Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 204-794-1 | CAS number: 126-58-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 06.09.1991 to 04.02.1992
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 992
- Report date:
- 1992
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OTS 798.5265 (The Salmonella typhimurium Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2,2,2',2'-tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)-3,3'-oxydipropan-1-ol
- EC Number:
- 204-794-1
- EC Name:
- 2,2,2',2'-tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)-3,3'-oxydipropan-1-ol
- Cas Number:
- 126-58-9
- Molecular formula:
- C10H22O7
- IUPAC Name:
- 2,2'-[oxybis(methylene)]bis[2-(hydroxymethyl)propane-1,3-diol]
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): dipentaerythritol
- Substance type: white powder
- Physical state: solid
Method
- Target gene:
- hisG46, hisC3076 and hisD3052.
Species / strainopen allclose all
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: histidine dependent auxotrophic mutants
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: histidine dependent auxotrophic mutants
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- -S9 mix obtained from the livers of Aroclor-1254 induced male Sprague-Dawley rats
- S9 mix contained: S-9 fraction (10% v/v), MgCl2 (8mgM), KCl (33mM). sodium phosphate buffer PH 7.4 (100mM), glucose-6-phosphate (5mM), NADP (4mM).
-the volume of S9 mix used in the culture is detailed in the "details on test system and experiment conditions" section below.
- quality controls of S9 : All the cofactors in S9 mix were filter sterilised before use. The S-9 fraction was tested with 7,12-dimethylbenxanthracene and 2-aminoanthracene before use. - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Range finding: solvent control, 5, 50, 500, 5000 µg/plate.
Mutation test: solvent control, 0, 50, 150, 500, 1500, 5000 µg/plate.
-Justification for the top dose: in the preliminary toxicity test, the test substance was not toxic towards the tester strains. therefore 5000 µg/plate was chose as the tope dose level in the mutation tests. - Vehicle / solvent:
- dimethyl sulphoxide
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used:DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Prior to commencing testing the solubility of the test material in solvents compatible with the test system was assessed. The chosen solvent was dimethyl sulphoxide.
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- dimethyl sulfoxide
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- Remarks:
- Without S9: 5 µg/plate for TA1535, and 3 µg/plate for TA100
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- Remarks:
- 80 µg/plate for TA1537 without S9
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 2-nitrofluorene
- Remarks:
- Without S9; 2 µg/plate for TA1538, 1 µg/plate for TA98
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- With S9: 2 µg/plate for TA1535 and TA1537, 0.5 µg/plate for TA1538 and TA98, 1 µg/plate for TA100
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- The plate incorporation method was used. The Salmonella strains used in the experiment were: TA1535 hisG46 rfa uvrB, TA1537 hisC3076 rfa uvrB, TA1538 hisD3052 rfa uvrB, TA98 hisD3052 rfa uvrB pKM101, and TA100 hisG46 rfa uvrB pKM101.
Batches of the strains were stored at -80°C. Each frozen batch was tested for cell membrane permeability and, where applicable, for ampicillin resistance. The response of the strain to a series of diagnostic mutagens was also assessed.
Fuse in tests, an aliquot of frozen culture was added to 25 ml of nutrient broth (DAB 7, Merck) and incubated, with shaking, at 37°C for 10 hours. This culture provided approximately 2x10exp9 cells per ml which was checked photometrically.
Preliminary toxicity test
Four concentrations of test substance were assessed for toxicity using the five tester strains. The highest concentration was 5000 µg/plate. The chosen solvent was used as the negative control. 0.1 ml bacterial culture and 0.5 ml S9 mix or 0.5 ml 0.1M phosphate buffer (pH7.4) were placed in glass bottles. 0.1 ml of the test substance solution was added, following immediately by 2 ml of histidine deficient agar. The mixture was thoroughly shaken and overlaid onto previously prepared petri dishes containing 25 ml minimal agar. A single pertri dish was used for each dose level. Plates were also prepared without the addition of bacteria in order to test the sterility of the test substance, S9 mix and phosphate buffer. All plates were incubated at 37°C for 3 days. After this period the appearance of the background lawn was examined. Revertant colonies were counted using a Biotran Automatic Colony Counter.
Concentrations for the main study were chosen based on toxic effects as assessed by a substantial reduction in revertant colony counts or by the absence of a complete bacterial lawn.
Mutation test
The test substance was added to cultures of the five tester strains at five concentrations separated by c. half-log10 intervals. The highest concentration used was 5000 µg/plate. The negative control was the chosen solvent. The plate incubation method was used as in the preliminary toxicity test. Three petri dishes were used per dose level. The mutation test was independently repeated using the same concentration of the test substance. - Rationale for test conditions:
- -Justification of the top does and vehicle choice were detailed in the relevant sections above.
-Justification of the number of plates per concentration: three petri dishes were used per does level which is aligned the OECD 471 suggestion. - Evaluation criteria:
- The mean number of revertant colonies was compared between treated groups and the solvent control. The following criteria were used in assessing the mutagenic response:
- the substance was considered to be mutagenic if there was at least twice the number of revertant colonies compared to the control, with some evidence of a dose-response relationship, in two separate experiments, with any bacterial strain either in the presence or absence of S 9 mix. No statistical analysis is performed.
- the substance was considered to be non-mutagenic if there was no reproducible increase of at least 1.5 times to control values at any dose with any bacterial strain. No statistical analysis is performed. - Statistics:
- When the results obtained failed to satisfy the evaluation criteria above for a clear positive or negative response. the test data maybe subjected to statistical analysis according to the study description.
As in the study no substantial increase of revertant colony numbers of any strains were observed, statistical analysis were not performed in the study.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- The mean number of the revertant colonies obtained in the first mutation test are shown in Table 2 in attachment. Positive control mutability checks are shown in Table 3.
The mean number of the revertant colonies obtained in the second mutation test are shown in Table 4 in attachment. Positive control mutability checks are shown in Table 5.
Any other information on results incl. tables
There were no substantial increases in revertant colony numbers of any of the tester strains following treatment with dipentaerythritol at any concentration, in either the presence or absence of S9 mix.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- No evidence of mutagenic activity was seen at any dose level of dipentaerythritol both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation.
- Executive summary:
In this in vitro assessment of the mutagenic potential of dipentaerythritol, histidine dependent auxotrophic mutants of Samonella typhimurium (strains TA1535, TA1537, TA1538, TA98 and TA100) were exposed to the test material, dissolved in dimethyl sulphoxide. In the preliminary dose range finding study with dose levels of up to 5000 µg/plate no toxicity was observed. A top dose level of 5000 µg/plate was chosen for the subsequent mutation study. Two independent mutation tests were performed, in the presence and absence of liver preparations from Aroclor 1254 -induced rats. No evidence of mutagenic activity was seen at any dose level of dipentaerythritol in either mutation test, when compared to the vehicle controls. The concurrent positive control compounds demonstrated the sensitivity of the assay and the metabolising activity of the liver preparations. It was concluded that dipentaerythritol was not mutagenic in this bacterial test system.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
