Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Toxicity to reproduction

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
31 May - 05 Oct 2018
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2018
Report date:
2018

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 421 (Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
Version / remarks:
adopted 29 Jul 2016
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Government of India, Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi, India
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Ethylene di(acetate)
EC Number:
203-881-1
EC Name:
Ethylene di(acetate)
Cas Number:
111-55-7
Molecular formula:
C6H10O4
IUPAC Name:
2-(acetyloxy)ethyl acetate
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Expiration date of the batch: 20 Oct 2019

STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: 15 to 25 °C
- Solubility and stability of the test substance in the vehicle were confirmed by analytical methods


Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Remarks:
HanTac: WH
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Vivo Bio Tech Ltd., Medak District, Telangana, India
- Age at study initiation: 12 - 13 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 275.04 - 347.30 g (males) and 173.29 - 209.05 g (females)
- Housing: Pre-mating: two rats of the same sex in sterilised standard polysulfone cages (size 425 x 266 x 185 mm) with a stainless steel top grill having facilities for pelleted food and water supply, steam sterilised clean corn cob as bedding
- Housing: Mating and post-mating: two rats (1 male, 1 female) in sterilised standard polysulfone cages (size 425 x 266 x 185 mm) with a stainless steel top grill having facilities for pelleted food and water supply. After confirming the presence of sperm in the vaginal smear or vaginal plugs, the mated pairs were separated. Males were housed with their former cage mates while females were housed individually in polysulfone cages. Sterilised nesting material was provided near-term.
- Diet: Teklad Certified (2014C) Global 14% Protein Rodent Maintainance Diet - Pellet, Envigo, Madison, Wisconsin, ad libitum
- Water: Deep bore-well water passed through an activated charcoal filter and exposed to UV rays in 'Aquagard' on-line water filter-cum-purifier (Eureka Forbes Limited, Mumbai, India), ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 - 24
- Humidity (%): 57 - 67
- Air changes (per hr): 12.3 - 13.6
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 25 Jun 2018 To:13 Aug 2018

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
corn oil
Details on exposure:
PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
Dosing solutions were prepared daily. Required quantities was weighed for each dose level separately into a beaker and a small volume of vehicle (corn oil) was added and stirred using a glass rod till a uniform suspension was obtained. The volume was made up to the mark using the vehicle to yield final concentrations of 20, 60 and 200 mg/mL. The suspensions were mixed well by stirring using a magnetic stirrer.

VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle: Based on a solubility test, the test item forms uniform suspension in corn oil. Hence, corn oil was used as vehicle for dose formulation preparations.
- Concentration in vehicle: 20, 60 and 200 mg/mL
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 5 mL/kg bw
Details on mating procedure:
- M/F ratio per cage: 1:1
- Length of cohabitation: Until there was evidence of sperm in the vagina smear or a vaginal plug. All females were successfully copulated within five days from the day of cohabitation.
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug and/or sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy
- After successful mating each pregnant female was caged: individually
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
yes
Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
For homogeneity and test item concentration analysis, prepared formulation samples were sampled in duplicate sets on Day 1 of the treatment period and during the 2nd month (Day 32) of treatment and analysed. For each set, duplicate samples were drawn from the top, middle and bottom-layers of each preparation and in case of the control duplicate samples from the middle layer were drawn. The test item in the dose formulation was determined using Gas Chromatograph with Flame Ionisation Detection (FID). The test item was used as the analytical standard.
The results were considered acceptable, as the percent agreement of the analysed concentrations were in the range 85% to 115% of the claimed concentrations. Homogeneity of the dose formulation was considered acceptable as the % relative standard deviation from six replicates at each dose level were ≤ 10%.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Males: 43 days
Females: maximum period of 56 days (14 days pre-mating until lactation day 14 when parental females were sacrificed)
Frequency of treatment:
daily, 7 days/week
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
Dose / conc.:
100 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Dose / conc.:
300 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Dose / conc.:
1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
No. of animals per sex per dose:
10
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Details on study design:
- Dose selection rationale: Dose levels were based on the results of a preliminary range-finding study, in which animals were orally exposed to 50, 200, 500 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day for 14 days. The test item did not cause any toxicological effect on general health at any dose tested in either sex.

Examinations

Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily

DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: prior to treatment on Day 1 and at weekly intervals thereafter during the treatment period
- In the detailed clinical examination the animals were observed for changes in skin, fur, eyes, mucous membranes, occurrence of secretions and excretions and autonomic activity (e.g. lacrimation, piloerection, pupil size, unusual respiratory pattern). Changes in gait, posture and response to handling as well as the presence of clonic or tonic movements and stereotypies (e.g. excessive grooming, repetitive circling or bizzare behavior like self-mutilation, walking backwards) were recorded.

BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: prior to treatment on Day 1 and at weekly intervals thereafter. Individual body weights of females were recorded in the same manner until cohabitation (till mating confirmation) with males.

FOOD CONSUMPTION: Yes
- Food consumption was calculated by using the food consumed at each interval per cage and dividing by the number of rats per cage and the number if days in the intervening period to determine the food consumption/rat/day. Food consumption was not measured during the cohabitation period. Food consumption of pregnant dams was recorded on GD 7, 14, 20 and on Days 4 and 13 of the lactation period.

WATER CONSUMPTION: No
Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
Vaginal smear was examined and the stage of oestrous cycle was recorded daily for two weeks before start of the treatment to select females with regular 4-5 days cyclicity for the study. The vaginal smear was also examined daily from the beginning of the treatment period until evidence of mating to determine the Day 0 of pregnancy/treatment-related effects on mating or precoital time. The time interval (in days) from the diestrus of an oestrous cycle to the next diestrus was considered as the oestrous cycle length of an animal.
Sperm parameters (parental animals):
Tissues collected form all animals in the control and high dose groups were examined microscopically for histopathological changes, including the qualitative assessment of all stages of spermatogenesis and interstitital testicular cell structure in the testis.
Litter observations:
STANDARDISATION OF LITTERS
- Performed on day 4 postpartum: yes
- If yes, maximum of 8 pups/litter (4/sex/litter as nearly as possible); excess pups were killed and discarded.

PARAMETERS EXAMINED
The following parameters were examined in F1 offspring: number and sex of pups, stillbirths, live births, postnatal mortality/ cannibalised pups, presence of gross anomalies/malformations, weight gain, physical or behavioral abnormalities, ano-genital distance (AGD), presence of nipples/areolae in male pups

GROSS EXAMINATION OF DEAD PUPS: Yes, for external deformities; possible cause of death was determined for pups born or found dead.

HORMONE ANALYSIS: Blood samples were collected and serum was separated for the determination of total rodent thyroxin (T4) and rodent thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) on Day 4 after birth. T4 and TSH were estimated by Enzyme Linked Immuno Sorbent Assay (ELISA).
Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
SACRIFICE: Terminally sacrificed adult animals were fasted overnight (water allowed), weighed and exsanguinated under isoflurane anaesthesia.
- Male animals: All male animals were sacrificed on Day 44.
- Maternal animals: All female were sacrificed on Lactation Day 14. One dam was pre-terminally found dead on gestation Day 19.

GROSS NECROPSY: Yes
Gross necropsy consisted of external and internal examinations. External macroscopical examination paid attention to all organs listed below, as well as the external genitals which were examined for signs of altered development. The following organs were microscopically examined: adrenals, epididymides, ovaries with oviducts, stomach, thymus, thyroid with parathyroids, uterus with cervix, vagina, prostate, seminal vesicles and coagulating glands, testes, levator ani bulbocavernosus muscle complex, cowper’s glands, glans penis.

HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGHTS: Yes
The following tissues were prepared for microscopic examination and weighed, respectively: adrenals, epididymides, ovaries with oviducts, stomach, thymus, thyroid with parathyroids, uterus with cervix, vagina, prostate, seminal vesicles and coagulating glands, testes, levator ani bulbocavernosus muscle complex, cowper’s glands, glans penis. Samples from all tissues were preserved in 10% neutral buffered formalin, except for the testes.

Postmortem examinations (offspring):
SACRIFICE
- The F1 offspring were sacrificed at day 13 post-partum
- These animals were subjected to post-mortem detailed macroscopic examinations as follows:

GROSS NECROPSY: Yes
Gross necropsy consisted of external and internal examinations. External macroscopical examination paid attention to all organs listed below, as well as the external genitals which were examined for signs of altered development. The following organs were microscopically examined: adrenals, epididymides, ovaries with oviducts, stomach, thymus, thyroid with parathyroids, uterus with cervix, vagina, prostate, seminal vesicles and coagulating glands, testes, levator ani bulbocavernosus muscle complex, cowper’s glands, glans penis.

HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGHTS: Yes
The following tissues were prepared for microscopic examination and weighed, respectively: adrenals, epididymides, ovaries with oviducts, stomach, thymus, thyroid with parathyroids, uterus with cervix, vagina, prostate, seminal vesicles and coagulating glands, testes, levator ani bulbocavernosus muscle complex, cowper’s glands, glans penis. Samples from all tissues were preserved in 10% neutral buffered formalin, except for the testes.
Statistics:
Built-in statistical tests were used to analyse net body weight gain, food consumption, ano-genital ratio, oestrous cycle length, organ weight ratios, post implantations, pre-coital intervals, mean litte size, sex ratio and gestation length (days), mating, fertility and survival indices. Data was captured using ProvantisTM. Hormonal data was statistically analysed using SYSTAT Statistical package version 12.0. The following tests were applied:
- Levene’s test for homogeneity of variances
- ANOVA using log transformation for one-way analysis of variances (non-optimal/non-normal or heteroschedastic data was transformed prior to ANOVA)
- Dunnett’s t-test for comparison of means between treatment groups and control groups (overall treatment)
- F-test for statistical significance
Reproductive indices:
- Male mating index [%] = Number of males with evidence of mating/Number of males cohabited x 100
- Male fertility index [%] = Number of males siring a litter/impregnated a female/Number of males cohabited x 100
- Female mating index [%] = Number of females mated/Number of females cohabited x 100
- Female fertility index [%] = Number of pregnant females/Number of females used for mating x 100
- Mean number of implantations/group = Total number of implantations/Total number of pregnant animals
- Post implantation loss [%] = (Number of implantations – Number of live pups)/Number of implantations x 100
Offspring viability indices:
- Mean litter size per group = Total number of pups born/Total number of littered animals
- Mean viable litter size = Number of viable pups/Number if females littered
- Live birth index [%] = Number of viable pups born (at first observation)/Total number of pups born (At first observation) x 100
- Day 4 survival index [%] = Number of viable pups on lactation day 4/Number of viable pups born x 100
- Sex ratio [%] = Number of male pups born/Total number of pups born x 100
- Ano-genital Distance Ratio [mm/g1/3] = Ano-genital distance/Cube root of body weight

Results and discussion

Results: P0 (first parental generation)

General toxicity (P0)

Clinical signs:
no effects observed
Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
not examined
Mortality:
mortality observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence):
control group: one dead female rat on gestation day 19
Body weight and weight changes:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
1000 mg/kg bw/day: significantly higher absolute body weight gains in females during days 1-15
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
100 mg/kg bw/day: significantly increased food consumption during days 1-8 in female rats
Food efficiency:
not examined
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
not examined
Ophthalmological findings:
not examined
Haematological findings:
not examined
Clinical biochemistry findings:
not examined
Urinalysis findings:
not examined
Behaviour (functional findings):
not examined
Immunological findings:
not examined
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
not examined
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
no effects observed
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
no effects observed
Other effects:
not examined

Reproductive function / performance (P0)

Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
no effects observed
Reproductive performance:
no effects observed

Details on results (P0)

MORTALITY:
One female rat from the control group (Rv117) was found dead on gestation day 19.

BODY WEIGHT AND WEIGHT CHANGES:
The mean body weights and body weight gains were unaffected throughout the treatment period in males and two weeks pre-mating period in females at all the tested doses when compared to vehicle control group. The absolute body weight gains (Day 1-15) were significantly higher in females at 1000 mg/kg bw/day. This was considered toxicologically not significant, as there were no significant differences observed in weekly mean body weights and food consumption.

FOOD CONSUMPTIONS:
The food consumption was not altered throughout the treatment period when compared to the vehicle control. An incidence of statistically significant increase in the food consumption was observed during days 1-8 in the 100 mg/kg bw/day dose group females and it was not related to treatment.

ESTROUS CYCLE:
The calculated mean oestrous cycle length in treated groups was not significantly different from those of the vehicle control group.

Effect levels (P0)

Key result
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Remarks:
systemic
Effect level:
>= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
other: no effects observed

Target system / organ toxicity (P0)

Key result
Critical effects observed:
no

Results: F1 generation

General toxicity (F1)

Clinical signs:
no effects observed
Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
not examined
Mortality / viability:
mortality observed, non-treatment-related
Body weight and weight changes:
no effects observed
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
no effects observed
Food efficiency:
not examined
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
not examined
Ophthalmological findings:
not examined
Haematological findings:
not examined
Clinical biochemistry findings:
not examined
Urinalysis findings:
not examined
Sexual maturation:
not examined
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
no effects observed
Gross pathological findings:
no effects observed
Histopathological findings:
no effects observed

Developmental neurotoxicity (F1)

Behaviour (functional findings):
not examined

Developmental immunotoxicity (F1)

Developmental immunotoxicity:
not examined

Effect levels (F1)

Key result
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Remarks:
reproduction
Generation:
F1
Effect level:
>= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
other: no effects observed

Target system / organ toxicity (F1)

Key result
Critical effects observed:
no

Overall reproductive toxicity

Reproductive effects observed:
no

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Summary of detailed clinical examination, clinical signs and mortality

Observation Type: All Types
From Day 1 (Start) to 44 (End)
  Male     Female  
0 100 300 1000 0 100 300 1000
mg/kg bwt/day mg/kg bwt/day
Normal 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Dead         1 0 0 0
Total litter loss         0 0 1 1
Not littered         0 1 0 0

Table 2: Summary of body weight and body weight gains

Day(s) Relative to Start Date Males Females
0 100 300 1000 0 100 300 1000
mg/kg bw/day mg/kg bw/day
Body Weight (g) 1 [a] Mean 308.72 306.35 305.3 306.54 194.16 193.28 193.83 194.39
SD 22.61 19.07 18.62 18.75 9.09 10.6 10.9 9.99
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
8 [a] Mean 320.57 319.68 316.24 318.3 194.76 198.37 199.22 200.97
SD 23.76 21.81 19.94 21.85 9.95 9.77 13.55 11.99
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
15 [a] Mean 332.21 331.14 323.48 330.4 200.12 203.82 203.3 206.06
SD 25.87 22.91 25.32 24.6 11.21 9.43 14.96 13.48
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
22 [a] Mean 338.67 339 331.85 336.39        
SD 26.26 24.07 26.8 27.52    
N 10 10 10 10    
29 [a] Mean 347.19 347.84 339.79 344.54    
SD 29.72 24.62 29.13 29.91    
N 10 10 10 10    
36 [a] Mean 356.25 356.68 351.77 350.89    
SD 31.5 26.76 30.05 28.94    
N 10 10 10 10    
43 [a] Mean 362.23 366.9 364.88 360.56    
SD 29.12 28.81 30.62 29.93    
N 10 10 10 10        
Absolute Weight Gain (g) 1 → 43 [a] Mean 53.51 60.55 59.58 54.02 5.97 10.54 9.47 11.67*
SD 9.51 12.84 21.93 16.9 4.89 3.73 5.32 5.64
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

[a] ANOVA and Dunnett test (Log)

* p < 0.05

Table 3: Summary of food consumption (g/rat/day)

Day(s) Relative to Start Date Males Females
0 100 300 1000 0 100 300 1000
mg/kg bw/day mg/kg bw/day
1 → 8 Mean 16.8 16.92 16.13 17.17 12.3 13.82* 12.63 13.42
SD 0.57 1.58 0.83 1.24 0.84 1.48 1.17 0.9
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
8 → 15 Mean 15.67 16.07 14.82 16.43 11.94 12.7 12.52 12.68
SD 0.56 1.72 1.27 1.25 0.74 1.02 1.24 0.95
N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
22 → 29 Mean 16 15.58 15.5 15.76
SD 0.24 0.88 0.66 0.93
N 10 10 10 10
29 → 36 Mean 16.4 16.36 16.93 16.68
SD 0.47 1.56 1.09 0.87
N 10 10 10 10
36 → 43 Mean 15.13 15.25 15.91 15.2
SD 0.57 1.64 1.05 0.89
N 10 10 10 10

ANOVA and Dunnett test (Log)

* p < 0.05

Table 4: Summary of oestrous cycle length prior to cohabitation period

Day(s) Relative to Start Date Females
0 100 300 1000
mg/kg bw/day
Mean 1 → 15 [a] Mean 4 4.3 4.2 4.6
Cycle days) SD 0 0.3 0.3 0.9
N 10 10 10 10

ANOVA and Dunnett test (Log)

Table 5: Summary of maternal body weights and body weight gain during gestation and lactation period

Day(s) Relative to Mating Females Day(s) Relative to Littering Females
0 100 300 1000 0 100 300 1000
mg/kg bw/day mg/kg bw/day
Body
weight (g)
0 [a] Mean 202.26 205.16 204.37 208.04 0 [a] Mean 217.16 214.1 222.79 224.03
SD 11.05 8.67 16.37 12.96 SD 15.27 10.09 13.48 22.52
N 10 9 10 10 N 9 9 10 10
7 [a] Mean 221.18 224.15 224.67 230.75 4 [a] Mean 223.05 225.2 233.29 231.78
SD 10.23 11.14 15.22 14.44 SD 15.61 9.61 14.17 20.16
N 10 9 10 10 N 9 9 9 10
14 [a] Mean 246.02 248.35 249.87 256.83 7 [a] Mean 231.92 232.98 235.73 240.83
SD 11.83 11.15 16.15 19.27 SD 18.34 12.78 21.01 18.68
N 10 9 10 10 N 9 9 9 9
20 [a] Mean 293.6 295.93 300.27 308.17 13 [a] Mean 236.55 235.35 242.55 250.98
SD 16.72 13.18 19.94 18.64 SD 18.62 13.05 14.53 23.01
N 9 9 10 10 N 9 9 9 9
Absolute
weight gain (g)
0 → 7 [a] Mean 18.92 18.98 20.3 22.71 0 → 4 [a] Mean 5.89 11.1 11.3 7.75
SD 4.24 3.76 3.3 4.1 SD 6.13 6.66 5.42 7.22
N 10 9 10 10 N 9 9 9 10
7 → 14 [a] Mean 24.84 24.2 25.2 26.07 4 → 7 [a] Mean 8.87 7.77 2.44 6.84
SD 3.16 2.87 3.08 6.35 SD 5.23 8.87 8.69 7.93
N 10 9 10 10 N 9 9 9 9
14 → 20 [a] Mean 48.18 47.58 50.41 51.34 7 → 13 [a] Mean 4.63 2.37 6.82 10.15
SD 5.42 3.46 6.84 5.89 SD 8.88 5.78 9.07 10.28
N 9 9 10 10 N 9 9 9 9
0 → 20 [a] Mean 92.44 90.76 95.9 100.13 0 → 13 [a] Mean 19.39 21.25 20.56 23.58
SD 9.34 5.75 6.75 10.71 SD 8.31 10.21 6.7 9.99
N 9 9 10 10 N 9 9 9 9

[a] ANOVA and Dunnett test (Log)

Table 6: Summary of maternal food consumption during gestation and lactation period

Day(s) Relative to Mating Females Day(s) Relative to Littering Females
0 100 300 1000 0 100 300 1000
mg/kg bw/day mg/kg bw/day
Total Food Consumption (g) 0 → 7 [a] Mean 97.97 103.17 99.19 106.3 0 → 4 [a] Mean 97.03 96.9 103.69 93.8
SD 6.79 9.01 9.92 9.84 SD 26.92 8.83 18.58 18.75
N 10 9 10 10 N 9 9 9 10
7 → 14 [a] Mean 121.13 123.03 123.02 130.9 4 → 13 [a] Mean 337.72 337.35 335.7 343.46
SD 10.05 10.41 8.5 17.7 SD 39.91 34.21 35.43 36.59
N 10 9 10 10 N 9 9 9 9
14 → 20 [a] Mean 111.17 107.38 113.12 119.65 0 → 13 [a] Mean 434.76 434.25 439.38 439.86
SD 9.7 9.2 10.72 10.13 SD 64.32 31.58 52.13 49.97
N 9 9 10 10 N 9 9 9 9
0 → 20 [a] Mean 331.5 333.58 335.33 356.85  
SD 21.5 22.55 24.48 31.55
N 9 9 10 10
Food Mean Consumption (g/day) 0 → 7 [a] Mean 14 14.74 14.17 15.19 0 → 4 [a] Mean 24.26 24.23 25.92 23.45
SD 0.97 1.29 1.42 1.41 SD 6.73 2.21 4.64 4.69
N 10 9 10 10 N 9 9 9 10
7 → 14 [a] Mean 17.3 17.58 17.57 18.7 4 → 13 [a] Mean 37.52 37.48 37.3 38.16
SD 1.44 1.49 1.21 2.53 SD 4.43 3.8 3.94 4.07
N 10 9 10 10 N 9 9 9 9
14 → 20 [a] Mean 18.53 17.9 18.85 19.94 0 → 13 [a] Mean 33.44 33.4 33.8 33.84
SD 1.62 1.53 1.79 1.69 SD 4.95 2.43 4.01 3.84
N 9 9 10 10 N 9 9 9 9
0 → 20 [a] Mean 16.57 16.68 16.77 17.84  
SD 1.08 1.13 1.22 1.58
N 9 9 10 10

[a] ANOVA and Dunnett test (Log)

Table 7: Summary of mean pup body weights, ano-genital distance (AGD)m Ano-genital ratio (AGR) and ano-genital index (AGI)

Day(s) Relative to Littering Females

0

100

300

1000

mg/kg bw/day

Litter Mean
Pup BW - M

0 [a]

Mean

5.74

5.43

5.98

5.83

SD 0.58 0.52 0.59 0.81
N 9 9 9 10

4 [a]

Mean

8.67

8.01

8.74

8.81

SD

1.39

0.89

1.21

1.79

N

9

9

9

9

7 [a] Mean 12.38 11.84 12.53 12.84
SD 1.46 1.07 1.5 2.26
N 9 9 9 9
13 [a] Mean 20.62 20.38 20.75 21.71
SD 1.98 1.35 2.25 2.7
N 9 9 9 9
Litter Mean
Pup BW - F
0 [a] Mean 5.68 5.25 5.68 5.63
SD 0.57 0.5 0.5 0.78
N 9 9 9 10
4 [a] Mean 8.55 7.86 8.28 8.76
SD 1.09 1.04 0.96 1.81
N 9 9 9 9
7 [a] Mean 12.26 11.43 11.99 12.59
SD 1.41 1.31 1.34 2.06
N 9 9 9 9
13 [a] Mean 20.47 19.7 20.01 21.4

SD

1.74

0.92

2.04

2.7

N 9 9 9 9
Litter Mean
Pup BW
0 [a] Mean 5.69 5.33 5.85 5.72
SD 0.55 0.5 0.55 0.77
N 9 9 9 10
4 [a] Mean 8.6 7.91 8.54 8.77
SD 1.22 0.94 1.12 1.8
N 9 9 9 9

7 [a]

Mean

12.32

11.61

12.3

12.68

SD

1.39

1.13

1.46

2.08

N 9 9 9 9

13 [a]

Mean

20.55

20.02

20.41

21.53

SD 1.8 0.97 2.14 2.62
N 9 9 9 9
Mean of pup
AGD males
0 [a] Mean 3.7 3.7 3.69 3.69

SD

0.04

0.07

0.06

0.14

N 9 9 9 10
Mean of pup
AGD females
0 [a] Mean 1.69 1.67 1.66 1.65
SD 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.06
N 9 9 9 10

Mean of pup
AGR males

0 [a]

Mean

2.07

2.11

2.04

2.05

SD 0.05 0.04 0.05 0.04
N 9 9 9 10
Mean of pup
AGR females
0 [a] Mean 0.95 0.96 0.93 0.93
SD 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.03

N

9

9

9

10

Mean of pup
AGI males
0 [a] Mean 2.1 2.1 2 2.1
SD 0.1 0 0 0
N 9 9 9 10

Mean of pup
AGI females

0 [a]

Mean

0.9

1

0.9

0.9

SD 0 0 0 0
N 9 9 9 10

[a] ANOVA and Dunnett test (Log)

Table 8: Summary of fertility data

Day(s) Relative to Mating Males and females
0 100 300 1000
mg/kg bw/day
Paired Males - N 10 10 10 10
Paired Females - N 10 10 10 10
Mated - N+ve 10 10 10 10
Fertile Male - N+ve 10 9 10 10
Fertile Female - N+ve 10 9 10 10
M Mating Index - [a] % 100 100 100 100
F Mating Index - [a] % 100 100 100 100
Pregnant - N+ve 10 9 10 10
Littered - N+ve 9 9 10 10
Pre-coital Interval (f) (days) - [a] Mean SD N 2.2 2 2.1 2.3
1.2 1.2 0.9 1.1
10 10 10 10
F Fertility Index - [a] % 100 90 100 100
M Impregnated Female - [a] % 100 90 100 100

[a] ANOVA and Dunnett test (Log)

M- male

F- female

Table 9: Summary of litter data

Day(s) Relative to Littering Females
0 100 300 1000
mg/kg bw/day
Littered - N+ve 9 9 10 10
Gestation
Length (days)
- [a] Mean 22.4 22.1 22.5 22.5
SD 0.5 0.3 0.7 0.5
N 9 9 10 10
Total No of Pups Born Day 0 - Mean 11 12 10 11
SD 2 2 4 2
N 9 9 10 10
Sum 99 108 104 111
Dead/Canibalism LD 0 Sum 3 . 2 8
Live Male Pups LD 0 Sum 41 53 53 48
Live Female Pups LD 0 Sum 55 55 49 55
Live Pups Day 0 - [a] Mean 10.7 12 11.3 10.3
SD 1.3 2 2.2 2.1
N 9 9 9 10
Sum 96 108 102 103
Live Birth Index (%) Day 0 - [a1] Mean 97.3 100 90 94.7
SD 5.4 0 31.6 16.9
N 9 9 10 10
Sex Ratio Day 0 - [a1] Mean 42.5 49.2 56.7 44.1
Dead/Cannibalism LD 1 Sum 1 1 . 2
Live Pups Day 1 - Mean 10.6 11.9 11.3 10.1
SD 1.1 1.9 2.2 2.5
N 9 9 9 10
Sum 95 107 102 101
Dead/Cannibalism LD 2-4 Sum 4 1 . 12
Live Pups Day 4 - [a] Mean 10.1 11.8 11.3 9.9
SD 1.1 1.8 2.2 2.6
N 9 9 9 9
Sum 91 106 102 89
No. of Pups Culled D4 - Sum 19 34 30 21
No.of Live Pup Post Cu ll - Sum 72 72 72 68
Survival Index on LD4 - [a] Mean 95.6 98.4 100 86.2
SD 10.3 3.1 0 31.6
N 9 9 9 10
Dead/Cannibalism LD 5-7 Sum 1 0 0 0
Live Pups Day 7 - [a1] Mean 7.9 8 8 7.6
SD 0.3 0 0 1
N 9 9 9 9
Sum 71 72 72 68
Survival Index on LD7 - [a] Mean 98.6 100 100 100
SD 4.2 0 0 0
N 9 9 9 9
Dead/Cannibalism LD 8-13 Sum 0 0 0 0
Live Pups Day 13 - Mean 7.9 8 8 7.6
SD 0.3 0 0 1
N 9 9 9 9
Sum 71 72 72 68
No. Of Implantation - [a1] Mean 12.6 13 12.4 12.9
SD 1.3 1.7 2.9 1.7
N 10 9 10 10
Sum 126 117 124 129
Post-implantation Loss (%) - [p] Mean 14.62 7.86 22.56 18.61
SD 10.85 7.92 27.75 19.33
N 9 9 10 10

[a] - Anova & Dunnett(Arc SineSQRT)

[a1] - Anova & Dunnett(Log)

[p] - T-Test(Arc SineSQRT): [G1vsG2, G1vsG3, G1vsG4]

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The test item had no effect on reproductive performance.