonferroni t-Test, α=0.05) showed no significant difference compared to the solvent control. Statistically significantly different mortality (70 %) was observed in the two highest concentrations (0.89 and 1.65 mg/L; measured) during the test and was considered to be due to test item effect.
Offspring:
The offspring produced by each parent animal were removed and counted daily from the appearance of the first brood.
The mean number of living offspring produced by parent animals having survived at the end of the test was 90.25 in the untreated control and 90.67 in the solvent control group. Similar or slightly higher numbers (104.38 and 90.89) were obtained for two lowest test concentration (0.12 and 0.22 mg/L; measured). Lower and statistically significantly different values compared to the solvent control (according to Bonferroni t-Test, α=0.05) was noticed in the concentrations of 0.44, 0.89 and 1.65 mg/L (measured).
Based on the results of statistical evaluation (Bonferroni t-Test, α=0.05) with parent mortality data, replicates of dead parents were excluded from reproductive performance analysis in the three lowest concentration and controls (where the parental mortality did not follow a concentration-response pattern). Parent mortality was considered to be due to test item effect in the two highest concentrations and therefore replicates of dead parents were included in the data analysis related to reproduction.
The 21-day NOEC related to reproduction was determined to be 0.22 mg/L (measured). The 21-day LOEC was 0.44 mg/L (measured).
The ECx values of the test item and their confidence limits related to reproduction were calculated using Probit analysis by TOXSTAT software.
The 21-day EC50 was determined to be 0.58 mg/L (95 % confidence limits: 0.53 – 0.62 mg/L). The 21-day EC10 was determined to be 0.33 mg/L (95 % confidence limits: 0.28 – 0.36 mg/L).
Growth Measurement:
At the end of the test body length measurement was performed and the obtained data were statistically evaluated by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni t-Test (α = 0.05) using TOXSTAT software.
Statistically significant difference compared to the solvent control group was noticed in the two highest tested concentrations of 0.89 and 1.65 mg/L (measured).
Other Parameters:
Aborted broods were observed in some cases at the two highest concentration (0.89 and 1.65 mg/L; measured).
Aborted broods (AB) observed during the test:
Concentration 0.89 mg/L:
– 2 AB in replicate 7 on 7th day
– 6 AB in replicate 9 on 7th day
Concentration 1.65 mg/L:
– 5 AB in replicate 7 on 11th day
– 8 AB in replicate 10 on 11th day
– 6 AB in replicate 7 on 19th day
– 4 AB in replicate 10 on 21st day
The total number of aborted broods counted during the experiment was 8 in the 0.89 mg/L concentration and 23 in the 1.65 mg/L concentration.
Stumpy limbs of parent animals were noticed in the highest test concentration (1.65 mg/L; measured) at the end of the study (on 21st day).
Presence of male neonates or ephippia was not noticed in this test. - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- For the estimation of LOEC and NOEC values for effects of the test item on the reproductive output of Daphnia the mean value and standard deviation for reproductive output of each concentration was calculated and results were analysed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni t-Test (α = 0.05) using TOXSTAT software compared with the Solvent Control. The data were checked for homogeneity of variance and normality.
In order to consider whether or not the parental mortality in exposed replicates followed a concentration-response pattern mortality data were analysed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni t-Test (α = 0.05) using TOXSTAT software.
Statistical analysis was assessed with the additional determined body length values by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni t-Test (α = 0.05) using TOXSTAT software compared with the Solvent Control.
The concentration which caused x per cent reduction in reproductive output (i.e. ECx value) was calculated by Probit analysis with 95 % confidence limits using the TOXSTAT software. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- In the 21-day semi-static chronic toxicity test to Daphnia magna with the tests substance the 21-day NOEC value based on reproduction was determined to be 0.22 mg/L. The 21-day LOEC based on reproduction was determined to be 0.44 mg/L. The 21-day EC50 value based on reproduction was determined to be 0.58 mg/L. The 21-day EC10 value based on reproduction was determined to be 0.33 mg/L. The results are based on the measured concentrations.
- Executive summary:
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of the test item on the reproductive output of Daphnia magna in a semi-static test water renewal system, with daily renewal periods. Young female Daphnia (the parent animals) aged less than 24 hours at the start of the test were exposed to aqueous test media (Elendt M4 Medium) containing the test item for 21 days at a range of concentrations. The nominal test item concentrations were 0.19, 0.38, 0.75, 1.50 and 3.00 mg/L. The measured test item concentrations deviated more than 20 % from the nominal during the experiment therefore the time-weighted mean of the measured start and end concentrations at each water renewal period were calculated in order to determine exposure concentrations. The calculated time-weighted mean concentrations were the followings: 0.12, 0.22, 0.44, 0.89 and 1.65 mg/L. All biological results are based on these measured test item concentrations. The test solutions were prepared using water-miscible solvent (acetone). An untreated control and an additional solvent control group were investigated concurrently. The concentration of the solvent (acetone) was 0.1 mL/L in each test concentration and in the additional solvent control. The animals were held individually (ten replicates/treatment) and were fed daily, with diet supplied based on the amount of organic carbon (C) per parent animal (constant 0.15 mg C/Daphnia/day). Analytical method: The quantification of the test item was performed by a previously validated analytical method using HPLC analysis. Samples were taken from each testing concentration at the start and at the end of each water renewal period. Controls were analysed at the start of each water renewal period. The validity criteria of the test were fulfilled. Biological results: The offspring produced by each parent animal were removed and counted daily from the appearance of the first brood. The statistical evaluation of the mean number of living juveniles showed that the offspring production for concentrations 0.44, 0.89 and 1.65 mg/L (measured) was statistically significantly different from that of the solvent control. No significant reduction of the offspring production was observed in the two lowest test concentration (0.12 and 0.22 mg/L; measured) and in the untreated control when compared to the solvent control group. Accordingly, the 21-day NOEC related to reproduction was determined to be 0.22 mg/L (measured). The 21-day LOEC was 0.44 mg/L (measured). The 21-day EC50 was determined to be 0.58 mg/L (95 % confidence limits: 0.28 – 0.36 mg/L). Aborted broods were observed in some cases at the concentrations of 0.89 and 1.65 mg/L (measured). The total number of aborted broods counted during the experiment was 8 in the 0.89 mg/L, 23 in the 1.65 mg/L. Stumpy limbs of parent animals were noticed in the highest test concentration (1.65 mg/L; measured) at the end of the study (on 21st day). The mortality among the parent animals was recorded daily. In order to consider whether or not the parental mortality in exposed replicates followed a concentration-response pattern mortality data were analysed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni t-Test (α= 0.05). Significant mortality was observed in the two highest concentration (0.89 and 1.65 mg/L; measured) when compared to the solvent control, therefore mortality in these concentrations were considered as a test item effect and the produced number of juveniles in replicates where parental mortality occurred were also included in the data analysis related to reproduction. In the lower concentrations (as well as in the controls) no significant parent mortality was observed (based on the statistical evaluation) and therefore the replicates of dead parents were excluded from reproductive performance analysis. At the end of the test body length measurements of the parent animals were performed and the obtained data was statistically evaluated. Statistically significant differences were observed for concentrations 0.89 and 1.65 mg/L (measured), when compared to the solvent control group.
Reference
Description of key information
The following results were obtained with the test substance in a 21-day semi-static chronic toxicity test to Daphnia magna: NOEC value of 0.22 mg/L based on reproduction; LOEC value of 0.44 mg/L based on reproduction and EC50 and EC10 values 0.58 and 0.33 respectively based on reproduction as well. The results were based on measured concentrations.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water invertebrates
Fresh water invertebrates
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect concentration:
- 0.22 mg/L
Fresh water invertebrates
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect concentration:
- 0.33 mg/L
Additional information
The study evaluated the effects of the test substance on the reproductive output of Daphnia magna. Young female Daphnia were exposed to aqueous test media containing the test item for 21 days at a range of concentrations.
The nominal test item concentrations were 0.19, 0.38, 0.75, 1.50 and 3.00 mg/L. The measured test item concentrations deviated more than 20 % from the nominal during the experiment therefore the time-weighted mean of the measured start and end concentrations at each water renewal period were calculated in order to determine exposure concentrations. The calculated time-weighted mean concentrations were the followings: 0.12, 0.22, 0.44, 0.89 and 1.65 mg/L. All biological results are based on these measured test item concentrations.
The test was run in a semi-static water renewal system, with daily renewal periods. The test solutions were prepared using water-miscible solvent (acetone). An untreated control (only Elendt M4 Medium) and an additional solvent control group were investigated concurrently. Ten Daphnia were investigated in each group (per concentration and controls). Samples were taken from each testing concentration at the start and at the end of each water renewal period. Controls were analysed at the start of each water renewal period. The validity criteria of the test were fulfilled.
The offspring produced by each parent animal were removed and counted daily from the appearance of the first brood. The statistical evaluation of the mean number of living juveniles showed that the offspring production for concentrations 0.44, 0.89 and 1.65 mg/L (measured) was statistically significantly different from that of the solvent control. No significant reduction of the offspring production was observed in the two lowest test concentration (0.12 and 0.22 mg/L; measured) and in the untreated control when compared to the solvent control group.
Accordingly, the 21-day NOEC related to reproduction was determined to be 0.22 mg/L (measured). The 21-day LOEC was 0.44 mg/L (measured). The 21-day EC50 was determined to be 0.58 mg/L (95 % confidence limits: 0.53 – 0.62 mg/L). The 21-day EC10 was determined to be 0.33 mg/L (95 % confidence limits: 0.28 – 0.36 mg/L).
Aborted broods were observed in some cases at the two highest concentration (0.89 and 1.65 mg/L; measured). Stumpy limbs of parent animals were noticed in the highest test concentration (1.65 mg/L; measured) at the end of the study (on 21st day). The mortality among the parent animals was recorded daily. Significant mortality was observed in the two highest concentration (0.89 and 1.65 mg/L; measured) when compared to the solvent control, therefore mortality in these concentrations were considered as a test item effect and the produced number of juveniles in replicates where parental mortality occurred were also included in the data analysis related to reproduction. In the lower concentrations (as well as in the controls) no significant parent mortality was observed (based on the statistical evaluation) and therefore the replicates of dead parents were excluded from reproductive performance analysis. At the end of the test body length measurements of the parent animals were performed and the obtained data was statistically evaluated. Statistically significant differences were observed for concentrations 0.89 and 1.65 mg/L (measured), when compared to the solvent control group.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.